October, 01 2009, 01:59pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Jessica Lass at 310-434-2300 (main), 202-468-6718
LA Ports Meet Clean Air Goals Years Ahead of Schedule
Clean Truck Fleet Key to Ending Diesel Death Zone in Ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach
LOS ANGELES
Today, a year after the Clean Truck Programs (CTP) launched at the
ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, more than 2,000 polluting trucks
are off the road and more than 5,500 clean trucks are in operation.
The ports are two years ahead of their goal to reduce truck-produced
emissions by 80%, according to the Natural Resources Defense Council
(NRDC).
"Los Angeles is home to the worst air pollution
in the country, which plays a role in thousands of heart attacks,
respiratory ailments and deaths every year," said David Pettit, senior
attorney with NRDC. "Knowing those statistics, the Port of Los Angeles
decided to take proactive and permanent action to reduce those deaths
and invest in sustainable jobs at the ports. Today, hundreds of lives
will have been saved and thousands of children will not contract asthma
or chronic respiratory disease in Los Angeles thanks to the clean truck
programs enacted one year ago by the Ports of Los Angeles and Long
Beach."
Diesel particulate matter is associated with
heart attacks, asthma, chronic bronchitis, premature mortality,
increased cancer risk and other serious health ailments. Children and
the elderly are particularly susceptible to these health risks. In
fact, prior to the ports' adoption of the program, the port trucking
system imposed up to $1.7 billion of costs on the public every year in
the form of operational inefficiencies, community impacts and, above
all, impacts on public health.
"Before the program,
diesel trucks that serviced the ports were some of the oldest and most
polluting trucks on the road and were the largest source of on-shore
diesel particulate matter in California," said Melissa Lin Perrella,
staff attorney, NRDC. "Now, thousands of those trucks are running
cleaner and producing far less diesel pollution responsible for
claiming hundreds of lives."
Over the course of less
than one year, the CTP has significantly reduced air pollution at the
ports and in communities along freight transportation corridors-so much
so that the ports' goal of reducing truck emissions by 80% by 2012 will
likely be achieved by next year. This is the only program at the ports
that has effectively reduced air pollution from port trucking.
Background:
The
Clean Truck Programs are designed to significantly reduce truck-related
emissions and manage and maintain these trucks long-term. Ports around
the country recognize the need for a sustainable trucking workforce and
are mobilizing to implement clean truck programs locally. The Port of
Oakland is banning dirty trucks starting this fall, and New York and
New Jersey ports are also working with their local Harbor Commissions
to introduce similar clean truck programs.
An estimated
$1.6 billion dollars is invested to replace an aging fleet of 17,000
trucks with newer, cleaner vehicles at the ports of Los Angeles and
Long Beach before 2012. In February, the ports began collecting a $35
container fee applied to each 20-foot container to offset financing
costs to purchase the clean trucks. Both ports expect the fund created
by the $35 fee will allow them to subsidize up to 80 percent of each
new truck.
In April, U.S. District Court Judge Christina
A. Snyder denied a request by the American Trucking Association (ATA)
to grant a preliminary injunction that would have devastated the clean
truck plans. Although a provision of the Port of Los Angeles plan
requiring a phase-in of employee drivers rather than independent
owner-operators was put on hold pending a February, 2010 trial, the
requirements that port-serving trucks be safe and adequately maintained
were upheld. The requirement that trucks meet stringent emissions
limits and the funding mechanism set up by the ports to replace the
17,000 old, dirty trucks that carry cargo to and from Long Beach and
San Pedro are also intact.
Nevertheless, ATA's lawsuit
threatens the long-term success of the program. ATA asserts that the
outdated Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA) of
1994 prevents ports from requiring that licensed motor carriers meet
minimal safety, environment and security-based standards if they want
to access port property.
The ports, NRDC, Sierra Club
and the Coalition for Clean Air continue to fight ATA's lawsuit in
federal court, and are working with federal legislators to update the
FAAAA to protect the Clean Truck Programs and the ability of ports
across the country to adopt similar long-term clean air strategies.
The
Clean Truck Programs are part of a larger Clean Air Action Plan
currently underway by the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach in an
effort to expand the ports' business operations and also reduce harmful
air pollution impacts on the local port community and environment. The
ports have numerous expansion projects planned during the next several
years and some experts expect to see port commerce double or triple by
2020.
Relevant Links:
Read David Pettit's blog on port air pollution: https://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/dpettit/
Read Melissa Lin Perrella's blog at: https://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/mlinperrella/
NRDC works to safeguard the earth--its people, its plants and animals, and the natural systems on which all life depends. We combine the power of more than three million members and online activists with the expertise of some 700 scientists, lawyers, and policy advocates across the globe to ensure the rights of all people to the air, the water, and the wild.
(212) 727-2700LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular