For Immediate Release

Contact: 

Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

Kennedy Plan Problems and Single-Payer Solutions

WASHINGTON -  
NICHOLAS SKALA
Skala, a Juris Doctor candidate and Harry L. Kinser Scholar for Health
Law at Northwestern University School of Law and a former senior
research associate at Physicians for a National Health Program.

He said today: "The Congressional Budget Office estimate predicts
that the Senate's HELP [Health, Education, Labor and Pensions]
Committee [chaired by Sen. Edward Kennedy] proposal would cost an
estimated $1 trillion over the next decade, yet only reduce the number
of uninsured by about one-third, or 16 million people. Many Republicans
are seizing on this to argue that there shouldn't be any change to the
status quo. But in fact, it's a reason to examine the single-payer
option.

"In contrast to the public option plan, single payer has at its
core the elimination of U.S.-style private insurance, using huge
administrative savings and inherent cost control mechanisms to provide
comprehensive, sustainable universal coverage.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

The media landscape is changing fast

Our news team is changing too as we work hard to bring you the news that matters most.

Change is coming. And we've got it covered.

"The 'public option' preserves all of the systemic defects
inherent in reliance on a patchwork of private insurance companies to
finance health care, a system which has been a miserable failure both
in providing health coverage and controlling costs.

"Elimination of U.S.-style private insurance has been a
prerequisite to the achievement of universal health care in every other
industrialized country in the world. In contrast, public program
expansions coupled with mandates have failed everywhere they’ve been
tried, both domestically and internationally."

Skala's recent testimony before the Congressional Progressive Caucus is here.

###

We want a more open and sharing world.

That's why our content is free. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported.

All of our original content is published under Creative Commons—allowing (and encouraging) our articles to be republished freely anywhere. In addition to the traffic and reach our content generates on our site, the multiplying impact of our work is huge and growing as our articles flourish across the Internet and are republished by other large and small online and print outlets around the world.

Several times a year we run brief campaigns to ask our readers to pitch in—and thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign is underway. Can you help? We can't do it without you.

A nationwide consortium, the Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) represents an unprecedented effort to bring other voices to the mass-media table often dominated by a few major think tanks. IPA works to broaden public discourse in mainstream media, while building communication with alternative media outlets and grassroots activists.

Share This Article