February, 15 2016, 10:30am EDT
ICYMI: Thursday, Feb. 18TH - A Day Without Latinos and Immigrants in Wisconsin
Latinos, immigrants, students, workers, business owners and allies will unite across Wisconsin to defeat racist, anti-immigrant legislationĀ AB450/SB369 would lead police to investigate people's immigration status and detain undocumented people for deportationĀ SB533/AB 723 would block counties statewide from issuing local identification cards to people who cannot access state ID
WASHINGTON
Who: Thousands of immigrant families, students, religious leaders, supporters, Wisconsin Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, We Are All Milwaukee Coalition, Voces de la Frontera
What:Wisconsin Day without Latinos and Immigrants 2016: Massive mobilization on the Capitol in Madison, student walk-outs, business closings, families and workers' march to defeat AB450/SB369 and SB533/AB723
When: Thursday, February 18th. Mobilization on the Capitol begins at 10am
Where: Assemble at State Capitol in Madison, State Street entrance
Why: Throughout January and February, more than 1000 Latino Wisconsinites and supporters have come to the Capitol to oppose anti-immigrant legislation. Various committees of the Wisconsin State Senate and Assembly have now passed SB 533 and AB450/SB369, two bills that severely restrict local control and aim to make Wisconsin more hostile to immigrants. On Tuesday, February 16th, the full Assembly will vote on both bills, and the Senate is expected to vote shortly after.
In an attempt to stop the bills, Wisconsin immigrant communities are calling for THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 18TH, TO BE A DAY WITHOUT LATINOS AND IMMIGRANTS IN WISCONSIN. Dozens of businesses have committed to close and workers are organizing in cities and towns throughout Wisconsin to go to the Capitol on the 18th instead of work. Parents are taking their kids out of school and students statewide are organizing walkouts.
"I am part of a group organizing so all the students walk out from the high schools and middle schools in Madison on the 18th," said Yaritza Brito, 17, a student at Memorial High School in Madison. "If we all fight together, hand in hand, this law will not defeat us. We have to keep walking with our heads high. The Latino community has so much pride, and we cannot let these people who hate us see us crying and on our knees, begging them not to do this. We need to make a stand."
Diverse businesses will close on the 18th ranging from cheese factories, tattoo shops, coffee shops, daycare centers, nail salons, restaurants, tax preparation centers, law firms, and others. Numerous workers in construction, hotels, manufacturing, and agriculture will not work and instead march.
"We are closing our business on the 18th so all of our employees can march because our business depends on the Latino community," said Miguel Garza, owner of MG Multiservicios, a tax preparation service that has been open for 16 years in Milwaukee and Madison."We want to see all of our community doing well and living without fear. Our economy depends on immigrant workers and their families who are targeted by these laws. Right now at MG we are working hard to help people prepare their taxes. Many of our clients have social security numbers, and other do not, but they comply with government requirements to report their tax contributions through an Individual Tax Identification Number. So contrary to what some people think, immigrants do contribute, and they want to be ready when immigration reform is passed."
"We are inviting everyone to mobilize on the Capitol in Madison on Thursday, February 18th, at 10am," said Christine Neumann-Ortiz, Executive Director of Voces de la Frontera. "We must oppose two anti-immigrant laws rapidly moving through the state legislature that will become laws if we don't unite as a community to stop them. One bill allows any public employee to inquire about immigration status, and if someone is charged with a crime, which includes something as simple as driving without a license or not paying traffic citations, that person could be arrested and turned over for deportation. We have seen cases, even before these bills have passed, where people with no criminal record have ended up in detention and deportation. The other law would block counties from issuing local identification cards statewide.
"In 2006 we defeated the Sensenbrenner bill by mobilizing a massive Day without Latinos. It is urgent that we do the same on February 18th. One day without work, one day without school, one day without shopping to show the economic power of Latinos and immigrants in this state. We invite all Latinos, immigrants, and people of all races to come together to defeat these discriminatory laws. It is no coincidence that these types of laws are also being introduced in North Carolina, Florida, and Arizona. These bills are being driven by politicians aligned with the American Legislative Exchange Council in an attempt to preempt local control and continue the shameful legacy of criminalization of immigrant workers and their families."
Interview opportunities:Workers, students, and business owners involved in the organizing are available for interviews from now until February 18th
For more information, visit our website at: www.vdlf.org
Voces de la Frontera is Wisconsin's leading immigrant rights group - a grassroots organization that believes power comes from below and that people can overcome injustice to build a better world.
LATEST NEWS
Climate Movement Cheers Michigan AG's Plans to Sue Big Oil
"Pursuing this litigation will allow us to recoup our costs and hold those responsible for jeopardizing Michigan's economic future and way of life accountable," said the state attorney general
May 09, 2024
Advocates of holding fossil fuel giants accountable for their significant contributions to the climate emergency welcomed Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel's Thursday announcement that she intends to sue the polluting industry.
"Big Oil knew decades ago that their products would cause catastrophic climate change, but instead of doing the right thing they lied about it," declared Richard Wiles, president of the Center for Climate Integrity. "The people of Michigan deserve their day in court to make these companies pay for the massive harm they knowingly caused."
Dozens of municipalities and attorneys general for the District of Columbia and eight statesāCalifornia, Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermontāhave already filed climate liability suits against Big Oil in recent years.
"Our 'Pure Michigan' identity is under threat from the effects of climate change," said Nessel, whose state was praised last year for passing clean energy legislation. "Warmer temperatures are shrinking ski seasons in the UP and disrupting the wonderful blooms of Holland's Tulip Time Festival. Severe weather events are on the rise."
"These impacts threaten not only our way of life but also our economy and pose long-term risks to Michigan's thriving agribusiness," she continued. "The fossil fuel industry, despite knowing about these consequences, prioritized profits over people and the environment. Pursuing this litigation will allow us to recoup our costs and hold those responsible for jeopardizing Michigan's economic future and way of life accountable."
The Democratic attorney general's office explained that she is "seeking proposals from attorneys and law firms to serve as special assistant attorneys general to pursue litigation related to the climate change impacts caused by the fossil fuel industry on behalf of the state of Michigan."
The Detroit Newsnoted that "Nessel took a similar tact in suing drugmakers for the opioid crisis, farming out much of the work to outside law firms in Michigan, Texas, and Florida."
According to the newspaper:
Nessel's office is working with other state departments to assess the costs associated with climate change, such as the cost of expanding storm water systems to handle flooding caused by stronger storms, responding to natural disasters, or supporting northern Michigan tourism economies dealing with dwindling ice and snow.
"This is going to be a massive discovery effort to find out exactly what our Michigan damages are now already and what can we expect to see in the future as a result of climate change," she said.
"I don't know that there's a bigger issue facing the state of Michigan than climate change," Nessel told the outlet. "We are talking about billions and billions of dollars in damages and we're already starting to see that on a day-to-day basis. We know this is only going to get worse."
The youth-led Sunrise MovementĀ applauded Nessel's plans and asserted that U.S. President Joe Bidenāwho is seeking reelection in Novemberāand the Department of Justice "must follow suit."
The group's call echoed similar demands that emerged last week in response to the U.S. Senate Budget Committee's hearing about a three-year investigation into "Big Oil's campaign of deception and distraction."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Compare Biden's Proposed Asylum Rule to 'Failed Trump-Era Policies'
"The Biden administration and Congress must not erect any more unjust barriers to asylum that will sow further disorder and result in irreparable harm," said one migrant rights advocate.
May 09, 2024
Immigrant rights advocates on Thursday slammed the Biden administration's proposal to fast-track the rejection of certain migrants seeking asylum in the United States.
On Thursday the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposed a rule that would empower immigration officials to disqualify certain asylum-seekers during their initial eligibility screeningācalled the credible fear interview (CFI)āusing existing national security and terrorism-related criteria, or bars.
DHS said the rule would apply to noncitizens who have "engaged in certain criminal activity, persecuted others, or have been involved in terrorist activities."
"I urge President Biden to embrace our values as a nation of immigrants and use this opportunity to instead provide relief for the long-term immigrants of this nation."
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas called the proposed rule "yet another step in our ongoing efforts to ensure the safety of the American public by more quickly identifying and removing those individuals who present a security risk and have no legal basis to remain here."
However, Greg Chen, senior director of government relations for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, argued that while "bars are an important feature of our immigration laws to ensure that dangerous individuals are not allowed into the country," they must be "accurately applied where warranted."
"This change could make the process faster by excluding people who would not be entitled to stay," he noted. "However, due process will likely be eroded by accelerating what is a highly complex legal analysis needed for these bars and conducting them at the preliminary CFI screening."
As Chen explained:
At that early stage, few asylum seekers will have the opportunity to seek legal counsel or time to understand the consequences of a bar being applied. Under the current process, they have more time to seek legal advice, to prepare their case, and to appeal it or seek an exemption. Ultimately to establish a fair and orderly process at the border, Congress needs to provide the Department of Homeland Security with the resources to meet its mission and also ensure the truly vulnerable are not summarily denied protection without due process.
Democratic lawmakersāsome of whom held a press conference Wednesday on protecting undocumented immigrants in the U.S.āalso criticized the proposal.
"As the Biden administration considers executive actions on immigration, we must not return to failed Trump-era policies aimed at banning asylum and moving us backwards," said Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), referring to former Republican President Donald Trump, the presumptive 2024 GOP nominee to face President Joe Biden in November.
"I urge President Biden to embrace our values as a nation of immigrants and use this opportunity to instead provide relief for the long-term immigrants of this nation," he added.
One year ago, critics accused Biden of "finishing Trump's job" by implementing a crackdown on asylum-seekers upon the expiration of Title 42āa provision first invoked during Trump administration at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic and continued by Biden to expel more than 1 million migrants under the pretext of public safety.
Earlier this week, the advocacy group Human Rights First released a report detailing the harms of the policy on its anniversary. The group held a press conference to unveil the report and warn of the dangers of further anti-migrant policies.
"The interviews with hundreds of asylum-seekers make clear that the asylum ban and related restrictions strands in danger children and adults seeking asylum, punishes people for seeking protection, leads to the return of refugees to persecution, spurs irregular crossings, and denies equal access to asylum to people facing the most dire risks," Human Rights First director of research and analysis of refugee protection Christina Asencio said during the press conference.
"The Biden administration and Congress must not erect any more unjust barriers to asylum that will sow further disorder and result in irreparable harm," Asencio added.
On Wednesday, three advocacy groupsāAl Otro Lado, the Civil Rights Education and Enforcement Center, and the Texas Civil Rights Projectāsued the federal government on behalf of noncitizens with disabilities seeking more information regarding CBP One, the problem-plagued Customs and Border Protection app migrants must use to schedule asylum interviews at U.S. ports of entry.
"We have and continue to see migrants with disabilities facing unlawful discrimination and unequal access to the asylum process due to the inaccessibility of the app," said Laura Murchie, an attorney with the Civil Rights and Education Enforcement Center involved in the case.
"CBP needs to release these documents so we can advocate for and ensure compliance with the law so asylum-seekers with disabilities do not continue to be harmed by CBP's disregard for rights that are guaranteed by federal disability law," she added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Netanyahu Says Israel 'Will Stand Alone' as Biden Threatens to Withhold Arms
"If we have to, we will fight with our nails," the Israeli prime minister said in response to the American leader's warning against a major Rafah invasion.
May 09, 2024
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday responded to U.S. President Joe Biden's threat to withhold shipments of arms used by the Israel Defense Forces to kill thousands of Palestinian civilians by declaring that his far-right government would continue its assault on Gaza with or without American help.
"If we are forced to stand alone, we will stand alone," Netanyahu said in a video ahead of next week's anniversary of Israel's establishment in 1948, largely via the ethnic cleansing of Palestine's Arabs. "I have already said that if we have to, we will fight with our nails."
Echoing Netanyahu, Israel Defense Forces spokesperson Daniel Hagari said the IDF already has the "necessary weapons" to wage war, "including in Rafah," where over 1 million people forcibly displaced from other parts of Gaza are sheltering alongside around 280,000 local residents, all of them bracing for a full-scale Israeli invasion.
The prime minister's remarks came a day after Biden threatened to withhold bombs and artillery shells from Israel if it launches a major invasion of Rafahāeven as critics noted that Israeli forces have already attacked and entered the city. Some accused Biden of walking back a previous "red line" warning against any assault on Rafah.
Common Dreamsreported Tuesday that Biden is delaying shipments of two types of bombs to Israel in order to send a message that the president's tolerance for what he called Israel's "indiscriminate bombing" of Gazan civilians is waning.
However, observers noted that Biden recently signed off on $14.3 billion in emergency armed assistance for Israel atop the nearly $4 billion the key ally already receives from Washington each year. The Biden administration has quietly approved more than 100 arms sales to Israel since October 7, while pushing for billions of dollars worth of additional deals, including advanced fighter jets.
Biden has also repeatedly bypassed Congress to fast-track weapons transfers to Israel as it wages what the International Court of Justice in January called a "plausibly" genocidal war that's killed, injured, or left missing more than 124,000 Palestiniansāmostly women and childrenāsince October 7.
The U.S. administration also provides diplomatic cover for Israel's policies and practices in the form of United Nations Security Council vetoes.
Despite all this supportāwhich comes as most election-year voters supporting Biden's Democratic Party believe Israel is committing genocide in GazaāIsraeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir on Thursday tweeted, "Hamas ā¤ļø Biden."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular