February, 03 2022, 04:06pm EDT

10 Executive Actions on Climate President Biden Should Take
Build Back Fossil Free coalition is pushing a “fossil fuel checklist” for President Biden ahead of the State of the Union
WASHINGTON
Ending the federal approval of new fossil fuel projects. Stopping drilling on public lands and waters. Respecting Indigenous rights.
These are amongst the 10 Executive Actions that the Build Back Fossil Free coalition is urging President Biden to take in order to choose the "people over fossil fuels" ahead of the State of the Union next month.
Build Back Fossil Free, which is composed of hundreds of climate, progressive, Indigenous, Black, Latino and social justice organizations, released the checklist of 10 executive actions on social media today as part of a month-long push on the Biden Administration to finally address the fossil fuel production that is threatening communities and the climate.
"Despite his bold campaign promises, and two climate executive orders on climate in the first week of his presidency, Biden has failed to use the full power of his office to tackle fossil fuel production and address the climate emergency," said Joye Braun, Indigenous Environmental Network, National Pipelines Organizer.
"Biden can't have it both ways. He can't claim to be a 'Climate President' while presiding over the largest offshore oil and gas lease ever, and more oil and gas leases on public lands than what the Trump administration issued over the same length of time. He has to listen to demands from the frontlines and use every power at his disposal to end the production, processing, and burning of fossil fuels," said Basav Sen, Climate Policy Director, Institute for Policy Studies.
After rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline because it threatened the country's air, water, climate, and violated Indigenous treaty rights - the Administration refused to stop the Line 3 pipeline, which posed a commensurate threat, refused to shut down the illegal Dakota Access Pipeline, and has failed to intervene on other major pipeline projects like Line 5 and the Mountain Valley Pipeline.
The President has also failed to make good on his promise to end fossil fuel development on public lands - in fact, he's expanded development. According to findings by the Center for Biological Diversity, the Biden administration approved 3,557 permits for oil and gas drilling on public lands in its first year, far outpacing the Trump administration's first-year total of 2,658. Just days after returning from the UN Climate Talks in Glasgow, the President hosted the largest offshore oil and gas lease sale in US history. Last week, a federal judge invalidated the sale, ruling that the Biden administration failed to accurately disclose and consider the greenhouse gas emissions and climate harms. Public lands account for about a quarter of US emissions and there is no way for the country to meet its climate targets if drilling continues at current rates.
"The Biden administration's bullish support for fracking and liquified natural gas exports is a disaster for communities and the climate. Shipping dirty gas abroad will lead to more drilling here at home, when we should be ending our addiction to fossil fuels. New research from Harvard builds on what we've known for years: Fracking is poisoning the people who live with this toxic industry every day, it pollutes our air and water, and it drives climate chaos. The White House must stop this fossil fuel madness," said Thomas Meyer, National Organizing Manager at Food & Water Watch.
For over a year now, climate justice, Indigenous, Black, Latino, and progressive groups with the Build Back Fossil Free coalition have been making the case to the Biden Administration that the best way to deliver on their climate agenda is to use the extensive executive authorities and regulatory powers granted to the administration, rather than "give the football" to Congress, where corrupt politicians with close ties to the fossil fuel industry have successfully blocked meaningful political action.
"Biden should quit peddling to polluters and their Congressional cronies, take out his presidential pen and deliver on his climate promises," said Kassie Siegel, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute. "Under existing law, Biden has powerful tools to stop approving fossil fuel projects, leases and exports, and to declare a climate emergency to ignite a just, renewable-energy economy. The future of life on earth depends on whether Biden will use his powers or surrender to a fossil-fueled catastrophe."
The President has a long list of actions that he could take or instruct his agencies to take, ranging from stopping fossil fuel infrastructure approvals to instructing the EPA to issue a stringent pollution prevention rule for the oil and gas sector. Declaring a climate emergency under the National Emergencies Act would unlock additional statutory powers, including the ability to halt crude oil exports and directing funds to build resilient, distributed renewable energy.
Last October, thousands of people joined Build Back Fossil Free in Washington, D.C. for the "People vs. Fossil Fuels" mobilization, where over 650 people were arrested in civil disobedience at the White House and Congress demanding that President Biden act on climate. Days later, 13 members of Congress sent a letter to the Administration echoing the coalition's demands.
Now, the Build Back Fossil Free coalition hopes that their escalating pressure, the growing number of climate disasters taking place across the country, and the administration's own failure to get its agenda passed in Congress, will lead President Biden to revisit the idea of using his executive and agency authorities to address the climate emergency.
"Despite claiming to be the 'Climate President,' so far, Biden has been the 'Climate Change-Causing President.' He's done next to nothing to curb fossil fuel development or hold fossil fuel corporations accountable for generations of environmental racism," said Erika Thi Patterson, Campaign Director, Climate and Environmental Justice, Action Center on Race and the Economy. "During his presidency, we've watched Biden repeatedly side with the fossil fuel industry over the people - defending Trump-era oil drilling proposals, auctioning off millions of acres for drilling, and supporting fracking and gas exports. Biden needs to listen to frontline BIPOC leaders urging him to use his full authority to end the era of fossil fuels once and for all."
The coalition is specifically calling on the Administration to use the upcoming State of the Union on March 1st to lay out a bold new climate agenda that can't be stopped by fossil fuel apologists in Congress.
No matter what, the Build Back Fossil Free coalition is committed to keep escalating pressure on the administration to act in the coming months, with more protests, mass call-ins, and meetings with administration officials in the works.
"Biden's failure to use his executive power in light of an overwhelming mandate from those most affected, is troubling. By not 'keeping it in the ground' and accelerating the transition to clean, renewable energy, he further endangers millions in overburdened communities who suffer from the poisonous effects of fossil fuels," said John Beard, Executive Director, Port Arthur Community Action Network. "Our lives, our planet is at risk, and he must take decisive executive action now. Delay is not an option. His choice is easy, his path clear and certain: he must choose 'people over fossil fuels' to build back better, fossil free. And we fully expect him to keep his word."
"Right now, over 91% of the public lands within the Greater Chaco landscape are currently leased for fracking, there are over 60,000 oil and gas wells in NM, and tens of thousands of New Mexicans already live within a quarter-mile of a frack-well." says Pueblo Action Alliance, an grassroots organization in New Mexico fighting for environmental justice. "For over a century, the federal government has dubbed the Greater Chaco Landscape a "national energy sacrifice zone" and the surrounding Dine people and frontline communities experience disproportionate negative impacts due to the presence of ongoing extractive industries. The Biden administration needs to do more and implement concrete action now to protect not only these sacred spaces, but the Indigenous people who occupy these lands as well."
Established in 1990 within the United States, IEN was formed by grassroots Indigenous peoples and individuals to address environmental and economic justice issues (EJ). IEN's activities include building the capacity of Indigenous communities and tribal governments to develop mechanisms to protect our sacred sites, land, water, air, natural resources, health of both our people and all living things, and to build economically sustainable communities.
LATEST NEWS
Environmental and Indigenous Groups Mobilize to Stop 'Alligator Alcatraz'
"This scheme is not only cruel, it threatens the Everglades ecosystem that state and federal taxpayers have spent billions to protect," said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades.
Jun 30, 2025
As Florida's Republican government moves to construct a sprawling new immigration detention center in the heart of the Everglades, nicknamed "Alligator Alcatraz," environmental groups and a wide range of other activists have begun to mobilize against it.
Florida's Republican attorney general, James Uthmeier, announced last week that construction of the jail, at the site of a disused airbase in the Big Cypress National Preserve, had begun. According to Fox 4 Now, an affiliate in Southwest Florida, construction has moved at "a blistering pace," with the site expected to be done by next week.
Three environmental advocacy groups have launched a lawsuit to try to halt the construction of the facility. And on Saturday, hundreds of protesters flocked to the remote site to voice their opposition.
Opponents have called out the cruelty of the plan, which comes as part of U.S. President Donald Trump's crusade to deport thousands of immigrants per day. They also called out the site's potential to inflict severe harm to local wildlife in one of America's most unique ecosystems.
Florida's government has said the site will have no environmental impact. Last week, Uthmeier described the area as a barren swampland. He said the site "presents an efficient, low-cost opportunity to build a temporary detention facility because you don't need to invest that much in the perimeter. People get out, there's not much waiting for 'em other than alligators and pythons," he said in the video. "Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide."
But local indigenous leaders have said that's not true. Saturday's protest was led by Native American groups, who say that the site will destroy their sacred homelands. According to The Associated Press, Big Cypress is home to 15 traditional Miccosukee and Seminole villages, as well as ceremonial and burial grounds and other gathering sites.
"Rather than Miccosukee homelands being an uninhabited wasteland for alligators and pythons, as some have suggested, the Big Cypress is the Tribe's traditional homelands. The landscape has protected the Miccosukee and Seminole people for generations," Miccosukee Chairman Talbert Cypress wrote in a statement on social media last week.
Environmental groups, meanwhile, have disputed the state's claims that the site will have no environmental impact. On Friday, the Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Everglades, and Earthjustice sued the Department of Homeland Security in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. They argued that the site was being constructed without any of the environmental reviews required by the National Environmental Policy Act.
"The site is more than 96% wetlands, surrounded by Big Cypress National Preserve, and is habitat for the endangered Florida panther and other iconic species. This scheme is not only cruel, it threatens the Everglades ecosystem that state and federal taxpayers have spent billions to protect," said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades.
Governor Ron DeSantis used emergency powers to fast track the proposal, which the Center for Biological Diversity says has left no room for public input or environmental review required by federal law.
"This reckless attack on the Everglades—the lifeblood of Florida—risks polluting sensitive waters and turning more endangered Florida panthers into roadkill. It makes no sense to build what’s essentially a new development in the Everglades for any reason, but this reason is particularly despicable," said Elise Bennett, Florida and Caribbean director and attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity.
Reuters has reported that the planned jail could hold up to 5,000 detained migrants at a time and could cost $450 million per year to maintain. It comes as President Trump has sought to increase deportations to a quota of 3,000 per day. The majority of those who have been arrested by federal immigration authorities have no criminal records.
"This massive detention center," Bennett said, "will blight one of the most iconic ecosystems in the world."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Kristi Noem Took Personal Cut of Political Donations While Governor of South Dakota: Report
"No wonder Pam Bondi gutted the public integrity section of DOJ. To protect utterly corrupt monsters like Kristi Noem."
Jun 30, 2025
The investigative outlet ProPublica revealed Monday that Kristi Noem secretly took a personal cut of funds she raised for a nonprofit that boosted her political career—and then did not disclose the income when President Donald Trump selected her to serve as head of the Department of Homeland Security.
ProPublica reported that in 2023, while Noem was governor of South Dakota, the nonprofit group American Resolve Policy Fund "routed funds to a personal company of Noem's that had recently been established in Delaware." The company is called Ashwood Strategies, and it was registered in June 2023.
"The payment totaled $80,000 that year, a significant boost to her roughly $130,000 government salary," according to the outlet. "Since the nonprofit is a so-called dark money group—one that's not required to disclose the names of its donors—the original source of the money remains unknown."
Experts told ProPublica that the arrangement and Noem's failure to disclose the income were unusual at best and possibly unlawful.
"If donors to these nonprofits are not just holding the keys to an elected official's political future but also literally providing them with their income, that's new and disturbing," Daniel Weiner, a former Federal Election Commission attorney who now works at the Brennan Center for Justice, told ProPublica.
Noem's lawyers denied that she violated the law but did not reply to ProPublica's questions about whether the Office of Government Ethics was aware of the $80,000 payment.
Unlike many Trump administration officials, Noem is not a billionaire. But "while she is among the least wealthy members of Trump's Cabinet, her personal spending habits have attracted notice," ProPublica observed, noting that she was "photographed wearing a gold Rolex Cosmograph Daytona watch that costs nearly $50,000 as she toured the Salvadoran prison where her agency is sending immigrants."
"In April, after her purse was stolen at a Washington, D.C. restaurant, it emerged she was carrying $3,000 in cash, which an official said was for 'dinner, activities, and Easter gifts,'" the outlet continued. "She was criticized for using taxpayer money as governor to pay for expenses related to trips to Paris, to Canada for bear hunting, and to Houston to have dental work done. At the time, Noem denied misusing public funds."
Political scientist Norman Ornstein wrote Monday that it was "no wonder [Attorney General] Pam Bondi gutted the public integrity section of DOJ."
"To protect utterly corrupt monsters like Kristi Noem," he added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Caving to Trump, Canada Drops Tax on US Tech Firms
One journalist accused Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney of chickening out.
Jun 30, 2025
Acquiescing to pressure from the Trump administration, the Canadian government announced on Sunday that the country will rescind the digital services tax, a levy that would have seen large American tech firms pay billions of dollars to Canada over the next few years.
The Sunday announcement from the Canadian government cited "anticipation of a mutually beneficial comprehensive trade arrangement" as the reason for the rescission.
"Today's announcement will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025, timeline set out at this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis," said Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in the statement.
The digital services tax impacts companies that make over $20 million in revenue from Canadian users and customers through digital services like online advertising and shopping. Companies like Uber and Google would have paid a 3% levy on the money they made from Canadian sources, according to CBC News.
The reversal comes after U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday blasted the digital services tax, calling it a "direct and blatant attack on our country" on Truth Social.
Trump said he was suspending trade talks between the two countries because of the tax. "Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately. We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period," Trump wrote. The United States is Canada's largest trading partner.
Payments from tech firms subject to the digital services tax were due starting on Monday, though the tax has been in effect since last year.
"The June 30, 2025 collection will be halted," and Canada's Minister of Finance "will soon bring forward legislation to rescind the Digital Services Tax Act," according to the Sunday statement.
"If Mark Carney folds in response to this pressure from Trump on the digital services tax, he proves he can be pushed around," said Canadian journalist Paris Marx on Bluesky, speaking prior to the announcement of the rescission. "The tax must be enforced," he added.
"Carney chickens out too," wrote the author Doug Henwood on Twitter on Monday.
In an opinion piece originally published in Canadian Dimension before the announcement on Sunday, Jared Walker, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Canadians for Tax Fairness, wrote that all the money generated for the tax could mean "more federal money for housing, transit, and healthcare transfers—all from some of the largest and most under-taxed companies in the world."
Walker also wrote that the digital service tax could serve as a counterweight to the so-called "revenge tax" provision in Trump's sprawling domestic tax and spending bill.
Section 899, called "Enforcement of Remedies Against Unfair Foreign Taxes," would "increase withholding taxes for non-resident individuals and companies from countries that the U.S. believes have imposed discriminatory or unfair taxes," according to CBC. The digital services tax is one of the taxes the Trump administration believes is discriminatory.
"If 'elbows up' is going to be more than just a slogan, Canada can't cave to pressure when Donald Trump throws his weight around," wrote Walker, invoking the Canadian rallying cry in the face of American antagonism when it comes to trade.
"But this slogan also means the Carney government has to make sure it is working on behalf of everyday Canadians—not just the ultra-rich and big corporations that are only 'Canadian' when it's convenient," Walker wrote.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular