August, 25 2020, 12:00am EDT
Another Broken Promise: Trump's Empty Drug Pricing Bluff Called By Pharma As August 24th Deadline Comes and Goes With No Action
Today, Accountable Pharma released the following statement after President Trump's August 24th deadline for the drug companies to come up with "something that will substantially reduce drug prices" or face his "international pricing index" executive order came and went with no word from the White House on any action.
WASHINGTON
Today, Accountable Pharma released the following statement after President Trump's August 24th deadline for the drug companies to come up with "something that will substantially reduce drug prices" or face his "international pricing index" executive order came and went with no word from the White House on any action.
"Once again President Trump talked a big game about cutting drug prices and followed it up with absolutely nothing but another broken promise to patients and families," said Eli Zupnick, spokesman for Accountable Pharma. "For a president to issue a threat like this and then allow the drug industry to walk all over him would be laughable if it wasn't so deadly serious for the patients and families who have seen their drug prices go up year after year while drug company profits went through the roof."
"When President Trump talks about his plans to cut drug prices sometime in the future he should be asked what he's done to deliver the '50, 60, even 70%' price reductions he has been guaranteeing for years."
Trump's big promise in July: "...we're going to hold that [executive order] until August 24th, hoping that the pharmaceutical companies will come up with something that will substantially reduce drug prices. And the clock starts right now. So it's August 24th at 12:00, after which the order on favored nations will go into effect."
Trump doubled down last week: "Drug prices will be coming down 50, 60, even 70%"
But when the deadline hit: "...federal law required signed executive orders to be published in the Federal Register. No 'favored nation' order has appeared, so the missing order either violates the law or is incomplete."
The executive orders had been widely panned as unlikely to have any impact this year even if they were actually implemented. Following his announced executive orders, the pharmaceutical industry cancelled a White House meeting with President Trump while assuring their shareholders that they don't expect Trump's executive orders to have any impact during his term.
Trump Claimed He Was Enacting "Favored Nations" Reforms To Lower Drug Prices At Least Three Times In Last Three Years--Promising "Transformative" And "Revolutionary" Change Each Time
- July 24, 2020: "I'm taking a bold and historic, very dramatic action to reduce the price of prescription drugs for American patients and American seniors. . . . Under this transformative order, Medicare will be required to purchase drugs at the same price as other countries pay. . . . But we have--we get now the lowest price anywhere in the world. And no more will we have to suffer by saying, "Gee, why is it so much cheaper for the exact same drug in some other country?"
- July 5, 2019: "We're going to be announcing something very shortly ... We're working on a favored nations clause, where we pay whatever lowest nation's price is. Why should other nations, like Canada--but why should other nations pay much less than us? They've taken advantage of the system for a long time--pharma. So we're working on, right now, a favored nations clause, so that whatever the lowest nation is, anywhere in the world--or company--but the lowest nation or company. Then what happens is we will pay that amount, and that's being worked on right now. We're going to do it in the form of an executive order."
- October 25, 2018: "Not anymore. Under our new plan, the Department of Health and Human Services would allow Medicare to determine the price it pays for certain drugs based on the cheaper prices paid by other nations. Some people call it "favored nations clauses." . . . At long last, the drug companies and foreign countries will be held accountable for how they rigged the system against American consumers. This is a revolutionary change. Nobody has had the courage to do it, or they just didn't want to do it."
President Trump Has Been Making Promises On Drug Prices For Years . . .
- February 4, 2020: "I was pleased to announce last year that, for the first time in 51 years, the cost of prescription drugs actually went down."
- July 5, 2019: "We're going to be announcing something very shortly ... We're working on a favored nations clause, where we pay whatever lowest nation's price is. Why should other nations, like Canada -- but why should other nations pay much less than us? They've taken advantage of the system for a long time--pharma. So we're working on, right now, a favored nations clause, so that whatever the lowest nation is, anywhere in the world--or company--but the lowest nation or company. Then what happens is we will pay that amount, and that's being worked on right now. We're going to do it in the form of an executive order."
- April 24, 2019: "Many drug companies are giving European countries a better deal than they give their own country. And that has to stop. We've already informed them that's stopping."
- February 6, 2019: "It's unacceptable that Americans pay vastly more than people in other countries for the exact same drugs, often made in the exact same place. This is wrong, this is unfair, and together we will stop it--and we'll stop it fast."
- January 23, 2019: "I just had a meeting on drug pricing and various other things. And prescription drugs, for the first time in history--the history of our country--have gone down in 2018."
- October 25, 2018: "This really is an important day for me. I've been talking about drug price reductions for a long time. And now we're doing things that nobody was, let's say--because I'm speaking on behalf of all of us--bold enough to do. And they're going to have a tremendous impact. . . . We're fighting for lower drug prices, which will now be automatic. It will be automatic and very substantial."
- March 19, 2018: "You'll be seeing drug prices falling very substantially in the not-too-distant future, and it's going to be beautiful."
- January 30, 2018: "One of my greatest priorities is to reduce the price of prescription drugs... I have directed my administration to make fixing the injustice of high drug prices one of our top priorities for the year. And prices will come down substantially--watch."
- February 28, 2017: "[I will] work to bring down the artificially high price of drugs, and bring them down immediately."
And Latest Executive Order Proclamations Were Met With Skepticism
- Salon: "Pharma CEOs privately scoff at Trump's drug pricing orders: "Not expecting any impact."
- Washington Post: "Trump signs executive orders aimed at lowering drug prices in largely symbolic move. The orders are unlikely to take effect anytime soon, if they do so at all."
- STAT News: "...it's unclear whether the effort to make progress on drug pricing will pay off, given that Trump can't immediately enact any of the policies. Rather, the orders direct his administration to begin the normal, notoriously slow regulatory processes needed to reform the existing system. The administration will have to speed through that process to formalize any of the policies before November."
- Politico: "'The drug EOs are a way to give the appearance of movement on Trump's pricing agenda without actually doing anything,' wrote Capital Alpha Partners' Rob Smith in a note, adding that the original favored nations rule has languished with budget officials for more than a year. 'A more impactful step would be to issue this actual proposed rule and begin the process of finalizing it rather than holding what amounts to a glorified press conference.'"
- NYT: "Mr. Trump's executive orders may have more symbolic meaning than any kind of immediate practical consequence."
- NPR: "The prescription drug bill that stalled after passing in the House in December, called HR3, would have had a much larger impact, says Stacie Dusetzina, a health policy professor at Vanderbilt University. "The bottom line is that these orders will not make a meaningful difference for patients when it comes to what they pay out-of-pocket for their medications," Dusetzina writes in an email to NPR."
MEANWHILE: Drug Prices Have Continued To Soar...
- Politico: "Drug prices steadily rise amid pandemic, data shows."
- Politifact: "Donald Trump wrong again about prescription drug prices."
- HealthDay: "U.S. Drug Prices Have Risen Three Times Faster Than Inflation."
- CBS News: "2020 is three days old and drug prices are already jumping."
- The Hill: "Survey: About 1 in 10 US adults rationing medicine in effort to lower costs."
... As Drug Companies Rake In Record Profits...
- West Health Policy Center: "New Analysis Finds Large Drugmakers Could Lose $1 Trillion in Sales and Still Be the Most Profitable Industry."
- Axios: "Health care CEO pay outstrips infectious disease research."
- Newsweek: "Big Pharma Companies Earn More Profits Than Most Other Industries, Study Suggests."
- FiercePharma: "How the 8 biggest U.S. pharmas enriched their shareholders in 2019."
- Axios: "Big Pharma is on a stock buyback spree."
- Axios: "4 pharma companies saved $7 billion from GOP tax law."
And Industry Executives Fill The Top Levels Of The Administration
- NYT: "Trump's Vaccine Chief Has Vast Ties to Drug Industry, Posing Possible Conflicts."
- Reuters: "Trump chooses Gottlieb to run FDA; Pharma breathes sigh of relief."
- Politico: "Trump picks ex-pharma executive Azar to lead HHS."
- Politico: "Former drug industry lobbyist helps steer Trump drug plan."
- Politico: "Trump's HHS secretary nominee boosted drug prices while at Eli Lilly."
Accountable.US is a nonpartisan watchdog that exposes corruption in public life and holds government officials and corporate special interests accountable by bringing their influence and misconduct to light. In doing so, we make way for policies that advance the interests of all Americans, not just the rich and powerful.
LATEST NEWS
'Make Polio Great Again': Alarm Over RFK Jr. Lawyer Who Targeted Vaccine
"So if you're wondering if Donald Trump is trying to kill your kids, yes, yes he is," said one critic.
Dec 13, 2024
Public health advocates, federal lawmakers, and other critics responded with alarm to The New York Timesreporting on Friday that an attorney helping Robert F. Kennedy Jr. select officials for the next Trump administration tried to get the U.S. regulators to revoke approval of the polio vaccine in 2022.
"The United States has been a leader in the global fight to eradicate polio, which is poised to become only the second disease in history to be eliminated from the face of the earth after smallpox," said Liza Barrie, Public Citizen's campaign director for global vaccines access. "Undermining polio vaccination efforts now risks reversing decades of progress and unraveling one of the greatest public health achievements of all time."
Public Citizen is among various organizations that have criticized President-elect Donald Trump's choice of Kennedy to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, with the watchdog's co-president, Robert Weissman, saying that "he shouldn't be allowed in the building... let alone be placed in charge of the nation's public health agency."
Although Kennedy's nomination requires Senate confirmation, he is already speaking with candidates for top health positions, with help from Aaron Siri, an attorney who represented RFK Jr. during his own presidential campaign, the Times reported. Siri also represents the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) in petitions asking the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "to withdraw or suspend approval of vaccines not only for polio, but also for hepatitis B."
According to the newspaper:
Mr. Siri is also representing ICAN in petitioning the FDA to "pause distribution" of 13 other vaccines, including combination products that cover tetanus, diphtheria, polio, and hepatitis A, until their makers disclose details about aluminum, an ingredient researchers have associated with a small increase in asthma cases.
Mr. Siri declined to be interviewed, but said all of his petitions were filed on behalf of clients. Katie Miller, a spokeswoman for Mr. Kennedy, said Mr. Siri has been advising Mr. Kennedy but has not discussed his petitions with any of the health nominees. She added, "Mr. Kennedy has long said that he wants transparency in vaccines and to give people choice."
After the article was published, Siri called it a "typical NYT hit piece plainly written by those lacking basic reading and thinking skills," and posted a series of responses on social media. He wrote in part that "ICAN's petition to the FDA seeks to revoke a particular polio vaccine, IPOL, and only for infants and children and only until a proper trial is conducted, because IPOL was licensed in 1990 by Sanofi based on pediatric trials that, according to FDA, reviewed safety for only three days after injection."
The Times pointed out that experts consider placebo-controlled trials that would deny some children polio shots unethical, because "you're substituting a theoretical risk for a real risk," as Dr. Paul A. Offit, a vaccine expert at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, explained. "The real risks are the diseases."
Ayman Chit, head of vaccines for North America at Sanofi, told the newspaper that development of the vaccine began in 1977, over 280 million people worldwide have received it, and there have been more than 300 studies, some with up to six months of follow-up.
Trump, who is less than six weeks out from returning to office, has sent mixed messages on vaccines in recent interviews.
Asked about RFK Jr.'s anti-vaccine record during a Time "Person of the Year" interview published Thursday, the president-elect said that "we're going to be able to do very serious testing" and certain vaccines could be made unavailable "if I think it's dangerous."
Trump toldNBC News last weekend: "Hey, look, I'm not against vaccines. The polio vaccine is the greatest thing. If somebody told me to get rid of the polio vaccine, they're going to have to work real hard to convince me. I think vaccines are—certain vaccines—are incredible. But maybe some aren't. And if they aren't, we have to find out."
Both comments generated concern—like the Friday reporting in the Times, which University of Alabama law professor and MSNBC columnist Joyce White Vance called "absolutely terrifying."
She was far from alone. HuffPost senior front page editor Philip Lewis said that "this is just so dangerous and ridiculous" while Zeteo founder Mehdi Hasan declared, "We are so—and I use this word advisedly—fucked."
Ryan Cooper, managing editor at The American Prospect, warned that "they want your kids dead."
Author and musician Mikel Jollett similarly said, "So if you're wondering if Donald Trump is trying to kill your kids, yes, yes he is."
Multiple critics altered Trump's campaign slogan to "Make Polio Great Again."
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) responded with a video on social media:
Without naming anyone, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), a polio survivor, put out a lengthy statement on Friday.
"The polio vaccine has saved millions of lives and held out the promise of eradicating a terrible disease. Efforts to undermine public confidence in proven cures are not just uninformed—they're dangerous," he said in part. "Anyone seeking the Senate's consent to serve in the incoming administration would do well to steer clear of even the appearance of association with such efforts."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Biden Pardon of 'Kids-for-Cash' Judge Michael Conahan Sparks Outrage
"It's a big slap in the face for us once again," said one of the disgraced judge's victims.
Dec 13, 2024
Victims of a scheme in which a pair of Pennsylvania judges conspired to funnel thousands of children into private detention centers in exchange for millions of dollars in kickbacks expressed outrage following U.S. President Joe Biden's Thursday commutation of one of the men's sentences.
In 2010, former Luzerne County Judge Michael Conahan pleaded guilty to federal racketeering charges and was sentenced to more than 17 years in prison after he and co-conspirator Mark Ciavarella shut down a county-run juvenile detention facility and then took nearly $3 million in payments from the builder and co-owner of for-profit lockups, into which the judges sent children as young as 8 years old.
"It's a big slap in the face for us once again," Amanda Lorah—who was sentenced by Conahan to five years of juvenile detention over a high school fight—toldWBRE.
Sandy Fonzo, whose son killed himself after being sentenced to juvenile detention, said in a statement: "I am shocked and I am hurt. Conahan's actions destroyed families, including mine, and my son's death is a tragic reminder of the consequences of his abuse of power."
"This pardon feels like an injustice for all of us who still suffer," Fonzo added. "Right now I am processing and doing the best I can to cope with the pain that this has brought back."
Many of Conahan's victims were first-time or low-level offenders. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court would later throw out thousands of cases adjudicated by the Conahan and Ciaverella, the latter of whom is serving a 28-year sentence for his role in the scheme.
Conahan—who is 72 and had been under house arrest since being transferred from prison during the Covid-19 pandemic—was one of around 1,500 people who received commutations or pardons from Biden on Thursday. While the sweeping move was welcomed by criminal justice reform advocates, many also decried the president's decision to not grant clemency to any of the 40 men with federal death sentences.
Others have called on Biden—who earlier this month pardoned his son Hunter Biden after promising he wouldn't—to grant clemency to people including Indigenous activist Leonard Peltier and environmental lawyer Steven Donziger.
"There's never going to be any closure for us."
"So he wants to talk about Conahan and everybody else, but what is Joe Biden doing for all of these kids who absolutely got nothing, and almost no justice in this whole thing that happened?" said Lorah. "So it's nothing for us, but it seems that Conahan is just getting a slap on the wrist every which way he possibly could still today."
"There's never going to be any closure for us," she added. "There's never going to be, somehow, some way, these two men are always going to pop up, but now, when you think about the president of the United States letting him get away with this, who even wants to live in this country at this point? I'm totally shocked, I can't believe this."
Keep ReadingShow Less
77 House Dems Call for 'Full Assessment' of Israeli Compliance With US Law
Lawmakers told the Biden administration they are "deeply troubled by the continued level of civilian casualties and humanitarian suffering in Gaza."
Dec 13, 2024
As Israel continues to decimate the Gaza Strip with American weapons, 77 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives this week demanded that the Biden administration "provide a full assessment of the status of Israel's compliance with all relevant U.S. policies and laws, including National Security Memorandum 20 (NSM-20) and Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act."
Reps. Jason Crow (D-Colo.), Madeleine Dean (D-Pa.), and Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) spearheaded the Thursday letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, with less than six weeks left in President Joe Biden's term.
Since Biden issued NSM-20 in February, his administration has repeatedly accepted the Israel government's assurances about the use of U.S. weapons, despite reports from journalists and human rights groups about how they have helped Israeli forces slaughter at least 44,875 Palestinians and injure another 106,454 people in the besieged enclave over the past 14 months.
"Our concerns remain urgent and largely unresolved, including arbitrary restrictions on humanitarian aid and insufficient delivery routes."
House Democrats' letter begins by declaring support for "Israel's right to self-defense," denouncing the Hamas-led October 2023 attack, and endorsing the Biden administration's efforts "to broker a bilateral cease-fire that includes the release of hostages," noting the deal recently negotiated for the Israeli government and the Lebanese group Hezbollah.
"Further, we condemn the unprecedented Iranian attacks against Israel launched on April 13, 2024, and October 1, 2024," the letter states, declining to mention the Israeli actions that led to those responses. "We must continue to avoid a major regional conflict—and we welcome the concerted diplomatic efforts by the U.S. and our allies to prevent further escalation."
"We are also deeply troubled by the continued level of civilian casualties and humanitarian suffering in Gaza," the lawmakers wrote, citing the administration's October 13 letter imposing a 30-day deadline for Israel to improve humanitarian conditions in Palestinian territory. "That deadline has expired, and while some progress has been made, we believe the Israeli government has not yet fulfilled the requirements outlined in your letter."
Asked during a November 12 press conference if the Israeli government has met the administration's demands, State Department spokesperson Vedant Patel said that "we have not made an assessment that they are in violation of U.S. law."
Shortly after that, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) forced votes on resolutions to block the sale of 120mm tank rounds, 120mm high-explosive mortar rounds, and Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs) to Israel, but they didn't pass.
Progressives and Democrats in Congress have been sounding the alarm about U.S. government complicity in Israel's armed assault and starvation campaign—which have led to an ongoing genocide case at the International Court of Justice—to varying degrees since October 2023, including with a May letter led by Crow and Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.) and signed by 85 others.
Citing that letter on Thursday, the 77 House Democrats wrote that "our concerns remain urgent and largely unresolved, including arbitrary restrictions on humanitarian aid and insufficient delivery routes, among others. As a result, Gaza's civilian population is facing dire famine."
"We believe further administrative action must be taken to ensure Israel upholds the assurances it provided in March 2024 to facilitate, and not directly or indirectly obstruct, U.S. humanitarian assistance," the letter concludes. "We remain committed to a negotiated solution that can bring an end to the fighting, free the remaining hostages, surge humanitarian aid, and lay the groundwork to rebuild Gaza with a legitimate Palestinian governing body. We thank you and the administration for its ongoing work to achieve those shared goals."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular