

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Karen Feridun, Berks Gas Truth, 610.678.7726, karen.feridun@gmail.com, Maya van Rossum Delaware Riverkeeper Network 215.369.1188x102 keepermaya@delawareriverkeeper.org, Barbara Arrindell, Damascus Citizens for Sustainability, 845.252.6677 dcs@DamascusCitizens.org, David Pringle, Clean Water Action New Jersey, 732.996.4288, dpringle@cleanwater.org, Wes Gillingham, Catskill Mountainkeeper, 845.901.1029, wes@catskillmountainkeeper.org, Peter Hart, Food & Water Watch, 732.266.4932, phart@fwwatch.org, Tracy Carluccio, Delaware Riverkeeper Network 215.369.1188x104, tracy@delawareriverkeeper.org
Today residents and organizations from throughout the Delaware River Watershed and beyond are celebrating and vowing enthusiastic support for the proposed ban on high volume hydraulic fracturing throughout the Delaware River Watershed in all "hydrocarbon bearing rock formations."
The groups will fight for a ban on all related activities (including wastewater processing and discharges from and water withdrawals for drilling and fracking operations) in the Basin in the face of newly issued draft regulations posted by the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) this afternoon.
At 4:20 pm today, November 30, the DRBC posted draft natural gas regulations, as required by a resolution passed by the Commissioners (the Governors of Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, and Delaware and the Army Corps of Engineers) at their public meeting in September. See the draft rules here: https://www.nj.gov/drbc/meetings/proposed/notice_hydraulic-fracturing.html
The public has been advocating for the adoption of a full and permanent ban on natural gas drilling and fracking and all related activities (including wastewater processing and discharges, and water withdrawals for drilling and fracking operations) throughout the Delaware River Watershed in a concerted public campaign.
The proposed ban is testimony to the impact that people and communities can have when pursuing the protections needed to provide clean drinking water, healthy communities and habitats and when insisting no compromises be allowed regarding the quality and durability of those protections for present and for future generations. The campaign to ban fracking in the Watershed is not complete, however, until all its related activities are banned so the campaign will fully participate in the DRBC's public participation process to achieve the goal of a full and unequivocal ban.
"While we are thrilled that the DRBC finally heard our demands for a ban on fracking, it doesn't feel like progress to those of us who are not sitting atop shale formations and are, therefore, only losing ground with regulations that allow previously prohibited activities," said Karen Feridun, Founder of Berks Gas Truth.
"The people have prevailed in our efforts to achieve a ban on fracking throughout the Delaware River Watershed, a monumental victory for the environment and our communities. But we will not rest until all activities related to fracking are banned as well - it makes no sense to ban fracking and allow frack waste to be dumped in the Watershed. We will fight the export of water and import of toxic frack wastewater in these rules and, if reason prevails, the DRBC will institute the only right thing to do - ban all aspects of fracking," said Maya van Rossum, the Delaware Riverkeeper.
"A comprehensive ban on fracking in the Delaware River basin means no drilling, no disposal or storage of toxic fracking waste, and no water withdrawals to drilling companies," said Wenonah Hauter, Executive Director of Food & Water Watch. "The draft rules released today open the door to waste treatment and water withdrawals for fracking, which is totally unacceptable, and the governors of the DRBC states should expect to hear that message from thousands of constituents over the coming weeks and months."
"Turning the temporary moratorium on actual fracking into a permanent ban is a big deal, but DRBC staff are trying to have it both ways and jeopardizing our water by permitting the transfer of clean water for fracking out of the basin and the discharge of polluted water from fracking into the basin. The Governors now need to clean up staff's dirty work and we are as committed as ever to make that so!" said David Pringle, NJ Campaign Director of Clean Water Action.
"Ten years of work to save the Delaware River Basin - very much worth all the effort! Grassroots can win!" said Barbara Arrindell, Damascus Citizens for Sustainability.
"The proposal to ban fracking throughout the Watershed provides the essential protection we need for the Delaware River Basin and all those who drink its water. But we will not tolerate the degradation and pollution caused by frack wastewater and we will not allow water to be depleted and to fuel fracking elsewhere - it is inconsistent and illogical to allow such activities. We will work through the DRBC's public input process for the draft gas regulations to emphatically support the complete ban on fracking that we have fought for and a ban on ALL waste and water related to it and will not rest until we have accomplished this goal," said Tracy Carluccio, Deputy Director, Delaware Riverkeeper Network.
"The Rules are out and the DRBC is proposing to ban fracking in the Basin. We believe this is a good first step in protecting the Delaware Valley but more needs to be done. We are calling on the DRBC to remove the parts of the rules that allow, with conditions, the bringing in of fracking waste water and robbing our Basin waters for fracking out of basin," said Jeff Tittel, Director of the New Jersey Sierra Club. "We want the DRBC to protect the Basin by banning all dangerous fracking activities. Banning fracking but then allowing the dumping of fracking waste undoes the whole purpose of the ban in the first place, which is to protect our water."
"Communities in the Upper Delaware have had fracking, and its dangerous health and community impacts, hanging over their head for the last ten years. In 2015, thanks to the work of New Yorkers statewide, Governor Cuomo banned fracking in our state--but the threats to the entire Delaware River Basin remained. Today, the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) is ready to put the final nail in fracking's coffin for our entire region. This is a huge win to everyone who lives here, and we applaud the DRBC. But what we've learned over the past ten years is that fracking's impacts are not just at the well pad. Now it's time to roll up our sleeves and make sure the DRBC does the right thing--we have 90 days for a comment period, and the agency needs to realize that wastewater should not be imported into the Basin and withdrawing water from the river should also be banned, said Wes Gillingham, Associate Director, Catskill Mountainkeeper.
Food & Water Watch mobilizes regular people to build political power to move bold and uncompromised solutions to the most pressing food, water, and climate problems of our time. We work to protect people's health, communities, and democracy from the growing destructive power of the most powerful economic interests.
(202) 683-2500"Bigotry has been his brand since day 1," said Congresswoman Yvette Clarke.
As President Donald Trump refuses to apologize for a now-deleted social media post in which former President Barack Obama and his wife Michelle Obama are portrayed as apes, the head of the Congressional Black Caucus on Friday blasted what she called the "bigoted and racist regime" in the White House.
“It’s very clear that there was an intent to harm people, to hurt people, with this video,” Congressional Black Caucus Chair Yvette Clarke (D-NY) said in an interview with the Associated Press. "Every week we are, as the American people, put in a position where we have to respond to something very cruel or something extremely off-putting that this administration does. It’s a part of their M.O. at this point."
After dismissing the widespread revulsion—including by some Republican lawmakers—over Trump's sharing of the racist election conspiracy video on his Truth Social network as "fake outrage," the White House subsequently claimed that an aide "erroneously made the post," which was deleted after nearly 12 hours online.
The president told reporters aboard Air Force one Friday evening, "I didn't make a mistake" and that he is the "least racist president you've had in a long time."
Trump launched his political career by amplifying the conspiracy theory that Barack Obama was not born in the United States and his 2016 presidential campaign by calling Mexicans "rapists." Since then, he has made numerous bigoted statements about racial minorities, immigrants, Muslims, women, and others.
Brushing off the administration's explanation for Trump's post, Clarke said that "they don’t tell the truth."
"If there wasn’t a climate, a toxic and racist climate within the White House, we wouldn’t see this type of behavior regardless of who it’s coming from," she contended.
"Here we are, in the year 2026, celebrating the 250th anniversary of the United States of America, the 100th anniversary of the commemoration of Black history, and this is what comes out of the White House on a Friday morning," the congresswoman added. "It’s beneath all of us."
Asked what it means that Trump—who rarely retracts anything—deleted the post, Clarke said, "I think it’s more of a political expediency than it is any moral compass."
"As my mother would say," she added, "'Too late. Mercy’s gone.'"
Civil rights groups also condemned Trump, with Color of Change posting on Facebook that "this is white supremacy expressed from the Oval Office."
"Trump resents what the Obamas represent: A Black family that is accomplished, respected, and widely admired," the group continued. "Their success contradicts the worldview he has spent years promoting. His attacks follow a clear trajectory—from birther conspiracies questioning Obama's legitimacy, to false accusations of treason, to now circulating imagery rooted in centuries of racial dehumanization used to justify slavery, lynching, and violence."
"Republican leadership has been silent," Color of Change added. "Elected officials who refuse to condemn this behavior are choosing to normalize it."
NAACP president Derrick Johnson said in a statement that "Donald Trump's video is blatantly racist, disgusting, and utterly despicable."
Johnson asserted that Trump is attempting to distract from the cost of living crisis and Jeffrey Epstein scandal.
"You know who isn't in the Epstein files? Barack Obama," he said. "You know who actually improved the economy as president? Barack Obama."
“Our concern remains centered on Liam and all children who deserve stability, safety, and the opportunity to be in school without fear," said an advocate for the family.
The Trump administration's bid to expedite deportation proceedings against 5-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos and his family faltered Friday as a judge granted them more time to plead their asylum case.
Danielle Molliver, an attorney for Ramos' family, told CNN that a judge issued a continuance in the case, meaning it is postponed to a later date.
The US Department of Homeland Security filed a motion Wednesday seeking to fast-track the Ecuadorian family's deportation. The family responded by asking the court for additional time to reply to the DHS motion.
Zena Stenvik, superintendent of the Columbia Heights Public Schools, where Ramos is a student, told CNN that Friday’s ruling “provides additional time, and with that, continued uncertainty for a child and his family."
“Our concern remains centered on Liam and all children who deserve stability, safety, and the opportunity to be in school without fear," Stenvik added. "We will continue to advocate for outcomes that prioritize children."
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrested Ramos and his father, Adrian Alexander Conejo Arias, in the driveway of their Columbia Heights home on January 20 during Operation Metro Surge, the Trump administration's ongoing deadly immigration crackdown in the Twin Cities.
They were taken to the Dilley Immigration Processing Center southwest of San Antonio, Texas. Run by ICE and private prison profiteer CoreCivic, the facility has been plagued by reports of poor health and hygiene conditions and accusations of inadequate medical care for children.
Detainees report prison-like conditions and say they’ve been served moldy food infested with worms and forced to drink putrid water. Some have described the facility as “truly a living hell.”
Ramos, who fell ill during his detention in Dilley, and his father were ordered released earlier this month on a federal judge's order, and is now back in Minnesota.
Molliver accused the Trump administration of retaliating against the family following their release. Assistant DHS Secretary Tricia McLaughlin claimed that “there is nothing retaliatory about enforcing the nation’s immigration laws."
Arias told Minnesota Public Radio Friday that he is uncertain about his family's future.
"The government is moving many pieces, it's doing everything possible to do us harm, so that they’ll probably deport us," he said. "We live with that fear too."
Congressman Joaquin Castro (D-Texas), who helped accompany Ramos and his father back to Minnesota, said at a Friday news conference that DHS "should leave Liam alone."
“His family came in legally through the asylum process,” Castro said. “And when I left the Dilley detention center, one of the ICE officers explained to me that his father was on a one-year parole in place, so they should allow that to continue.”
"This decision will wipe out the availability of release through bond for tens of thousands of people," one critic noted.
A divided federal appellate panel ruled Friday in favor of the Trump administration's policy of locking up most undocumented immigrants without bond, a decision that legal experts called a serious blow to due process.
A three-judge panel of the right-wing 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled 2-1 that President Donald Trump's reversal of three decades of practice by previous administrations is legally sound under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA). The ruling reverses two lower court orders.
"The text [of the IIRIRA] says what it says, regardless of the decisions of prior administrations," Judge Edith Jones—an appointee of former President Ronald Reagan—wrote for the majority. "That prior administrations decided to use less than their full enforcement authority... does not mean they lacked the authority to do more."
Writing in dissent, Judge Dana M. Douglas, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, asserted that "the Congress that passed IIRIRA would be surprised to learn it had also required the detention without bond of two million people. For almost 30 years there was no sign anyone thought it had done so, and nothing in the congressional record or the history of the statute’s enforcement suggests that it did."
This is a very, very bad decision from one of the two Reagan judges left on the Fifth Circuit, joined by one of the two most extreme Trump appointees on the court.And, it is about the issue I walked through at Law Dork earlier this week, in the context of Minnesota: www.lawdork.com/i/186796727/...
[image or embed]
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) February 6, 2026 at 6:50 PM
"Nonetheless, the government today asserts the authority and mandate to detain millions of noncitizens in the interior, some of them present here for decades, on the same terms as if they were apprehended at the border," Douglas added. "No matter that this newly discovered mandate arrives without historical precedent, and in the teeth of one of the core distinctions of immigration law. The overwhelming majority elsewhere have recognized that the government’s position is totally unsupported."
Past administration generally allowed unauthorized immigrants who had lived in the United States for years to attend bond hearings, at which they had a chance to argue before immigration judges that they posed no flight risk and should be permitted to contest their deportation without detention.
Mandatory detention by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was generally reserved for convicted criminals or people who recently entered the country illegally.
However, the Trump administration contends that anyone who entered the United States without authorization at any time can be detained pending deportation, with limited discretionary exceptions for humanitarian or public interest cases. As a result, immigrants who have lived in the US for years or even decades are being detained indefinitely, even if they have no criminal records.
According to a POLITICO analysis, more than 360 judges across the country—including dozens of Trump appointees—have rejected the administration's interpretation of ICE's detention power, while just 26 sided with the administration.
While US Attorney General Pam Bondi hailed Friday's ruling as a "significant blow against activist judges who have been undermining our efforts to make America safe again at every turn," some legal experts said the decision erodes constitutional rights.
"AWFUL news for due process," American Immigration Council senior fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick said on social media in response to Friday's ruling. "This decision will wipe out the availability of release through bond for tens of thousands of people detained in or transported to Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi by ICE."
While Friday's ruling only applies to those three states, which fall under the 5th Circuit Court's jurisdiction, there are numerous legal challenges to the administration's detention policy in courts across the country.