

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Rebecca Kurtz (207) 860-0356; Pete Didisheim (207) 232-4768
Top lake protection experts today called on the Legislature to pass a bill (LD 1744) to protect the water quality in Maine's 6,000 lakes. Representing communities and lake associations across the state, the experts expressed concerns about the slow decline in water quality they are currently seeing in Maine lakes. They warned that some lakes are reaching a "tipping point" and may rapidly deteriorate, unless Maine takes action to strengthen the safety net for Maine's lakes, including through passage of LD 1744.
Top lake protection experts today called on the Legislature to pass a bill (LD 1744) to protect the water quality in Maine's 6,000 lakes. Representing communities and lake associations across the state, the experts expressed concerns about the slow decline in water quality they are currently seeing in Maine lakes. They warned that some lakes are reaching a "tipping point" and may rapidly deteriorate, unless Maine takes action to strengthen the safety net for Maine's lakes, including through passage of LD 1744.
"Maine's lakes generate more than $3.5 billion in economic activity annually, supporting 52,000 jobs," said Rebecca Kurtz, Executive Director of the Maine Lakes Association. "Yet the health of these treasured and invaluable assets is declining as non-point source pollution is flushed across the land and into our lakes. We can no longer afford to be complacent about lake protection. LD 1744 is a comprehensive and common sense bill that will help protect our lakes and the many benefits they provide."
"It's important to understand that Maine's lakes are really fragile and we're heading toward a tipping point on many of them," said Peter Lowell, Executive Director of Lakes Environmental Association. "We are much closer to losing our traditional water quality than most people realize. It is vital that DEP be a strong player in lake protection efforts to provide research and stand firm when enforcement measures are called for."
Lake advocates testified in support of "An Act to Protect Maine's Lakes" (LD 1744), introduced by Representative Jeff McCabe (D-Skowhegan). The Environment and Natural Resources Committee held a public hearing on the bill today, with plans to conduct work sessions in coming weeks.
New research from the University of Maine shows that the clarity of Maine's lakes has worsened since 1995.
"LD1744 is entitled, 'An Act to Protect Maine Lakes,' but it could just as easily be titled, 'An Act to Protect over 52,000 Maine Jobs and our most valuable economic assets that generate over $3.5 billion of economic activity annually,'" said Peter Kallin, Executive Director of the Belgrade Regional Conservation Alliance. "In the town of Rome where I live, 80% of the property tax base is shorefront property, which pays virtually the entire education budget of the town. Much of that property is owned by nonresidents. Governor LePage has called for the creation of special economic zones where out-of-state money will be invested to create jobs in Maine. Maine's lakes are already the 'Mother of all special economic zones.' This bill will help ensure their continued success not just this year but for the foreseeable future."
"We are at a pivotal juncture in lake protection here in Maine," said Debbie Hite, Executive Director, Androscoggin Lake Improvement Corporation. "Collaborative efforts are the key to getting the job done. Lake associations and their affiliates don't mind doing the legwork, but we need the reassurance of strong support from the DEP to maximize the good we can accomplish together."
LD 1744 would clarify responsibilities for the Department of Environmental Protection's lake protection program; reduce nutrient and chemical pollution runoff to lakes; boost enforcement through creation of photographic records of shorelines; provide improved code enforcement officer trainings; create a certification program for landscape contractors who work on lakefront properties; and strengthen a voluntary program for lakefront property owners to reduce lake pollution.
"Maine's lakes are jewels worth billions to our state economy," said Matt Scott, former DEP Chief Biologist hired to establish DEP's lake program in the 1970s. "DEP once had a lake program that earned national and international recognition. I was hired to help create that program. It pains me to see what is now happening in terms of lost staff, lost institutional knowledge, and reduced education and outreach. Surely we can do better than this. We must do better than this to protect Maine's lakes into the future."
"Maine lakes are a huge economic driver for our state," said Ginger Jordan-Hillier, a former environmental public health coordinator for the Department of Environmental Protection who lives in Monmouth. "Lakes have been a cherished and important part of my family for many generations, as they have been for so many people. Unfortunately, Maine's lake protection efforts have weakened in recent years. We need to get back on track and do more to protect this valuable resource for our children and grandchildren."
The Natural Resources Council of Maine is the leading nonprofit membership organization working statewide for clean air and water; healthy people, wildlife and forests; and clean energy solutions. NRCM harnesses the power of science, the law, and the voices of more than 12,000 supporters to protect the nature of Maine. Visit NRCM online at www.nrcm.org.
Asked if he would try to seize Greenland by military force, Trump responded, "No comment."
US President Donald Trump declared Tuesday after a call with the head of NATO that "there can be no going back" on his push to seize Greenland as Denmark deployed more troops to the island, amid widespread concerns that Trump could try to take it by military force.
In an early morning post to his social media platform, Trump said he agreed to a "meeting of the various parties" in Davos, Switzerland and reiterated his view that Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark, "is imperative for National and World Security."
"There can be no going back—On that, everyone agrees!" the US president wrote. "The United States of America is the most powerful Country anywhere on the Globe, by far... We are the only POWER that can ensure PEACE throughout the World—And it is done, quite simply, through STRENGTH!"
Trump later appeared to leak text messages he received from French President Emmanuel Macron, who—according to screenshots posted by the US president—wrote to Trump: "I do not understand what you are doing on Greenland."
"Let us try to build great things," one of the messages reads.
Trump also posted a screenshot of a text message purportedly from NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who wrote that he is "committed to finding a way forward on Greenland."
The developments came as the head of the Royal Danish Army and a "substantial contribution" of soldiers reportedly landed in Greenland to participate in multinational military exercises known as Operation Arctic Endurance. Germany, Sweden, France, Norway, the Netherlands, and Finland have also sent troops to Greenland in recent days.
Wielding the threat of economic warfare, Trump has demanded that European nations capitulate to a deal for "the complete and total purchase of Greenland" by the US. But the American president has also declined to rule out using force to seize the mineral-rich island, which Trump donors and allies have long been eyeing greedily.
Asked Monday whether he would try to seize Greenland by force, Trump replied: "No comment."
The president is trying to fire Fed Gov. Lisa Cook for alleged mortgage fraud. Critics say he's targeting another one of his political foes.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell reportedly plans to attend Wednesday's US Supreme Court oral arguments in the case involving President Donald Trump's attempt to fire Fed Gov. Lisa Cook.
A "person familiar with the matter" told the Associated Press on condition of anonymity that Powell would attend the high court session in the face of Trump's unprecedented effort to oust one of the seven members of the Fed's governing board.
Last August, Trump announced his termination of Cook—an appointee of former President Joe Biden—for alleged fraud, accusing her of signing two primary residence mortgages within weeks of each other. An investigation published last month by ProPublica revealed that Trump did the same thing that he's accusing Cook of doing.
Cook denies any wrongdoing, has not been charged with any crime, and has filed a lawsuit challenging Trump’s attempt to fire her. In October, the Supreme Court declined to immediately remove Cook and agreed to hear oral arguments in the case.
In what many critics allege is an attempt by Trump to strong-arm the Fed into further interest rate cuts, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) earlier this month served the central bank with grand jury subpoenas related to Powell's congressional testimony on renovations to Fed headquarters in Washington, DC.
Powell—who was nominated by Trump in 2017 and whose four-year term as Fed chair ends May 15—responded by alleging that “the threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the president."
"This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions—or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation," he added.
Trump is trying to install his puppets at the Fed.First by trying to fire Lisa Cook and rushing in his top econ adviser.Now by abusing the law to try to push Jerome Powell out for good.Next he'll nominate a new Chair—and Trump says “anybody that disagrees" with him is out.
[image or embed]
— Elizabeth Warren (@warren.senate.gov) January 15, 2026 at 7:54 AM
In addition to Cook, Trump has targeted a number of Democrats with what critics say are dubious mortgage fraud claims.
Last November, a federal judge dismissed a DOJ criminal case against New York Attorney General Letitia James, who was charged with bank fraud and false statements regarding a property in Virginia. Critics called the charges against James—who successfully prosecuted Trump for financial crimes—baseless and politically motivated. A federal grand jury subsequently rejected another administration attempt to indict James.
The president has accused other political foes, including US Sen. Adam Schiff and Rep. Eric Swalwell—both California Democrats who played key roles in both of the president’s House impeachments—of similar fraud. Swalwell is currently under formal criminal investigation. Both lawmakers deny the allegations.
"Billionaires can’t be allowed to buy elections."
After flirting last year with forming his own political party, far-right billionaire Elon Musk is funding Republican political candidates once again.
Axios reported on Monday that Musk recently made a massive $10 million donation to bolster Nate Morris, a MAGA candidate who is vying to replace retiring US Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
Axios described the massive donation, the largest Musk has ever given to a Senate candidate, as "the biggest sign yet that Musk plans to spend big in the 2026 midterms, giving Republicans a formidable weapon in the expensive battle to keep their congressional majorities."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) reacted with disgust to the news, and said that Musk's enormous donation was indicative of a broken campaign finance system.
"Are we really living in a democracy when the richest man on earth can spend as much as he wants to elect his candidates?" Sanders asked in a social media post.
"The most important thing our nation can do is end Citizens United and move to public funding of elections," he added, referring to the 2010 Supreme Court decision that cleared the way for unlimited spending on elections by corporations. "Billionaires can’t be allowed to buy elections."
Democratic Maine State Auditor Matt Dunlap, currently running to represent Maine's second congressional district, also denounced Musk for throwing his weight around to buy politicians.
"Billionaires buy our elections, rig the tax code, and undermine our democracy," wrote Dunlap. "Working people deserve a government that works for them—not for billionaires like Elon Musk."
Musk is no stranger to spending big to help elect Republicans, having spent more than $250 million in 2024 to help secure President Donald Trump's victory.
However, his riches are no guarantee of a GOP win. Last year, for example, Musk spent millions to elect former Wisconsin Attorney General Brad Schimel to a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, only to wind up losing the race by 10 points.