November, 09 2010, 09:56am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Chris DeScherer (attorney), Southern Environmental Law Center,
843-720-5270.
Jim Murphy (attorney), National Wildlife Federation, 802-552-4325.
Nancy Cave, Coastal Conservation League, 843-545-0403.
Ben Gregg, SC Wildlife Federation, 803-256-0670.
Christine Ellis, Waccamaw Riverkeeper, 843-349-4007.
Lawsuit Aimed at Army Corps Leads to Protection of Critical Wetland South of Myrtle Beach
CHARLESTON, SC
Following a court challenge brought by conservation
groups, the Army Corps of Engineers has reversed its removal of
federal protection for a large wetland near Murrells Inlet, South
Carolina, and brought the wetland under the federal Clean Water Act.
"Despite the vital benefits wetlands provide to communities and
wildlife, many are at risk of being destroyed by development across
the South," said Chris DeScherer, Director of the Coast and Wetlands
Program at the Southern Environmental Law Center. "The Corps must
apply careful review to decisions regarding wetlands or the South will
continue to lose these invaluable natural resources at staggering
rates."
U.S. Supreme Court rulings over the past several years created
confusion over which wetlands are protected by the Clean Water Act and
essentially left it to the Corps to decide on a case-by-case basis for
most wetlands and streams. When Spectre, LLC, proposed to fill the
wetland in Horry County, the Corps declared the wetland "isolated" and
therefore not subject to federal protection.
The Southern Environmental Law Center and National Wildlife Federation
filed suit in federal court in 2009 on behalf of the Coastal
Conservation League, National Wildlife Federation, S.C. Wildlife
Federation, and Waccamaw Riverkeeper. An investigation by the
conservation groups indicated that the wetland is connected with the
Waccamaw River and should have been protected.
On November 1, 2010, the Corps filed its revised evaluation of the
wetland in federal district court in Charleston. The Corps' analysis
shows that the wetland is hydrologically connected to a tributary of
the Waccamaw River and that the wetland, along with other nearby
wetlands, provides significant benefits to downstream waters and the
surrounding area, including stormwater filtration, flood storage, and
vital habitat for wildlife.
"This lawsuit has demonstrated that the Corps must be vigilant in
evaluating wetlands and streams before stripping them of federal
protection under the Clean Water Act," said Nancy Cave, office
director of the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League's North
Coast office.
Wetlands improve water quality, buffer storms, and act as freshwater
reservoirs and habitat for fish, shellfish and migratory birds. When
hurricanes batter the coast, wetlands are the first line of defense
for communities. They absorb excess rainwater and filter runoff in
downpours. When drought threatens, wetlands are important natural
reservoirs. These benefits will be increasingly important for South
Carolina as the climate changes and flooding events and storm surges
likely increase in frequency and intensity. The extent of resources
put at risk due to the confusion created by the recent Supreme Court
rulings is staggering: in the continental U.S., about 60 percent of
our stream miles do not flow year round, and approximately 20 percent
of our more than 100 million acres of wetlands are geographically
isolated.
"This decision shows that if the Corps properly applies sound science
and looks at both the individual and aggregate benefits wetlands
provide, it can protect valuable wetlands in South Carolina and
throughout the Southeast," said Jim Murphy, attorney for the National
Wildlife Federation.
###
About South Carolina Coastal Conservation League
The Coastal Conservation League is a grassroots non-profit
conservation organization, founded in 1989 to protect the natural
environment of the South Carolina coastal plain and to enhance the
quality of life of our coastal communities. The League works with
individuals, businesses, and government to ensure balanced solutions.
About Southern Environmental Law Center
The Southern Environmental Law Center uses the power of the law to
protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia,
Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama).
Founded in 1986, SELC's staff of 40 attorneys includes experts on air
and energy, water, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation,
and land use. SELC is a non-profit organization and works with
more than 100 partner groups. www.SouthernEnvironment.org
https://selc.southernenvironment.org/site/R?i=ciR1iMctwCW3WQ1y4po7Lw..
About South Carolina Wildlife Federation
The South Carolina Wildlife Federation, SCWF, promotes effective
habitat conservation and respect for outdoor traditions through
statewide leadership, education, advocacy and partnerships. The
Federation was formed in 1931, when a handful of sportsmen
crisscrossed the state to recruit fellow outdoor enthusiasts. In just
a few months, around 2,000 people joined as charter members.
About National Wildlife Federation
National Wildlife Federation is America's conservation organization
inspiring Americans to protect wildlife for our children's future.
About Waccamaw Riverkeeper
The Waccamaw RIVERKEEPER(r) Program is a program of Winyah Rivers
Foundation. Our mission is to protect, preserve, monitor and
revitalize the health of the lands and waters of the greater Winyah
Bay watershed. We are a grassroots organization, working locally
to educate and advocate for protection of our watershed.
LATEST NEWS
To Push for Bold Treaty, Greenpeace Unveils Biden's Plastic Legacy Monument
"He can be the president who put an end to the plastic pollution crisis, or he can be the one who let it spiral out of control."
Mar 28, 2024
Inspired by Atlas, who in Greek mythology carried the heavens on his shoulders, Greenpeace installed a 15-foot monument outside the U.S. Capitol on Thursday to pressure the Biden administration to support an ambitious global plastics treaty.
President Joe Biden "has the chance to cement a lasting legacy: He can be the president who put an end to the plastic pollution crisis, or he can be the one who let it spiral out of control," Greenpeace oceans director John Hocevar said in a statement. "We're calling on him to stand up to plastic polluters like Exxon and Dow and put us on a greener and healthier path."
The third round of treaty talks ended in Kenya late last year with little progress—largely thanks to fossil fuel and chemical lobbyists along with allied governments. The next round of negotiations is set to be held in Canada next month.
The "Biden's Plastic Legacy" monument features the president kneeling and holding up an Earth full of plastic. The base has a written message: "Biden, the world's in your hands. Is this your plastic legacy?"
"Plastic pollution is everywhere, impacting every aspect of our lives. It affects our health, harms our communities, and fuels the climate crisis."
The statue's unveiling ceremony included remarks from Dr. Leo Trasande, a world-renowned environmental health researcher at New York University, and Jo Banner, who lives in Louisiana's Cancer Alley and co-directs the Descendants Project, an environmental justice group.
"The communities of color that live among the plastic manufacturers are first in line for the toxic mix of pollution they produce," said Banner. "Our health, bodies, and communities matter. We refuse to be treated as a mere checkmark on a list of concerns, and we cannot continue to be sacrificial zones."
"We need President Biden to truly listen to our needs and help create a strong global plastics treaty that protects communities like ours," she added. "We must ensure that Cancer Alley is confined to the past, not a part of the future we gift our children."
Trasande noted that in addition to the public health argument for cleaning up the plastic industry, there's an economic one.
"The chemicals found in plastics cost our economy hundreds of billions of dollars because of increases in disease and disability," the doctor said. "The easiest way to stop these diseases is to address plastic production, and a strong global treaty is essential, for people here in the U.S. and around the world."
Research has repeatedly shown the pervasiveness of plastic pollution. A January study found that there are 240,000 plastic particles in the average liter of bottled water. Last September, researchers discovered microplastics in clouds, potentially "contaminating nearly everything we eat and drink via 'plastic rainfall.'"
A 2022 Greenpeace report revealed that U.S. households "generated an estimated 51 million tons of plastic waste" the previous year, and the vast majority ended up in landfills or as pollution.
"Plastic pollution is everywhere, impacting every aspect of our lives. It affects our health, harms our communities, and fuels the climate crisis," Greenpeace campaigner Kate Melges said Thursday.
"The global plastics treaty is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create a cleaner, safer planet," Melges argued. "President Biden must rise to this moment by supporting a strong plastics treaty that prioritizes human health, cuts production, and ensures a just transition for workers and communities."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Justice Is Delayed' as Judges OK Rigged South Carolina Map for Elections
"I'm disappointed it appears 30,000 people lost their political voice and nobody seems to care," said one Democratic congressional candidate from the affected district.
Mar 28, 2024
Voting rights defenders on Thursday decried a federal panel's
decision to let South Carolina use a congressional map the three judges found to be racially gerrymandered in this year's primary and general elections due to the U.S. Supreme Court's delayed resolution of the case.
The three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for South Carolina in Columbia ruled last August that "race was the predominant motivating factor" in the Republican-controlled state Legislature's design of the 1st Congressional District "and that traditional districting principles subordinated to race."
Their ruling, which ordered the redrawing of the map, noted that "Charleston County was racially gerrymandered and over 30,000 African Americans were removed from their home district."
"Make no mistake—these discriminatory maps are a direct attempt to suppress Black voices ahead of a consequential election."
In their new decision, the judges acknowledged the awkward predicament of ordering the use of an unconstitutional map.
"But with the primary election procedures rapidly approaching, the appeal before the Supreme Court still pending, and no remedial plan in place, the ideal must bend to the practical," they asserted.
Brenda Murphy, president of the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, said: "Make no mistake—these discriminatory maps are a direct attempt to suppress Black voices ahead of a consequential election. We will not stand idly by as the rights of thousands of South Carolinians continue to be overlooked."
"The court's ruling today, further delaying these proceedings, continues to tip the scale of justice during a crucial moment in our democracy in an undemocratic attempt to sway the outcome of the upcoming election," Murphy added. "We must strive for a system where every voice is heard and every vote counts, free from the stain of discrimination."
Last October, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case, which was filed in 2021 by the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and voter Taiwan Scott. They are represented by the ACLU, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the ACLU of South Carolina, Boroughs Bryant LLC, Arnold & Porter, and the General Counsel's Office of the NAACP.
As Democracy Docket noted Thursday: "The parties asked the Supreme Court for a decision by January 1, 2024. Nearly three months later, the court still hasn't ruled on the case, creating a dire situation for congressional candidates as the candidate filing period started on March 16 and will end on Monday."
Joshua Douglas, a professor at the University of Kentucky Rosenberg College of Law, said on social media that "someone should write an article about the number of times jurisdictions have been allowed to use an illegal map because there's 'not enough time' to create a fair, legal one."
Douglas noted states where this has occurred, including Alabama, Louisiana, Ohio, North Carolina, "and now South Carolina."
South Carolina primary voters will head to the polls on June 11.
The 1st Congressional District is represented by Congresswoman Nancy Mace, a Republican. On Thursday, she toldThe Post and Courier that the judges' ruling "makes sense."
"It's only fair candidates know what the lines are," Mace said. "For us, I just want to know what constituents I'm serving."
Michael B. Moore, a Democrat running for the seat, called the decision "regrettable."
"I'm disappointed it appears 30,000 people lost their political voice," he said, "and nobody seems to care."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Weak Biden Endangered Species Rules a 'Massive Missed Opportunity'
"Imperiled plants and animals do not have the time for half-measures, since extinction is forever," one expert warned.
Mar 28, 2024
While welcoming efforts by President Joe Biden's administration to undo Trump-era damage to endangered species protections, conservationists warned Thursday that three new federal rules are inadequate, given the world's worsening biodiversity crisis.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries, which proposed the rules last June, said that they will "restore important protections for species and their habitats; strengthen the processes for listing species, designating of critical habitat, and consultation with other federal agencies; and ensure a science-based approach that will improve both agencies' ability to fulfill their responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)."
The Center for Biological Diversity—which had blasted the Trump administration for taking a "wrecking ball" to the decades-old law—praised the agencies for removing barriers to designating unoccupied areas as critical habitat as well as for restoring the "blanket rule" for threatened species and the ban on considering economic impacts of listing decisions.
However, the center also pointed out that "of the 31 harmful changes made in 2019 to the act's regulations, only seven are fully addressed and corrected in today's final rules," despite years of work on the new rules and nearly half a million public comments.
"We're mostly still stuck with the disastrous anti-wildlife changes made by the previous administration."
"This was a massive missed opportunity to address the worsening extinction crisis," said Stephanie Kurose, a senior policy specialist at the center. "We needed bold solutions to guide conservation as the climate crisis drives more and more animals and plants to extinction. Instead we're mostly still stuck with the disastrous anti-wildlife changes made by the previous administration."
Jamie Rappaport Clark, president and CEO of Defenders of Wildlife, similarly said that "while the regulations restore some essential wildlife protections, we were hopeful for far more than the marginal win the Biden administration delivered today."
"Our nation's threatened and endangered species are under constant attack and the Endangered Species Act is the only thing standing between them and extinction," she stressed. "We appreciate the administration's work on this matter, but at the end of the day much work remains to be done to ensure the Endangered Species Act can fulfill its critical lifesaving mission."
Experts at the environmental law organization Earthjustice also expressed disappointment that—as Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans put it—the Biden administration didn't fully seize "the opportunity to fully reverse the damage inflicted upon the Endangered Species Act and the imperiled species it protects."
Writing about former Republican President Donald Trump's gutting of the ESA—which Biden helped pass shortly after joining the U.S. Senate in 1973—Earthjustice president Abigail Dillen explained at The Progressive on Wednesday:
The dismantling of the ESA could not have come at a worse time. Scientists around the world are telling us that we are on track to lose a million or more species in this century. We have already witnessed a staggering drop of more than two-thirds of all plant and animal life on Earth since 1970. In the United States, nearly half of our ecosystems are now at risk of collapse. It is a staggering pace of loss that climate change is only accelerating.
It would have been far worse without the ESA. The law has saved 99% of listed species from extinction, including the bald eagle, Florida manatee, and the gray wolf, one of my first "clients" when I began my career as an environmental lawyer more than two decades ago.
Earthjustice attorney Kristen Boyles declared Thursday that "we are in the midst of an extinction crisis; it is time for bold action."
"Imperiled plants and animals do not have the time for half-measures," she noted, "since extinction is forever."
The new rules—expected to provoke lawsuits from farmers, ranchers, and right-wing groups—come as Biden and Trump prepare for a rematch in November.
"One of the lingering legacies of Donald Trump is his attempt to undermine the Endangered Species Act, one of the most successful and popular conservation laws in the history of the United States," Sierra Club executive director Ben Jealous said Thursday. "At this moment, we should be listening to scientists and acting urgently to save biodiversity, not letting Donald Trump's gutting of environmental safeguards and sellouts to Big Business stand."
"President Biden has made generational investments in climate action with the Inflation Reduction Act and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, but we need him to do more to protect imperiled wildlife," he added. "The Biden administration needs to protect more habitat, not less. We need the administration to increase protections for biodiversity, not abandon them. The president has the power, and we need him to use it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular