

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Chris DeScherer (attorney), Southern Environmental Law Center,
843-720-5270.
Jim Murphy (attorney), National Wildlife Federation, 802-552-4325.
Nancy Cave, Coastal Conservation League, 843-545-0403.
Ben Gregg, SC Wildlife Federation, 803-256-0670.
Christine Ellis, Waccamaw Riverkeeper, 843-349-4007.
Following a court challenge brought by conservation
groups, the Army Corps of Engineers has reversed its removal of
federal protection for a large wetland near Murrells Inlet, South
Carolina, and brought the wetland under the federal Clean Water Act.
"Despite the vital benefits wetlands provide to communities and
wildlife, many are at risk of being destroyed by development across
the South," said Chris DeScherer, Director of the Coast and Wetlands
Program at the Southern Environmental Law Center. "The Corps must
apply careful review to decisions regarding wetlands or the South will
continue to lose these invaluable natural resources at staggering
rates."
U.S. Supreme Court rulings over the past several years created
confusion over which wetlands are protected by the Clean Water Act and
essentially left it to the Corps to decide on a case-by-case basis for
most wetlands and streams. When Spectre, LLC, proposed to fill the
wetland in Horry County, the Corps declared the wetland "isolated" and
therefore not subject to federal protection.
The Southern Environmental Law Center and National Wildlife Federation
filed suit in federal court in 2009 on behalf of the Coastal
Conservation League, National Wildlife Federation, S.C. Wildlife
Federation, and Waccamaw Riverkeeper. An investigation by the
conservation groups indicated that the wetland is connected with the
Waccamaw River and should have been protected.
On November 1, 2010, the Corps filed its revised evaluation of the
wetland in federal district court in Charleston. The Corps' analysis
shows that the wetland is hydrologically connected to a tributary of
the Waccamaw River and that the wetland, along with other nearby
wetlands, provides significant benefits to downstream waters and the
surrounding area, including stormwater filtration, flood storage, and
vital habitat for wildlife.
"This lawsuit has demonstrated that the Corps must be vigilant in
evaluating wetlands and streams before stripping them of federal
protection under the Clean Water Act," said Nancy Cave, office
director of the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League's North
Coast office.
Wetlands improve water quality, buffer storms, and act as freshwater
reservoirs and habitat for fish, shellfish and migratory birds. When
hurricanes batter the coast, wetlands are the first line of defense
for communities. They absorb excess rainwater and filter runoff in
downpours. When drought threatens, wetlands are important natural
reservoirs. These benefits will be increasingly important for South
Carolina as the climate changes and flooding events and storm surges
likely increase in frequency and intensity. The extent of resources
put at risk due to the confusion created by the recent Supreme Court
rulings is staggering: in the continental U.S., about 60 percent of
our stream miles do not flow year round, and approximately 20 percent
of our more than 100 million acres of wetlands are geographically
isolated.
"This decision shows that if the Corps properly applies sound science
and looks at both the individual and aggregate benefits wetlands
provide, it can protect valuable wetlands in South Carolina and
throughout the Southeast," said Jim Murphy, attorney for the National
Wildlife Federation.
###
About South Carolina Coastal Conservation League
The Coastal Conservation League is a grassroots non-profit
conservation organization, founded in 1989 to protect the natural
environment of the South Carolina coastal plain and to enhance the
quality of life of our coastal communities. The League works with
individuals, businesses, and government to ensure balanced solutions.
About Southern Environmental Law Center
The Southern Environmental Law Center uses the power of the law to
protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia,
Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama).
Founded in 1986, SELC's staff of 40 attorneys includes experts on air
and energy, water, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation,
and land use. SELC is a non-profit organization and works with
more than 100 partner groups. www.SouthernEnvironment.org
https://selc.southernenvironment.org/site/R?i=ciR1iMctwCW3WQ1y4po7Lw..
About South Carolina Wildlife Federation
The South Carolina Wildlife Federation, SCWF, promotes effective
habitat conservation and respect for outdoor traditions through
statewide leadership, education, advocacy and partnerships. The
Federation was formed in 1931, when a handful of sportsmen
crisscrossed the state to recruit fellow outdoor enthusiasts. In just
a few months, around 2,000 people joined as charter members.
About National Wildlife Federation
National Wildlife Federation is America's conservation organization
inspiring Americans to protect wildlife for our children's future.
About Waccamaw Riverkeeper
The Waccamaw RIVERKEEPER(r) Program is a program of Winyah Rivers
Foundation. Our mission is to protect, preserve, monitor and
revitalize the health of the lands and waters of the greater Winyah
Bay watershed. We are a grassroots organization, working locally
to educate and advocate for protection of our watershed.
The president is trying to fire Fed Gov. Lisa Cook for alleged mortgage fraud. Critics say he's targeting another one of his political foes.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell reportedly plans to attend Wednesday's US Supreme Court oral arguments in the case involving President Donald Trump's attempt to fire Fed Gov. Lisa Cook.
A "person familiar with the matter" told the Associated Press on condition of anonymity that Powell would attend the high court session in the face of Trump's unprecedented effort to oust one of the seven members of the Fed's governing board.
Last August, Trump announced his termination of Cook—an appointee of former President Joe Biden—for alleged fraud, accusing her of signing two primary residence mortgages within weeks of each other. An investigation published last month by ProPublica revealed that Trump did the same thing that he's accusing Cook of doing.
Cook denies any wrongdoing, has not been charged with any crime, and has filed a lawsuit challenging Trump’s attempt to fire her. In October, the Supreme Court declined to immediately remove Cook and agreed to hear oral arguments in the case.
In what many critics allege is an attempt by Trump to strong-arm the Fed into further interest rate cuts, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) earlier this month served the central bank with grand jury subpoenas related to Powell's congressional testimony on renovations to Fed headquarters in Washington, DC.
Powell—who was nominated by Trump in 2017 and whose four-year term as Fed chair ends May 15—responded by alleging that “the threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the president."
"This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions—or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation," he added.
Trump is trying to install his puppets at the Fed.First by trying to fire Lisa Cook and rushing in his top econ adviser.Now by abusing the law to try to push Jerome Powell out for good.Next he'll nominate a new Chair—and Trump says “anybody that disagrees" with him is out.
[image or embed]
— Elizabeth Warren (@warren.senate.gov) January 15, 2026 at 7:54 AM
In addition to Cook, Trump has targeted a number of Democrats with what critics say are dubious mortgage fraud claims.
Last November, a federal judge dismissed a DOJ criminal case against New York Attorney General Letitia James, who was charged with bank fraud and false statements regarding a property in Virginia. Critics called the charges against James—who successfully prosecuted Trump for financial crimes—baseless and politically motivated. A federal grand jury subsequently rejected another administration attempt to indict James.
The president has accused other political foes, including US Sen. Adam Schiff and Rep. Eric Swalwell—both California Democrats who played key roles in both of the president’s House impeachments—of similar fraud. Swalwell is currently under formal criminal investigation. Both lawmakers deny the allegations.
"Billionaires can’t be allowed to buy elections."
After flirting last year with forming his own political party, far-right billionaire Elon Musk is funding Republican political candidates once again.
Axios reported on Monday that Musk recently made a massive $10 million donation to bolster Nate Morris, a MAGA candidate who is vying to replace retiring US Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
Axios described the massive donation, the largest Musk has ever given to a Senate candidate, as "the biggest sign yet that Musk plans to spend big in the 2026 midterms, giving Republicans a formidable weapon in the expensive battle to keep their congressional majorities."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) reacted with disgust to the news, and said that Musk's enormous donation was indicative of a broken campaign finance system.
"Are we really living in a democracy when the richest man on earth can spend as much as he wants to elect his candidates?" Sanders asked in a social media post.
"The most important thing our nation can do is end Citizens United and move to public funding of elections," he added, referring to the 2010 Supreme Court decision that cleared the way for unlimited spending on elections by corporations. "Billionaires can’t be allowed to buy elections."
Democratic Maine State Auditor Matt Dunlap, currently running to represent Maine's second congressional district, also denounced Musk for throwing his weight around to buy politicians.
"Billionaires buy our elections, rig the tax code, and undermine our democracy," wrote Dunlap. "Working people deserve a government that works for them—not for billionaires like Elon Musk."
Musk is no stranger to spending big to help elect Republicans, having spent more than $250 million in 2024 to help secure President Donald Trump's victory.
However, his riches are no guarantee of a GOP win. Last year, for example, Musk spent millions to elect former Wisconsin Attorney General Brad Schimel to a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, only to wind up losing the race by 10 points.
"This is the third person who has died in the $1.24 billion privately-run facility that focuses on profits instead of meeting basic standards," said one lawmaker.
Officials in both Texas and Minnesota are calling for accountability and a full investigation into conditions at Camp East Montana, the sprawling detention complex at Fort Bliss in El Paso, Texas, following the third reported death at the facility in less than two months.
Victor Manuel Diaz, 36, was detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers in Minneapolis, where ICE has been carrying out violent immigration arrests, cracking down on dissent, and where one officer fatally shot a legal observer earlier this month.
He was one of roughly 2,903 detainees being held at Camp East Montana at Fort Bliss US Army base, one of the largest ICE detention centers in the country, on January 14 when contract security workers found him “unconscious and unresponsive” in his cell.
He was later pronounced dead and ICE released a statement saying he had died of "presumed suicide," but officials arre still investigating his cause of death.
Diaz's death comes days after it was reported that a medical examiner in Texas was planning to classify another death reported at Camp East Montana—that of Geraldo Lunas Campos—as a homicide.
A doctor said Lunas Campos' preliminary cause of death in early January was "asphyxia due to neck and chest compression." An eyewitness said he had seen several guards in a struggle with the 55-year-old Cuban immigrant and then saw guards choking Lunas Campos.
A month prior of Lunas Campos' death, 49-year-old Guatemalan immigrant Francisco Gaspar-Andres died at a nearby hospital; he was a detainee at Camp East Montana. ICE said medical staff attributed his death to "natural liver and kidney failure.”
Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan called for a "complete and transparent investigation" into what happened to Diaz after his death was announced Sunday.
"We deserve answers," said Flanagan.
US Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas), who last year expressed concern about the US government's deal with a small private business, Acquisition Logistics LLC, to run Camp East Montana, said the detention center "must be shut down immediately," warning that "two deaths in one month means conditions are worsening."
After the administration awarded a $1.2 billion contract to Acquisition Logistics to build and operate the camp, lawmakers and legal experts raised questions about the decision, considering the small company had no listed experience running detention centers, its headquarters was listed as a Virginia residential address, and the president and CEO of the company did not respond to media inquiries.
"It's far too easy for standards to slip," Escobar told PBS Newshour after touring the facility. "Private facilities far too frequently operate with a profit margin in mind as opposed to a governmental facility."
In September, ICE's own inspectors found at least 60 violations of federal standards, with employees failing to treat and monitor detainees' medical conditions and the center lacking safety procedures and methods for detainees to contact their lawyers.
Across all of ICE's detention facilities, 2025 was the deadliest year for immigrant detainees in more than two decades, with 32 people dying in the agency's centers.
After Diaz's death was reported Sunday, former National Nurses United communications adviser Charles Idelson said that "ICE detention centers are functioning like death camps."