

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Michael Stulman (202) 546-7961
Monday, March 8th marks International Women's Day, and the 15th
anniversary of the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women,
held in Beijing. 189 countries signed on to a Beijing Platform for
Action, pledging to work towards the advancement of women and the
achievement of gender equality.
On this day, Africa Action celebrates the many achievements of women.
Throughout the continent, women are organizing to strengthen and
reinforce women's movements and civil society organization's capacity
for gender advocacy and activism. Take for example, the political
leadership emerging among women in Rwanda, Ethiopia, or Liberia. There
are also vibrant civil society organizations across the continent
working to enhance women's rights, including Zimbabwe's Women of
Zimbabwe Arise (WOZA), Zambia's Women For Change (WFC), or the
Daughters of Mumbi Global Resource Center in Kenya.
Sadly, we also mark the occasion with a recognition that the global
HIV/AIDS crisis continues to take a disproportionate toll on women.
Africa Action calls on the U.S. and international policymakers to do
more to address the vulnerability of women and girls to HIV/AIDS and
other health challenges.
Today, women still face discrimination and inequality. HIV/AIDS is the
leading cause of death of women of between the ages of 15-44.
To
address the effects of HIV/AIDS on women, Africa Action urges U.S.
policymakers to support HIV prevention programs that are targeted to
women, which empower them to make their own sexual decisions. HIV
treatment programs must include drugs to prevent mother-to-child
transmission, and treatment access to women must be ensured so they
continue to lead productive and healthy lives.
Sub-Saharan Africa continues to be the
region most heavily affected by HIV, and in 2008 accounted for 67
percent of HIV infections worldwide. Women represent the majority of
infections, accounting for about 60 percent. In Cote d'Ivoire, for
example, the HIV prevalence among women was twice as high as among
males in 2005, and women in South Africa are three times as likely to
contract HIV than men.
The high rate of sexual violence is one
of the main contributors to HIV infections among women. The BBC
reports that 70 percent of women around the globe are forced to have
unprotected sex. A recent study in
Lesotho found that 47 percent of men and 40 percent of women believe
that women have no right to refuse sex with their husbands or
boyfriends.
More broadly, the disproportionate effect of the epidemic on women is a
result of gender inequality, with AIDS services not responding to the
needs of women. Women are also increasingly vulnerable to the epidemic
due to social, legal and economic disadvantages.
Even in the U.S., about one in four Americans living with HIV are
women, and among African American women, HIV/AIDS is the leading cause
of death for those between the ages of 25 and 34.
The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria takes into
account women's experiences, as women affected by the disease
contribute to the the Fund's treatment and prevention programs. The
United Nations Trust Fund grantees in 2009 also make a compelling case
for how much can be done with strategic support. For example, in the
Democratic Republic of Congo, a grantee equipped 300 civil society
leaders with new knowledge of paralegal services that permitted
thousands of women survivors of sexual violence, including many with
HIV, to access justice.
Africa Action and civil society organizations across Africa have
charged that President Obama's global health budget plan represents a
significant reduction from commitments made in campaign promises and by
Congressional pledges. In a report released in 2009, Africa Action and
other human rights organizations, evaluated President Obama's first
year in office-giving the President and his Administration a 'D+' for
work so far on HIV/AIDS. President's first budget request to Congress,
for fiscal year 2010, essentially froze spending for global AIDS at
fiscal year 2009 levels.
Finally, Africa Action calls for better health care services,
especially reproductive health care, that can be made accessible and
affordable to women everywhere. Many African governments are unable to
devote adequate funds to public health, due to the outstanding debt.
Debt cancellation is one way to encourage the allocation of more
resources to HIV/AIDS treatment and education programs focused on
prevention. Even in the U.S., women in economically disadvantaged
communities are often unable to receive adequate basic healthcare and
HIV treatment, and more funding must be devoted to health services in
these areas.
Ultimately, the disproportionate effect of HIV/AIDS on women indicates
that women's human rights are not being adequately protected. Women
are often the backbone of African society responsible for educating
children, running households as well as performing fundamental income
generating activities that are crucial to subsistence.
Women's right to health must be enforced through access to treatment
and prevention programs that allow them to persevere in their pivotal
roles, and live long, productive, and fulfilling lives. As long as
women continue to suffer sexual violence, whether in a situation of
armed conflict or at the hands of their husbands and partners, their
physical and mental health will be increasingly at risk. While health
resources, including those relating to HIV/AIDS, are fundamental to
ensuring women's rights, the international community must take a
holistic approach in everything from foreign policy to aid and trade to
prevent the continued and systematic undervaluation of women throughout
the world.
Africa Action is a national organization that works for political, economic and social justice in Africa. Through the provision of accessible information and analysis combined with the mobilization of public pressure we work to change the policies and policy-making processes of U.S. and multinational institutions toward Africa. The work of Africa Action is grounded in the history and purpose of its predecessor organizations, the American Committee on Africa (ACOA), The Africa Fund, and the Africa Policy Information Center (APIC), which have fought for freedom and justice in Africa since 1953. Continuing this tradition, Africa Action seeks to re-shape U.S. policy toward African countries.
"This move undermines the integrity of nonpartisan election administration," said Arizona's secretary of state.
US President Donald Trump late Thursday forced out the remaining three members of an independent, bipartisan commission that assists state election officials across the country, a move that critics condemned as a "pathetic power grab" ahead of the 2026 midterms.
The two Democratic members of the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), Benjamin Hovland and Thomas Hicks, were fired, and Republican Commissioner Christy McCormick resigned at the White House's request, according to ProPublica. The agency, established by Congress more than two decades ago, now lacks leadership and any ability to make decisions, just months before the 2026 elections.
The EAC, as its website states, is "an independent, bipartisan commission whose mission is to help election officials improve the administration of elections and help Americans participate in the voting process." In an executive order last year, Trump ordered the EAC to implement proof-of-citizenship requirements in the federal voter registration process, along with other changes. The president's effort to impose his policy demands on the EAC was mostly blocked in federal court.
Trump, who has said he wants his administration to "take over" voting nationwide ahead of the 2026 midterms, has since taken other steps that watchdogs and Democratic lawmakers say amount to an attempt to preemptively subvert the coming elections, including a sweeping assault on mail-in voting—which is also facing legal challenges. Legislatively, Trump is pushing Republicans to pass the SAVE America Act, a bill that experts say would prevent millions of Americans from voting.
Michael Waldman, president and CEO of the Brennan Center for Justice, said Thursday's EAC firings "are deeply concerning in light of President Trump’s relentless efforts to try to interfere in elections."
"These removals leave the agency without leadership and unable to carry out its major responsibilities," said Waldman. "The guardrails Congress placed on this agency are clear and must be followed: The Election Assistance Commission was designed to be bipartisan with four members, no more than two of which can be from the same political party. The agency cannot make any significant decisions or take any significant actions unless three confirmed commissioners agree. Until bipartisan replacements are confirmed, the agency cannot lawfully make any decisions that affect how Americans vote."
Lisa Gilbert, co-president of Public Citizen, said Trump's termination of EAC commissioners underscores that "he’s scared of the voting power of the American people."
"This move is another pathetic attempt to sow doubt in our elections, which are safely and expertly run by states and localities," said Gilbert. "This agency deserves a steady hand and expert leadership. That said, it is important for voters to know that states and localities, not the EAC, run our elections. Even more importantly, it is the voters who decide who takes office."
The EAC firings came less than two weeks after the conservative-dominated US Supreme Court handed Trump the power to purge independent agencies at will with its Trump v. Slaughter ruling, erasing around 90 years of precedent.
Election law expert Rick Hasen warned in a blog post on Thursday that Trump "could try to direct the commissioner-less EAC to do his bidding, for example by stating that the EAC must amend the federal voter registration form that states must accept for federal elections to include documentary proof of citizenship."
"Trump’s first voting-related EO tried to do this, and he was stymied. But that was acting through the commissioners and before the Slaughter case," Hasen noted. "If he tries anything like this, it will be high-profile and very important litigation that will end up at the Supreme Court on the emergency docket over the summer."
Adrian Fontes, Arizona’s Democratic secretary of state, said in a statement late Thursday that the EAC purge was "irresponsible and dangerous," accusing the administration of remaining "dead set on causing chaos for our election officials across this country."
"This move undermines the integrity of nonpartisan election administration," Fontes added.
Salgado "called Houston home for 35 years," said New York's democratic socialist mayor. "On Tuesday, an ICE agent shot and killed him."
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani on Thursday renewed his call to "abolish ICE" after a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent fatally shot a man in Texas earlier this week.
"Lorenzo Salgado Araujo called Houston home for 35 years. On Tuesday, an ICE agent shot and killed him," Mamdani said on social media. "His family learned of his death from a video before anyone bothered to knock on their door."
"New York City stands with the Salgado family in demanding a full, independent investigation and real accountability," the mayor added. "To the Salgado family and any immigrant family in this city living in fear: We grieve with you, and we will continue to stand beside you in the pursuit of justice."
More than 1,000 people gathered in Houston's East End on Wednesday evening to denounce ICE and remember Salgado, a 52-year-old married father of three originally from Mexico who, according to relatives, was in the process of legalizing his status in the United States.
Salgado's son, school teacher Ronaldo Salgado, said that his father had "dedicated his life to giving his family the American dream."
Salgado was driving in the Magnolia Park neighborhood to pick up his construction crew on Tuesday morning when an unidentified ICE agent fatally shot him during an enforcement operation. ICE claimed that Salgado tried to evade arrest and threatened agents with his vehicle, but his family, civil rights advocates, and community leaders strongly dispute that account, pointing to surveillance footage and eyewitness accounts that they argue undermine the agency's narrative.
A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told The New York Times late on Thursday that neither Salgado nor any of his three passengers were the targets of ICE enforcement, but that they drew agents' attention because one of them resembled a wanted man from Guatemala.
Democratic lawmakers and civil rights groups have joined Salgado's relatives in demanding an independent investigation of his killing.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum announced Thursday that her government plans to file criminal complaints in the United States in connection with 14 Mexican nationals who died in ICE custody. Sheinbaum added that Salgado's killing "is not only sad and regrettable, but also appears to have been targeted."
On-duty officers from ICE and other Department of Homeland Security agencies have fatally shot at least four other people during President Donald Trump's deadly second-term crackdown on undocumented immigrants: Silverio Villegas González of Mexico and US citizens Ruben Ray Martinez, Renee Good, and Alex Pretti.
At least dozens of people have also died in ICE custody or shortly after being released during Trump's second term. Last month, ICE announced that it was rescinding a 2021 Biden administration policy requiring congressional notification and an investigation whenever a detainee died within 30 days of their release.
“Consumers are getting really screwed by all of this,” said one critic.
Political appointees installed by President Donald Trump are overruling career attorneys inside the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division, intervening to weaken or halt investigations into major corporate mergers in a way never seen before, MS NOW reported Thursday.
Three unnamed sources told the outlet "that DOJ staff have privately complained that the Trump administration is essentially deciding not to enforce antitrust laws that are critical to keeping companies from becoming single-source providers and being able to charge enormous sums for their product or service."
According to MS NOW:
The two mergers that DOJ leaders are ramming through include two low-cost Mexican air carriers, Viva Aerobus and Volaris, who announced their plans to merge last year, and the proposed merger of the Italian firm Saipem and UK firm Subsea7, who together control a sizable portion of sales for equipment used for subsea oil operations. Major oil companies, including ExxonMobil, Petrobras and TotalEnergies, have filed formal objections with federal regulators about the latter merger, arguing to antitrust regulators that the combined firms will create a subsea monopoly that will increase costs, delay critical projects and force clients into expensive, long-term contracts.
Experts say the aforementioned mergers are likely to drive up prices US consumers pay for airfare to Mexico and at the gas pump, yet again giving the lie to Trump's "America First" pledge.
Current and former DOJ officials described Trump's interference as without precedent.
“It’s unilateral surrender on antitrust enforcement; it’s absolutely unprecedented,” Bill Baer, the former assistant attorney general for the antitrust division during the Obama administration. “It’s definitely going to hurt consumers. It means prices will go up, concentration is going to increase—and quality often diminishes when you have only a few firms operating in the same market.”
The DOJ Antitrust Division was originally launched more than a century ago during the tail-end of the Progressive Era to combat monopolies and enforce antitrust legislation like the Clayton Antitrust Act and the Gilded Age-era Sherman Act. It was formally created during the Great Depression following weak enforcement of the Sherman and Clayton acts, as the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration viewed concentrated corporate power as a threat not only to consumers but to democracy itself.
While the postwar decades saw relatively aggressive antitrust enforcement by presidents of both major parties, the Reagan administration adopted a much more permissive merger philosophy that laid the groundwork for decades of consolidation across industries that has continued to this day, despite limited antitrust revivals during the Obama and Biden administrations.
Biden-era Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan and DOJ officials pursued a more aggressive antitrust agenda that Trump has been rolling back in favor of deregulation. Critics have pointed out that Trump has sometimes used antitrust mechanisms selectively, targeting certain media or technology companies for political reasons rather than consistently applying a broad anti-monopoly approach.
According to an article published last month in The Wall Street Journal, Stanley Woodward, the senior DOJ official now overseeing antitrust enforcement, has told department lawyers that he favors resolving cases through settlements rather than taking corporations to trial. Some antitrust attorneys interpreted the remarks as a directive to avoid litigation and seek settlements in ongoing and future cases. Critics say Woodward’s posture could weaken the DOJ's ability to challenge monopolistic mergers in favor of fast-tracked settlements.
"He's taking litigation off the table, and you don’t get a settlement absent a litigation threat,” one person with knowledge of Woodward's actions told MS NOW. “I can’t think of an administration in history that would want to run antitrust policy like this.”
“Consumers are getting really screwed by all of this,” the person continued. “We’re talking 10 years of consumer harm that can’t be undone.”