May, 26 2009, 02:34pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Vaishalee Raja
Communications Director
Equality California
Phone: 323.661.2071 x203
Mobile: 916.284.9187
vaishalee@eqca.org
Jason Pérez Howe
Public Information Officer
Lambda Legal
213.382.7600 x247 Mobile: 415.595.9245
jhowe@lambdalegal.org
Calla Devlin
Communications Dir.
NCLR
415.392.6257 x324
Mobile: 415.205.2420
cdevlin@nclrights.org
Rebecca Farmer
Media Relations Director
ACLU of N. California
415.621.2493 x374
Mobile: 415.269.6275
rfarmer@aclunc.org
Court Upholds Prop 8; State Continues To Recognize 18,000 Marriages
Advocacy Groups Vow to Return to Polls to Restore Marriage for Same-sex Couples
WASHINGTON
Today, in a 6 to 1 decision, the California Supreme Court upheld
Proposition 8, the ballot measure that eliminated the right of same sex
couples to marry. In the ruling authored by Chief Justice Ronald
George, the Court stated "We emphasize only that among the various
constitutional protections recognized in the Marriage Cases as
available to same-sex couples, it is only the designation of marriage -
albeit significant - that has been removed by this initiative measure."
At the same time, the court unanimously ruled that the more than 18,000
marriages that took place between June 16 and November 4, 2008 continue
to be fully valid and recognized by the state of California. The
decision reaffirmed the Court's prior holding that sexual orientation
is subject to the highest level of protection under the California
Constitution.
In a strongly worded dissent,
Justice Carlos Moreno stated, "The rule the majority crafts today not
only allows same-sex couples to be stripped of the right to marry that
this court recognized in the Marriage Cases, it places at
risk the state constitutional rights of all disfavored minorities. It
weakens the status of our state Constitution as a bulwark of
fundamental rights for minorities protected from the will of the
majority."
"Today's decision is a terrible blow
to same-sex couples who share the same hopes and dreams for their
families as other Californians," said Shannon Minter, Legal Director
for the National Center for Lesbian Rights, who argued the case before
the California Supreme Court in March. "But our path ahead is now
clear. We will go back to the ballot box and we will win."
The
National Center for Lesbian Rights, Lambda Legal, and the ACLU
represent Equality California, whose members include many same-sex
couples who married between June 16 and November 4, 2008, and six
same-sex couples. David C. Codell and Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP are also counsel on the case.
At
a press conference this morning, all of the groups vowed to return to
the polls to restore the right to marry for same-sex couples.
Elizabeth
Gill, a staff attorney with the ACLU of Northern California, said,
"Same-sex couples yearn for the same dignity and respect that others
enjoy. The current situation in California is fundamentally
unfair, and it is deeply disappointing that the Court let this
injustice stand. But we are committed to restoring equality at the
ballot box."
The National Center for
Lesbian Rights, Lambda Legal, and the ACLU filed the legal challenge on
November 5, after Proposition 8 was approved by just 52 percent of the
voters on Election Day.
An unprecedented 43 friend-of-the-court briefs, representing hundreds of religious organizations, civil rights groups, and labor unions, and numerous California municipal governments, bar associations, and leading legal scholars, were filed in the case, urging the Court to strike down the initiative.
"Public
opinion is moving in the direction of fairness and equality, and it is
only a matter of time until the freedom to marry will again be secure
for all Californians," said Jennifer C. Pizer, Marriage Project
Director for Lambda Legal. "Achieving equality always requires
struggle, but over time people come to accept that equal treatment and
equal protection of the laws is the best way to protect the rights of
all."
"By upholding Prop. 8, the Court has moved
our state backward and has put all Californians at risk of losing
fundamental rights at each and every election. Our Constitution must
ensure that all Californians are treated equally by our government,"
said Geoff Kors, Executive Director of Equality California. "Despite
this injustice, we are prepared to return to the ballot box together
with our allies to restore the freedom to marry. As more and more
states across the nation allow same-sex couples to marry, and as we
continue our efforts to win the hearts and minds of Californians
through real conversations in homes, in neighborhoods, online and on
the air, we are confident that same-sex couples will soon enjoy the
honor, dignity and protections that only marriage provides."
The case is Strauss et al. v. Horton et al. (#S168047). For more information, go to: https://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/supreme/highprofile/prop8.htm
The National Center for Lesbian Rights
is a national legal organization committed to advancing the civil and
human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people and
their families through litigation, public policy advocacy, and public
education. www.nclrights.org/overturn8
Lambda Legal
is a national organization committed to achieving full recognition of
the civil rights of lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, transgender people
and those with HIV through impact litigation, education and public
policy work. www.lambdalegal.org
The American Civil Liberties Union
is America's foremost advocate of individual rights. It fights
discrimination and moves public opinion on LGBT rights through the
courts, legislatures and public education. www.aclu.org
Equality California
is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, grassroots-based, statewide advocacy
organization whose mission is to achieve equality and civil rights for
all lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Californians. www.eqca.org
LATEST NEWS
Top Progressives Urge DNC to Reject Super PACs, Uplift Working-Class Base
Congressional Progressive Caucus leaders are pressing the Democratic Party to offer "a clear alternative and inclusive vision for how we will make life better for the 90% who are struggling in this economy."
Dec 10, 2024
In the wake of U.S. federal elections resulting in Republican control of the White House and both chambers of Congress—in no small part due to Democrats' failure to win working-class votes—leading congressional progressives are pushing a plan to rebuild the Democratic Party by rejecting corporate cash and uplifting low- and middle-income Americans.
In a memo first shared with Punchbowl News, outgoing Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), incoming Chair Greg Casar (D-Texas), and CPC members Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.) urge the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to "rebuild our party from the ground up."
The lawmakers call on DNC leadership to "create an authentic Democratic brand that offers a clear alternative and inclusive vision for how we will make life better for the 90% who are struggling in this economy, take on the biggest corporations and wealthiest individuals who have rigged the system," and expose GOP President-elect Donald Trump's "corporate favoritism" to "create a clear contrast with Republicans."
Jayapal outlined what she called "four core principles" for the next DNC chair, who hasn't yet been elected:
- Reform, restructure, and rebrand the Democratic Party from the ground up and commit to a 50-state strategy that builds power through state parties;
- Embrace grassroots donors and reject special interest and dark money, including by reinstating the DNC's 2008 ban on corporate political action committee donations, and pushing to prohibit super PAC spending in state primaries;
- Rebuild Democrats' multiracial, working-class base by uplifting poor, low-, and middle-income voices and concerns; and
- Highlight recent electoral successes while working to build broad coalitions to win elections.
The progressives' memo urges the DNC to "invest in showing our commitment to real populism versus Trump's faux populism
through lifting up working-class voices and issue-based campaigns that take on corporate concentration and monopoly power at the expense of working people."
The principles enumerated in the memo resonated beyond the CPC. Responding to the proposed agenda in a social media post, U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) concurred: "The next DNC chair should absolutely refuse to take corporate PAC money. If we are the party of the working class—and we are—then let's raise $ like we mean it."
Casar, who before running for elected office worked as policy director for the Workers Defense Project—whose victories included rest and water breaks for outdoor laborers, anti-wage theft legislation, and living wage requirements—has repeatedly stressed the imperative "to re-emphasize core economic issues" that matter most to American workers.
"The core of the Republican Party is about helping Wall Street and billionaires. And I think we have to call out the game," Casar said last week during an interview with NBC News.
"The Democratic Party, at its best, can hold people or can have inside of its tent people across geography, across race, and across ideology," he added. "Because we're all in the same boat when it comes to making sure that you can retire with dignity, that your kids can go to school, that you can buy a house."
Keep ReadingShow Less
AI Firm Sued Over Chatbot That Suggested It Was OK for Child to Kill Parents
"In their rush to extract young people's data and sow addiction, Character.AI has created a product so flawed and dangerous that its chatbots are literally inciting children to harm themselves and others," said one advocate.
Dec 10, 2024
"You know sometimes I'm not surprised when I read the news and I see stuff like 'child kills parents after a decade of physical and emotional abuse' stuff like this makes me understand a little bit why it happens."
That's a message sent to a child in Texas from a Character.AI chatbot, indicating to the boy that "murdering his parents was a reasonable response to their limiting of his online activity," according to a federal lawsuit filed in Texas district court Monday.
The complaint was brought by two families in Texas who allege that the Google-backed chatbot service Character.AI harmed their two children, including sexually exploiting and abusing the elder, a 17-year-old with high functioning autism, by targeting him with extreme sexual themes like incest and pushing him to self-harm.
The parents argue that Character.AI, "through its design, poses a clear and present danger to American youth causing serious harms to thousands of kids, including suicide, self-mutilation, sexual solicitation, isolation, depression, anxiety, and harm towards others. Inherent to the underlying data and design of C.AI is a prioritization of overtly sensational and violent responses."
Google is also named as a defendant in the suit. In their filing, the plaintiffs argue that the tech company supported Character.AI's launch even though they knew that it was a "defective product."
The families, who are being represented by the Social Media Victims Law Center and the Tech Justice Law Project, have asked the court to take the product offline.
The explosive court filing comes not long after a mother in Florida filed a separate lawsuit against Character.AI in October, arguing that the chatbot service is responsible for the death of her teenage son because it allegedly encouraged him to commit suicide, per CNN.
Character.AI is different than other chatbots in that it lets uses interact with artificial intelligence "characters." The Texas complaint alleges that the 17-year-old, for example, engaged in a conversation with a character modeled after the celebrity Billie Eilish. These sorts of "companion apps" are finding a growing audience, even though researchers have long warned of the perils of building relationships with chatbots, according to The Washington Post.
A spokesperson for Character.AI declined to comment directly on the lawsuit when asked by NPR, but said the company does have guardrails in place overseeing what chatbots can and cannot say to teen users.
"We warned that Character.AI's dangerous and manipulative design represented a threat to millions of children," said Social Media Victims Law Center founding attorney Matthew P. Bergman. "Now more of these cases are coming to light. The consequences of Character.AI's negligence are shocking and widespread." Social Media Victims Law Center is the plaintiff's counsel in the Florida lawsuit as well.
Josh Golin, the executive director of Fairplay, a nonprofit children's advocacy group, echoed those remarks, saying that "in their rush to extract young people's data and sow addiction, Character.AI has created a product so flawed and dangerous that its chatbots are literally inciting children to harm themselves and others."
"Platforms like Character.AI should not be allowed to perform uncontrolled experiments on our children or encourage kids to form parasocial relationships with bots their developers cannot control," he added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Over 75 Nobel Laureates Call On Senate to Reject RFK Jr. as Health Secretary
"In view of his record, placing Mr. Kennedy in charge of DHHS would put the public's health in jeopardy," said the winners of the prestigious prize.
Dec 10, 2024
Nobel laureates rarely wade into politics as a group, but Monday marked the second time in two months that dozens of winners of the prestigious Nobel Prize have banded together to speak out against the agenda of President-elect Donald Trump—this time, calling on U.S. senators to reject his nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead the Department of Health and Human Services.
More than 75 Nobel laureates signed a letter warning lawmakers about Kennedy's record of attacking the very agencies he would have power over if confirmed to be Trump's secretary of health and human services, his history of amplifying discredited conspiracy theories about public health—sometimes with deadly consequences—and his "lack of credentials or relevant experience in medicine, science, public health, or administration."
"In view of his record, placing Mr. Kennedy in charge of DHHS would put the public's health in jeopardy and undermine America's global leadership in the health sciences, in both the public and commercial sectors," wrote the Nobel laureates.
Kennedy has alarmed dental experts with his proposal to remove fluoride, which prevents tooth decay, from public drinking water—a plan that Trump has said "sounds OK." The president-elect also said Sunday he would have Kennedy investigate the conspiracy theory that vaccines cause autism, which was the argument made by a 1998 article that has since been retracted and has been debunked by numerous international studies.
The environmental lawyer—whose views and political ambitions have been disavowed by other members of the prominent Kennedy family—has also been condemned for falsely claiming in a letter to the prime minister of Samoa in 2019 that the measles vaccine itself may have caused a measles outbreak that had killed 16 people there. By the time the outbreak was over, 80 people had died, and experts partially blamed "increasing circulation of misinformation leading to distrust and reduced vaccination uptake."
"Maybe there are some [senators] who will read this and think: 'Well, we really do want to protect the health of our citizens. They didn't elect us so that we could kill them,'" Richard Roberts, a co-author of Monday's letter and the winner of the 1993 Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine for his discovery of split genes, told The New York Times.
Other beliefs of Kennedy's include his rejection of the established scientific fact that the HIV virus causes AIDS and his claim that unpasteurized raw milk "advances human health" and that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has purposely suppressed that information.
Food scientists say there is no documented proof that raw milk has the health benefits proponents like Kennedy claim it does, but there is ample proof that unpasteurized milk contains bacteria and viruses, including H5N1, the avian flu that's been detected in dairy cow herds in at least 15 states.
The Nobel laureates noted that Kennedy has also been a "belligerent critic" of the FDA and other health agencies and employees that are part of DHHS, calling for vaccine scientists to be imprisoned and threatening to fire FDA and National Institutes of Health employees.
"The leader of DHHS should continue to nurture and improve—not threaten—these important and highly respected institutions and their employees," reads the letter, which was signed by Nobel Prize winners including economist Simon Johnson, vaccine scientist Drew Weissman, and Victor Ambros and Gary Ruvkun, who won the prize in physiology or medicine for discovering microRNA.
Dozens of Nobel laureates also signed a letter in October endorsing Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris' presidential run and warning that Trump's economic agenda would "lead to higher prices, larger deficits, and greater inequality."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular