December, 23 2008, 05:17am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Sean Kenny +44 7766 443 506Â - skenny@oxfam.org.uk
Roy Probert +44 (0)77 3800 3555 - roy.probert@oxfaminternational.org
Louis Belanger +1 917 224 0834 - Louis.belanger@oxfaminternational.org
Oxfam Closes Historic Tsunami Response
WASHINGTON
Oxfam International is
preparing to close its response to Indian Ocean tsunami at the end of
this month, four years after the disaster. Oxfam and its local partner
organizations assisted 2.5 million people in seven tsunami-affected
countries in the largest emergency program in its history.
In a
report published today, Barbara Stocking, the chair of the Oxfam
International Tsunami Fund Board, said: "What has been achieved is
astounding. Hundreds of thousands of people are now living in better
conditions than they were in before the tsunami thanks to the generous
support we received from the public, the hard work of our staff and
local partners and the resilience of the affected communities to
rebuild their lives".
Oxfam received $294 million in donations to
help affected people - more than 90 per cent of it from the public. The
sum was used in Indonesia for instance where Oxfam was the first
international agency to provide housing to tsunami survivors in Aceh,
going on to build 1,566 permanent houses. In Sri Lanka, the
international aid agency helped to restore the livelihoods of almost
170,000 people. Oxfam also funded, amongst other projects, the
reconstruction of eight tsunami-affected secondary schools serving
around 6,000 students each year. In India, Oxfam helped to restore the
livelihoods of 660,000 people and create structures to allow them to
save money.
"The money we received allowed us not only to help
meet the immediate emergency needs of tsunami-affected populations, but
also to try to address the factors that made them vulnerable: not least
poverty and a lack of influence over their own lives," Stocking said.
The
activities of Oxfam and its partners ranged from the provision of
emergency clean water and sanitation to people displaced by the
disaster; improving the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of poor
and displaced people, especially women; and the construction of
permanent houses to better protect communities against future disasters.
"The
tangible results, such as the new houses and fishing boats, are only
one marker of progress," Stocking said. "The less visible interventions
are just as important. We have helped to give people better access to
markets for their goods. We have helped them gain the knowledge they
need to protect themselves against future disasters and the confidence
to demand a say in decisions that affect them."
Oxfam hopes that
the world's generous and speedy response to the devastation wrought by
the tsunami will be regarded as landmark. There are processes in place
to keep improving the coordination between international agencies.
Oxfam itself has extracted many lessons from the tsunami response which
have already been applied in subsequent disasters.
Notes to editors
The
Oxfam International Tsunami Fund was established in March 2005 as an
independent company and registered charity in the UK. The Fund
officially closes on 31 December 2008 Oxfam has received $294
million, more than 90% of it from the public. Less than five per cent
has been spent on administration and fundraising costs. The Oxfam
International Tsunami Fund End of Program Report can be found at: https://www.oxfam.org/en/emergencies/tsunami
Among the many successes of the Oxfam tsunami program are:
In Indonesia (where Oxfam spent $114.4 million, or 44% of the total program spend):
- As
well as delivering emergency water supplies, Oxfam built a piped
municipal water supply system in Lhokseumawe to serve 10,000 people and
constructed or repaired more than 50 gravity flow water supply systems
serving 170 villages. - Oxfam's advocacy efforts led to the
agreement by Indonesian authorities to grant all people in Aceh who
rented or squatted on other people's land before the tsunami the legal
right to their own home, as well as giving women joint ownership with
their husbands of newly constructed houses. - Oxfam paid for the construction of 30 elementary schools, serving 7,000 children, and the training of 1,200 teachers.
- Oxfam helped strengthen the fledgling civil society sector by helping to fund 75 organizations.
- Oxfam
was the first international agency to provide housing to tsunami
survivors in Aceh, going on to build 1,566 permanent houses.
In Sri Lanka (where Oxfam spent $86.6 million, or 33% of the total program spend):
- Oxfam
helped to restore the livelihoods of almost 170,000 people. Our
partner, BRAC, assisted 60,000 women to set up small businesses and now
reports that 88 per cent of them have higher incomes today than they
did before the tsunami. - Oxfam funding, technical assistance and
market research helped more than 3,000 poor women coir (coconut fiber)
workers in southern Sri Lanka to revive and expand their businesses.
They have now doubled, and in some cases tripled, their incomes. - Oxfam funded the reconstruction of eight tsunami-affected secondary schools serving around 6,000 students each year.
- Oxfam has funded the establishment of a national disaster risk reduction resource center
In India (where Oxfam spent $45.2 million, or 17% of the total program spend):
- Oxfam helped to restore the livelihoods of 660,000 people and create structures to allow them to save money for the first time.
- Oxfam provided 360 new boats to fishermen and repaired another 900 boats and 800 outboard motors.
- Oxfam
funded the creation of Village Information Centers in 106 villages,
which now provide services such as a disaster early warning system,
market information and computer training courses to 34,000 people.
In
Indonesia, Sri Lanka and India Oxfam also funded the Green Coast
program, which combined environmental rehabilitation, the restoration
of livelihoods and disaster risk reduction. This program directly
helped 106,000 people.
Oxfam International is a global movement of people who are fighting inequality to end poverty and injustice. We are working across regions in about 70 countries, with thousands of partners, and allies, supporting communities to build better lives for themselves, grow resilience and protect lives and livelihoods also in times of crisis.
LATEST NEWS
Privacy Defenders Decry 'Spy Draft' in Section 702 Renewal Advanced by Senate
"It's not about who RISAA allows the government to spy on, it's about who RISAA allows the government to force to spy," explained one critic.
Apr 18, 2024
Civil liberties defenders on Thursday decried the U.S. Senate's advancement of the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, which critics say lawmakers are trying to ram through without protection against warrantless surveillance and with a provision that would effectively make every American a spy whether they like it or not.
Senators voted 67-32 in favor of a cloture motion to begin voting on RISAA, a bill to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which expires on Friday. FISA—a highly controversial law that has been abused hundreds of thousands of times—allows warrantless surveillance of non-U.S. citizens but also often sweeps up Americans' communication data in the process.
In a 273-147 vote last week, House lawmakers passed RISAA, including an amendment critics say dramatically expands the government's unchecked surveillance authority by compelling a wide range of individuals and organizations—including businesses and the media—to cooperate in government spying operations.
This so-called "Make Everyone a Spy" clause would allow the attorney general or director of national intelligence to force electronic communication service providers to "immediately provide... all information, facilities, or assistance" the government deems necessary.
"This bill would basically allow the government to institute a spy draft," Seth Stern, director of advocacy at Freedom of the Press Foundation, warned Thursday. "It will lead to significant distrust between journalists and sources, not to mention everyone else."
"It's not about who RISAA allows the government to spy on, it's about who RISAA allows the government to force to spy," he added. "Regardless of whether the end target of the surveillance is a foreigner, it's indisputable that the people the government can enlist to conduct the surveillance are Americans. And what's more, these civilians ordered to spy would be gagged and sworn to secrecy under the law."
In addition to the "Make Everyone a Spy" provision, civil libertarians have sounded the alarm over the House lawmakers' rejection of an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the legislation.
Critics accuse Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and colleagues including Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Mark Warner (D-Va.) of trying to rush a vote on RISAA while disingenuously claiming Section 702's powers will expire with the law on Friday. That's a misleading claim, as a national security court earlier this month approved the government's request to continue a disputed surveillance program even if Section 702 lapses.
"There is simply no defense of Majority Leader Schumer and Sen. Warner's duplicity," Sean Vitka, policy director at the progressive advocacy group Demand Progress, said in a statement. "House Intelligence Committee leaders poisoned this bill with one of the most repugnant surveillance expansions in history, and apparently the administration was too busy attacking commonsense privacy protections to notice. They know it, we know it, and now the American people know it."
"There can be no mistake: Sens. Schumer and Warner just helped hand the next president an unspeakably dangerous weapon that will be used against their own constituents," Vitka added. "And there is only one vote left to stop it."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)—who
said earlier this week that the bill would dragoon the American people into becoming "an agent for Big Brother"—on Thursday argued that "this issue demands a debate about meaningful reforms, not a rushed vote to rubber-stamp more warrantless government surveillance powers."
In an attempt to tackle the warrantless surveillance issue, Senate Judiciary Chair Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) on Thursday proposed a RISAA amendment that would require the government to obtain a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court before accessing Americans' private communications.
However, the amendment contains exceptions to the warrant requirement in the event of unspecified emergencies and cyberattacks.
"If the government wants to spy on the private communications of Americans, they should be required to get approval from a judge—just as our Founders intended," Durbin said in a statement. "Congress has a responsibility to the American people to get this right."
The Biden administration and U.S. intelligence agencies vehemently oppose the Durbin-Cramer amendment. The White House called the measure "a reckless policy choice contrary to the key lessons of 9/11 and not grounded in any constitutional requirement or statute."
"The amendment outright bars the government from gaining access to lawfully collected information using terms associated with U.S. persons," the administration added. "Exceptions to that prohibition are narrow and unworkable. They are insufficient to protect our national security."
On Wednesday, the House also passed the Fourth Amendment Is Not for Sale Act, which would prohibit the government from buying Americans' information from data brokers if it would otherwise need a warrant to obtain the data, which includes location and internet records. The Senate will now take up FANFSA.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Opposite of Leadership': US Vetoes Palestine's UN Membership
Palestine's permanent observer at the United Nations said the resolution's failure "will not break our will, and it will not defeat our determination."
Apr 18, 2024
U.S. President Joe Biden's administration on Thursday used the country's veto power at the United Nations Security Council to block Palestine's bid to become a full member of the U.N.
While 12 nations voted in favor of Palestinian membership and two abstained, the United States is one of five countries—along with China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom—who have veto authority at the Security Council.
Since Israel launched what the International Court of Justice has said is a "plausibly" genocidal assault of the Gaza Strip in response to a Hamas-led October attack, the Biden administration has blocked three cease-fire resolutions at the Security Council. Under mounting global pressure, the U.S. finally abstained last month, allowing a cease-fire measure to pass.
In the lead-up to Thursday's vote, the Biden administration was pressuring other countries to oppose the Palestinian Authority's renewed membership effort so it could possibly avoid a veto, according to leaked cables obtained by The Intercept.
"Take a moment to ponder how isolated Biden has made the U.S.," said Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, after the veto. "Biden lobbied Japan, South Korea, and Ecuador HARD to oppose the Palestine resolution so that the U.S. wouldn't have to veto. They refused. So Biden cast his fourth veto in seven months (!!) This is the opposite of leadership."
In addition to the nations Parsi highlighted, Algeria, China, France, Guyana, Malta, Mozambique, Russia, Sierra Leone, and Slovenia voted for giving Palestine full U.N. membership while Switzerland and the United Kingdom abstained.
After the vote, U.N. Newsreported on remarks from Riyad Mansour, a U.N. permanent observer for the state of Palestine:
"We came to the Security Council today as an important historic moment, regionally and internationally, so that we could salvage what can be saved. We place you before a historic responsibility to establish the foundations of a just and comprehensive peace in our region."
Council members were given the opportunity "to revive the hope that has been lost among our people" and to translate their commitment towards a two-state solution into firm action "that cannot be maneuvered or retracted," and the majority of council members "have risen to the level of this historic moment, and they have stood on the side of justice and freedom and hope, in line with the ethical and humanitarian and legal principles that must govern our world and in line with simple logic."
"The fact that this resolution did not pass will not break our will, and it will not defeat our determination," Mansour added. "We will not stop in our effort. The state of Palestine is inevitable. It is real. Perhaps they see it as far away, but we see it as near, and we are the faithful."
Parsi said that "a Western-friendly senior Global South diplomat" told him of Biden's veto: "Whatever agonizing claim the U.S. had to lead a self-appointed free world has died a very loud public death on the Security Council horseshoe tonight. YOU CAN'T LEAD IF YOU CAN'T LISTEN."
Biden, a Democrat seeking reelection in November, has faced fierce criticism in the United States and around the world for U.S. complicity in Israel's war on Gaza—which Hamas, not the Palestinian Authority, has controlled for nearly two decades. In under seven months, Israeli forces have killed 33,970 Palestinians, injured another 76,770, displaced most of the besieged enclave's 2.3 million population, devastated civilian infrastructure, and severely limited the flow of lifesaving humanitarian assistance.
Israel—which already got $3.8 billion in annual U.S. military aid before October 7—continues to receive weapons support from the Biden administration, even as a growing chorus of critics, including some Democrats in Congress, argues that the arms transfers violate U.S. and international law.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Shameful': Columbia Greenlights Police Crackdown on Anti-War Encampment
Even after dozens of students were arrested, hundreds "rushed to take the place of their classmates" and continued the protest.
Apr 18, 2024
The arrests of dozens of Columbia University and Barnard College students on Thursday "galvanized" other supporters of Palestinian rights on the campuses, as hundreds of students occupied the school's western lawn after New York City police filled at least two buses with protesters who had been detained for setting up an encampment.
"Disclose, divest, we will not stop, we will not rest," chanted hundreds of students as they marched around the area where organizers had set up a tent encampment early Wednesday morning.
Columbia President Minouche Shafik informed the campus community on Thursday that she had authorized the police to clear the encampment.
As it has been in the past, the school has become a center of anti-war protests—and crackdowns by school officials and the police—since Israel began its bombardment of Gaza in October.
Pro-Palestinian students and alumni have demanded that Columbia divest from companies that profit from Israel's apartheid policies in the occupied Palestinian territories and cancel its dual degree program with Tel Aviv University.
In response to pro-Palestinian demonstrations, Columbia in November suspended the campus chapters of Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine—an action that pushed the New York Civil Liberties Union and Palestine Legal to file a lawsuit on behalf of the students last month.
On Thursday, police and Columbia employees took down about 50 tents that had been up for more than a day and disposed of them in trash cans and alleyways—but The New York Times reported later that "demonstrators repitched a couple of tents, and ... recovered the main signage from the encampment as well," while hundreds of students were "still gathered and chanting on the south side of the grass."
The arrests came a day after Shafik testified before the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce about antisemitism on campus.
U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), whose daughter, Isra Hirsi, was among the Barnard students who were suspended on Thursday for participating in the encampment protest, questioned Shafik about whether antisemitic protests have actually taken place at Columbia, prompting the president to say there have not.
"There has been a rise in targeting and harassment against anti-war protesters, because it's been pro-war and anti-war protesters is what it seems, like, correct?" asked Omar.
"Correct," replied Shafik.
On Thursday, Omar posted on social media two images of protesters at Columbia: one from the encampment this week, and one from 1968, when students protested the U.S. war in Vietnam.
New York City Council member Tiffany Cabán was among those who condemned the university's crackdown on the protests on Thursday.
"Suspending and arresting Columbia/Barnard student activists and disbanding student organizations—including Jewish students and organizations—doesn't combat antisemitism or increase safety," said Cabán. "All it does is punish and intimidate those who believe in human rights for Palestinians. Shameful."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular