January, 13 2021, 11:00pm EDT
Watchdog Calls on President-Elect Biden, Congress to Reverse Trump Admin Policies that Weaken Climate Protections
Government watchdog Accountable.US is calling on President-Elect Joe Biden and Congress to reverse harmful Trump administration policies that jeopardize climate protections and were finalized over the last four years as favors to industry and former lobbyists for large corporations focused on maximizing profits, not protecting the environment.
WASHINGTON
Government watchdog Accountable.US is calling on President-Elect Joe Biden and Congress to reverse harmful Trump administration policies that jeopardize climate protections and were finalized over the last four years as favors to industry and former lobbyists for large corporations focused on maximizing profits, not protecting the environment.
As part of its Damage Control project, Accountable.US is highlighting the actions taken by the Trump administration to benefit industry, its lobbyists, and those that filled the president's campaign coffers.
"The Trump administration rarely saw an environmental protection that they did not want to do away with as a kick-back to the oil and gas industry," said Chris Saeger, spokesperson for Accountable.US. "The incoming Biden administration and Congress are duty-bound to fix the damage done over the past four years -- and to do it as quickly as they can. We need leaders who follow science, listen to experts, and refuse to put industry demands over the needs of the environment and the American people. Protecting our planet can't wait."
The Biden administration should immediately take action in the following areas that will help repeal the dangerous standards set during the past four years under Trump:
- Restore regulations for air pollution sources that were at any time considered "major sources." Under the Trump administration, the EPA finalized a rule that removed the "once in, always in" standard that required hazardous air pollutant sources to remain "major sources" once they pass the ten tons of emissions threshold. Under the new rule, if sources reduce their hazardous air pollutant they can be reclassified as "area sources" and endure less stringent requirements. This risks a large increase in pollution and undermines the Clean Air Act, and the Biden administration must reverse this rule. [See details here.]
- Strengthen standards and timelines for coal ash pond closures to reduce toxic waste emissions. The Trump administration rolled back a 2015 rule to allow coal ash pond operating to delay closing ponds and seek more time to store toxic waste. [See details here.]
- Re-do the EPA's study on anti-backsliding with updated models. The Trump administration, with the support of the oil and gas industry -- including many with deep connections to the Trump administration -- supported a rule that purported no additional measures are necessary to mitigate the adverse impact on air quality of renewable fuel volumes. The rule was based on a study which used a flawed modeling system, which the Biden administration should immediately re-do. [See details here.]
- Reduce unnecessary barriers to additional Clean Air Act regulations. Trump's administration proposed unnecessary procedural requirements for providing all information regarding the cost-benefit analysis of Clean Air Act regulatory decisions. This rule, supported by the energy industry, slowed down regulations and allowed polluters to continue while procedural problems were solved. The Biden administration should refuse to move forward with finalizing this rule. [See details here.]
- Refuse to implement Trump-era deregulations that are parting gifts for the oil and gas industry. In 2020, the Trump administration proposed a rule to backtrack on three Obama-era public lands oil and gas regulations in response to "concerns" from "representatives of the oil and gas industry." This rule-making is just a parting gift to the oil industry after the industry lobbyists running Trump's Interior spent four years bending over backwards to deregulate public lands leasing for their clients' benefit and the Biden administration should keep the 2016 regulations as-is. [See details here.]
- Halt any lease sales or oil production in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The Trump administration fought to open Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) to oil and gas drilling, and a lease sale took place last week. Oil development in Alaska's ANWR could have serious implications for Alaska's climate and could disturb Alaska's caribou herds, which the Gwich'in people rely on for subsistence. [See details here.]
- Halt coal leasing and reinstate the Obama-era moratorium on new lease sales. The Trump administration sought to end an Obama-era moratorium on new coal leases on federal land. The long-term impacts of coal mining and power generation threaten environmental quality, the climate, and Western public lands important to tribes like the Northern Cheyenne. The Biden administration should reinstate the moratorium and halt coal leasing. [See details here.]
- Reinstate rule preventing fracking companies from abusing weak state regulations. In 2017, the Trump administration got rid of a rule that required oil and gas operators to apply through the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) before fracking on public lands managed by the BLM. Without federal regulation such as this rule, fracking companies are free to use and abuse lax state rules, further contributing to the climate crisis and destroying our natural resources. [See details here.]
- Reinforce strong standards for vehicles' fuel and carbon dioxide emissions. Following a request from the auto industry, the Trump administration weakened vehicles' fuel and carbon dioxide standards. The Biden administration should direct the EPA to issue a replacement rule that would recognize California's authority to standards and pursue more stringent standards going forward from models 2026 and beyond. [See details here.]
- Withdraw the Trump administration's failed "guidance" on the treatment of greenhouse gasses. In June 2019, the White House Council on Environmental Quality published draft guidance on the treatment of greenhouse gases -- guidance that did not address climate change and its impact, provided little clarity to federal agencies on how to weigh emissions and climate impacts in National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews, and appeared to encourage agencies to avoid those considerations entirely. The Biden administration should withdraw the 2019 guidance and replace it. [See details here.]
- Establish standards greenhouse gas emissions for airplanes that help reduce emissions -- not appease aviation industry executives. The Trump administration proposed a rule establishing greenhouse gas emissions standards for airplanes that reflected current industry practices. This meant that the standards would have little impact on emissions by the aviation sector, which are responsible for accelerating climate change and exacerbating respiratory illness, and whose executives supported Trump in 2016 and 2020. [See details here.]
- Direct EPA to tighten the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for particulate matter after the Trump administration retained looser standards. This came even as EPA scientists recommended lowering the annual particulate matter standard, noting that reducing the limit to 9 micrograms per cubic meter could save between 9,050 and 34,600 lives per year. [See details here.]
- Reinstate reputable climate scientists who were removed and replaced -- by science skeptics -- by the Trump administration. [See details here.]
A non-partisan federal watchdog, Accountable.US has released full documentation for the corrupt origins of these harmful policies on its Damage Control site, which catalogs solutions to harmful Trump policies the Biden administration should pursue to make the government work for all Americans again.
Accountable.US is a nonpartisan watchdog that exposes corruption in public life and holds government officials and corporate special interests accountable by bringing their influence and misconduct to light. In doing so, we make way for policies that advance the interests of all Americans, not just the rich and powerful.
LATEST NEWS
Billionaire Palantir Co-Founder Pushes Return of Public Hangings as Part of 'Masculine Leadership' Initiative
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," said one critic in response.
Dec 07, 2025
Venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of data platform company Palantir, is calling for the return of public hangings as part of a broader push to restore what he describes as "masculine leadership" to the US.
In a statement posted on X Friday, Lonsdale said that he supported changing the so-called "three strikes" anti-crime law to ensure that anyone who is convicted of three violent crimes gets publicly executed, rather than simply sent to prison for life.
"If I’m in charge later, we won’t just have a three strikes law," he wrote. "We will quickly try and hang men after three violent crimes. And yes, we will do it in public to deter others."
Lonsdale then added that "our society needs balance," and said that "it's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable."
Lonsdale's views on public hangings being necessary to restore "masculine leadership" drew swift criticism.
Gil Durán, a journalist who documents the increasingly authoritarian politics of Silicon Valley in his newsletter "The Nerd Reich," argued in a Saturday post that Lonsdale's call for public hangings showed that US tech elites are "entering a more dangerous and desperate phase of radicalization."
"For months, Peter Thiel guru Curtis Yarvin has been squawking about the need for more severe measures to cement Trump's authoritarian rule," Durán explained. "Peter Thiel is ranting about the Antichrist in a global tour. And now Lonsdale—a Thiel protégé—is fantasizing about a future in which he will have the power to unleash state violence at mass scale."
Taulby Edmondson, an adjunct professor of history, religion, and culture at Virginia Tech, wrote in a post on Bluesky that the rhetoric Lonsdale uses to justify the return of public hangings has even darker intonations than calls for state-backed violence.
"A point of nuance here: 'masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable' is how lynch mobs are described, not state-sanctioned executions," he observed.
Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll argued that Lonsdale's remarks were symbolic of a kind of performative masculinity that has infected US culture.
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," he wrote.
Tech entrepreneur Anil Dash warned Lonsdale that his call for public hangings could have unintended consequences for members of the Silicon Valley elite.
"Well, Joe, Mark Zuckerberg has sole control over Facebook, which directly enabled the Rohingya genocide," he wrote. "So let’s have the conversation."
And Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin noted that Lonsdale has been a major backer of the University of Austin, an unaccredited liberal arts college that has been pitched as an alternative to left-wing university education with the goal of preparing "thoughtful and ethical innovators, builders, leaders, public servants and citizens through open inquiry and civil discourse."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hegseth Defends Boat Bombings as New Details Further Undermine Administration's Justifications
The boat targeted in the infamous September 2 "double-tap" strike was not even headed for the US, Adm. Frank Bradley revealed to lawmakers.
Dec 07, 2025
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday defended the Trump administration's policy of bombing suspected drug-trafficking vessels even as new details further undermined the administration's stated justifications for the policy.
According to the Guardian, Hegseth told a gathering at the Ronald Reagan presidential library that the boat bombings, which so far have killed at least 87 people, are necessary to protect Americans from illegal drugs being shipped to the US.
"If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you," Hegseth said. "Let there be no doubt about it."
However, leaked details about a classified briefing delivered to lawmakers last week by Adm. Frank Bradley about a September 2 boat strike cast new doubts on Hegseth's justifications.
CNN reported on Friday that Bradley told lawmakers that the boat taken out by the September 2 attack was not even headed toward the US, but was going "to link up with another, larger vessel that was bound for Suriname," a small nation in the northeast of South America.
While Bradley acknowledged that the boat was not heading toward the US, he told lawmakers that the strike on it was justified because the drugs it was carrying could have theoretically wound up in the US at some point.
Additionally, NBC News reported on Saturday that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth had ordered all 11 men who were on the boat targeted by the September 2 strike to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted."
This is relevant because the US military launched a second strike during the September 2 operation to kill two men who had survived the initial strike on their vessel, which many legal experts consider to be either a war crime or an act of murder under domestic law.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, watched video of the September 2 double-tap attack last week, and he described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” Himes explained. “Now, there’s a whole set of contextual items that the admiral explained. Yes, they were carrying drugs. They were not in position to continue their mission in any way... People will someday see this video and they will see that that video shows, if you don’t have the broader context, an attack on shipwrecked sailors.”
While there has been much discussion about the legality of the September 2 double-tap strike in recent days, some critics have warned that fixating on this particular aspect of the administration's policy risks taking the focus off the illegality of the boat-bombing campaign as a whole.
Daphne Eviatar, director for security and human rights for Amnesty International USA, said on Friday that the entire boat-bombing campaign has been "illegal under both domestic and international law."
"All of them constitute murder because none of the victims, whether or not they were smuggling illegal narcotics, posed an imminent threat to life," she said. "Congress must take action now to stop the US military from murdering more people in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Memo Shows Pam Bondi Wants List of 'Domestic Terrorism' Groups Who Express 'Anti-American Sentiment'
"Millions of Americans like you and I could be the target," warned journalist Ken Klippenstein of the new memo.
Dec 07, 2025
A leaked memo written by US Attorney General Pam Bondi directs the Department of Justice to compile a list of potential "domestic terrorism" organizations that espouse "extreme viewpoints on immigration, radical gender ideology, and anti-American sentiment."
The memo, which was obtained by journalist Ken Klippenstein, expands upon National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7), a directive signed by President Donald Trump in late September that demanded a "national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts."
The new Bondi memo instructs law enforcement agencies to refer "suspected" domestic terrorism cases to the Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs), which will then undertake an "exhaustive investigation contemplated by NSPM-7" that will incorporate "a focused strategy to root out all culpable participants—including organizers and funders—in all domestic terrorism activities."
The memo identifies the "domestic terrorism threat" as organizations that use "violence or the threat of violence" to advance political goals such as "opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders; adherence to radical gender ideology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, or anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; hostility towards traditional views on family, religion, and morality."
Commenting on the significance of the memo, Klippenstein criticized mainstream media organizations for largely ignoring the implications of NSPM-7, which was drafted and signed in the wake of the murder of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.
"For months, major media outlets have largely blown off the story of NSPM-7, thinking it was all just Trump bluster and too crazy to be serious," he wrote. "But a memo like this one shows you that the administration is absolutely taking this seriously—even if the media are not—and is actively working to operationalize NSPM-7."
Klippenstein also warned that NSPM-7 appeared to be the start of a new "war on terrorism," but "only this time, millions of Americans like you and I could be the target."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular