December, 29 2020, 11:00pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Josh Chetwynd, Communications Manager, 303-573-5558, jchetwynd@publicinterestnetwork.org
Looking Ahead: Environment America's 2021 Federal and State Priorities
Agenda includes ramping up renewable energy, prioritizing wildlife over waste and increasing protections for our wild spaces.
WASHINGTON
Environment America, a national nonpartisan network of state environmental groups, contributed to numerous environmental victories in 2020. The organization is looking ahead to spurring more environmental progress at the federal and state levels.
"We enter 2021 with hope for a brighter and healthier year," said Environment America's Acting President Wendy Wendlandt. "With a new presidential administration and state and local governments showing leadership, we are optimistic we can continue to slash emissions from our cars and trucks, transition more of our cities and states to 100 percent renewable energy, conserve our wild spaces, reduce plastic waste and ensure Americans have clean water."
Here is a roundup of some of the top issues and bills that Environment America and its 29 state organizations will be working on across the country this coming year:
Building on momentum toward a 100% Renewable Energy society
With seven states and more than 150 cities pledging to generate electricity from clean energy sources, we continue to move closer to powering our country with 100 percent renewable energy. To continue on that road at the federal level, Environment America will press for further extending solar and wind energy tax credits, expanding incentives for electric vehicles and energy efficiency, and creating new tax credits for energy storage projects.
In addition, our organization will be working for 100 percent clean energy bills in at least six states -- Florida, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Texas and Connecticut -- and supporting 100 percent renewable initiatives on at least 23 college campuses.
Along with that work, there will be a big push to improve existing renewable energy plans. Environment California is supporting policies to accelerate the state's transition to 100 percent clean energy, which currently has a 2045 deadline. Environment Missouri will be looking to increase Missouri's Renewable Energy Standard of 15 percent renewable energy by 2021 to 50 percent by 2035; and Environment Minnesota is also seeking an update to its Renewable Energy Standards. In Michigan, Environment Michigan is calling on its legislature to create a legal roadmap to get the state to its 100 percent renewable energy commitment by 2050, which Gov. Gretchen Whitmer announced in September.
Environment California has other ambitious clean energy plans, such as working to ensure that state legislators set a goal of 3 gigawatts of offshore wind energy by 2030 and 10 gigawatts by 2040, and advocating for state investments in long-duration renewable energy storage technologies. Other plans on our California agenda include increasing geothermal power; ramping up the number of solar panels paired with battery storage on K-12 public schools; and heightening the use of such important energy efficiency options as all-electric buildings.
On the defense side, Environment Texas will be fighting against efforts to impose a tax on energy sources other than natural gas and to discriminate against wind and solar as part of the state's economic development program. At the same time, the group will support, among other policies, adopting a solar consumer protection act to make it easier for Texans to go solar; commencing a study on expanding the state's renewable energy standard on electricity to 50 percent by 2030 and 100 percent by 2050; and investing in additional transmission lines to bring wind and solar power to cities.
Elsewhere, Environment Colorado will back The Healthier Homes Act of 2021, which would help utilities develop plans to replace gas and propane-powered appliances with high-efficiency versions and The Building Energy Performance Act of 2021, which would require most large commercial, multifamily and public buildings to benchmark energy use and reduce emissions. Environment Maryland will advocate for a school clean energy bill that ensures the state's public schools develop comprehensive school energy policies. In the Southeast, Environment Georgia will aim to get burdensome solar fees outlawed. And Environment Florida will, among other things, press for expanding community solar, increasing rooftop solar numbers, adding new energy storage capacity, ratcheting up energy efficiency and banning fracking statewide.
Addressing the plastic pollution crisis
Every day, people throw away tons of single-use cups, containers and other plastic "stuff." All of this waste not only trashes our parks and public spaces, but it also washes into our rivers, where it's harmful to wildlife and pollutes our drinking water. To change that cycle, state environmental groups across the country will advocate for legislation to make sure that containers we only use for moments don't pollute our planet for generations.
For example, Environment Colorado, Environment Florida, Environment Michigan, Environment Oregon, Environment Virginia and Environment Washington will all be working for statewide bans on polystyrene -- what many people refer to as Styrofoam. Environment Florida, along with such groups as Environment Missouri and Environment Texas, will also be working to ensure that state legislatures don't preempt local communities' efforts to address polystyrene foam pollution.
Our groups will promote numerous other policies to reduce plastic foam and other forms of plastic pollution. For instance, Environment Virginia will work for a ban on intentional balloon releases, which can be one of the most dangerous types of litter for wildlife. Environment Georgia will advocate for bans on plastic bags and plastic foam in state facilities and grocery stores. Along with its battle against preemption, Environment Texas will also support a bill that creates a statewide debris management plan with emphasis on landfill diversion and environmental protection.
In the Pacific Northwest, both Environment Oregon and Environment Washington will support statewide policies that require producers to take responsibility for the plastic pollution they create. Environment Oregon will also seek a comprehensive foodware policy that shifts away from single-use products and toward reusables; and a statewide stop to permitting new or expanded "chemical recycling" facilities, which is a false solution to the plastics problem.
Similarly, Environment Maryland will call for companies that produce plastic to be responsible for its disposal costs. Its state agenda includes a plastic incineration ban; a statewide ban on plastic bags and legislation that requires hotels to stop providing single-use toiletry containers, bans plastic utensils and stirrers, and requires that straws be given upon request only.
Conserving public lands and wild spaces
When The Great American Outdoors Act was signed into law in August, it was a rare bright spot for 2020. While the federal statute, which permanently funds the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) with $900 million annually and provides $9.5 billion over five years to fix maintenance problems plaguing America's public lands, was a big win, it was only a start.
In 2021, Environment America will lobby at the national and state level for resolutions that call for the conservation of 30 percent of America's lands and water by 2030. It will also support the Roadless Area Conservation Act, which aims to keep our wild spaces wild. Safeguarding our waters from offshore oil drilling will continue to be a vital issue in states along the Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific coasts.
Protecting pollinators will also be a priority. Environment Texas will support a series of policies to aid bees. These include establishing a voluntary pollinator-friendly designation for solar farms; backing a bill that requires utilities to install native and pollinator-friendly plants after they dig along state highways; and banning the use of bee-killing neonicotinoid pesticides along state highways and on other state property.
Preventing the use of neonicotinoids is also at the center of both Environment Oregon and Environment Missouri's efforts on this issue.
Finally state environmental groups will continue to advocate state park funding. For example, Environment Texas will support an effort to appropriate all of the state's sporting goods sales tax to state parks and historic sites.
Decarbonizing the transportation sector
Despite fewer cars on the road in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, transportation emissions continued to be the top contributor to global warming in the United States. Environment America and our national network will continue efforts to solve this problem in 2021.
When federal transportation spending authorization expires in September, Environment America will be supporting a reauthorization that prioritizes reducing greenhouse gases emissions and investing in electric vehicles. Among the federal bills that the group will support is the Driving America Forward Act, which renews and extends the electric vehicle tax credit.
California has long been a leader on the transportation front, and Environment California looks to ensure that continues in 2021. The group will press for increased electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure as part of an effort to reach a goal of 1 million charging stations by 2030. The group will also embrace efforts to double the amount of trips taken on public transit in the next 10 years and will back programs that help people replace fossil-fuel powered cars with EVs.
Building on California's announcement in September that, by 2035, it will stop the sale of gas-powered vehicles, Environment Washington is aiming to get its state to enact a similar ban on new fossil fuel-powered cars and trucks -- but, in this case, by 2030. In the short term, the Seattle-based group will also push for a clean fuel standard within the state.
In the Lone Star State, Environment Texas will fight for allocating all current Texas Emissions Reduction Plan funds to support clean air and for expanding funding for electric vehicle rebates. The affiliate will also back cities' rights to adopt local option taxes for transportation investments. In addition, the group will endorse one bill that allows state employees to telecommute and another that requires drivers to stop and yield the right-of-way to pedestrians. It will oppose a bill that assesses an annual $200 fee on electric vehicles and another that takes "rainy day" funds to build roads and other infrastructure for oil and gas development.
Other state plans include Environment Missouri's support for increasing Missouri's current 17-cent fuel tax to 30 cents per gallon. Environment Colorado will support a transportation funding bill that will emphasize reducing vehicle miles travelled and accelerate a transition to EVs. Environment New Jersey is supporting initiatives to rapidly expand electric vehicle charging infrastructure. It is also advocating for spending Volkswagen settlement funds and Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) money on electrification measures for public transit vehicles, charging stations and seaport electrification.
Cleaning up America's waterways and protecting our drinking water
Too many of America's waterways continue to be threatened by toxic chemicals and too many schools continue to have unacceptable levels of lead in their drinking water that threaten children's health.
To that end, Environment America will urge Congress to increase water infrastructure funding to stop sewage overflows, make our waterways safe for swimming, and "Get the Lead Out" of our kid's school faucets and fountains via the Get the Lead Out Act, which would require replacing lead service lines within 10 years.
At the federal administrative level, the organization will work to repeal the Dirty Water Rule, a Trump administration regulation that deeply diminished protections for our streams and wetlands. Other necessary changes include: increasing limits on toxic pollution from power plants; strengthening the Lead and Copper Rule; curbing pollution from meat processing plants with updated permit standards; and barring direct discharges of the "forever chemicals" per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFS) into waterways while also phasing out these toxins where possible.
State groups in the Environment America network will also be leaning into many of these issues. Environment Florida will push for comprehensive water testing and full public access to all the data from those studies. The group is also calling for schools to immediately shut off taps where water contains more lead than one part per billion (ppb), which is the threshold recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, and install National Sanitation Foundation-certified filters on faucets or fountains used for drinking or cooking. Similarly, Environment Maryland is backing a bill that strengthens protections from lead in school drinking water and Environment Washington is calling for both testing and alerts when drinking water taps test above 1 ppb. Environment Washington is also backing the approval of $3 million for the state Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction to replace or remediate lead fixtures.
Environment Michigan will have PFAS and PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) in its crosshairs. The group will press for thorough regulations that protect Michiganders from this whole class of chemicals. The group will also support strengthening Michigan's "polluter pays" laws, which should hold those accountable when a company has contaminated our water or soil with these compounds.
Environment Virginia, which has worked for years to prevent runoff into the Chesapeake Bay, will continue these efforts. In Florida, another iconic body of water -- the Suwannee River -- also remains under threat. To solve that and other water-related dangers in the state, Environment Florida is aiming to protect state waterways through limits on agricultural pollution from large factory farms; keep beaches and other waterways safe from sewage overflows and runoff pollution with new stormwater standards and adequate funding for green infrastructure; and promote water conservation through incentive programs and appliance standards. Environment Georgia will fight to protect Georgia's waterways from toxic coal ash pollution by requiring stricter rules for long-term coal ash storage.
Environment Texas' large clean water agenda includes supporting a nature-based infrastructure financing program to fully fund community projects, policies that get toxic lead out of school drinking water, and a drinking water standard that reduces exposure to PFAS.
With Environment America, you protect the places that all of us love and promote core environmental values, such as clean air to breathe, clean water to drink, and clean energy to power our lives. We're a national network of 29 state environmental groups with members and supporters in every state. Together, we focus on timely, targeted action that wins tangible improvements in the quality of our environment and our lives.
(303) 801-0581LATEST NEWS
Thanks to Trump's Iran War Disaster, Fossil Fuel Industry to Enjoy $700 Billion Windfall in 2026
"We witness not only a massive fossil fuel crisis but a vast upward transfer of wealth built on instability of fossil fuel markets and pain," said an expert at 350.org.
Jun 18, 2026
US President Donald Trump’s war with Iran may finally be reaching a close. But consumers and businesses around the world will continue to pay the price in the months ahead as still-elevated energy costs funnel hundreds of billions of dollars to fossil fuel giants.
That’s according to a report from the environmental group 350.org released Thursday, following Trump’s signing of a memorandum of understanding with Iran this week to begin the process of formally ending a war that has sent global oil prices skyrocketing and saddled ordinary people with record fuel prices.
The group estimated that just 110 days of war resulted in the transfer of an additional $374 billion from consumers and businesses into the coffers of oil and gas companies beyond what would have been expected had the war never been launched.
And while Trump claims his agreement to end the war this week will avert an “economic catastrophe,” there will likely still be tremendous pain even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens promptly.
Using oil and gas pricing scenarios from the International Monetary Fund’s April 2026 World Economic Outlook and data on global consumption, 350.org predicted that by the end of the year, consumers and businesses will spend an additional $199.8 billion on oil and $128.1 billion on gas above a non-war scenario, making for a grand total of more than $700 billion as a result of the war.
This, the group said, is a conservative estimate, as it does not even take into account knock-on effects. The war will ultimately end up costing much more when factoring in inflation across the rest of the economy, resulting from higher fuel costs or fertilizer shortages caused by the strait's closure, which has affected food prices.
It also does not take into account the resulting effects on economic output or employment as rising costs and lower consumer spending force companies to tighten their belts.
"The oil and gas industry is draining billions from people and businesses on the back of a war that has killed thousands and pushed millions toward poverty and hunger," said Andreas Sieber, head of political Strategy at 350.org.
"Even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens tomorrow, we should expect prices to remain above pre-crisis levels," he said. "We witness not only a massive fossil fuel crisis but a vast upward transfer of wealth built on instability of fossil fuel markets and pain."
While the war has brought it into starker relief, previous reports from 350.org have shown that even if the US had never attacked Iran, the continued global dependence on fossil fuels was resulting in trillions of dollars of avoidable costs each year, including $9.3 trillion to mitigate climate-related damages and air pollution-related deaths each year, costs that disproportionately fall on the world's poorest.
In order to alleviate economic strain from the war, Sieber said, "governments should tax these excess profits now and use the revenues to protect people, cut bills, and rapidly deploy renewables that make households and small businesses less vulnerable to the next fossil fuel shock.”
Estimates of inflation also do not account for how the war has heightened global instability and poverty, which will require additional resources for humanitarian relief efforts. In late April, the United Nations Development Program estimated that even if the conflict had ended then, more than 32 million people worldwide would be pushed into economic precarity.
This is not to mention the resources that will need to be expended to address the harms caused by the war itself.
In exchange for negotiations on Iran's nuclear program, a portion of the memorandum of understanding requires the US to work with "regional partners," presumably other Persian Gulf allies, to scrounge up at least $300 billion to help Iran pay for reconstruction and economic development after the country was devastated by American and Israeli attacks on civilian infrastructure and millions were displaced.
As a report from the International Rescue Committee detailed last week, the Iran war has also had cascading effects on other conflicts and catastrophes.
"Six months ago, the IRC warned that a New World Disorder was emerging," said David Miliband, the humanitarian group's president and CEO. "Since then, disorder has not only grown but accelerated. A war with Iran. A million people have been forced to flee their homes in Lebanon. A brewing global food security catastrophe that risks plunging millions more people into acute hunger. An expanding Ebola outbreak. Defanged diplomacy and collapsing aid budgets."
"The Iran war couldn’t have happened at a worse time," Miliband said in a New Yorker article published Thursday. "It set off a chain of events that’s very damaging.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Another Unauthorized Trump Fund': Democrats Fume Over $300 Million in Taxpayer Money for Ballroom
"While Republicans slash healthcare and other programs Americans depend on, President Trump is reportedly using hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars for a White House ballroom," said US Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi.
Jun 18, 2026
Democratic lawmakers are reacting with disgust amid new reporting on how the White House has been using sneaky budget maneuvering to get US taxpayers to fund President Donald Trump's luxury ballroom that was never approved by Congress.
According to a Thursday report in The Washington Post, the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) mysteriously shifted $352 million within the US Secret Service budget that had been earmarked for training and recruitment, but that will now be spent on White House security measures.
An insider familiar with the process told the Post that the redirected funds were related to the construction of the ballroom.
A White House spokesperson did not deny that the money was going toward the ballroom project, while insisting that "the East Wing Modernization Project is inextricably tied to the security of the president, the White House grounds, and the certain security infrastructure assets."
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, told the Post he was concerned that money "intended to pay Secret Service agents and ensure they have the technology and resources they need to keep individuals under their protection safe" is now being spent on the president's "vanity project."
In a Wednesday interview with NOTUS, Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) said it appears Trump "was just flat out lying when he said the taxpayers will not pay a dime for his ballroom," adding that it appears "he is now trying to find ways to funnel public money into it."
In a Thursday social media post, Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.) contrasted Trump's willingness to use taxpayer cash for his ballroom with cuts he and the GOP made to vital healthcare and food assistance programs.
"While Republicans slash healthcare and other programs Americans depend on," Krishnamoorthi wrote, "President Trump is reportedly using hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars for a White House ballroom he claimed would be privately funded."
Rep. Jonathan Jackson (D-Ill.) similarly argued that while the GOP's 2025 budget law "kicked 4.3 million people off SNAP and 5 million people off [Affordable Care Act] health insurance coverage," the administration is now "dishonestly spending millions of dollars of YOUR money to fund a ballroom instead of helping struggling Americans put food on the table and receive essential medical care."
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) linked the ballroom money to other Trump schemes to enrich himself through the presidency, including his acceptance of a luxury jet from the government of Qatar and his $1.8 billion slush fund for political allies.
"Now we learn that Trump’s bad architecture obsession is costing us all $600 million," Raskin wrote, in reference to earlier reporting on how the ballroom project has ballooned in costs from the White House's early estimates. "Turn your illegal Qatari jet over to the people and we’ll sell it for $400 million and we’ll take the rest out of other illegal emoluments and slush funds, including the $1.776 billion fund for insurrectionists, and the Board of Peace, another unauthorized Trump fund bankrolled by money misallocated from the State Department."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Would You Rather Go Back to War?' Critics Ask Democrats Fuming Over Trump's Iran Deal
"Trump currently owns this failed war," said one expert, "but if the Democrats help torpedo the MOU and war resumes, then they will co-own the next war."
Jun 18, 2026
Supporters of a diplomatic resolution to the illegal war that US President Donald Trump launched against Iran earlier this year are pushing back against Democratic critics of the interim peace agreement signed on Wednesday, warning it is politically and morally foolish to attack efforts to end a conflict that has killed thousands and plunged the global economy into chaos.
"Would you rather go back to war?" Matt Duss, executive vice president of the Center for International Policy and a former adviser to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), asked Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), one of several Democrats joining war-hawk Republicans in openly decrying the new memorandum of understanding (MOU).
In a series of social media posts on Wednesday, Blumenthal pointed to "bipartisan condemnation" of what he called "a disgraceful deal" and "unconditional surrender" on the part of the US. The senator added that "anything like this deal will be dead on arrival in the Senate" and declared, "It must be approved here to have enforceable effect."
Other prominent Democrats offered similar critiques. Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said it is "hard to imagine a more thorough capitulation," while Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) called the deal a "dangerous giveaway" to "this enemy," referring to Iran.
"His war proved only one thing: that diplomacy was the answer all along."
Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, warned Thursday that such criticisms of the interim peace deal imply that "a war should not be brought to an end until it has produced better terms—even when the war itself is failing."
"Taken seriously, that logic leads to a dangerous conclusion: that a failed war must continue until the battlefield fortunes somehow improve and a more favorable outcome becomes attainable. Perhaps that day will come. Perhaps it never will. In the meantime, the costs—in lives, treasure, regional stability, and strategic credibility—are treated as secondary considerations," Parsi wrote. "This is how endless wars are born."
Parsi expressed disappointment at the rhetoric of some Democrats "because it echoes the same bad-faith tactics Republicans deployed" against the Obama-era Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which Trump ripped up in 2018, setting the stage for war.
"To be sure, Trump has invited some of this treatment. He spent years attacking Obama’s agreement with a barrage of misleading arguments and exaggerated claims," Parsi noted. "But that does not make it wise for Democrats to return the favor. Trump currently owns this failed war, but if the Democrats help torpedo the MOU and war resumes, then they will co-own the next war. Trump’s disaster will become theirs as well."
Many Democrats appear to understand that risk and are welcoming diplomatic progress—while also condemning the illegal war and its consequences for the US and the world.
"Matters of war and peace must rise above partisan politics," said Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas). "Democrats must not replicate Republicans’ irresponsible opposition to the Obama administration’s Iran nuclear agreement, which placed real constraints on Iran’s nuclear program before President Trump foolishly tore it up, setting the stage for this disastrous war."
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), in a Thursday morning appearance on Fox News, said the emerging deal between the US and Iran "is not as good as the JCPOA was," while also expressing support for efforts to end the war.
Watch:
Ro Khanna on Maria Bartiromo's show makes the case for why Trump's deal with Iran is far inferior to the JCPOA (Note that Bartiromo acknowledges he's making "important points, and good ones") pic.twitter.com/n1nm3LyBcd
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 18, 2026
Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) wrote in a social media post on Thursday that "any move toward diplomacy and away from violence is welcome news," calling Trump's Iran war "reckless" and "illegal."
"This war should be a lesson. The push for military adventurism and regime change by neocon war hawks was, unsurprisingly, an unmitigated disaster," said McGovern. "After three months of death and destruction, the rest of us are now left paying the price. His war proved only one thing: that diplomacy was the answer all along."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


