SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
November, 01 2012, 04:48pm EDT
Contact:
Jordan Libowitz,,jlibowitz@citizensforethics.org,.
CREW Releases New Report Detailing Web Tracking in Politics
Today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) released its latest report, Web Crawlers: How Candidates and Political Groups Track You Online. New research by CREW found visitors to the websites of the presidential candidates, party committees, and top-spending outside groups in 2012 are being tagged by dozens of sophisticat
WASHINGTON
Today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) released its latest report, Web Crawlers: How Candidates and Political Groups Track You Online. New research by CREW found visitors to the websites of the presidential candidates, party committees, and top-spending outside groups in 2012 are being tagged by dozens of sophisticated pieces of technology used to identify unique users and track their online behavior.
Click here to read the full report
"CREW's latest report proves Washington political operatives are keeping an extraordinarily close eye on prospective voters' online habits," said CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan. "Not only has this practice exploded since the 2008 election, tracking has continued to increase the closer we get to Election Day. While these groups may claim such trackers allow them to present web users with more relevant information, people should be wary of how their personal information is being safeguarded."
Notably, CREW found 37 trackers on President Barack Obama's campaign website -- the highest number of trackers on any of the 27 political websites CREW examined. Governor Mitt Romney's campaign website proved to be the second most aggressive data collector, utilizing 28 tracking tools. Meanwhile, the non-profit group Crossroads GPS had 20 trackers. In these three instances, the majority of these trackers were ad-related.
Although the New York Times ran an article about this issue on October 28th, that piece focused only on the presidential campaigns and not on the party committees or the top-spending outside groups. Further, CREW's report delves more deeply into the privacy concerns raised by the use of these trackers.
In total, CREW found 77 separate tracking tools, many of which appeared on multiple websites, totaling 319 trackers in all. The privacy policies of 16 of these trackers have been criticized as warranting either "concern" or "caution" by PrivacyScore, an online tool for assessing the privacy practices and policies of websites and companies. CREW also found 39 of the trackers identified do not disclose any data retention policy, meaning web users have no way of knowing how long the information collected is kept by these companies.
"The vast majority of Americans are disturbed by advertising based on online tracking, especially when it comes to politics," continued Ms. Sloan. "Visitors to web sites have little to no idea how much information is collected or what happens to the information about them. Voters should be concerned about both the lack of transparency and invasion of privacy."
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to promoting ethics and accountability in government and public life by targeting government officials -- regardless of party affiliation -- who sacrifice the common good to special interests. CREW advances its mission using a combination of research, litigation and media outreach.
LATEST NEWS
Because 'This Is Murder,' Family of Colombian Fisherman Killed by Trump Readies Legal Fight
"We want this case to help stop these killings from taking place again," said the American lawyer representing the family.
Nov 14, 2025
Family members of a Colombian fisherman killed in one of the Trump administration's illegal strikes on boats in the Caribbean is preparing to take legal action over what they describe as the murder of their loved one.
The New York Times reported Thursday that the family of Alejandro Carranza "has hired an American lawyer, who said he was preparing a legal claim."
The lawyer, Dan Kovalik, told the Times that the impending case is important both because "the family deserves compensation for the loss" of Alejandro and, more broadly to stop the Trump administration from killing people with impunity.
"We want this case to help stop these killings from taking place again," Kovalik said. "This is murder, and it is destroying rule of law."
The description of Carranza's killing as murder aligns with the views of United Nations experts and human rights advocates who have characterized the Trump administration's bombings in international waters as extrajudicial killings. To date, the administration has carried out at least 19 strikes on vessels in international waters, killing an estimated 75-80 people in total.
"I never thought I would lose my father in this way," said Cheila Carranza, Alejandro's 14-year-old daughter.
Trump has claimed, without providing any evidence, that the targeted vessels were smuggling drugs to the US. Though his body has yet to be found, Carranza is believed to have been killed in an attack in the Caribbean on September 15, part of the Trump administration's broader military campaign and buildup in the region that has sparked fears of a direct US war with Venezuela and other nations.
The attack infuriated Colombia President Gustavo Petro, who suspended intelligence cooperation with the US in response and accused the Trump administration of trampling international law.
"If intelligence communications only serve to kill fishermen with missiles, it is not only irrational, but a crime against humanity, insofar as the murder of civilians is systematic," Petro wrote in a lengthy social media post earlier this week.
"Colombia respects international law and defends it because it is the only wall we have as a human civilization against the barbarism that threatens to take over all of humanity," he added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'We Do Not Want ICE Here': NC Officials Oppose Trump Targeting Immigrants in Charlotte
"Everyone deserves to be treated with dignity," said Congresswoman Alma Adams, warning of "what we have seen Border Patrol and ICE agents do in places like Chicago and Los Angeles."
Nov 14, 2025
Elected officials in North Carolina are letting it be known they do not want to see federal immigration raids in their communities like those suffered by other states in recent months.
As CBS News reported Friday morning that after two months of terrorizing Chicago, US Border Patrol Commander-at-Large Gregory Bovino left for Charlotte, officials came together in his apparent destination to speak out against the looming assault on immigrants there.
"We're all gathered here from many branches of government, from obviously our state Legislature, our school board, our County Commission, our City Council members, because we do not want ICE here," said state House Rep. Aisha Dew (D-107), referring to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
"We do not need to have Border Patrol. As I've already said, I'm not quite sure what border we're patrolling here," she continued. Stressing that the surrounding US states pose no threat to North Carolina, Dew added that "this is a safe city. Our crime rates have gone down since the previous year. This is just another something out of the playbook."
The press conference—which also included leaders of local organizations—came after various reports this week cited unnamed US officials who said President Donald Trump has set his sights on Charlotte.
Amid mounting reports of the forthcoming operation, Mecklenburg County Sheriff Garry L. McFadden said in a Thursday statement that he was contacted a day earlier "by two separate federal officials confirming that US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) personnel will be arriving in the Charlotte area as early as this Saturday or the beginning of next week."
"At this time, specific details regarding the federal operation have not been disclosed and the Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Office (MCSO) has not been requested to assist with or participate in any enforcement actions," the statement highlighted.
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department similarly said in a Friday statement that CMPD "has no authority to enforce federal immigration laws" and "does not participate in ICE operations, nor are we involved in the planning of these federal activities."
ICE and CBP are both part of the US Department of Homeland Security. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin has declined to provide any details about possible action in Charlotte, telling multiple outlets: "Every day, DHS enforces the laws of the nation across the country. We do not discuss future or potential operations."
As the Associated Press noted Thursday:
Trump has defended sending the military and immigration agents into Democratic-run cities like Los Angeles, Chicago, and even the nation's capital, saying the unprecedented operations are needed to fight crime and carry out his mass deportation agenda.
Charlotte is another such Democratic stronghold. A statement of solidarity from several local and state officials estimated the city is home to more than 150,000 foreign-born people. The city's population is about 40% white, 33% Black, 16% Hispanic, and 7% Asian.
While a spokesperson for North Carolina Congressman Tim Moore, a Republican whose district includes parts of Mecklenburg County, expressed support for DHS in a statement to the Charlotte Observer, Democratic Congresswoman Alma Adams, who represents the targeted city, sounded the alarm about the department's reported plans.
"I am extremely concerned about the deployment of US Border Patrol and ICE agents to Charlotte," Adams said in a Thursday statement. "Charlotte's immigrant community is a proud part of the Queen City, and I will not stand by and watch my constituents be intimidated or harassed."
"Everyone deserves to be treated with dignity, and what we have seen Border Patrol and ICE agents do in places like Chicago and Los Angeles—using excessive force in their operations and tear gassing peaceful protestors—threatens the well-being of the communities they enter," she continued. "Those tactics and values have no place in the city of Charlotte or Mecklenburg County."
After the sheriff's Thursday announcement, Charlotte's Democratic mayor, Vi Lyles, also shared a statement on social media: "We still don't know any details on where they may be operating and to what extent. I understand this news will create uncertainty and anxiety for many people in our community. Everyone in our community deserves to feel secure, and I am committed to doing all that I can to inform our community, help make sure everyone feels safe, and understands their rights."
"It is also important that people understand CMPD is not involved in federal immigration activities, so people who need local law enforcement services should feel secure calling 911," she added. "There continues to be rumors about enforcement activities and I would ask that everyone refrain from sharing unverified information. Doing so creates more fear and uncertainty when we need to be standing together. We will continue to work with local and state partners to do what we can to ensure the safety of our community."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Wake the F Up. This Is Going to Destroy Us': Senator Sounds Alarm After AI Cyberattack
"The barriers to performing sophisticated cyberattacks have dropped substantially—and we predict that they’ll continue to do so," said AI company Anthropic.
Nov 14, 2025
A Democratic senator on Thursday sounded the alarm on the dangers of unregulated artificial intelligence after AI company Anthropic revealed it had thwarted what it described as "the first documented case of a large-scale cyberattack executed without substantial human intervention."
According to Anthropic, it is highly likely that the attack was carried out by a Chinese state-sponsored group, and it targeted "large tech companies, financial institutions, chemical manufacturing companies, and government agencies."
After a lengthy technical explanation describing how the attack occurred and how it was ultimately thwarted, Anthropic then discussed the security implications for AI that can execute mass cyberattacks with minimal direction from humans.
"The barriers to performing sophisticated cyberattacks have dropped substantially—and we predict that they’ll continue to do so," the firm said. "With the correct setup, threat actors can now use agentic AI systems for extended periods to do the work of entire teams of experienced hackers."
Anthropic went on to say that hackers could now use AI to carry tasks such as "analyzing target systems, producing exploit code, and scanning vast datasets of stolen information more efficiently than any human operator," which could open the door to "less experienced and resourced groups" carrying out some of the most sophisticated attack operations.
The company concluded by warning that "the techniques described above will doubtless be used by many more attackers—which makes industry threat sharing, improved detection methods, and stronger safety controls all the more critical."
This cybersecurity strategy wasn't sufficient for Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), who said government intervention would be needed to mitigate the potential harms caused by AI.
"Guys wake the f up," he wrote in a social media post. "This is going to destroy us—sooner than we think—if we don’t make AI regulation a national priority tomorrow."
Democratic California state Sen. Scott Wiener noted that many big tech firms have continuously fought against government oversight into AI despite threats that are growing stronger by the day.
"For two years, we advanced legislation to require large AI labs to evaluate their models for catastrophic risk or at least disclose their safety practices," he explained. "We got it done, but industry (not Anthropic) continues to push for federal ban on state AI rules, with no federal substitute."
Some researchers who spoke with Ars Technica, however, expressed skepticism that the AI-driven hack was really as sophisticated as Anthropic had claimed simply because they believe current AI technology is not yet good enough to execute that caliber of operation.
Dan Tentler, executive founder of Phobos Group, told the publication that the efficiency with which the hackers purportedly got the AI to carry out their commands was wildly different than what he has experienced using the technology.
"I continue to refuse to believe that attackers are somehow able to get these models to jump through hoops that nobody else can," he said. "Why do the models give these attackers what they want 90% of the time but the rest of us have to deal with ass-kissing, stonewalling, and acid trips?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular