The Progressive

NewsWire

A project of Common Dreams

For Immediate Release
Contact:

Jim Haber 415-828-2506
Kathy Kelly: 773-619-2418

Judge Decides to Devote Four Months to Studying Issues and Testimony Presented in "Creech 14" Case

The "Creech 14" went to trial on September 14, 2010 in Clark County Regional Court in Las
Vegas, Nevada. The case originated during a week of demonstrations and vigils in April 2009,
when the activists entered Creech Air Force Base in Indian Springs to highlight the serious
injustice of the U.S. military's use of drones, or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in
Afghanistan and elsewhere. Crews at Creech control the drones used in these expanding wars,
including killing civilians in remote controlled assassination attacks. The protesters were charged
with trespassing.

LAS VEGAS

The "Creech 14" went to trial on September 14, 2010 in Clark County Regional Court in Las
Vegas, Nevada. The case originated during a week of demonstrations and vigils in April 2009,
when the activists entered Creech Air Force Base in Indian Springs to highlight the serious
injustice of the U.S. military's use of drones, or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in
Afghanistan and elsewhere. Crews at Creech control the drones used in these expanding wars,
including killing civilians in remote controlled assassination attacks. The protesters were charged
with trespassing. Judge William Jansen scheduled the verdict for January 27, 2011.

Judge Jansen allowed the pro-se defendants to call three expert witnesses - former Attorney
General Ramsey Clark, retired Col. and former Embassy Official Ann Wright, and Bill Quigley,
Legal Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights.

"Targeted assassinations by Predator and Reaper drones," said defendant Renee Espeland, "must
be catapulted into the court of public opinion. I am bound by the law of our land that makes it
my duty to stop the killing of civilians and to protect U.S. soldiers being ordered to perform
illegal acts."

The judge limited the defense to questions strictly pertaining to the charge of trespass. However,
through carefully crafted questions, the defendants were able to extract several key points from
their witnesses:

- Intentional killing is a war crime, as embodied in U.S. constitutional law.

- Drone strikes by U.S. and coalition forces kill a disproportionate number of civilians.

- People have the right, even the duty, to stop war crimes.

- According to the Nuremberg principles, individuals are required to disobey domestic
orders that cause crimes against humanity.

Defendant Brian Terrell delivered the group's closing statement. Referring to earlier mention of
a classic metaphor used in cases invoking the necessity defense, he depicted a house on fire, with
a baby trapped inside. "The house is on fire; the baby is in the house," said Terrell, "We fourteen
are ones who see the smoke, and will not allow a 'no trespass' sign to stop us from reaching
burning children." Terrell was speaking about the civilian deaths caused by U.S. drones in
Afghanistan.

The Creech 14 include Fr. John Dear, SJ; Dennis DuVall; Renee Espeland; Judy Homanich;
Kathy Kelly; Fr. Steve Kelly, SJ; Mariah Klusmire; Brad Lyttle; Libby Pappalardo; Sr. Megan
Rice, SHCJ; Brian Terrell; Eve Tetaz; Fr. Louie Vitale, OFM; and Fr. Jerry Zawada, OFM.

Voices for Creative Nonviolence has deep, long-standing roots in active nonviolent resistance to U.S. war-making. Begun in the summer of 2005, Voices draws upon the experiences of those who challenged the brutal economic sanctions imposed by the U.S. and U.N. against the Iraqi people between 1990 and 2003.