

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Katy Pownall, mobile +44 7961 421 583 or +232 786 39176.
Email: katy.pownall@amnesty.org
Judit Arenas, mobile + 44 7778 472 188.
Email: judit.arenas@amnesty.org
On the eve of world leaders meeting in New York to discuss increased
funding for healthcare in developing countries, Amnesty International's
Secretary General Irene Khan launched a campaign to reduce maternal
deaths in Sierra Leone.
The accompanying report Out of Reach: The Cost of Maternal Health in
Sierra Leone uses graphic and personal testimonials to show how women
and girls are often unable access lifesaving treatment because they are
too poor to pay for it. In Sierra Leone one in eight women risk dying
during pregnancy or childbirth.
On the eve of world leaders meeting in New York to discuss increased
funding for healthcare in developing countries, Amnesty International's
Secretary General Irene Khan launched a campaign to reduce maternal
deaths in Sierra Leone.
The accompanying report Out of Reach: The Cost of Maternal Health in
Sierra Leone uses graphic and personal testimonials to show how women
and girls are often unable access lifesaving treatment because they are
too poor to pay for it. In Sierra Leone one in eight women risk dying
during pregnancy or childbirth. This is one of the highest maternal
death rates in the world.
Thousands of women bleed to death after giving birth. Most die in
their homes. Some die on the way to hospital; in taxis, on motorbikes
or on foot. In Sierra Leone, less than half of deliveries are attended
by a skilled birth attendant and less than one in five are carried out
in health facilities.
"These grim statistics reveal that maternal deaths are a human
rights emergency in Sierra Leone," said Irene Khan while launching the
report in Sierra Leone's capital, Freetown. "Women and girls are dying
in their thousands because they are routinely denied their right to
life and health, in spite of promises from the government to provide
free healthcare to all pregnant women."
At the United Nations General Assembly meeting on 23 September,
access to healthcare in the developing world will be high on the
agenda. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is expected to announce a
series of new finance packages devoted to improving healthcare in the
developing world with particular focus on infant and maternal health.
Sierra Leone is expected to be among the recipients of the fund.
"Additional money is desperately needed in Sierra Leone but will not
reach women and children in remote areas who are at greatest risk,"
said Irene Khan. "The lives of women and girls will only be saved when
the health system is properly managed and the government is held to
account.
"Money alone will not solve the problem. In Sierra Leone severe
discrimination and the low social status of women underlies the
terrible tragedy of maternal deaths. This is a country where girls are
forced into early marriage, excluded from schools and face sexual
violence. Women's health needs are given a low priority by their own
families, community leaders and their government."
Irene Khan's visit to Sierra Leone marks the start of Amnesty
International's action against maternal mortality in the country. A
campaign caravan will tour Sierra Leone over the coming weeks acting as
a vehicle for information and debate on the issue of maternal health.
Amnesty International believes poverty is a human rights issue and
this year launched a global campaign called Demand Dignity which calls
for an end to the human rights violations that drive and deepen
poverty. Maternal mortality is a key strand of this campaign.
The campaign mobilises people all over the world to demand that
governments and corporations listen to the voices of those living in
poverty and respect their rights.
Notes to editors
* On 22 September in Freetown, thousands are expected to gather at a
public event where Irene Khan will kick-off the Amnesty International
Caravan to End Maternal Mortality. The caravan will tour the country
raising awareness of maternal deaths as a human rights issue within
Sierra Leone and demanding improved healthcare services from the
government. The event will be addressed by Irene Khan, senior
government officials and will feature a film screening and play
performance on the subject of maternal mortality.
* While in Sierra Leone Irene Khan met with First Lady Sia Koroma and
other senior government officials. She also visited a number of health
facilities, slums and women's groups to hear those who live with the
daily reality of maternal death.
* Images, a News Access Tape and B-roll of the mission will be available under embargo ahead of the report launch.
* Irene Khan will be available for interviews from Sierra Leone.
* Amnesty International is tackling maternal mortality as part of its
recently launched Demand Dignity campaign focusing on poverty and human
rights.
* The mission to Sierra Leone comes ahead of the launch of Irene Khan's
book, the Unheard Truth, on October 15. This is Amnesty International's
first book addressing poverty and human rights. www.theunheardtruth.com
Amnesty International is a worldwide movement of people who campaign for internationally recognized human rights for all. Our supporters are outraged by human rights abuses but inspired by hope for a better world - so we work to improve human rights through campaigning and international solidarity. We have more than 2.2 million members and subscribers in more than 150 countries and regions and we coordinate this support to act for justice on a wide range of issues.
"The result will be fewer opportunities for creators, fewer jobs across the production ecosystem, higher costs, and less choice for audiences."
A group of Hollywood actors, directors, and producers on Monday published an open letter demanding the proposed merger between Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery be blocked.
In their letter, the Hollywood heavyweights outlined the harms that would come from allowing Paramount—which is owned by David Ellison, son of billionaire Trump donor Larry Ellison—to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery.
"This transaction would further consolidate an already concentrated media landscape, reducing competition at a moment when our industries—and the audiences we serve—can least afford it," the letter states. "The result will be fewer opportunities for creators, fewer jobs across the production ecosystem, higher costs, and less choice for audiences in the United States and around the world. Alarmingly, this merger would reduce the number of major US film studios to just four."
The letter goes on to describe how consolidation in the entertainment industry has already "accelerated the disappearance of the mid-budget film, the erosion of independent distribution, the collapse of the international sales market, the elimination of meaningful profit participation, and the weakening of screen credit integrity."
Looking at the bigger picture, the letter notes that "competition is essential for a healthy economy and a healthy democracy," then goes on to praise California Attorney General Rob Bonta and other state AGs for filing legal actions aimed at blocking the merger amid fears that the Trump administration could rubber-stamp it.
"We are grateful for their leadership," the letter concludes, "and stand ready to support all efforts to preserve competition, protect jobs, and ensure a vibrant future for our industry, for American culture, and for our single most significant export."
Actor Mark Ruffalo, a signatory of the letter, published an article on his Substack page outlining his own reasons for opposing the merger, which he described as "the epitome of crony capitalism and the oligarchs consolidating more corporations and media power to shape the outcome of their business interests."
Ruffalo also said he's spoken with others in Hollywood who were reluctant to sign the letter over concerns about retaliation from Trump or Ellison should the attempt to block the merger fail.
"The people pushing monopolies such as this one use fear to keep the workers in line," Ruffalo said. "I have heard it time and time again from my fellows, they are afraid of retribution. Some didn’t want to sign because they are afraid. How sad is that? In America the artists are afraid to speak out against power."
Actress Jane Fonda, founder of the modern Committee for the First Amendment, said that the proposed Paramount-Warner Bros. merger "would be one of the most destructive threats to free speech and creative expression in our history," because it would put "unprecedented power in the hands of a single corporation that already appears to have proven itself willing to sacrifice integrity for political favor."
The letter earned praise from democracy and antitrust advocates, who argued that blocking the merger was necessary to stopping President Donald Trump's ambitions for a right-wing takeover of US media.
“The future of free media and a strong entertainment industry in America is at stake here,” said Norm Eisen, co-founder and executive chair of Democracy Defenders Fund. “This proposed merger would not only harm competition and creativity, it would erode the very bedrock of our democracy."
Matt Stoller, director of research at the American Economic Liberties Project, noted that "consolidation in Hollywood has been a disaster, and has led to the weak state of the industry," and said the Paramount-Warner Bros. merger needed to be blocked to prevent further damage.
"Not only does this kind of concentration hollow out creative markets," said Stoller, "it concentrates control over culture and information in the hands of a few unaccountable executives, and in this case totalitarian Gulf countries, undermining a free and pluralistic media ecosystem that democracy depends on."
"The extremist Netanyahu government that has committed genocide in Gaza does not need more military support from American taxpayers."
With members of Congress returning to Washington, DC, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday pledged that he will, yet again, force a vote aimed at cutting off the flow of US weapons to Israel over its genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.
"I will be forcing a vote on legislation to block the sale of nearly half a billion dollars worth of bombs and bulldozers to the Israeli military," Sanders (I-Vt.) said on social media, taking aim at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court over the mass slaughter in Gaza.
"The extremist Netanyahu government that has committed genocide in Gaza does not need more military support from American taxpayers," declared Sanders, who has forced multiple votes on measures targeting US arms to Israel since it began bombarding Gaza in retaliation for the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack.
The next vote, which could come as soon as Wednesday, follows a similar effort last July, when a majority of the Senate Democratic Caucus backed his resolutions disapproving of the Trump administration's sale of 1,000-pound bombs, Joint Direct Attack Munition guidance kits, and tens of thousands of assault rifles to the Israeli government. Previous votes had garnered less support.
"The American people do not want to spend billions to starve children in Gaza," Sanders said last summer, after the resolutions failed. "The Democrats are moving forward on this issue, and I look forward to Republican support in the near future."
Republicans currently have narrow majorities in both chambers of Congress, though Democrats aim to flip both in the November midterm elections.
According to a Pew Research poll released last week, 60% of US adults have an unfavorable view of Israel, up from 53% last year, and 59% have little or no confidence that Netanyahu will do the right thing regarding world affairs, up from 52% in 2025.
Although much of the world's attention has been focused on Netanyahu and President Donald Trump's war on Iran—and Israel's related assault on Lebanon—in recent weeks, Israeli forces have also continued to kill Palestinians in Gaza, despite an October 2025 ceasefire agreement.
As of Monday, Gaza officials put the death toll at 72,333, with another 172,202 wounded, though global experts have warned the true figures could be far higher. Over 750 deaths and 2,100 injuries have been recorded since the ceasefire took effect, with another 760 bodies recovered during that time.
"At least two children a day have been killed or injured in the six months since the ceasefire for Gaza was agreed," said Save the Children International CEO Inger Ashing last week, as her group and others released a report marking six months since the deal was reached. “This is not peace for children in Gaza. The ceasefire agreement has not translated into meaningful protection for children or created conditions for recovery."
Among the children killed was Ritaj Rihan, a 9-year-old girl reportedly shot by Israeli forces in front of her third grade class at Abu Ubaida bin al-Jarrah School in Beit Lahiya last week. The Gaza Ministry of Health said that "it was not an isolated incident, but a direct extension of a systematic policy targeting the Palestinian people."
The fight seemingly isn't over, with a spokesperson for the president pledging that he will "refile this powerhouse lawsuit," which critics have called part of his war on free speech.
A Florida-based federal judge on Monday dismissed President Donald Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over its reporting on a "bawdy" birthday letter the Republican allegedly gave to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Trump denies writing the letter or drawing the outline of a naked woman around the text. He sued the journalists behind the July report—Joseph Palazzolo and Khadeeja Safdar—and the newspaper, plus its parent company News Corp, chief executive Robert Thomson, and founder Rupert Murdoch.
The US House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform subsequently subpoenaed the Epstein estate for all materials that now-imprisoned co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell allegedly compiled for the dead financier's birthday book, including the letter attributed to Trump—and in September, the panel published those documents online.
US District Judge Darrin P. Gayles, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, found on Monday that Trump's "complaint fails to adequately allege actual malice." However, Gayles also gave Trump the opportunity to amend his filing within the next two weeks.
While The Wall Street Journal did not immediately respond to CNN's request for comment, a spokesperson for Trump's legal team said in a statement that the president intends to continue the case.
"President Trump will follow Judge Gayles' ruling and guidance to refile this powerhouse lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and all of the other defendants," the spokesperson said. "The president will continue to hold accountable those who traffic in Fake News to mislead the American People."
CNN noted that despite the legal battle, "the 95-year-old Murdoch has maintained a cozy if complicated relationship with the president, including multiple meetings at the White House in recent months."
The suit over the birthday letter to Epstein—whom Trump was publicly friends with in the 1980s and '90s until a reported falling out in the early 2000s—is just part of a sweeping effort by the president and his political enablers "to undermine and chill the most basic freedoms protected under the First Amendment," as the advocacy group Free Press put it in a December analysis.
In addition to the Journal case, examples included Trump's legal battles with the BBC and The New York Times, the White House taking control of the presidential press pool, the administration blocking The Associated Press from the Oval Office over its refusal to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America, ABC temporarily suspending late-night host Jimmy Kimmel following comments from Trump's Federal Communications Commission chair, and the Pentagon's legally contested media policy.
Such attacks continue. Last month, as the costs of his unconstitutional war on Iran mounted, Trump floated "treason" charges against media outlets that he accused of reporting false information about the conflict.