August, 05 2009, 04:22pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Christopher
Lancette, TWS communications director, (202) 429-2692; chris_lancette@tws.org
Kristen
Boyles, Earthjustice, 206-343-7340 x 33
Roadless Forests Win in Court
Decision reinstates most of national rule opposed by Bush, timber lobbyists
WASHINGTON
The Wilderness Society and 19 other
environmental organizations notched
a huge victory today when the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco affirmed
protection for almost 40 million acres of wild national forests and grasslands
from new road building, logging, and development. The decision puts an end to
the Bush administration's efforts to open these last great natural areas
to development. Today's ruling protects the majority of national forest
roadless areas in the country.
"Americans
love the wild forests and rivers our country has been blessed with," said
Kristen Boyles, an attorney for Earthjustice -- the nonprofit environmental law
firm representing the plaintiffs in this case. "From campers, hunters,
hikers, fishermen, and bird watchers to cities and towns that rely on clean,
mountain-fed drinking water, we all stand and cheer that the court today
protected our national roadless areas."
Michael
Francis, The Wilderness Society's national forest program director in Washington D.C.,
said that "the court's decision reinstates the most popular
environmental rule of all time. It marks a virtual end to the Bush
administration's attacks on the 2001 roadless rule. It also frees
this administration to pursue President Obama's pledge to 'support
and defend' the 2001 rule. We trust the president will welcome the
ruling as much as we do."
The appellate court
explained that the Bush rule it struck down, "had the effect of
permanently repealing uniform, nationwide, substantive protections that were
afforded to inventoried roadless areas, and replacing them with a [variable]
regime of the type the agency had rejected as inadequate a few years
earlier." The court repeated its earlier finding that "there
can be no doubt that the 58.5 million acres subject to the Roadless Rule, if
implemented, would have greater protection if the Roadless Rule stands."
The 2001 rule has, the court emphasized, "immeasurable benefits from a
conservationist standpoint."
In 2009,
127 eminent scientists, four governors, 121 members of Congress, 25 Senators,
and 119 outdoor recreation businesses sent letters appealing to President Obama
and Agriculture Secretary Vilsack to protect and defend roadless areas.
"We're
not out of the woods yet," said Mike Anderson, a senior resource analyst
with The Wilderness Society in Seattle,
Washington. "This decision
halts the Bush administration assault on roadless areas, but the Obama
administration must now take the next steps necessary to make protection
permanent and nationwide."
Specifically,
the next step for Obama would be to instruct the Department of Justice to
appeal a suit sitting in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, where
another Bush hold-over effort seeks to nullify the entire 2001 roadless rule.
With
the roadless rule now back in effect in all areas except for Idaho
and the Tongass National
Forest in Alaska, The
Wilderness Society asserts that a proposed state-specific rule pending in Colorado is not needed.
"Coloradans
overwhelmingly supported the 2001 national rule and welcome its reinstatement
with open arms," said Suzanne Jones, the Colorado regional director for The
Wilderness Society. "While one final court challenge to the 2001
rule remains, there is no need for a state-specific rule like the watered-down Colorado proposal that
has just been released for public comment."
The
fate of the roadless rule has been caught up in the federal courts and the politics
of changing presidents for almost a decade. Originally adopted by the Clinton administration
after an environmental review that included 600 public hearings and over 1.6
million public comments, the Bush administration actively colluded to get rid
of it. Despite these efforts, and due to deep public support for roadless area
protection, only seven miles of roads were built and 535 acres of trees logged
in roadless areas since 2001.
In the challenge to the repeal of the roadless rule,
Earthjustice represented The Wilderness Society, California Wilderness
Coalition, Forests Forever Foundation, Northcoast Environmental Center, Oregon
Wild, Sitka Conservation Society, Siskiyou Project, Biodiversity Conservation
Alliance, Sierra Club, National Audubon Society, Greater Yellowstone Coalition,
Center for Biological Diversity, Environmental Protection Information Center,
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Defenders of Wildlife, Pacific Rivers
Council, Idaho Conservation League, Humane Society of the United States,
Conservation NW, and Greenpeace, and joined with the states of California,
Oregon, New Mexico, and Washington.
Since 1935, The Wilderness Society has led the conservation movement in wilderness protection, writing and passing the landmark Wilderness Act and winning lasting protection for 107 million acres of Wilderness, including 56 million acres of spectacular lands in Alaska, eight million acres of fragile desert lands in California and millions more throughout the nation.
LATEST NEWS
Environmental and Indigenous Groups Mobilize to Stop 'Alligator Alcatraz'
"This scheme is not only cruel, it threatens the Everglades ecosystem that state and federal taxpayers have spent billions to protect," said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades.
Jun 30, 2025
As Florida's Republican government moves to construct a sprawling new immigration detention center in the heart of the Everglades, nicknamed "Alligator Alcatraz," environmental groups and a wide range of other activists have begun to mobilize against it.
Florida's Republican attorney general, James Uthmeier, announced last week that construction of the jail, at the site of a disused airbase in the Big Cypress National Preserve, had begun. According to Fox 4 Now, an affiliate in Southwest Florida, construction has moved at "a blistering pace," with the site expected to be done by next week.
Three environmental advocacy groups have launched a lawsuit to try to halt the construction of the facility. And on Saturday, hundreds of protesters flocked to the remote site to voice their opposition.
Opponents have called out the cruelty of the plan, which comes as part of U.S. President Donald Trump's crusade to deport thousands of immigrants per day. They also called out the site's potential to inflict severe harm to local wildlife in one of America's most unique ecosystems.
Florida's government has said the site will have no environmental impact. Last week, Uthmeier described the area as a barren swampland. He said the site "presents an efficient, low-cost opportunity to build a temporary detention facility because you don't need to invest that much in the perimeter. People get out, there's not much waiting for 'em other than alligators and pythons," he said in the video. "Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide."
But local indigenous leaders have said that's not true. Saturday's protest was led by Native American groups, who say that the site will destroy their sacred homelands. According to The Associated Press, Big Cypress is home to 15 traditional Miccosukee and Seminole villages, as well as ceremonial and burial grounds and other gathering sites.
"Rather than Miccosukee homelands being an uninhabited wasteland for alligators and pythons, as some have suggested, the Big Cypress is the Tribe's traditional homelands. The landscape has protected the Miccosukee and Seminole people for generations," Miccosukee Chairman Talbert Cypress wrote in a statement on social media last week.
Environmental groups, meanwhile, have disputed the state's claims that the site will have no environmental impact. On Friday, the Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Everglades, and Earthjustice sued the Department of Homeland Security in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. They argued that the site was being constructed without any of the environmental reviews required by the National Environmental Policy Act.
"The site is more than 96% wetlands, surrounded by Big Cypress National Preserve, and is habitat for the endangered Florida panther and other iconic species. This scheme is not only cruel, it threatens the Everglades ecosystem that state and federal taxpayers have spent billions to protect," said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades.
Governor Ron DeSantis used emergency powers to fast track the proposal, which the Center for Biological Diversity says has left no room for public input or environmental review required by federal law.
"This reckless attack on the Everglades—the lifeblood of Florida—risks polluting sensitive waters and turning more endangered Florida panthers into roadkill. It makes no sense to build what’s essentially a new development in the Everglades for any reason, but this reason is particularly despicable," said Elise Bennett, Florida and Caribbean director and attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity.
Reuters has reported that the planned jail could hold up to 5,000 detained migrants at a time and could cost $450 million per year to maintain. It comes as President Trump has sought to increase deportations to a quota of 3,000 per day. The majority of those who have been arrested by federal immigration authorities have no criminal records.
"This massive detention center," Bennett said, "will blight one of the most iconic ecosystems in the world."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Kristi Noem Took Personal Cut of Political Donations While Governor of South Dakota: Report
"No wonder Pam Bondi gutted the public integrity section of DOJ. To protect utterly corrupt monsters like Kristi Noem."
Jun 30, 2025
The investigative outlet ProPublica revealed Monday that Kristi Noem secretly took a personal cut of funds she raised for a nonprofit that boosted her political career—and then did not disclose the income when President Donald Trump selected her to serve as head of the Department of Homeland Security.
ProPublica reported that in 2023, while Noem was governor of South Dakota, the nonprofit group American Resolve Policy Fund "routed funds to a personal company of Noem's that had recently been established in Delaware." The company is called Ashwood Strategies, and it was registered in June 2023.
"The payment totaled $80,000 that year, a significant boost to her roughly $130,000 government salary," according to the outlet. "Since the nonprofit is a so-called dark money group—one that's not required to disclose the names of its donors—the original source of the money remains unknown."
Experts told ProPublica that the arrangement and Noem's failure to disclose the income were unusual at best and possibly unlawful.
"If donors to these nonprofits are not just holding the keys to an elected official's political future but also literally providing them with their income, that's new and disturbing," Daniel Weiner, a former Federal Election Commission attorney who now works at the Brennan Center for Justice, told ProPublica.
Noem's lawyers denied that she violated the law but did not reply to ProPublica's questions about whether the Office of Government Ethics was aware of the $80,000 payment.
Unlike many Trump administration officials, Noem is not a billionaire. But "while she is among the least wealthy members of Trump's Cabinet, her personal spending habits have attracted notice," ProPublica observed, noting that she was "photographed wearing a gold Rolex Cosmograph Daytona watch that costs nearly $50,000 as she toured the Salvadoran prison where her agency is sending immigrants."
"In April, after her purse was stolen at a Washington, D.C. restaurant, it emerged she was carrying $3,000 in cash, which an official said was for 'dinner, activities, and Easter gifts,'" the outlet continued. "She was criticized for using taxpayer money as governor to pay for expenses related to trips to Paris, to Canada for bear hunting, and to Houston to have dental work done. At the time, Noem denied misusing public funds."
Political scientist Norman Ornstein wrote Monday that it was "no wonder [Attorney General] Pam Bondi gutted the public integrity section of DOJ."
"To protect utterly corrupt monsters like Kristi Noem," he added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Caving to Trump, Canada Drops Tax on US Tech Firms
One journalist accused Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney of chickening out.
Jun 30, 2025
Acquiescing to pressure from the Trump administration, the Canadian government announced on Sunday that the country will rescind the digital services tax, a levy that would have seen large American tech firms pay billions of dollars to Canada over the next few years.
The Sunday announcement from the Canadian government cited "anticipation of a mutually beneficial comprehensive trade arrangement" as the reason for the rescission.
"Today's announcement will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025, timeline set out at this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis," said Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in the statement.
The digital services tax impacts companies that make over $20 million in revenue from Canadian users and customers through digital services like online advertising and shopping. Companies like Uber and Google would have paid a 3% levy on the money they made from Canadian sources, according to CBC News.
The reversal comes after U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday blasted the digital services tax, calling it a "direct and blatant attack on our country" on Truth Social.
Trump said he was suspending trade talks between the two countries because of the tax. "Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately. We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period," Trump wrote. The United States is Canada's largest trading partner.
Payments from tech firms subject to the digital services tax were due starting on Monday, though the tax has been in effect since last year.
"The June 30, 2025 collection will be halted," and Canada's Minister of Finance "will soon bring forward legislation to rescind the Digital Services Tax Act," according to the Sunday statement.
"If Mark Carney folds in response to this pressure from Trump on the digital services tax, he proves he can be pushed around," said Canadian journalist Paris Marx on Bluesky, speaking prior to the announcement of the rescission. "The tax must be enforced," he added.
"Carney chickens out too," wrote the author Doug Henwood on Twitter on Monday.
In an opinion piece originally published in Canadian Dimension before the announcement on Sunday, Jared Walker, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Canadians for Tax Fairness, wrote that all the money generated for the tax could mean "more federal money for housing, transit, and healthcare transfers—all from some of the largest and most under-taxed companies in the world."
Walker also wrote that the digital service tax could serve as a counterweight to the so-called "revenge tax" provision in Trump's sprawling domestic tax and spending bill.
Section 899, called "Enforcement of Remedies Against Unfair Foreign Taxes," would "increase withholding taxes for non-resident individuals and companies from countries that the U.S. believes have imposed discriminatory or unfair taxes," according to CBC. The digital services tax is one of the taxes the Trump administration believes is discriminatory.
"If 'elbows up' is going to be more than just a slogan, Canada can't cave to pressure when Donald Trump throws his weight around," wrote Walker, invoking the Canadian rallying cry in the face of American antagonism when it comes to trade.
"But this slogan also means the Carney government has to make sure it is working on behalf of everyday Canadians—not just the ultra-rich and big corporations that are only 'Canadian' when it's convenient," Walker wrote.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular