April, 15 2009, 02:20pm EDT
![Earthjustice](https://assets.rbl.ms/32012672/origin.jpg)
Groups Sue National Marine Fisheries Service to Protect Sea Turtles
Seek emergency action to correct violation of Endangered Species Act
TALLAHASSEE, Florida
A group of conservation organizations is suing the National
Marine Fisheries Service to force action quickly to protect threatened
and endangered sea turtles from death and injury in the Gulf of Mexico
bottom longline fishery. Earthjustice, the Center for Biological
Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, and a coalition of conservation
groups are urging the Fisheries Service to impose immediate protections
for the imperiled species.
"Important populations of sea turtles in the Gulf have been
illegally killed by the hundreds since 2006 in flagrant violation of
the Endangered Species Act," said Steve Roady, an attorney with
Earthjustice. "Now that the fishery is in full force for the season, it
has become necessary to go to court to require the new administration
to take emergency action to protect these vulnerable turtles."
The National Marine Fisheries Service, an agency of the U.S.
Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration ("NMFS" or "NOAA Fisheries") is responsible for ensuring
that bottom longline fishing does not pose a threat to sea turtle
populations. In 2005, the agency determined that the Gulf of Mexico
fishery could capture up to 114 sea turtles, including 85 loggerheads,
during a three-year period without violating the Endangered Species
Act. But the agency has released new information estimating that
vessels in the Gulf caught nearly 1,000 turtles between July 2006 and
December 2008 - more than eight times the number allowed. Although the
agency was required to issue a report on the number of turtles captured
by the bottom longline fishery every year starting in 2006, it failed
to do so. As a result, the high numbers of turtles caught in longline
equipment was not discovered at that time and hundreds more sea turtles
were captured in 2007 and 2008.
"The current emergency could have been avoided if the National
Marine Fisheries Service simply had been paying attention and making
adjustments in the fishery before the turtle takes soared to
astronomical levels in the past several years," said Andrea Treece, an
attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity. "Now the agency's
only lawful choice is to suspend the bottom longline fishery until the
agency figures out how to prevent more turtles from being hurt or
killed."
Following on the conservation organizations' notice of its intent to
sue the agency for violations of the Endangered Species Act in January,
the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council also weighed in,
recommending the closure of the bottom longline fishery until the
National Marine Fisheries Service can ensure the protection of the
turtles. But in March, the bottom longline fishery fully re-opened for
the season - greatly increasing the immediate threat to sea turtles.
"Information indicates that the sea turtles are in trouble now.
April has been a high time for turtle takes in the past and the agency
has no basis for thinking they are not currently at risk," said Sierra
Weaver, an attorney for Defenders of Wildlife.
In addition to the high rate of capture from the bottom longline
fishery, other troubling news from Florida researchers has documented a
startling decline in loggerhead sea turtle nesting over the past decade.
"Loggerhead nesting in Florida has declined by nearly 41% in the
last decade while green and leatherback turtle nesting on the very same
beaches is increasing dramatically," said Marydele Donnelly of the
Caribbean Conservation Corporation. "This fishery is undermining nearly
three decades of conservation work to protect loggerheads from a
multitude of threats. By failing to act, the National Marine Fisheries
Service is not serving as a good steward for the nation's sea turtles."
"We must end the indiscriminate killing of sea turtles," said Manley
Fuller, president of the Florida Wildlife Federation. "The adult and
sub-adult turtles harmed by bottom longline fishing are simply too
valuable to the overall health and survival of these populations - and
we need them to be able to reach our local beaches to nest."
"The National Marine Fisheries Service has
the responsibility to protect endangered and threatened turtle
populations from destructive fishing practices," said Cynthia Sarthou,
Executive Director of the Gulf Restoration Network. "The public needs
to know that no more sea turtles are killed just to put grouper on a
dinner plate."
Bottom longline fishing is a fishing process that uses hundreds or
even thousands of baited hooks along miles of lines laid behind fishing
vessels and stretching down to the reef and Gulf floor. The fishing
hooks target species like grouper, tilefish, and sharks, but often
catch other fish or wildlife, including endangered and threatened sea
turtles. Injuries from these hooks affect a sea turtle's ability to
feed, swim, avoid predators, and reproduce. Many times the turtles
drown or, unable to recover from the extreme physiological stress, die
soon after being released from the longlines.
Conservation groups are calling on the new administration to halt
the Gulf of Mexico bottom longline fishery until it can analyze what
measures are necessary to follow the Endangered Species Act. The
continued operation of the bottom longline fishery in the Gulf is
likely to result in the continued death and injury of sea turtles. The
loggerhead turtle faces an especially serious threat from Gulf longline
fishing due to the severe nesting decline over recent years, according
to research by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
"In addition to loggerheads, the Kemp's ridley population in the
Gulf of Mexico is struggling to increase from numbers that threatened
extinction in the mid-1980s," said Carole Allen, Gulf office director
at the Sea Turtle Restoration Project. "We simply cannot risk losing
more sea turtles to longline fishing, which has shown no regard for
endangered species."
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:
A copy of the complaint
filed against the National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration, and Department of Commerce in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of Florida.
A copy of the letter
the groups sent to the National Marine Fisheries Service outlining the
immediate dangers to threatened and endangered sea turtles.
Earthjustice is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment. We bring about far-reaching change by enforcing and strengthening environmental laws on behalf of hundreds of organizations, coalitions and communities.
800-584-6460LATEST NEWS
'Tragic Outcome' for Gig Workers as California Supreme Court Hands Win to Uber, DoorDash
"Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers," the case plaintiff said.
Jul 25, 2024
Labor advocates on Thursday decried a ruling by the California Supreme Court upholding a lower court's affirmation of a state ballot measure allowing app-based ride and delivery companies to classify their drivers as independent contractors, limiting their worker rights.
The court's seven justices ruled unanimously in Castellanos v. State of California that Proposition 22, which was approved by 58% of California voters in 2020, complies with the state constitution. Prop 22—which was overturned in 2021 by an Alameda County Superior Court judge in 2021—was upheld in March 2023 by the state's 1st District Court of Appeals.
The business models of app-based companies including DoorDash, Instacart, Lyft, and Uber rely upon minimizing frontline worker compensation by categorizing drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. Independent contractors are not entitled to unemployment insurance, health insurance, or compensation for business expenses.
There are approximately 1.4 million app-based gig workers in California, according to industry estimates.
While DoorDash hailed Thursday's ruling as "not only a victory for Dashers, but also for democracy itself," gig worker advocates condemned the decision.
"Over the last three years, gig workers across California have experienced firsthand that Prop 22 is nothing more than a bait-and-switch meant to enrich global corporations at the expense of the Black, brown, and immigrant workers who power their earnings," plaintiff Hector Castellanos, who drives for Uber and Lyft, said in a statement.
"Prop 22 has allowed gig companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash to deprive us of a living wage, access to workers compensation, paid sick leave, and meaningful healthcare coverage," Castellanos added. "Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers."
Lorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO, said that "we are deeply disappointed that the state Supreme Court has allowed tech corporations to buy their way out of basic labor laws despite Proposition 22's inconsistencies with our state constitution."
"These companies have upended our social contract, forcing workers and the public to take on the inherent risk created by this work, while they profit," she continued. "A.B. 5 granted virtually all California workers the right to be paid for all hours worked, health and safety standards, unemployment insurance, workers compensation, and the right to organize."
"Rideshare and delivery drivers deserve those rights as well," Gonzalez stressed.
The Gig Workers Rising campaign said on social media that "Uber and other app corporations spent $220 million to buy this law, and they did it by tricking Californians."
Prop 22's passage in November 2020 with nearly 59% of the vote was the culmination of what was by far the most expensive ballot measure in California history. App-based companies and their backers outspent labor and progressive groups by more than 10 to 1, with proponents pouring a staggering $204.5 million into the "yes" campaign's coffers against just $19 million for the "no" side.
"Voters were told the initiative would provide us with 'historic new benefits' and guaranteed earnings," said Gig Workers Rising. "But since it went into effect, drivers have seen our pay go down, learned the benefits are a sham, and have to accept unsafe rides because of the constant threat of being 'deactivated,' kicked off the app with little explanation or warning."
"If Uber really cared about good benefits and fair wages, it could make that happen tomorrow," the campaign added. "Instead, it has shown it would rather slash pay, bamboozle voters, and put drivers' lives and livelihoods in danger—all while promising $7 billion in stock buybacks to banks and billionaires."
Veena Dubal, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine who focuses on labor and inequality, toldCalMatters that Thursday's ruling was "a really tragic outcome," but "it's not the end of the road."
Dubal's sentiment was echoed by some California state legislators, who said the ruling presents an opportunity to act.
"While this decision is frustrating, it must also be motivating," said state Senate Labor Committee Chair Lola Smallwood-Cuevas (D-28). "I'm more determined than ever to ensure that all workers—including our diverse and Black, Indigenous, and people of color-led gig workforce—have the basic protections of workers compensation, paid sick leave, family leave, disability insurance, and the right to form a union."
Prop 22 has served as a template for lawmakers in other states seeking to deny or limit basic worker rights, benefits, and protections.
In Massachusetts, app-based companies have been fighting for years to get a measure to classify drivers as contractors on the state ballot. In 2022, Lyft made the largest political donation in state history—$14.4 million—to a coalition funding one such proposal.
Last month, Uber and Lyft reached an agreement with the office of Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, a Democrat, to pay $175 million to settle a lawsuit filed in 2020. As part of the deal, the companies also agreed to increase driver pay and provide paid sick leave, accident insurance, and some health benefits. The agreement does not address how app-based gig workers should be classified.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Young Voters Tell Kamala Harris to 'Fight for Our Future'
"This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Jul 25, 2024
Four youth-led groups on Thursday urged Vice President Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, to "fight for our future" by pursuing a policy agenda the coalition unveiled in a March letter to U.S. President Joe Biden.
It's been less than a week since Biden left the race and endorsed Harris, who is expected to face former Republican Donald Trump and his running mate, U.S. Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), in the November election. Since then, she's racked up endorsements from Democratic members of Congress and progressive groups focused on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
March for Our Lives, which was launched after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, honored Harris with the group's first-ever endorsement on Wednesday, calling her "the right person to stand up for us and fight for the country we deserve."
"To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters."
The gun violence prevention organization is part of the youth-led coalition behind the new letter, which also includes the climate-focused Sunrise Movement; Gen-Z for Change, which advocates on a range of issues; and the national immigrant network United We Dream Action.
"You have an urgent and important task. To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters," the coalition told Harris on Thursday, noting that she sought the Democratic nomination during the last cycle. "You should build on your 2020 campaign platform where you put forward a strong vision to make the economy work for everyday people and ensure a livable future for us all."
The groups urged Harris to support the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and the Reverse Mass Incarceration Act. They pushed her to expand pathways to citizenship, keep families together, end fossil fuel subsidies, and create good, union jobs. They also called on her to prioritize gun violence prevention and investments in public health solutions and green, affordable housing.
"Democrats are at a critical crossroads with young people," the coalition wrote to Harris on Thursday. "Polls showed Biden and Trump neck-and-neck among young voters."
ANew York Times/Siena College poll conducted July 22-24 shows Trump leading Harris 48% to 47% among likely voters and 48% to 46% among registered voters—differences that fall within the margin of error.
Forbesnoted Thursday that "Democrats are far more enthusiastic about Harris than they were Biden, the Times/Siena survey found, with nearly 80% of voters who lean Democrat saying they would like Harris to be the nominee, compared to 48% of Democrats who said the same about Biden three weeks ago."
The outlet also pointed to two other polls conducted by Morning Consult and Reuters/Ipsos since Biden dropped out, which both show Harris with a narrow lead over Trump.
"You have an opportunity to win the youth vote by turning the page and differentiating yourself from Biden policies that are deeply unpopular with us, such as approving new oil and gas projects, denying people their right to seek refuge and asylum, and funding the Israeli government's killing of civilians in Gaza," the youth coalition highlighted Thursday. "You must speak to the economic pain young people are facing from crushing student debt and skyrocketing housing and food prices."
Looking beyond November, the groups told Harris—who could be the first Black woman and person of Asian descent elected to the country's highest office—that "you could be a historic president. Not just because of who you are, but what you can accomplish."
"Young people are energized and ready to organize against fascism and for the future we deserve," they concluded. "This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Video Game Actors Strike for AI Protections
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said one union leader. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games."
Jul 25, 2024
After nearly two years of negotiations with video game giants and no deal that would protect performers from artificial intelligence, unionized voice and motion capture actors who work in video game development announced Thursday that they will go on strike starting at 12:01 am on Friday, July 26.
The performers are represented by Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), which last year won a contract for TV and film actors that included "unprecedented provisions for consent and compensation that will protect members from the threat of AI," after the union went on strike for four months.
The union has been negotiating on behalf of video game actors with major production companies including Disney Character Voices Inc., Activision Productions Inc., and WB Games Inc., and has won concessions over wages and job safety—but "AI protections remain the sticking point," said SAG-AFTRA on Thursday as the impending strike was announced.
Unionized actors want protections that would stop video game companies from training AI to replicate actors' voices or likeness without their consent and without compensating them.
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, national executive director and chief negotiator for SAG-AFTRA. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games. That includes the SAG-AFTRA members who bring memorable and beloved game characters to life, and they deserve and demand the same fundamental protections as performers in film, television, streaming, and music: fair compensation and the right of informed consent for the AI use of their faces, voices, and bodies."
"Frankly, it's stunning that these video game studios haven't learned anything from the lessons of last year—that our members can and will stand up and demand fair and equitable treatment with respect to AI, and the public supports us in that," he added.
Sarah Elmaleh, negotiating committee chair for the union's interactive media agreement, said the negotiations have shown the companies "are not interested in fair, reasonable AI protections, but rather flagrant exploitation."
"We look forward to collaborating with teams on our interim and independent contracts, which provide AI transparency, consent, and compensation to all performers, and to continuing to negotiate in good faith with this bargaining group when they are ready to join us in the world we all deserve," said Elmaleh.
The unionized actors voted in favor of the strike authorization with a 98.32% yes vote, said SAG-AFTRA.
The strike was announced as more than 500 workers who help develop the popular World of Warcraft video game franchise voted to join the Communications Workers of America (CWA), with the games publisher, Blizzard Entertainment, recognizing the bargaining unit.
CWA noted that the workers' journey to union representation began with a walkout in 2021 at Activision Blizzard, which was later bought by Microsoft, over sexual harassment and discrimination.
"What we've accomplished at World of Warcraft is just the beginning," Eric Lanham, a World of Warcraft test analyst, said in a statement. "We know that when workers have a protected voice, it's a win-win for employee standards, the studio, and World of Warcraft fans looking for the best gaming experience."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular