April, 15 2009, 02:20pm EDT

Groups Sue National Marine Fisheries Service to Protect Sea Turtles
Seek emergency action to correct violation of Endangered Species Act
TALLAHASSEE, Florida
A group of conservation organizations is suing the National
Marine Fisheries Service to force action quickly to protect threatened
and endangered sea turtles from death and injury in the Gulf of Mexico
bottom longline fishery. Earthjustice, the Center for Biological
Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, and a coalition of conservation
groups are urging the Fisheries Service to impose immediate protections
for the imperiled species.
"Important populations of sea turtles in the Gulf have been
illegally killed by the hundreds since 2006 in flagrant violation of
the Endangered Species Act," said Steve Roady, an attorney with
Earthjustice. "Now that the fishery is in full force for the season, it
has become necessary to go to court to require the new administration
to take emergency action to protect these vulnerable turtles."
The National Marine Fisheries Service, an agency of the U.S.
Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration ("NMFS" or "NOAA Fisheries") is responsible for ensuring
that bottom longline fishing does not pose a threat to sea turtle
populations. In 2005, the agency determined that the Gulf of Mexico
fishery could capture up to 114 sea turtles, including 85 loggerheads,
during a three-year period without violating the Endangered Species
Act. But the agency has released new information estimating that
vessels in the Gulf caught nearly 1,000 turtles between July 2006 and
December 2008 - more than eight times the number allowed. Although the
agency was required to issue a report on the number of turtles captured
by the bottom longline fishery every year starting in 2006, it failed
to do so. As a result, the high numbers of turtles caught in longline
equipment was not discovered at that time and hundreds more sea turtles
were captured in 2007 and 2008.
"The current emergency could have been avoided if the National
Marine Fisheries Service simply had been paying attention and making
adjustments in the fishery before the turtle takes soared to
astronomical levels in the past several years," said Andrea Treece, an
attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity. "Now the agency's
only lawful choice is to suspend the bottom longline fishery until the
agency figures out how to prevent more turtles from being hurt or
killed."
Following on the conservation organizations' notice of its intent to
sue the agency for violations of the Endangered Species Act in January,
the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council also weighed in,
recommending the closure of the bottom longline fishery until the
National Marine Fisheries Service can ensure the protection of the
turtles. But in March, the bottom longline fishery fully re-opened for
the season - greatly increasing the immediate threat to sea turtles.
"Information indicates that the sea turtles are in trouble now.
April has been a high time for turtle takes in the past and the agency
has no basis for thinking they are not currently at risk," said Sierra
Weaver, an attorney for Defenders of Wildlife.
In addition to the high rate of capture from the bottom longline
fishery, other troubling news from Florida researchers has documented a
startling decline in loggerhead sea turtle nesting over the past decade.
"Loggerhead nesting in Florida has declined by nearly 41% in the
last decade while green and leatherback turtle nesting on the very same
beaches is increasing dramatically," said Marydele Donnelly of the
Caribbean Conservation Corporation. "This fishery is undermining nearly
three decades of conservation work to protect loggerheads from a
multitude of threats. By failing to act, the National Marine Fisheries
Service is not serving as a good steward for the nation's sea turtles."
"We must end the indiscriminate killing of sea turtles," said Manley
Fuller, president of the Florida Wildlife Federation. "The adult and
sub-adult turtles harmed by bottom longline fishing are simply too
valuable to the overall health and survival of these populations - and
we need them to be able to reach our local beaches to nest."
"The National Marine Fisheries Service has
the responsibility to protect endangered and threatened turtle
populations from destructive fishing practices," said Cynthia Sarthou,
Executive Director of the Gulf Restoration Network. "The public needs
to know that no more sea turtles are killed just to put grouper on a
dinner plate."
Bottom longline fishing is a fishing process that uses hundreds or
even thousands of baited hooks along miles of lines laid behind fishing
vessels and stretching down to the reef and Gulf floor. The fishing
hooks target species like grouper, tilefish, and sharks, but often
catch other fish or wildlife, including endangered and threatened sea
turtles. Injuries from these hooks affect a sea turtle's ability to
feed, swim, avoid predators, and reproduce. Many times the turtles
drown or, unable to recover from the extreme physiological stress, die
soon after being released from the longlines.
Conservation groups are calling on the new administration to halt
the Gulf of Mexico bottom longline fishery until it can analyze what
measures are necessary to follow the Endangered Species Act. The
continued operation of the bottom longline fishery in the Gulf is
likely to result in the continued death and injury of sea turtles. The
loggerhead turtle faces an especially serious threat from Gulf longline
fishing due to the severe nesting decline over recent years, according
to research by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
"In addition to loggerheads, the Kemp's ridley population in the
Gulf of Mexico is struggling to increase from numbers that threatened
extinction in the mid-1980s," said Carole Allen, Gulf office director
at the Sea Turtle Restoration Project. "We simply cannot risk losing
more sea turtles to longline fishing, which has shown no regard for
endangered species."
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:
A copy of the complaint
filed against the National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration, and Department of Commerce in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of Florida.
A copy of the letter
the groups sent to the National Marine Fisheries Service outlining the
immediate dangers to threatened and endangered sea turtles.
Earthjustice is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment. We bring about far-reaching change by enforcing and strengthening environmental laws on behalf of hundreds of organizations, coalitions and communities.
800-584-6460LATEST NEWS
Trump Bid to Block $4.9 Billion With 'Pocket Rescission' Blasted as 'Authoritarianism 101'
"Congress—and only Congress—passes budgets. Because the president's job is to take care the laws are faithfully executed, he must spend the money as directed," said Rep. Jamie Raskin, a constitutional scholar.
Aug 30, 2025
Democracy defenders and members of Congress are condemning US President Donald Trump's effort to use a "pocket rescission" process to block $4.9 billion in foreign aid as authoritarian and illegal.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on Friday shared on social media Trump's letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) about the move. According to a White House fact sheet linked in a subsequent post, much of the money was headed for the US Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which Trump has gutted.
As The Associated Press explained:
The 1974 Impoundment Control Act gives the president the authority to propose canceling funds approved by Congress. Congress can within 45 days vote on pulling back the funds or sustaining them, but by proposing the rescission so close to September 30 the White House argues that the money won’t be spent and the funding lapses.
What was essentially the last pocket rescission occurred in 1977 by Democratic then-President Jimmy Carter, and the Trump administration argues it's a legally permissible tool despite some murkiness as Carter had initially proposed the clawback well ahead of the 45-day deadline.
Shortly after the OMB social media posts, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that OMB Director Russ Vought was helping shutter USAID, writing on the platform X: "Since January, we've saved the taxpayers tens of billions of dollars. And with a small set of core programs moved over to the State Department, USAID is officially in closeout mode. Russ is now at the helm to oversee the closeout of an agency that long ago went off the rails. Congrats, Russ."
Meanwhile, Rubio's former congressional colleagues and others are sounding the alarm over the administration's effort.
"America is staring down next month's government funding deadline on September 30," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). "It's clear neither Trump nor congressional Republicans have any plan to avoid a painful and entirely unnecessary shutdown. With Trump's illegal 'pocket rescission': They seem eager to inflict further pain on the American people, raising their healthcare costs, compromising essential services, and further damaging our national security."
Congressman Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) also put pressure on GOP lawmakers, saying that "this is wrong—and illegal. Not only is Trump gutting $5 billion in foreign aid that saves lives and advances America's interests, but he's doing so using an unlawful 'pocket recission' method that undermines Congress' power of the purse. I urge my Republican colleagues to say hell no."
While most Republicans on Capitol Hill have backed Trump's endeavors to claw back funding previously appropriated by Congress, GOP Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) voted against his $9 billion rescission package earlier this year.
Collins, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, also spoke out against Trump's new move, noting in a Friday statement that under the US Constitution, Congress has "the power of the purse," and the Government Accountability Office "has concluded that this type of rescission is unlawful and not permitted by the Impoundment Control Act."
Congressman Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), a constitutional scholar, similarly stressed that "Congress—and only Congress—passes budgets. Because the president's job is to take care the laws are faithfully executed, he must spend the money as directed. Trump's 'pocket recissions' are lawless and absurd. If a president opposes legislative spending decisions, he can veto them, subject to override, but once passed, he must execute on them."
Lisa Gilbert, co-president of the watchdog group Public Citizen, declared in a Friday statement that with the pocket rescission move, the Trump administration "demonstrated yet again its contempt for Congress' power of the purse and the Constitution's separation of powers."
"With this Constitution-mocking action, the administration is bringing us closer to a shutdown on September 30, and it doesn't seem to care," Gilbert said. "We call on Congress to push back, pass and abide by appropriations packages, and fight the administration’s illegal impoundments that harm regular Americans."
"This is not just a constitutional crisis, it's a matter of global justice," she added. "The congressionally appropriated funds that the Trump administration illegally aims to cancel support economic development programs to empower the world's most vulnerable and impoverished, and address some of the ravage of catastrophic climate change in developing nations."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Tariffs Bound for Supreme Court After Another Legal Loss
If the president's policies are struck down, the administration may have to repay billions of dollars in duties, which customs and trade experts warn "would be a logistical nightmare."
Aug 29, 2025
As working-class Americans endure the pain from US President Donald Trump's tariff war, the Republican signaled that he plans to keep fighting for the levies after a loss at the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Trump is the first president to impose tariffs by citing the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. In a 7-4 ruling, the appellate court's majority found that most of his tariffs are illegal.
The court said that "tariffs are a core congressional power" and "we discern no clear congressional authorization by IEEPA for tariffs of the magnitude of the reciprocal tariffs and trafficking tariffs."
The decision affirms a May ruling from the US Court of International Trade, which also found that Trump exceeded his authority.
Friday's ruling is paused until October 14, to give the White House time to appeal to the nation's highest court. Trump suggested he would do so in a post on his Truth Social platform, writing:
ALL TARIFFS ARE STILL IN EFFECT! Today a Highly Partisan Appeals Court incorrectly said that our Tariffs should be removed, but they know the United States of America will win in the end. If these Tariffs ever went away, it would be a total disaster for the Country. It would make us financially weak, and we have to be strong. The U.S.A. will no longer tolerate enormous Trade Deficits and unfair Tariffs and Non Tariff Trade Barriers imposed by other Countries, friend or foe, that undermine our Manufacturers, Farmers, and everyone else. If allowed to stand, this Decision would literally destroy the United States of America. At the start of this Labor Day weekend, we should all remember that TARIFFS are the best tool to help our Workers, and support Companies that produce great MADE IN AMERICA products. For many years, Tariffs were allowed to be used against us by our uncaring and unwise Politicians. Now, with the help of the United States Supreme Court, we will use them to the benefit of our Nation, and Make America Rich, Strong, and Powerful Again! Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Politico noted that the Friday decision opens the door "for the administration to potentially have to repay billions worth of duties," and pointed to recent warnings from customs and trade experts "that repayments would be a logistical nightmare, and would likely trigger a wave of legal challenges from other businesses and industry groups seeking reimbursement."
Trump's latest legal loss on the tariff front follows various analyses and polling that show the harm his policies are causing. One Accountable.US report from this month highlights comments from grocery executives about passing costs on to consumers, and a recent survey found that 90% of Americans consider the price of groceries a source of stress.
Democrats on the Joint Economic Committee also released a related report earlier this month. As JEC Ranking Member Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) said at the time, "While President Trump promised that he would expand our manufacturing sector, this report shows that, instead, the chaos and uncertainty created by his tariffs has placed a burden on American manufacturers that could weigh our country down for years to come."
Another mid-August analysis from the Century Foundation and Groundwork Collaborative details the surging cost of school supplies as American families prepared for the 2025-26 academic year. TCF senior fellow Rachel West said that "from his reckless tariffs to his budget law slashing food assistance and federal student loans, Trump's back-to-school message to America's families is crystal clear: Don't expect help, just expect less."
Keep ReadingShow Less
US 'Denying and Revoking' Visas of Palestinian Officials Ahead of UN General Assembly
The Palestinian presidency said the decision—which comes as more and more nations formally recognize Palestine's statehood—"stands in clear contradiction to international law and the UN Headquarters Agreement."
Aug 29, 2025
The Trump administration said Friday that Secretary of State Marco Rubio "is denying and revoking visas from members of the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority" ahead of next month's United Nations General Assembly in New York.
The US State Department said Friday that "the Trump administration has been clear: It is in our national security interests to hold the PLO and PA accountable for not complying with their commitments, and for undermining the prospects for peace."
"Before the PLO and PA can be considered partners for peace, they must consistently repudiate terrorism—including the October 7 massacre—and end incitement to terrorism in education, as required by US law and as promised by the PLO," the statement continues.
No US administration in modern times has ever demanded that Israel repudiate its generations-long illegal occupation and settler colonization of Palestine, its ongoing genocide in Gaza, or any other violation of international law or human rights.
"The PA must also end its attempts to bypass negotiations through international lawfare campaigns, including appeals to the [International Criminal Court] and [International Court of Justice], and efforts to secure the unilateral recognition of a conjectural Palestinian state," the State Department added. "Both steps materially contributed to Hamas' refusal to release its hostages, and to the breakdown of the Gaza ceasefire talks."
The ICC last year issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza, including murder and the forced starvation of Palestinians that is driving a famine that has killed at least hundreds of Palestinians and is starving hundreds of thousands more. The ICJ is currently weighing a genocide case against Israel filed by South Africa—not the PA.
As for ceasefire talks, Matthew Miller, who served as a State Department spokesperson during the Biden administration, recently admitted that Israel habitually torpedoed ceasefire agreements each time they were nearing a conclusion in what he called a sustained effort to "try and sabotage" a deal. Miller repeatedly stood at his podium and told reporters that Hamas was to blame for thwarting a truce.
Miller added that Netanyahu openly admitted to US officials that he wanted to continue the Gaza war for "decades."
It is not clear which Palestinian officials will have their visas denied or revoked. The office of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said in a statement responding to the US announcement that "this decision stands in clear contradiction to international law and the UN Headquarters Agreement—which effectively shields UN member-state officials from US immigration policies—particularly since the state of Palestine is an observer member of the United Nations."
This isn't the first time the US has blocked Palestinian officials from attending a General Assembly. In 1998, the Regan administration denied then-PLO Chair Yasser Arafat a visa and the General Assembly was convened in Geneva instead of New York. There have already been numerous calls to relocate this year's General Assembly to the Swiss city following the US move.
The US announcement comes as more and more countries formally recognize Palestinian statehood or move to do so amid Israel's genocidal assault, siege, and famine in Gaza, which, combined, have left more than 230,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing and the strip in ruins.
Approximately 150 of the UN's 193 member states have officially recognized Palestine. Since October 2023, countries including Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Malta, Portugal, Slovenia, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Norway, and Spain have either recognized Palestine or announced their intent to do so.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular