December, 02 2015, 07:45am EDT
Divestment Commitments Pass the $3.4 trillion Mark at COP21
500+ Institutions Have Now Joined the Movement, Campaigners Urge Governments to Follow Suit
PARIS
The fossil fuel divestment campaign has broken a new record at COP21: more than 500 institutions representing over $3.4 trillion in assets have made some form of divestment commitment according to 350.org and Divest-Invest, two organizations coordinating the growing movement.
The new numbers are another impressive leap for the divestment effort, although campaigners are quick to point out that some of the commitments are only partial divestments, and the $3.4 trillion represents the total amount of assets represented by institutions, not the amount of money divested, which is difficult to track due to varying degrees of disclosure.
Wednesday's announcement is another sign in the early days of the Paris Climate Summit that investors are reading the writing on the wall and dramatically shifting capital away from fossil fuels and towards clean, renewable energy. On Monday, Bill Gates and a group of investors announced the launch of a multi-billion dollar private sector coalition to accelerate clean energy innovation. Other voices, including many of the world's most vulnerable countries, are demanding that the Paris agreement send a clear signal that the age of fossil fuels has come to an end and the dawn of renewables is irreversible.
The institutions that have joined the fossil fuel divestment campaign hope that their actions can push governments to follow suit by shifting public finance from fossil fuels to climate solutions. Many are calling on governments to specifically make good on their promises to end fossil fuel subsidies and fulfill their climate finance commitments.
In September 2014, 181 institutions representing $50 billion in assets had made a divestment commitment. On September 21, during Climate Week in New York City, 350.org and Divest-Invest announced the number had jumped to 400 institutions representing $2.6 trillion under management, and launched a "Divest for Paris" initiative to garner new commitments ahead of COP21. In the intervening 10 weeks between then and today, more than 100 institutions made new divestment commitments.
Organizers will announce a series of new divestment announcements and endorsements on Wednesday, including:
- 19 French Cities have endorsed divestment ahead of COP21: 350.org will announce for the first time that they have secured commitments from 19 French cities, including Lille, Bordeaux, Dijon, Saint-Denis, Rannes, Ile-de-France, and others.
- The French parliament has endorsed divestment: On November 25th, the French National Assembly adopted a resolution encouraging public investors, companies (especially those in which the states owns shares) and local authorities not to invest in fossil fuels anymore. The resolution is the first step to formalizing the policy as law.
- The French Ensemble Foundation will join European Divest-Invest: Jacqueline Delia Bremond, Co-founder and Co-Chair will announce that the foundation will join the European Divest-Invest initiative and divest their holdings from fossil fuels. Since 2004, the foundation has given over $28 million to environmental causes around the world.
Some of the most notable new announcements since September 21, 2015 include:
- Uppsala became the largest city in Sweden to endorse fossil fuel divestment.
- Munster became the first city in Germany to divest completely from fossil fuels.
- Melbourne, Australia's second largest city, committed to go fossil free ahead of COP21. In fact, Australia has seen a seven-fold growth in the divestment movement, from two councils divesting in 2014, to 14 divesting as of now. Together, these funds represent AUD $5.5 billion in assets under management.
- Oslo, the capital of Norway, announced that it will divest its $9 billion pension fund (EUR8 billion) from coal, oil and gas companies, becoming the first capital city in the world to ban investments in fossil fuels.
- Dutch pension fund PFZW announced it will divest from coal companies and reduce its investments in other fossil fuel companies. The fund has EUR161 billion of assets under management.
- London School of Economics, one of the preeminent economics schools in the world, dropped all its direct and indirect holdings of coal and tar sands, and all direct holdings of fossil fuel companies.
- Allianz, Europe's largest insurance company, divested EUR630 million of their own capital investment portfolio from coal, and are reinvesting over EUR4 billion into wind energy over the next 6 months. This is one of the largest funds to make a commitment to divest from fossil fuels. Allianz tied their announcement to COP21, making the moral and economic case for investing in cleaner technologies
- APRA AMCOS, the biggest music industry organisation in the southern hemisphere announced that it is beginning the process of divesting from all fossil fuels. APRA AMCOS distributed over $250 million in royalties to its 87,000 songwriter and composer members last year, making it a large cultural force for divestment.
- London Science Museum announced plans to dump Shell Oil as a sponsor, amidst controversy and public pressure.
- In addition to the London School of Economics 5 Universities from the UK took action: Oxford Brookes University, University of the Arts London, University of Surrey and University of Sheffield divested from all fossil fuel companies; Wolfson College (Oxford university) divested from coal and tar sands. Fund manager CCLA, which manages investments for Birmingham City University, Cranfiled University, Heriot-Watt University, University of Hertfordshire, University of Portsmouth, University of Westminster excluded coal and tar sands from its investments.
- The first church in Germany, theProtestant Church in Hesse and Nassau, managing EUR1.8 billion, committed to drop investments in coal, oil and gas too.
- Two weeks ago, renowned economists Thomas Piketty and Tim Jacksonwrote a letter in The Guardian, calling on investors to divest from fossil fuel ahead for the COP21.
The commitments vary in their exact language and some are only partial divestment commitments, or just apply to a particular fossil fuel, such as coal or tar sands. At many institutions on the list, activists are still pushing for more action. The top line number refers to the number of assets under management by the institutions that have made a commitment, not the amount of money directly removed from fossil fuels. The goal is to demonstrate that a growing number of significant institutions are either reducing their carbon risk, taking a moral stance on fossil fuels, increasing investments in climate solutions, or all of the above.
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
LATEST NEWS
Coalition of Nonprofits, Unions Launch Challenge to Trump's 'Unlawful' Attack on Government
"Americans did not vote for a power grab, nor did they vote for a federal government so hollowed out it cannot deliver the services we all rely on," said one advocate.
Apr 29, 2025
U.S. President Donald Trump's dismantling of federal agencies and government programs has been a centerpiece of his second-term agenda, but as labor unions and nonprofits launched a legal challenge Monday against the president's attacks, they emphasized how the lawsuit reflects widespread public disapproval of Trump's tactics.
"Enough, already—Americans did not vote for a power grab, nor did they vote for a federal government so hollowed out it cannot deliver the services we all rely on," said Michael Wall, chief litigation officer for the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), one of nearly two dozen organizations in a coalition that filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
The groups said the suit is the "largest and most significant challenge to Trump's authority to remake the government without congressional approval."
The lawsuit was filed days after a Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll found that only 35% of Americans approve of tech billionaire Elon Musk's role in the Trump administration, in which he has led the so-called Department of Government Efficiency and spearheaded efforts to dismantle agencies including the Department of Education and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), cut more than 280,000 jobs, and use government data to advance baseless claims about fraud in federal programs like Social Security—supporting Republicans' push to privatize the crucial anti-poverty program.
Fifty-seven percent said they disapprove of how DOGE has proceeded, up from 49% in February.
The long list of plaintiffs in the lawsuit filed Monday reflect Trump's wide-scale attack on public services, with the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks, the Western Watershed Project, and the Alliance for Retired Americans joining three of the country's largest labor unions and several local governments in arguing that Trump lacks the authority to reorganize the government without congressional approval.
The coalition, which also includes the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), is calling on the court to intervene to stop the implementation of Trump's Executive Order 14210, titled "Implementing the President's 'Department of Government Efficiency' Workforce Optimization Initiative."
The order violates the U.S. Constitution's separation of powers principles, the coalition is arguing.
"The Trump administration's reckless attempt to dismantle our government without congressional approval threatens vital services Americans depend on every day—from caring for veterans and safeguarding public health, to protecting our environment and maintaining national security," said AFGE national president Everett Kelley. "This illegal power grab would gut federal agencies, disrupt communities nationwide, and put critical public services at risk. AFGE is proud to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with this coalition to protect not just the patriotic public servants we represent, but the integrity of American government and the essential services that our nation deserves."
A federal judge in Maryland last month barred DOGE from taking "any actions relating" to USAID and said Musk had likely acted unconstitutionally by moving to shut down the international aid agency, and another judge temporarily blocked the advisory body from accessing sensitive data, but several federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have declined to rein in DOGE.
The coalition said the filing made clear that Congress must approve any president's efforts to remake the government.
"When the president takes for himself the legislative power of Congress to recreate federal agencies in the manner he sees fit, he violates the Constitution," reads the lawsuit, which cited Supreme Court cases including Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer and Bowsher v. Synar. "And when the president does so across every federal agency, he threatens the very constitutional foundation of this nation: 'There can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person.' ... Thus, for nearly 100 years, when presidents have wanted to restructure the government by reorganizing both between and within federal agencies, they have obtained congressional authorization to do so."
Democracy Forward, which is representing the coalition, said "the impact of the reckless decisions that have been made in an attempt to unlawfully reorganize the federal government without Congress and is being felt in communities across our nation, in red states and blue states."
Lee Saunders, president of AFSCME, said the coalition was "filing this lawsuit to challenge the hostile takeover of government by billionaires and anti-union extremists."
"From the mass firings of federal employees to effectively shutting down agencies formed by Congress, this White House has repeatedly broken the law and violated the Constitution to advance their extremist Project 2025 agenda," said Saunders. "Working people deserve to know the public services they depend on will be delivered—that their food will be safe to eat and drinking water clean, that kids in school will have the resources they need to thrive, and that our communities will be able to fight public health epidemics. All these things and more are at stake if this power grab goes unchecked."
The Alliance for Retired Americans said Trump's attacks have threatened senior citizens' "right to the guaranteed benefits they have earned as well as to a fully staffed, well-functioning Social Security Administration," while Phil Francis, chair of the executive council of the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks, said the loss of about 1,500 National Park Service staffers is "making an already dire situation at many national parks and program offices far worse."
"The people who have been removed by this administration help to ensure our parks are safe and accessible, and our irreplaceable resources are protected for future generations," said Francis. "Additional mass firings mean safety at parks could be compromised and visitors should expect longer lines, reduced hours of operation at facilities, trails that are not maintained, limited access to some park amenities, and far fewer park rangers to help ensure they have a safe and memorable visit to their national parks."
Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, said "the size and breadth of the coalition behind this case demonstrates the wide-ranging implications of the president's unlawful behavior."
Keep ReadingShow Less
National Climate Group Endorses 'Working-Class Champion' Zohran Mamdani for NYC Mayor
"Zohran embodies the kind of bold, people-powered leadership that Sunrise was built to fight for," said the head of the national Sunrise Movement.
Apr 29, 2025
In a first for the national branch of the youth climate group, the Sunrise Movement announced Tuesday that they have endorsed state Assemblymember and democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani in the New York City mayoral race, citing his "bold vision" for confronting the climate emergency and his campaign's focus on making the city more affordable for working people.
The national Sunrise Movement has not previously offered a mayoral endorsement, according to a spokesperson for the group. Their support for Mamdani follows an earlier endorsement of him by Sunrise Movement NYC in March.
"Zohran embodies the kind of bold, people-powered leadership that Sunrise was built to fight for," said Aru Shiney-Ajay, executive director of the Sunrise Movement, on Tuesday. "He's shown us what it looks like to take on the fossil fuel industry, offer a transformative vision for climate policy, and stand unapologetically with working-class communities. This is the leadership New York City—and our whole movement—needs to meet the climate crisis head-on."
Michael Magazine, elected partnerships lead of Sunrise NYC added that "Zohran is a true climate, youth, and working-class champion."
While affordability, not climate, has been the central focus of Mamdani's campaign, the candidate recently toldThe Nation that "climate and quality of life are not two separate concerns. They are, in fact, one and the same."
His campaign proposes a plan called Green Schools for a Healthier New York City, which pledges to rehab hundreds of public school buildings with renewable energy infrastructure and HVAC upgrades, remake hundreds of asphalt schoolyards into green spaces, and create at least 15,000 union jobs for people who build, maintain, and run New York City schools. It also proposes using 50 schools to serve as resilience hubs, a year-round resource for community members who can use the space during extreme weather events for shelter and to receive aid.
Mamdani has also made free, fast city buses a core plank of his campaign.
Mamdani, who began the race with relatively little name recognition, has risen in polls to the number two spot. He has garnered endorsements from New York City's largest public employee union AFSCME District Council 37, the NYC chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America, Jewish Voice for Peace Action, and the Muslim Democratic Club of New York City, to name a few.
Many organizations backing Mamdani have endorsed a slate of candidates because of New York City's rank choice voting system, which allows voters to select multiple candidates on their ballot as opposed to one.
In their release on Tuesday, the national Sunrise Movement did not opt to endorse a slate, but noted that Sunrise Movement NYC is "urging voters to rank a full progressive slate—and to reject Andrew Cuomo—in the upcoming election."
The recommendation not to rank mayoral candidate and former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who has consistently polled at number one, aligns with the aims of the "DREAM" campaign (which stands for Don't Rank Eric or Andrew for Mayor). The DREAM campaign, which is also targeting candidate and current Mayor Eric Adams, is backed by United Auto Workers Region 9A, another Mamdani endorser, and the political action committee New Yorkers for A Better New York Today.
The group is urging voter unity around keeping Cuomo and Adams off ballots, and hoping that their campaign will cut into Cuomo's formidable lead, and further destabilize Adams' position in the race.
Mamdani has become a viable contender in the race in part because of an impressive ground game. Last week, the campaign announced that volunteers have so far knocked on over 220,000 doors across the city.
According to the Sunrise Movement, Sunrise Movement NYC is mobilizing "neighborhood teams" to canvass and turn out voters for Mamdani.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump DOJ Attacks 'Fundamental Fabric' of Democracy by Gutting Voting Rights Unit
"The upheaval and loss of experience will leave the division unable to enforce the nation's civil rights laws," said one voting rights advocate.
Apr 29, 2025
U.S. President Donald Trump's Justice Department has reportedly gutted the leadership of the agency's voting rights unit and ordered attorneys to drop all active cases, the latest signal that the administration is hellbent on undercutting civil rights protections and abandoning federal enforcement of key election laws.
The Guardianreported Monday that Trump appointees at the Department of Justice "have removed all of the senior civil servants working as managers in the department's Voting Section," reassigning most of them to a DOJ office that handles employee complaints.
"Political appointees have also instructed career employees to dismiss all of their active cases without meeting with them and offering a rationale—a significant break with the department's practices and norms," The Guardian added.
Angelina Clapp, advocacy manager for election protection at Issue One, said in a statement Monday that "our democracy must be accessible for all eligible voters to participate in and make their voices heard, but these recent moves by President Trump's appointees at the Justice Department take us further away from those goals."
"This decision to dismiss all active cases threatens to erode public trust in the very department tasked with protecting Americans' freedom to vote and sends the message that the rule of law is not being upheld," said Clapp. "These actions are part of a broader trend of the second Trump administration dismantling and interfering with federal agencies dedicated to protecting our elections and democracy."
"In the end," Clapp added, "all Americans will suffer as a result of decisions like these because taken together, they undermine the fundamental fabric of our democracy—the idea that the government should be by, of, and for the people."
"If regular Americans think that this administration is going to protect their rights, they're just wrong."
The DOJ's Voting Section is housed within the department's Civil Rights Division, which is now led by Harmeet Dhillon, a lawyer who aided Trump's unsuccessful bid to overturn his 2020 election loss. Dhillon, who is not a civil rights attorney, was confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate in a largely party-line vote earlier this month.
Since her confirmation, she has moved quickly to do Trump's bidding at the department, prompting a mass exodus of lawyers from the Civil Rights Division. CNNreported Monday that roughly 70% of division staffers are "expected to accept a second offer to federal workers that allows them to resign from their positions and be paid through September."
Joyce Vance, a former U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Alabama, wrote Monday that "when the career people, the experts at civil and criminal enforcement in this area, are removed from their positions, there is no one there to protect us."
"And as we've learned from Trump's deportations to El Salvador, when due process is denied to one person, we are all at risk," Vance added. "The news from the Justice Department tonight, on the eve of Trump's 100th day in office, is deeply disturbing."
The departures come after Dhillon issued a series of internal memos indicating, as NBC News put it, "a 180-degree shift in the direction of the department from its original mission: enforcing laws that prohibit discrimination in hiring, housing, and voting rights."
One unnamed Civil Rights Division lawyer who recently left their DOJ toldNBC News that "if regular Americans think that this administration is going to protect their rights, they're just wrong."
The progressive advocacy group Common Cause noted Tuesday that the DOJ's Voting Section "enforces the federal laws protecting the right to vote, including the Voting Rights Act, the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, the National Voter Registration Act, the Help America Vote Act, and the Civil Rights Act."
Omar Noureldin, Common Cause's senior vice president for policy and litigation, said Monday that "the Trump administration’s gutting of the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division is doing profound and lasting damage to the protection of voting rights in the United States."
"The removal and reassignment of the section's leadership and the dismissal of cases are themselves attacks on the voting rights of every American," said Noureldin. "Attorney General Pam Bondi's systematic removal of career attorneys and staff is not confined to the voting section—it extends to the entire Civil Rights Division. The upheaval and loss of experience will leave the division unable to enforce the nation's civil rights laws."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular