March, 29 2022, 08:30am EDT


For Immediate Release
Contact:
Collin Rees, collin@priceofoil.org
Tyler Kruse, tkruse@greenpeace.org
Dominic Kavakeb, dkavakeb@globalwitness.org (Global Witness, based in UK)
Cassidy DiPaola, cassidy@fossilfree.media (Fossil Free Media, based in US)
U.S. Oil and Gas Companies Set to Make Tens of Billions More from Wartime Oil Prices in 2022
As American families continue to be hammered by skyrocketing gasoline prices, U.S. oil and gas companies are poised to reap tens of billions in windfall profits thanks to high wartime prices. New analysis by Global Witness, Greenpeace USA and Oil Change International finds that high oil prices due to Russia's invasion of Ukraine will net the U.S. upstream oil and gas industry a windfall of $37 to $126 billion (all totals USD) in 2022 alone.
WASHINGTON
As American families continue to be hammered by skyrocketing gasoline prices, U.S. oil and gas companies are poised to reap tens of billions in windfall profits thanks to high wartime prices. New analysis by Global Witness, Greenpeace USA and Oil Change International finds that high oil prices due to Russia's invasion of Ukraine will net the U.S. upstream oil and gas industry a windfall of $37 to $126 billion (all totals USD) in 2022 alone.
The analysis comes amidst a flurry of debate on how the government can best address gasoline prices that have surpassed $6 per gallon in some states. Despite misleading talk of 'energy independence' from some politicians, the United States can't drill its way to lower gasoline prices -- oil prices are set on an integrated global market. Additionally, fossil fuel companies already hold leases to extract more oil and gas than global carbon budgets allow to meet climate targets. The Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax bill currently being considered by Congress is a better method of easing the financial burden placed on working families.
Read the full briefing.
Collin Rees, United States Program Manager at Oil Change International, said:
"From lobbying against climate solutions to actively spreading misinformation, the oil and gas industry has spent decades doing everything in its power to deepen our dependence on dirty fossil fuels. Now, Big Oil and Gas executives are rolling in cash while working families suffer from sky-high profits. It's high time for Congress to pass a windfall profits tax and prevent the fossil fuel industry from harnessing a war to make billions. This can be a clear step toward a fossil-free future if paired with real investments in a renewable energy future."
Murray Worthy, Gas Campaign Leader at Global Witness, said:
"It's clear the energy system is deeply broken when the companies that are driving the climate crisis are the ones who reap the rewards when hospitals and schools are being bombed in Ukraine. Shovelling billions of dollars into Big Oil's pockets will only lead to more fossil fuels. But to escape the crises of spiralling energy prices, wars funded by petrostates and the climate emergency, we urgently need a world beyond fossil fuels."
Tim Donaghy, Research Manager at Greenpeace USA, said:
"It is unconscionable that U.S. upstream companies like Chevron, Occidental and ExxonMobil, who receive federal tax subsidies totaling millions of dollars every year, are now set to make billions of dollars more from these high wartime gas prices. American consumers don't get a break from high prices just because we drill more here at home, instead, we get more air and water pollution and higher public health risks. The only way to achieve true energy independence is to cut our ties with fossil fuels entirely."
Cassidy DiPaola, Spokesperson for Stop the Oil Profiteering Campaign at Fossil Free Media, said:
"While Americans are struggling to keep up with high prices at the pump and on their utility bills, Big Oil is profiting off of the war in Ukraine, driving up gas prices and raking in record profits. Fortunately, there's a simple way to stop this profiteering: put a tax on the excess profits oil companies are making because of this crisis and use the money to send a check to the people who need it. Making Big Oil pay for their greedy war profiteering is a win-win for our families and the climate."
The top ten companies by projected 2022 free cash flow from U.S. oil and gas production are:
- ConocoPhillips
- Chevron
- Occidental Petroleum
- Exxon Mobil
- EOG Resources
- Pioneer Natural Resources
- BP
- Devon Energy
- Shell
- Diamondback Energy
The analysis was done using Rystad Energy's UCube -- a database that tracks the oil and gas industry's production economics at the well level. Before the most recent phase of Russia's war against Ukraine began, the forecast oil price for 2022 used in Rystad Energy's upstream database was $70 per barrel, in line with the U.S. Energy Information Administration's December 2021 assessment. On March 9, Rystad updated its 2022 oil price to $88 per barrel. But oil prices could remain elevated if Russia's supply is severely curtailed, represented by the $120 case. Some analysts believe that prices could even hit $200 per barrel this summer. We ran two scenarios comparing the pre-war price of $70 per barrel with the updated base case of $88 per barrel and a high case of $120 per barrel. These scenarios also include similarly higher gas prices in their analysis of companies' cash flow.
Greenpeace is a global, independent campaigning organization that uses peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future.
+31 20 718 2000Oil Change International is a research, communications, and advocacy organization focused on exposing the true costs of fossil fuels and facilitating the ongoing transition to clean energy.
(202) 518-9029LATEST NEWS
63% of US Voters Oppose Attack on Venezuela as Trump's March to War Accelerates
The new poll comes as the US president openly plots to seize Venezuela’s oil supply.
Dec 18, 2025
President Donald Trump has taken increasingly aggressive actions against Venezuela in recent weeks, but a new poll released Wednesday shows US voters are not on board with a new war.
A new poll from Quinnipiac University found that 63% of voters oppose military operations inside Venezuela, with just 25% registering support.
What's more, a US military strike in Venezuela would draw significant opposition even from Republican voters, 33% of whom told Quinnipiac that they would oppose such an action. Eighty-nine percent of Democratic voters and 68% of independent voters said they were opposed to a US military campaign in Venezuela.
Trump's policy of bombing suspected drug trafficking boats in international waters, which many legal experts consider to be acts of murder, drew significantly less opposition in the new survey than a prospective attack on Venezuela, but it is still unpopular, with 42% in favor and 53% opposed.
A potential war is also unpopular with Venezuelans, as a recent survey from Caracas-based pollster Datanalisis found 55% opposed to a foreign military attack on their nation, with 23% in favor.
The Trump administration's boat strikes, which have now killed at least 99 people, have been just one aspect of its campaign of military aggression against Venezuela. The US military last week seized a Venezuelan oil tanker, and Trump has said that it's only a matter of time before the military launches strikes against targets inside the country.
Trump on Wednesday also said that one goal of his campaign against Venezuela would be to seize the country's oil supply.
“Getting land, oil rights, whatever we had—they took it away because we had a president that maybe wasn’t watching,” Trump said while talking to reporters. “But they’re not gonna do that. We want it back. They took our oil rights. We had a lot of oil there. They threw our companies out. And we want it back."
Venezuela first nationalized its oil industry in 1976, and the US has no legitimate claim to the nation's petroleum supply.
Keep ReadingShow Less
AOC Dismisses Premature 2028 Polls, But Says ‘I Would Stomp’ JD Vance
A survey this week showed the congresswoman leading the vice president 51-49 in a hypothetical presidential matchup.
Dec 18, 2025
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez gave a cheeky reaction after a poll suggested that she'd slightly edge out Vice President JD Vance in a hypothetical presidential election in 2028.
The survey of over 1,500 registered voters, published Wednesday by The Argument/Verasight, showed Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) leading Vance 51-49 and winning back several key voting demographics that propelled Trump's return to the White House last year.
As she walked out of the Capitol building Wednesday evening, the Bronx congresswoman was asked about the poll by Pablo Manríquez, the editor of Migrant Insider.
She responded to the question with a laugh: "These polls three years out, they are what they are. But, let the record show I would stomp him! I would stomp him!" she said before getting into her car.
Neither Ocasio-Cortez nor Vance has officially announced a presidential run. But Vance is considered by many to be a natural successor to President Donald Trump. The president and his allies have suggested he could run for an unconstitutional third term.
Ocasio-Cortez, meanwhile, is reportedly mulling either a presidential run or a bid to take down the increasingly unpopular Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY).
More than two years out from a Democratic primary, Ocasio-Cortez is considered a likely choice to fill the progressive lane in 2028, with support for increasingly popular, affordability-focused policies, including Medicare for All.
However, despite her strong support among young voters, early polls show her behind California Gov. Gavin Newsom and former Vice President Kamala Harris for the Democratic nomination.
Wednesday's poll showed that in a hypothetical contest against Vance, Newsom had a 53% to 47% edge, a margin only slightly larger than Ocasio-Cortez's.
Keep ReadingShow Less
4 More Killed in Pacific Boat Strike as White House Ramps Up Demands for Venezuelan Oil
President Donald Trump “wants to keep on blowing boats up until Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro cries uncle," said White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles in a recent interview.
Dec 18, 2025
Hours after US House Republicans voted down a war powers resolution Wednesday aimed stopping the Trump administration from continuing its attacks on "presidentially designated" terrorist organizations, the death toll of the Pentagon's continued boat strikes was brought to 99 with the latest bombing in the Pacific Ocean.
US Southern Command reported Wednesday night that at the direction of Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, the military had killed four people in a "kinetic strike on a vessel operated by a Designated Terrorist Organization in international waters."
As with the rest of the more than two dozen bombings that the administration has carried out in the Caribbean and Pacific since September, the Pentagon said that intelligence had confirmed the boat was "engaged in narco-trafficking operations."
The White House has not released evidence that the boats it's targeted were carrying drugs. In the past, the US military has been involved in intercepting vessels suspected of drug trafficking and charging passengers with a criminal offense, but President Donald Trump has insisted the US is engaged in an armed conflict with drug cartels in the Western Hemisphere, including in Venezuela.
US and international intelligence agencies have not found Venezuela to be a significant source of drugs flowing into the US and have found the country to play virtually no role in the trafficking of fentanyl, the biggest cause of drug overdoses in the US.
The latest boat bombing came a day after Trump announced a "total and complete blockade" on oil tankers approaching and leaving Venezuela, accusing the country of stealing "Oil, Land, and other Assets" from the US.
Venezuela nationalized its petroleum sector in 1976, taking control of its own vast oil reserves. Previously, US-based companies had largely controlled the country's oil industry. In 2007, then-President Hugo Chavez further pushed out US oil giants such as Exxon Mobil when he nationalized foreign oil projects in Venezuela.
Stephen Miller, a top adviser to Trump, accused Venezuela's government of "theft" on Wednesday.
“American sweat, ingenuity, and toil created the oil industry in Venezuela,” Miller said in a social media post. “Its tyrannical expropriation was the largest recorded theft of American wealth and property. These pillaged assets were then used to fund terrorism and flood our streets with killers, mercenaries, and drugs.”
Regarding the blockade, Trump also said Wednesday that Venezuela "illegally took" US energy rights.
While the administration has insisted for months that its deadly boat strikes are aimed at stopping drug trafficking, comments from White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles in an extensive Vanity Fair interview released Tuesday further confirmed that the White House aims to take control of the South American country.
Trump “wants to keep on blowing boats up until Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro cries uncle," said Wiles.
Brian Finucane, senior adviser at the International Crisis Group, said Wednesday night's boat strike amounted to "more premeditated killing outside of armed conflict."
"There's a word for that," he said.
Legal experts have said the repeated, lethal bombings of boats have been part of a campaign of extrajudicial killings and have warned Hegseth and others involved in the attacks could be liable for murder.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


