

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Lindsay Meiman, lindsay@350.org, (347) 460-9082
A technical report released today shows the proposed Williams fracked gas "Northeast Supply Enhancement" pipeline (NESE) is not only dangerous, but also completely unnecessary. The report, "False Demand: The case against the Williams fracked gas pipeline," shows how Williams Company and its main customer National Grid have manufactured false demand that the pipeline is needed to convert boilers from oil to gas, while most oil boiler conversions are already complete and mainstream alternatives to new gas hookups abound.
Williams is proposing a 23-mile-long pipeline beginning in New Jersey into New York Harbor, passing a mile and a half from Staten Island off Rockaway Beach, the very communities most devastated and still recovering from Superstorm Sandy. The company argues that oil-to-gas boiler conversions are driving increased gas demand.
"The public deserves better scrutiny of this pipeline project. The arguments from Williams and the utility don't make sense, and the numbers don't add up. New York's energy future depends on our government making the right decision. This report is a first step," said Suzanne Mattei, consultant with Lookout Hill Public Policy Associates, former Regional Director of the State Department of Environmental Conservation, and author of the report.
The "False Demand" report shines a spotlight on the questionable motivation behind National Grid's announcement that, beginning May 15, it would impose a moratorium on providing gas to large development projects if the pipeline isn't approved, similar to Con-Ed's moratorium in Westchester County.
Using government and company data, the report explains, among other things, that:
All No. 6 oil boilers converted to another fuel years ago
NYCHA housing stopped using No. 6 and 4 oils at least a decade ago
Very few No. 4 boilers remain in National Grid's service area and many can convert to a non-gas alternative
Williams has already added large amounts of gas capacity to the area in the past three years.
Gas demand is flat, largely because of increases in energy efficiency and the use of renewables. A new pipeline is not needed.
New Yorkers have been ramping up the call on Governor Andrew Cuomo to use his power to protect communities and reject the pipeline immediately. Over 60 elected officials have signed a letter urging Gov. Cuomo to reject the Williams pipeline, along with over 16,000 petition signatures, more than 250 New York groups, and over 10,000 comments submitted to the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYDEC) in opposition of the pipeline. NYDEC is expected to rule on key permits for the pipeline in the coming weeks.
"This report utterly rejects Williams' playbook of disinformation and holding our communities' energy needs hostage," said Cata Romo, Fossil Free NY organizer with 350.org. "Stopping the Williams pipeline is Governor Cuomo's first major test on his commitment to a Green New Deal for New York. We need fast and just transition to 100% renewable energy, not toxic and outdated pipelines."
Williams Company has a disturbing safety record, with six people killed and over 100 injured because of accidents in the last 10 years.
Today's report comes before tomorrow's massive #GreenNewDeal4NY Accountability Forum where New Yorkers will question key elected officials on what they're doing to deliver climate action, including stopping the Williams fracked gas pipeline. Organizers will escalate the call on Governor Cuomo to reject the toxic pipeline in the lead-up to the April 18 march over the Brooklyn Bridge ahead of Earth Day.
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
"It is time for us to all stand up together in a nationwide shutdown and say enough is enough!"
Communities across the United States are protesting Immigration and Customs Enforcement and showing solidarity with its victims on Friday and into the weekend with small business closures, school walkouts, rallies, and other expressions of dissent as President Donald Trump's army of masked goons continues to terrorize American cities.
A map and schedule of actions nationwide—spurred by the killings of Alex Pretti and Renee Good, the detention of young children, and other horrors—can be viewed here.
Many of Friday's actions were organized by student groups in Minnesota—a flashpoint of Trump's assault on immigrant families and those protesting ICE abuses—and backed by organizations across the country, from the North Carolina Poor People's Campaign to the Boston Education Justice Alliance.
"The people of the Twin Cities have shown the way for the whole country—to stop ICE’s reign of terror, we need to SHUT IT DOWN," organizers said. "On Friday, January 30, join a nationwide day of no school, no work, and no shopping."
"The entire country is shocked and outraged at the brutal killings of Alex Pretti, Renee Good, Silverio Villegas González, and Keith Porter Jr. by federal agents," they continued. "Every day, ICE, Border Patrol, and other enforcers of Trump’s racist agenda are going into our communities to kidnap our neighbors and sow fear. It is time for us to all stand up together in a nationwide shutdown and say enough is enough!"
High school students are among those set to participate in Friday's mass demonstrations. The Sacramento Bee reported that students "planning a district-wide walkout Friday morning, joining a nationwide student effort to protest immigration enforcement following fatal shootings in Minneapolis."
"This is a peaceful walkout demonstration to show that the students in California’s capital do not stand with ICE,” Michael Heffron, a student organizer, told the local newspaper. “It’s also to show solidarity to those in Minnesota—the protesters who have been killed, those who have been injured for standing up for their own civil rights.”
Additionally, hundreds of businesses nationwide, including in Maine and Minnesota, are closing their doors Friday—or donating their proceeds for the day to groups that support immigrant communities—as part of the protest against ICE as federal agents continue their lawless rampage.
Speaking to reporters on Thursday, Trump said he is "not at all" pulling back ICE activities in Minnesota, even after the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti.
Friday's actions come amid a high-stakes fight over ICE reforms on Capitol Hill. On Thursday, Senate Democrats blocked an appropriations bill that included $10 billion for ICE, and the Democratic leadership reached a deal with the Trump White House to extend Department of Homeland Security funding at current levels—with no reforms—for two weeks while negotiations move forward.
Britt Jacovich, a spokesperson for MoveOn Civic Action, condemned the agreement, saying in a statement that "Leader Schumer should ask the Minnesotans who are watching their neighbors get killed in cold blood if a deal with no plan to stop ICE is enough right now.”
Friday's protests will be followed by more demonstrations on Saturday under the banner, "ICE Out of Everywhere."
“We are responding to people’s outrage. We’ve seen the Overton window shifting,” said Gloriann Sahay, a national coordinator with 50501, which organized Saturday's actions. “We’re seeing people from typically non-political spectrums get involved in this conversation and say: ‘This doesn’t feel like America.’”
"I don’t care what your political beliefs or leanings are, what journalism outlet you represent," said one fellow journalist, "this absolutely cannot stand."
Journalist Don Lemon was taken into custody by federal law enforcement agents on Friday morning in Los Angeles, the latest escalation against the free press by the Justice Department under the control of President Donald Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi, both of whom have repeatedly targeted journalists for doing their jobs.
The former CNN anchor had been accused of misconduct by Trump following his coverage of an anti-ICE protest that took place inside a Minneapolis church on Jan. 18. While organizers and participants of that protest—aimed at the pastor of the congregation who is also a federal immigration enforcement official—chanted and disrupted the service, Lemon later interviewed the pastor and covered the events as they took place.
According to the Associated Press:
Lemon was taken into custody by federal agents in Los Angeles, where had been covering the Grammy Awards, his attorney Abbe Lowell said.
It is unclear what charge or charges Lemon is facing in the Jan. 18 protest. The arrest came after a magistrate judge last week rejected prosecutors’ initial bid to charge the journalist.
Lemon, who was fired from CNN in 2023, has said he has no affiliation to the organization that went into the church and that he was there as a journalist chronicling protesters.
Fellow journalists and free-press advocates swiftly came to Lemon's defense and condemned the Trump DOJ over the arrest.
"Reporters in America are free to view, document, and share information with the public. This arrest is a constitutional violation, an outrage, an authoritarian breach, and utterly appalling.” —Lisa Gilbert, Public Citizen
"They arrested Don Lemon. This is horrifying," said Jemele Hill, a staff writer with The Atlantic. "I don’t care what your political beliefs or leanings are, what journalism outlet you represent, this absolutely cannot stand."
Jim Acosta, Lemon's colleague when they both worked at CNN, also condemned the arrest and declared: "The First Amendment is under attack in America!"
“Don Lemon’s arrest is an egregious violation of the 1st amendment," said Lisa Gilbert, co-president of Public Citizen, in a statement. "Reporters in America are free to view, document, and share information with the public. This arrest is a constitutional violation, an outrage, an authoritarian breach, and utterly appalling.”
Prior to Lemon's arrest, a magistrate judge who reviewed the case against the journalist ruled it as insufficient to justify an arrest warrant. But that didn't stop the Justice Department from pursuing the case further.
The New York Times reports:
Mr. Lemon is scheduled to appear in federal court in Los Angeles on Friday morning. Now that he has been arrested, he is likely to challenge the prosecution’s case by arguing that he was not protesting, but rather covering the event as a journalist.
“Once the protest started in the church, we did an act of journalism, which was report on it and talk to the people involved, including the pastor, members of the church and members of the organization,” Mr. Lemon said in a recent video. “That’s it. That’s called journalism.”
“Don has been a journalist for 30 years, and his constitutionally protected work in Minneapolis was no different than what he has always done,” Lowell, Lemon's attorney, said in his statement. “The First Amendment exists to protect journalists whose role it is to shine light on the truth and hold those in power accountable.”
His attorney said Lemon "will fight these charges vigorously and thoroughly in court.”
Victor Ray, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Iowa, said, "I'm not a huge Don Lemon fan, but this is totalitarian nonsense meant to threaten anyone who reports on the regime's horrors."
"While Trump is weaponizing taxpayer privacy laws for his own benefit, his Treasury Department is flouting those exact same laws to send tens of thousands of individual tax records to his anti-immigrant henchmen at ICE."
President Donald Trump has sued the US Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service for $10 billion over the leak of his tax returns during his first term in the White House, when the president broke with decades of tradition by refusing to voluntarily divulge the records.
The lawsuit—joined by Trump's two eldest sons and his family business, the Trump Organization—was revealed Thursday in a filing with the Miami division of the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The suit alleges that the IRS and Treasury Department "caused Plaintiffs reputational and financial harm, public embarrassment, unfairly tarnished their business reputations, portrayed them in a false light, and negatively affected President Donald Trump and the other Plaintiffs' public standing."
Charles Littlejohn, a former IRS contractor who was employed by Booz Allen Hamilton, pleaded guilty in late 2023 to one count of unauthorized disclosure of tax return information and was later sentenced to up to five years in prison.
The US Treasury Department, led by Scott Bessent, announced earlier this week that it was canceling all of its contracts with Booz Allen Hamilton, accusing the company of failing to "implement adequate safeguards to protect sensitive data, including the confidential taxpayer information it had access to through its contracts with the Internal Revenue Service."
The leak included the tax records of Trump and other mega-rich Americans, including Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. The New York Times, which obtained the records along with ProPublica, reported in 2018 that the returns showed Trump engaged in "outright fraud" and other "dubious" schemes to avoid taxation.
Trump, according to the Times investigation, "paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016, the year he was elected president, and... he had not paid any income taxes in 10 of the previous 15 years."
US Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, said in response to the president's lawsuit that “Donald Trump is a cheat and a grifter to his core, and for him to abuse his office in an attempt to steal $10 billion from the American taxpayer is a shameless, disgusting act of corruption."
"While Trump is weaponizing taxpayer privacy laws for his own benefit, his Treasury Department is flouting those exact same laws to send tens of thousands of individual tax records to his anti-immigrant henchmen at ICE," Wyden continued. "It is the height of hypocrisy for Trump to pretend he cares one bit about taxpayer privacy."
Journalist Tim O'Brien, who has covered Trump for decades, called the lawsuit "a flagrant and obvious conflict of interest."
"Trump oversees the IRS. He wants the IRS to pay him a big chunk of change," O'Brien wrote on social media. "He is, and always has been, in it for the money."
The lawsuit isn't the first time Trump has sought a large sum of taxpayer money from a federal agency during his second term in office. Last year, Trump demanded via an administrative claims process that the US Justice Department pay him roughly $230 million in compensation for federal investigations he has faced.
Trump launched his attempt to wring $10 billion in taxpayer money out of the Treasury Department and IRS as he and his allies worked to gut the tax agency, leaving it with inadequate staff and resources to audit wealthy individuals and large corporations. The IRS is currently headed by Frank Bisignano, who was named "chief executive officer" of the agency late last year.
In a letter to Bessent and Bisignano earlier this week, Wyden and a group of fellow Senate Democrats warned that "the administration’s plans for the IRS"—including painful budget cuts—"will shift the burden of audits more heavily onto working Americans while giving rich scofflaws and big businesses a green light to cheat on their taxes."
"The administration has failed to detail any serious plan to avoid that unfair outcome," the senators warned.