SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
December, 01 2015, 07:45am EDT
Contact:
Clemence Dubois, clemence@350.org +33642713175
Lindsay Meiman, lindsay@350.org, +19148444950
Divest for Paris
350.org co-founder Bill McKibben, President of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund Stephen Heinz, Pascal Canfin former Minister of Development of France and Senior Advisor for the International Climate Affairs at the World Resources Institute, and other divestment leaders will announce the new tally of divestment commitments and total money under management that's gone fossil free.
WASHINGTON
350.org co-founder Bill McKibben, President of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund Stephen Heinz, Pascal Canfin former Minister of Development of France and Senior Advisor for the International Climate Affairs at the World Resources Institute, and other divestment leaders will announce the new tally of divestment commitments and total money under management that's gone fossil free.
Le Bourget, Paris -- 350.org and partners will make a major new fossil fuel divestment announcement this Wednesday, unveiling the new sum total of institutions and assets under management that are committed to the cause.
This September, divestment advocates announced that over 400 institutions representing over $2.6 trillion in assets under management had made some form of divestment commitment. In just a matter of weeks, that number has grown significantly, as cities, universities, foundations, faith communities, and other institutions "Divest for Paris." Institutions are modeling the type of commitment they'd like to see politicians make here at COP21, moving money out of fossil fuels and into climate solutions.
This Wednesday, December 2, 350.org will unveil the new commitments at two events at COP21:
Divest-Invest Press Conference
When: Wednesday 2nd of December, 12.30pm - 1.00pm
Where: Press Conference Room 3, Media Center, Hall 5, Le Bourget
Speakers:
May Boeve, Executive Director of 350.org: May Boeve is the Co-Founder and Executive Director of 350.org, a global grassroots movement working to solve the climate crisis. 350.org has helped lead the fossil fuel divestment movement, the fastest growing such effort in history, according to Oxford University.
Stephen Heintz, President of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund: As President of Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Stephen Heintz divested one of the original fossil fuel fortunes and has become a leading advocate for divesting from fossil fuels and investing in climate solutions.
Kevin De Leon, President pro tempore of the California State Senate: De Leon led the effort in the California State Senate to pass a resolution to divest two of the world's largest pension funds, CalPERS and CalSTRS, which together represent nearly $500 billion in assets.
Noelie Audi-Dor, President of London School of Economics (LSE) Divest: After a long running student campaign, the LSE announced this November 26th that it would divest its PS97.2 million endowment from coal and tar sands companies and not invest directly in any fossil fuel companies. Students are still pushing for full divestment.
Jacqueline Delia Bremond, Co-founder and Co-Chair of the Ensemble Foundation: Delia Bremond will be announcing a new divestment commitment as part of the growing European Divest-Invest movement of foundations divesting from fossil fuels.
Momentum for Divestment Side Event
When: Wednesday 2nd December, 1.00pm - 2.30pm
Where: Le Bourget, Climate Generation Areas, Room 4, Green Zone.
Momentum for Divestment will feature speakers from across the global divestment movement who will speak to the growing momentum for change. Representatives will include faith groups, cities, universities, foundations, and more. In the last year alone, the movement has seen a 50-fold increase in the amount of assets under management from funds who have committed to some level of fossil fuel divestment. Divested assets under management are well over $2.6 trillion. Together, institutions are modeling what we need to see from governments: clear commitments to move money out of fossil fuels and into climate solutions.
May Boeve, Executive director of 350.org
Bill McKibben, Co-Founder of 350.org
Pascal Canfin, Senior Advisor for International Climate Affairs at the World Resources Institute
Jeremy Leggett, from Carbon Tracker Initiative
Stephen Heintz, President of the Rockefeller Brothers foundation
Jacqueline Delia Bremond, Co-founder and Co-Chair of the Ensemble foundation
Clara Vondrich, Global director of Divest / Invest philanthropy
Kevin De Leon, President pro tempore of the California State Senate
Jesse Bragg, Media Director at Corporate Accountability International
Noelie Audi-Dor, President of LSE Divest
Jess Worth, from "BP or Not BP?"
Kathy Jetnil- Kijiner, Poet and a Pacific Climate Warrior from the Marshall Islands
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
LATEST NEWS
Strait of Hormuz ‘Is Open For Us,’ Says China’s Defense Minister as US Blockade Begins
"We have trade and energy agreements with Iran. We will respect and honor them and expect others not to meddle in our affairs."
Apr 13, 2026
Although President Donald Trump has ordered the US military to enforce a blockade around the Strait of Hormuz, Chinese Defense Minister Dong Jun warned on Monday against any effort to obstruct Chinese vessels.
As reported by Business Today, the Chinese defense minister emphasized that his country and Iran have reached an arrangement allowing the safe transportation of Chinese ships through the strait, and he said the US should not subject them to its blockade.
"Our ships are moving in and out of the waters of the Strait of Hormuz," the defense minister said. "We have trade and energy agreements with Iran. We will respect and honor them and expect others not to meddle in our affairs. Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz, and it is open for us."
Chinese Defense Minister Admiral Dong Jun:
"We have trade and energy agreements with Iran; we expect others not to interfere in our affairs. The Strait of Hormuz is open to us."
China is issuing a warning to the US. pic.twitter.com/oIQK9845Ty
— Daily Iran News (@DailyIranNews) April 13, 2026
Trump announced a blockade on the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday, saying the US would not allow any ships that had cut deals with Iran for safe passage to be let through.
The blockade announcement came after US negotiators, led by Vice President JD Vance, failed to reach a peace agreement with their Iranian counterparts to bring an end to the conflict, which Trump launched illegally without any congressional approval six weeks ago.
The failure to reach a peace deal sent the price of oil upward yet again, as the price of Brent crude oil futures and WTI crude oil futures approached $100 per barrel.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Labor Official Who Used to Represent Amazon Is About to Give the Company a Huge Gift
Crystal Carey, general counsel at the National Labor Relations Board, represented Amazon during her time at one of the biggest management-side law firms in the country.
Apr 13, 2026
National Labor Relations Board General Counsel Crystal Carey proposed a settlement on Sunday that would unwind a major case against the e-commerce behemoth Amazon—a company that Carey represented when she worked in the private sector for corporate clients.
Carey, whom President Donald Trump nominated after firing the Biden-era NLRB general counsel last year, sent her proposed settlement terms to the judge overseeing the labor agency's case against Amazon, which originated in the final year of the Biden administration. According to Bloomberg, Carey proposed that Amazon provide two weeks' worth of pay to dozens of drivers who were previously employed by Battle-Tested Strategies (BTS), formerly one of Amazon's delivery service partners (DSPs).
Amazon, in turn, would not be required to admit to unfair labor practices or be "found liable as a joint employer." The Biden-era NLRB argued that Amazon was a joint employer of the BTS delivery drivers and thus required to recognize and collectively bargain with their union—something Amazon has refused to do.
Bloomberg noted that, if decided against Amazon, the case Carey wants to settle "could have led for the first time to an agency judge, the NLRB members in Washington, and, eventually, federal appeals court judges ruling that Amazon was the joint employer of drivers for one of its delivery service partners."
"Amazon contracts with thousands of such partners to manage hundreds of thousands of delivery workers," Bloomberg observed.
Before Trump nominated her to replace labor champion Jennifer Abruzzo as general counsel of the NLRB, Carey was a partner at Morgan Lewis, one of the biggest management-side law firms in the country. The Economic Policy Institute noted following Carey's Senate confirmation last year that Morgan Lewis "represents corporations known for violating workers’ rights, including Amazon, SpaceX, Apple, and Tesla."
"Morgan Lewis is also pursuing the legal challenge that the NLRB is unconstitutional, despite several former NLRB members being employed at the firm," EPI noted. (Amazon has also argued in court that the labor board is unconstitutional.)
Amazon donated $1 million to Trump's inaugural fund, and the company's founder, mega-billionaire Jeff Bezos, attended the inauguration ceremony alongside other big-name tech executives.
Despite her ties to Amazon via her tenure at Morgan Lewis, Carey argued that she was not required to recuse herself from the case she's working to settle. According to Bloomberg, Carey said in an interview that "because a year had passed since she herself represented Amazon and because Morgan Lewis wasn’t representing the company in the [ongoing joint employer] case, she didn’t need to recuse herself."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Epitome of Crony Capitalism': Hollywood Stars Come Out Swinging at Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger
"The result will be fewer opportunities for creators, fewer jobs across the production ecosystem, higher costs, and less choice for audiences."
Apr 13, 2026
A group of Hollywood actors, directors, and producers on Monday published an open letter demanding the proposed merger between Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery be blocked.
In their letter, the Hollywood heavyweights outlined the harms that would come from allowing Paramount—which is owned by David Ellison, son of billionaire Trump donor Larry Ellison—to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery.
"This transaction would further consolidate an already concentrated media landscape, reducing competition at a moment when our industries—and the audiences we serve—can least afford it," the letter states. "The result will be fewer opportunities for creators, fewer jobs across the production ecosystem, higher costs, and less choice for audiences in the United States and around the world. Alarmingly, this merger would reduce the number of major US film studios to just four."
The letter goes on to describe how consolidation in the entertainment industry has already "accelerated the disappearance of the mid-budget film, the erosion of independent distribution, the collapse of the international sales market, the elimination of meaningful profit participation, and the weakening of screen credit integrity."
Looking at the bigger picture, the letter notes that "competition is essential for a healthy economy and a healthy democracy," then goes on to praise California Attorney General Rob Bonta and other state AGs for filing legal actions aimed at blocking the merger amid fears that the Trump administration could rubber-stamp it.
"We are grateful for their leadership," the letter concludes, "and stand ready to support all efforts to preserve competition, protect jobs, and ensure a vibrant future for our industry, for American culture, and for our single most significant export."
Actor Mark Ruffalo, a signatory of the letter, published an article on his Substack page outlining his own reasons for opposing the merger, which he described as "the epitome of crony capitalism and the oligarchs consolidating more corporations and media power to shape the outcome of their business interests."
Ruffalo also said he's spoken with others in Hollywood who were reluctant to sign the letter over concerns about retaliation from Trump or Ellison should the attempt to block the merger fail.
"The people pushing monopolies such as this one use fear to keep the workers in line," Ruffalo said. "I have heard it time and time again from my fellows, they are afraid of retribution. Some didn’t want to sign because they are afraid. How sad is that? In America the artists are afraid to speak out against power."
Actress Jane Fonda, founder of the modern Committee for the First Amendment, said that the proposed Paramount-Warner Bros. merger "would be one of the most destructive threats to free speech and creative expression in our history," because it would put "unprecedented power in the hands of a single corporation that already appears to have proven itself willing to sacrifice integrity for political favor."
The letter earned praise from democracy and antitrust advocates, who argued that blocking the merger was necessary to stopping President Donald Trump's ambitions for a right-wing takeover of US media.
“The future of free media and a strong entertainment industry in America is at stake here,” said Norm Eisen, co-founder and executive chair of Democracy Defenders Fund. “This proposed merger would not only harm competition and creativity, it would erode the very bedrock of our democracy."
Matt Stoller, director of research at the American Economic Liberties Project, noted that "consolidation in Hollywood has been a disaster, and has led to the weak state of the industry," and said the Paramount-Warner Bros. merger needed to be blocked to prevent further damage.
"Not only does this kind of concentration hollow out creative markets," said Stoller, "it concentrates control over culture and information in the hands of a few unaccountable executives, and in this case totalitarian Gulf countries, undermining a free and pluralistic media ecosystem that democracy depends on."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular