October, 08 2012, 03:29pm EDT
Egypt: Fix Draft Constitution to Protect Key Rights
Provisions Inconsistent With International Law
WASHINGTON
The Egyptian Constituent Assembly should amend articles in the draft constitution that undermine human rights in post-Mubarak Egypt, Human Rights Watch said today in a letter to members of the Constituent Assembly. The draft provides for some basic political and economic rights but falls far short of international law on women's and children's rights, freedom of religion and expression, and, surprisingly, torture and trafficking, Human Rights Watch said.
"The Constituent Assembly has a landmark opportunity to lay the groundwork for respecting human rights in tomorrow's Egypt, but its current draft fails to meet that standard because of vague language or limitations that destroy the essence of many rights," said Nadim Houry, deputy director of the Middle East and North Africa division at Human Rights Watch. "It is particularly shocking that Egypt's post-Mubarak constitution does not mention the word torture but instead refers only to lesser forms of physical harm."
Human Rights Watch reviewed the September 27, 2012, draft of the constitution and subsequent changes to individual provisions made public on the official Assembly website. There has been a lack of transparency about the timeline of the constitution drafting process but the president of the Assembly, Judge Hossam Gheryany, said that he expected the constitution to be ready by the first half of November. The official website of the constitution shows how each provision was revised during the drafting process and invites online feedback, but local nongovernmental organizations have criticized the public hearing sessions held by the Assembly as cosmetic.
Once the specialized committees have finalized negotiating the drafting of each chapter and approved it at the committee level, the entire document will go to the plenary of the Assembly for vote, where it will be subject to further amendments. As set out in the Constitutional Declaration decreed by President Morsy on August 12, a referendum on the constitution will take place 30 days after the draft constitution is finalized and parliamentary elections will take place two months later.
The draft constitution upholds many key civil, political, social, and economic rights, Human Rights Watch said. Article 47, which prohibits the creation of exceptional courts and the trial of civilians before military courts, is particularly noteworthy. This provision could put an end to the abusive use of military courts to try civilians, a widespread practice during Mubarak and Supreme Council of the Armed Forces eras, and dissolve Egypt's State Security courts.
Provisions That Fall Short
But other key provisions are inconsistent with international human rights standards and would pose a serious threat to the future of human rights in Egypt, Human Rights Watch said.
Article 5 fails to clearly prohibit torture, instead only prohibiting lesser forms of "physical or psychological harm," instead of including the crime of torture and setting out a duty to investigate and prosecute when it occurs. One of the main reasons impunity for torture remains rampant in Egypt is that the penal code does not fully criminalize torture. This makes it difficult to prosecute police for torture that occurred in the Mubarak era. The failure to fully prohibit torture is especially surprising given the fact that anger against police abuse played a central role in the January 2011 uprising, Human Rights Watch said.
Article 36 threatens equality between men and women by saying that the state shall ensure equality between men and women as long as it does not conflict with "the rulings of Islamic Sharia" and goes on to say that the state shall ensure that a woman will "reconcile between her duties toward the family and her work in society." This provision is inconsistent with the provision in the same chapter that prohibits discrimination on the grounds of sex. Discrimination against women under Egyptian law, and in particular in family law, is a longstanding problem, but keeping the reference to "rulings of Sharia" in the new constitution would open the door to further regression in women's rights.
Following pressure from Salafi members of the Assembly, drafters removed wording that prohibited trafficking of women and children and replaced it with the more general prohibition of "violations of women's and children's rights."
On September 19, a leading Nour party Assembly member, Younis Makhyoun, said in a live interview on Tahrir TV that he had pushed for the removal of the provision, contending that "in Egypt there is no trafficking of women and children," that including the provision would "tarnish Egypt's image abroad" and that some international treaties consider early marriage tantamount to human trafficking.
In a later interview Makhyoun said on the live TV program Al Ashira Masa2an that in his view girls could marry as young as 9 or 10. Salafi members of parliament had tried to amend Egypt's child law to lower the marriage age from 18 to 16 or even 9. One of the frequently criticized forms of human trafficking in Egypt is that young girls from poor families have been trafficked to the Gulf for early marriage.
"It is particularly reprehensible that committee members should bow to pressure to exclude language criminalizing trafficking of women and children when this is not only a serious crime under international law but also under Egyptian law, and is clearly happening," Houry said.
Article 8 is discriminatory because it limits the construction of places of worship to adherents of Abrahamic religions, thereby excluding followers of non-Abrahamic religions, particularly Bahais, Human Rights Watch said.
One provision that is still being negotiated although not included in the current draft is article 9, which would amount to a serious threat to freedom of speech and religion, since it states that, "The divine being is protected and any criticism thereof is prohibited, as are the prophets of God and all of his messengers, the mothers of the faithful and the rightly guided caliphs."
Such a provision would in particular endanger the Egypt's Shia, Muslims who hold different interpretations than the majority Sunnis regarding the "rightly guided caliphs." On July 18, Makhyoun, the Nour member, told the daily Al Masry al -Youm that this provision would halt the spread of Shiism in Egypt and put an end to attempts to build Husseiniya, Shia houses of worship, in Egypt. The official religious institution al Azhar representative to the Assembly, Sheikh Abdel Tawab Abdel Hakim Qotb, was quoted as saying that Al Azhar would "resist the spread of Shiism, which harms God and his prophet."
Another source of controversy, and perhaps the most significant one in terms of the future of human rights in legislation in Egypt, is the proposal many Salafi members of the Assembly are currently pushing on establishing the religious institution Al Azhar as the sole body authorized to interpret Sharia, which article 2 sets out as the main source of legislation, and granting Al Azhar a vetting role to certify the consistency of all legislation with Sharia. If article 4 is included in the final draft it will effectively create a legislative vetting role for an unelected, unaccountable body with no recourse to judicial review.
Human Rights Watch also urged members of the Assembly to include a provision directly incorporating human rights as defined by international treaties ratified by Egypt into Egyptian law to strengthen the basis for amending many domestic laws that restrict rights. These treaties include the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and the African Charter on Human and People's Rights. In January, Human Rights Watch published a report urging parliament to amend many repressive laws, saying that reforming these laws should be a legislative priority.
"The draft constitution contains many loopholes that would allow future authorities to repress and limit basic rights and freedoms," Houry said. "The Constituent Assembly should address those concerns before voting on the constitution."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Ad Featuring Orgasm, Broken Condom, and Plan B Shows How MAGA Is Bad For Men, Too
"The only way to guarantee our right to privacy is to vote for Democrats," said one advocacy group. "They have no interest in forcing guys to be dads before they are ready."
Oct 31, 2024
With just five days until the U.S. elections, Democrats are continuing to highlight another presidential term for Republican nominee Donald Trump as a grave danger for women, as the nation learns about a growing number of women who have died because of abortion bans and voters in 10 states make their voices heard on proposed measures to protect abortion rights.
But a provocative ad that went viral on social media Thursday makes the case that men should be worried about letting the far-right MAGA movement take control of the White House and Congress, too.
The ad, by the Democratic political action committee Progress Action Fund, opens with a young man and woman having sex.
Just afterward, the man says he's realized the condom he was using broke.
"Oh, I have Plan B in the bathroom," replies the woman, referring to the emergency contraception pill approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1999.
Her partner offers to get the pill, but makes another troubling realization as soon as he closes the medicine cabinet.
"Sorry," says a balding man who's appeared in the bathroom. "You can't use that... I'm your Republican congressman. Now that we're in charge, we banned Plan B."
"No, you can't do this," pleads the young man. "I can't have a kid right now!"
But the lawmaker explains that since he won the last election, whether or not the young couple has a child is no longer their decision.
"It's my decision," he says. "Now let's get back in there so we can give her the news... Daddy."
The nonprofit progressive advocacy group DemCast said the ad was one "every man in America" needs to see.
"The only way to guarantee our right to privacy is to vote for Democrats," said the group. "They have no interest in forcing guys to be dads before they are ready."
The production company Eleven Films said the ad provides a new perspective on the idea that "MAGA wants to control everything about you. Including when you can have a baby."
"Yeah, bro," said the organization. "Even you."
Nick Knudsen, co-founder and executive director of DemCast, said that the ad, "when tested, moves under-30-men by 2+ points away from Donald Trump."
Common Dreams was unable to independently verify the claim as of this writing.
Political action committee Defend the Vote said it had partnered with Progress Action Fund to air the ad in battleground states.
"There are only a few days left in the election," said the group. "Get out and vote to protect your freedoms!"
Democratic strategist Alicia Strohl Resnicoff said the ad and its reminder that the Republican Party aims to attack reproductive freedom, including the right to abortion care as well as contraception, "is the scariest thing you see today."
The ad was originally released on YouTube in mid-October, four months after Republicans in the Senate blocked consideration of the Right to Contraception Act. In 2022, when the right-majority on the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Justice Clarence Thomas said the court should also review the precedent set by Griswold v. Connecticut, which affirmed in 1965 that couples have the right to use contraceptives.
Progress Action Fund has produced a number of ads exposing Republicans' plans to invade the privacy of people across the U.S. Last week the group posted one featuring the same "Republican congressman," who appears in a man's bedroom and snatches his phone out of his hands to stop him from watching a pornographic video. Project 2025, the far-right agenda that was co-authored by at least 140 of people from Trump's presidential term, proposes a nationwide ban on pornography.
"Creepy Republicans want control of your bedroom," said Eleven Films on Thursday. "Don't let MAGA in your sheets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
FEC Accused of Sleeping at the Wheel as Crypto Giant Pumps Tens of Millions Into 2024 Race
"The time to hold campaign finance violators accountable is now—not after illegal election spending has corrupted our democracy," said the research director of Public Citizen.
Oct 31, 2024
The progressive watchdog group Public Citizen accused the U.S. Federal Election Commission of abdicating its responsibility by failing to act in the face of "illegal" election spending by the cryptocurrency exchange giant Coinbase, a federal contractor.
Public Citizen noted in a statement Thursday that "federal law bars campaign contributions to political parties, committees, or candidates from federal contractors."
The group's statement came a day after Brian Armstrong, the CEO of Coinbase, pledged that his company would pump another $25 million into Fairshake PAC, a super PAC dedicated to electing candidates supportive of the crypto industry, which has spent big to influence the outcome of the 2024 elections. Fairshake has spent roughly the same amount of money supporting Democratic and Republican candidates, reflecting the extent to which both parties have sought to court the still-nascent crypto industry.
According to Public Citizen, Armstrong's pledge brought Coinbase's total 2024 election spending above $76 million. In August, Public Citizen filed a complaint with the FEC arguing that a portion of Coinbase's spending appears to be unlawful due to the company's multimillion-dollar contract with the U.S. Marshals Service.
"Coinbase has spent more than $50 million in what appears to be illegal campaign contributions from a federal contractor to attack candidates who might stand up to Big Crypto; meanwhile, the FEC is snoozing through the election," Rick Claypool, Public Citizen's research director, said Thursday.
"The time to hold campaign finance violators accountable is now—not after illegal election spending has corrupted our democracy," Claypool added.
The FEC is currently chaired by Sean Cooksey, a Republican appointed by former president and GOP nominee Donald Trump. Evenly divided between three Democrats and three Republicans, the agency has faced backlash for refusing to take action to stem the proliferation of AI-generated deepfakes and illegal campaign spending.
What's more, as The New York Timesreported earlier this year, the agency has moved aggressively in recent months to weaken already-inadequate constraints on political spending.
"One decision this spring that is already reshaping the 2024 presidential race allowed super PACs and campaigns for the first time to work together to plan and execute costly door-to-door canvassing operations," the Times noted.
Additionally, the commission "decided that a wealthy donor could put money into a trust that then could distribute donations to campaigns—while keeping the original source anonymous," the Times reported.
This year's federal election cycle is on pace to be the most expensive in U.S. history, according to OpenSecrets. An analysis released earlier this week by Americans for Tax Fairness found that billionaire families have pumped nearly $2 billion into federal elections so far—likely a significant underestimate, given that the sum excludes untraceable dark money.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Indigenous Brazilians Rally Against 'Death Decree' Attack on Land Demarcation
"We are fighting for life," said one Indigenous leader. "We do not want our land to be exploited, we want to continue living in harmony with nature."
Oct 31, 2024
Thousands of Indigenous Brazilians rallied and marched in the capital Brasília and staged demonstrations in at least five states on Wednesday in a bid to block a proposed constitutional amendment that critics say could halt or even reverse the process of demarcating native lands.
Constitutional Amendment Proposal (PEC) 48 was introduced in September 2023 by federal Sen. Hiran Gonçalves of the right-wing Progressives party. The amendment would constitutionally enshrine a thesis backed by the country's powerful agribusiness sector under which Indigenous land claims made after October 5, 1988—the date Brazil's current constitution was adopted—would be invalidated.
Many Indigenous Brazilians call the proposal the "PEC of death." The Articulation of the Indigenous Peoples of Brazil (APIB), the country's leading nongovernmental Indian advocacy group, says the amendment "is an agribusiness and anti-Indigenous proposal as it violates the original right of peoples to their ancestral territory, already recognized by the 1988 constitution, which PEC 48 seeks to alter."
"The measure also ignores the violence and persecutions that Indigenous peoples have faced for over 500 years, especially during the military dictatorship, which prevented many peoples from being in their territories on that exact date in 1988," APIB added, referring to the U.S.-backed regime that ruled through terror and torture from 1964-85 and in whose army former far-right Brazilian President Jair Bolsnaro—a big supporter of PEC 48—proudly served.
On September 21, 2023, Brazil's Supreme Federal Tribunal ruled 9-2 that the Temporal Framework thesis is unconstitutional. On the same day, both houses of Brazil's Congress approved PL 2903, which contained provisions to codify the Temporal Framework.
Leftist Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva subsequently issued a veto for parts of the bill dealing with the Temporal Framework and other provisions that abolished Indigenous peoples' right to free, prior, and informed consultation; made it easier to intrude upon Indigenous lands; and would have banned the expansion of previously demarcated Indigenous lands.
However, right-wing Brazilian lawmakers overruled Lula's veto in December 2023. Despite being declared unconstitutional, lawmakers passed Law 14.701, which codified the Temporal Framework and was subsequently challenged in multiple lawsuits. In April 2024, the Supreme Federal Tribunal suspended these cases and suggested a process of mediation and conciliation between Indigenous people and agribusiness interests. That process began in August.
In a Wednesday interview with Agência Brasil, APIC executive coordinator Alberto Terena of the Terena Indigenous community said that PEC 48 "is a threat against our demarcated lands" that will exacerbate the planetary climate emergency.
"As soon as we stop protecting the environment, the climate crisis will be even worse," he argued. "Indigenous lands are the territories with the greatest preservation of the environment, the greatest biodiversity. We are fighting for life. We do not want our land to be exploited, we want to continue living in harmony with nature."
The demonstrations in Brazil came as a United Nations biodiversity summit (COP16) is underway in neighboring Colombia. Indigenous rights advocates reported that Amazon defender Txai Suruí, one of Brazil's best-known Indigenous activists, was accosted at COP16 after speaking out against the Temporal Framework.
Takakpe Tapayuna Metuktire of the Raoni Institute, which promotes Indigenous rights and sustainability, toldg1 that the Temporal Framework is a death decree for us and our children."
Brian O'Donnell, head of the international advocacy group Campaign for Nature, said in a statement Thursday that "if the world is to maintain its important cultural diversity, or achieve its biodiversity and climate goals, Indigenous peoples' territories must be recognized and secured."
"We are outraged by the assault on Indigenous territories and the disenfranchisement of Indigenous people," O'Donnell added. "Their rights to their ancestral lands must be secured. We stand in solidarity with Indigenous people in Brazil and around the world, who are calling for this ill-conceived set of policies to be scrapped and for world leaders to recognize the territorial rights of Indigenous peoples."
In addition to the Brasília rally and march, Indigenous-led demonstrations saw road blockages and other actions across the country of 200 million inhabitants. Protests took place in the states of São Paulo, Santa Catarina, Rio Grande do Sul, Maranhão, and Roraima.
"We will not stop our mobilization as long as there is this assault on our rights," said Terena. "This march is not only in the streets, but in Congress and other government agencies... We want the constitution to be respected within this country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular