

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Cynthia Brooke, Communications Director
Interfaith Worker Justice
(773) 728-8400 ext. 40
Hundreds of people of faith in Arizona and
in communities across the country are standing together to oppose
Arizona's anti-immigrant law SB-1070 with a nationwide weekend of
coordinated prayer and action. Part of the law goes into effect today,
while other provisions were temporarily blocked by a federal judge in
Arizona yesterday. At an interfaith prayer vigil this morning in
Phoenix, and at events in more than a dozen cities across the country,
people of faith denounced punitive laws that divide families and
communities, called for an end to SB-1070 and similar legisl
Hundreds of people of faith in Arizona and
in communities across the country are standing together to oppose
Arizona's anti-immigrant law SB-1070 with a nationwide weekend of
coordinated prayer and action. Part of the law goes into effect today,
while other provisions were temporarily blocked by a federal judge in
Arizona yesterday. At an interfaith prayer vigil this morning in
Phoenix, and at events in more than a dozen cities across the country,
people of faith denounced punitive laws that divide families and
communities, called for an end to SB-1070 and similar legislation in
other states, and urged immediate action from Congress to pass sorely
needed comprehensive immigration reform.
"We have come to Arizona to protest SB-1070 because we know that
worker rights and immigrant rights are integrally linked... we need
comprehensive immigration reform," said Kim Bobo, executive director of Interfaith Worker Justice.
She said that while religious leaders are heartened that some of the
most troubling provisions in the legislation were set aside today with
the preliminary injunction, there is still far more work to be done. "It
in no way changes the fact that we need comprehensive immigration
reform and there are still serious problems with the Arizona
legislation."
The weekend mobilization, the National Weekend of Prayer and Action for Immigrant Justice,
will take place July 29- August 1 in Chicago; Oakland; Cincinnati;
Milwaukee; Toledo; San Francisco; New York City; Houston; Philadelphia;
Charlotte, North Carolina; and Albany, New York and is coordinated by
Interfaith Worker Justice. Actions include marches, rallies, prayer
vigils, civil disobedience, educational forums, and worship services,
sermons, and homilies about immigration, as hundreds voice their
opposition to SB-1070 and demand a just solution to the broken
immigration system that gave rise to this draconian law.
In Arizona, people of faith gathered at Trinity Episcopal
Cathedral in Phoenix for a prayer vigil today at 6 a.m., which will be
followed by a press conference with national faith leaders at 7:30 a.m.,
a 9 a.m. rally at the Sandra Day O'Connor Federal Courthouse in
downtown Phoenix and a 5 p.m. interfaith vigil at the state capitol.
Rev. Trina Zelle, director of the Arizona Interfaith Alliance for Worker Justice
and Presbyterian minister, shared her on-the-ground perspective as a
resident of Arizona who works with workers and families who are being
exploited by a broken immigration system and punitive legislative that
has already led to fear and division.
"People are living in fear, afraid to go to work and church, or
to leave their home at all. Since April 23, I have heard from people ...
who have been stopped and had their citizenship challenged on the basis
that they're Hispanic," Rev. Zelle said. "SB 1070 is dehumanizing and
violates our human rights. I believe it grieves God. All of us in
Arizona are grateful for the outpouring of support and solidarity from
people around the country.
"We join with people of faith everywhere who are calling for comprehensive immigration reform," said Rev. Peter Morales,
president of the Unitarian Universalist Association. "Beyond that, we
want to participate in an effort to change the hearts and minds of
people. Our public policy ought to represent our most humane values not
our narrowest fears. This is a struggle for America's soul. Will we
operate out of fear, or out of hope? Will we retrench into racial
profiling... or move forward with optimism and acceptance into a
multiracial and multicultural future?"
Rev. Morales will join with other national leaders at this
morning's press conference in Phoenix, making a strong moral case for
stopping the spread of anti-immigrant legislation at the state level and
urging the federal government to pass comprehensive immigration reform.
One of the most heinous parts of the legislation, which has been
temporarily blocked by today's ruling on the preliminary injunction,
instructs law enforcement officers to stop any individual they suspect
of being undocumented, a requirement rife with potential for abuse and
racial profiling. "I join with brothers and sisters from the interfaith
community to voice opposition to SB-1070," said Hussam Ayloush,
Executive Director of the Southern California Council on
American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). "As a Muslim, I can personally
attest to the destructive nature on racial profiling on my community. I
refuse to see this unjust and un-American practice in the form of
SB1070. It is an ill-advised and extremely ineffective way to fix the
country's broken immigration system."
This weekend's nationwide actions build on months of religious
activity from Interfaith Worker Justice and the Interfaith Immigration
Coalition in support of immigration reform and in opposition to
regressive state laws like SB-1070 and similar prospective legislation
across the country. In July, IWJ's Memphis chapter held a prayer vigil
to stand in solidarity with immigrants in Arizona and call on elected
officials in Tennessee to reject copycat legislation being considered.
The Arizona Interfaith Alliance for Worker Justice has also been working
around-the-clock since SB-1070 was signed into law to protect Arizonan
workers and families and oppose the legislation.
Interfaith Worker Justice (IWJ) calls upon our religious values in order to educate, organize, and mobilize the religious community in the U.S. on issues and campaigns that will improve wages, benefits, and working conditions for workers, especially low-wage workers.
"It is astonishing that any president would try to target, shame, and harass children just trying to be themselves, let alone a president with so many actual problems to address," said the state attorney general.
The US Department of Justice on Monday continued President Donald Trump's crusade against transgender youth competing in sports in line with their identity by suing the Minnesota Department of Education and the state's high school league.
"The United States files this action to stop Minnesota's unapologetic sex discrimination against female student athletes," says the complaint, filed in a federal court in the state by the DOJ's Civil Rights Division.
"The state of Minnesota, through its Department of Education, and the Minnesota State High School League require girls to compete against boys in athletic competitions that are designated exclusively for girls and share intimate spaces, such as multiperson locker rooms and bathrooms, with boys," the complaint continues. "This unfair, intentionally discriminatory practice violates the very core of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972."
The Associated Press noted that "the administration has filed similar lawsuits against Maine and California, and has threatened the federal funding of some universities over transgender athletes, including San José State in California and the University of Pennsylvania."
Tim Leighton, a spokesperson for the league, told the AP that it does not comment on threatened or pending lawsuits. According to The New York Times, Emily Buss, a spokesperson for the state department, said Minnesota's leadership was reviewing the complaint while remaining "committed to ensuring every child—regardless of background, ZIP code, or ability—has access to a world-class education."
While Trump and his allies have aimed to stop all trans women and girls from competing as they identify—including at the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles—the fight with Minnesota specifically traces back to the president's February 2025 executive order, after which the administration began investigating the state.
The Minnesota Department of Education gets over $3 billion in federal funding. Democratic state Attorney General Keith Ellison sued to stop the administration from pulling that money last April. In September, the US departments of Education and Health and Human Services concluded that the state agency and league violated Title IX, and the case was referred to the DOJ in January.
In a Monday statement, Ellison said that the DOJ's lawsuit "is just a sad attempt to get attention over something that's already been in litigation for months."
"Donald Trump is currently facing an unpopular war that he launched, rising gas prices, massive health insurance price hikes, and a partial government shutdown caused in part by his ICE agents killing two Minnesotans in broad daylight," Ellison said, referring to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. "It is astonishing that any president would try to target, shame, and harass children just trying to be themselves, let alone a president with so many actual problems to address."
The DOJ filing about trans student-athletes came less than a week after Ellison and other Minnesota officials sued the Trump administration over its refusal to cooperate with state investigators probing the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by federal immigration agents earlier this year, as well as the shooting of Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, who was wounded but survived.
“Trump has shown he will abuse every inch of power we give him," said one critic. "So you would think that given an opportunity to check his authority and protect Americans, Democrats would jump at the chance."
Critics denounced the top Democrat on the US House Intelligence Committee after he said Monday that he would vote to extend a highly controversial authorization for warrantless government spying sought by President Donald Trump that has been abused hundreds of thousands of times under various administrations.
While acknowledging that many of his Democratic colleagues will vote against reauthorizing Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) because they do not trust Trump to use the provision's sweeping surveillance powers legally, House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Jim Himes (D-Conn.) signaled that he would support renewal and vote against any efforts for privacy protections.
“There’s a lot of people who are going to switch from yes two years ago to no today," Himes told The Hill. "Because even though Donald Trump’s been president for five years, and he has never abused the program—I would know it pretty much in real time if he did—even though that’s true, people don’t trust Donald Trump."
"And you know, that word came up a lot in the classified briefing; there’s a huge trust gap here," he added. "So there’s going to be a lot of people switching on the Democratic side from yes to no.”
While Section 702 ostensibly limits warrantless surveillance to non-US citizens, such spying also captures the communications of Americans. The measure has been abused at least hundreds of thousands of times, including to spy on protestors, congressional donors, journalists, and others.
“Donald Trump has shown he will abuse every inch of power we give him," Sean Vitka, executive director of the pro-democracy group Demand Progress, said in a statement Monday. "So you would think that given an opportunity to check his authority and protect Americans, Democrats would jump at the chance."
"But instead, Rep. Jim Himes is failing his critical role as an overseer of intelligence agencies and using his political power to lobby his fellow Democrats in service of the Trump administration domestic surveillance agenda," Vitka continued. "It is unforgivably cynical and reckless for Rep. Himes to make it easier for this administration to spy on Americans, especially at a time when government agencies’ have made it clear that they intend to supercharge surveillance with [artificial intelligence], and when their misuse of these powers is horrifically on display.”
Nearly 100 civil society groups including Demand Progress are urging congressional Democrats to "stand firm" and vote against Section 702 reauthorization without reforms, including closing the so-called data broker loophole.
Among the Democratic lawmakers reportedly considering voting against the extension is Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY), who voted for reauthorizing Section 702 in 2024—when Congress extended the spying power until April 20, 2026.
“I supported it because I felt very comfortable that... additional guardrails were safeguarding Americans’ privacy in a sufficiently significant way as to justify the importance of getting this information on an urgent basis," he told The Hill. "And as a former prosecutor, I know how difficult it can be to get a search warrant, and especially in these cases where there often isn’t even probable cause, but my vote was taken on the expectation that the law would be implemented as written."
“And we now have an administration that has routinely, repeatedly, regularly—and seemingly and intentionally—violated numerous laws, undermined the Constitution, attacked our democracy, and simply cannot be trusted with the privacy information that is included in the materials gathered and potentially searched," Goldman continued.
"So unless I receive a lot more information about every single search for a US person that has been done by this administration since they came into office, I don’t see how I can possibly support the reauthorization," he added.
"Right now the US and Israel are realizing 'Greater Israel' by attacking-invading Lebanon and Iran," said one professor. "Hegseth is saying it's Greenland, Cuba, Canada, and Mexico next."
Alarm mounted Monday over the Trump administration's "Greater North America" plan, a geopolitical blueprint for US imperial hegemony from Greenland to Guyana that's drawing comparisons with a messianic project being pushed by President Donald Trump's far-right allies and war partners in Israel.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth first unveiled the plan earlier this month, telling reporters: "Trump has drawn a new strategic map, from Greenland to the Gulf of America to the Panama Canal and its surrounding countries. At the Department of War we call this strategic map the Greater North America."
"Why? Because every sovereign nation and territory north of the Equator, from Greenland to Ecuador and from Alaska to Guyana, is not part of the 'Global South,'" Hegseth added. "It is our immediate security perimeter in this great neighborhood that we all live in."
Graeme Garrard, a Canadian professor at Cardiff University in Wales, said Monday on social media in response to Hegseth's comments: "By 'Greater North America' he means 'Greater United States. The US is now and has long been a menace and threat to the sovereignty and independence of its hemispheric neighbors."
Numerous observers have compared Trump's "Greater America" with the "Greater Israel" movement, whose most zealous proponents want to conquer everything between the Nile and Euphrates rivers—that is, all of Palestine, Lebanon, and Jordan; most of Syria and Kuwait; large parts of Egypt and Iraq; and some of Turkey—for Israel.
"Hesgeth's 'Greater North America' should be taken VERY seriously as a real threat," University of Lausanne professor Julia Steinberger, who is Swiss-American, said on social media. "Right now the US and Israel are realizing 'Greater Israel' by attacking-invading Lebanon and Iran. Hegseth is saying it's Greenland, Cuba, Canada, and Mexico next."
Based on the biblical boundaries of ancient Jewish kingdoms, Greater Israel is rooted in the supremacist supposition that the Abrahamic deity figure God promised the Jews all of the lands between the Nile and Euphrates.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza—and other prominent right-wing Israelis support the Greater Israel vision and are working to make it a reality by accelerating the illegal settler colonization and ethnic cleansing of the West Bank and East Jerusalem, preparing to annex the dwindling Palestinian territories, and planning to occupy—perhaps permanently—parts of Syria and Lebanon.
For nearly two centuries, claims of divine favor have also underpinned US expansionism, most famously expressed in Manifest Destiny and mid-19th century plans to annex lands "from the Arctic to the Tropic." This notion drove the US conquest of half of Mexico, as well as later takeovers of Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, and Haiti. The US also took control over the Panama Canal, which it built at the cost of thousands of laborers' lives, most of them from Barbados and other West Indies isles.
"It is part of the great law of progress that the weak should give way to the strong, and that the superior should displace the inferior races," one New Orleans newspaper opined in 1848.
Nearly 178 years later, Hegseth echoed this supremacist ideology, telling Latin American leaders that the region must remain "Christian nations under God" and stand united in the face of "radical narco-communism."
Like the 19th century US imperialists, Trump has also repeatedly expressed his goal of "taking Cuba"—an objective that goes back over 200 years, when Thomas Jefferson, then a former president, called the island “the most interesting addition which could ever be made to our system of states."