March, 30 2010, 12:07pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Joe Smyth, Greenpeace US media: 831 566 5647, joe.smyth@greenpeace.org
Kert Davies, Greenpeace US Research Director: 202 413 8515, kert.davies@greenpeace.org
Mareike Britten, Greenpeace International: +31 6 2900 1141
Giant Private US Oil Company at Center of Climate Denial Funding: Greenpeace
A little-known, privately-owned US oil and
manufacturing giant that has made its owners the 19th richest men in the
world has outspent even ExxonMobil in funding the denial of the science
of climate change in recent years, according to a Greenpeace report
released today.
WASHINGTON
A little-known, privately-owned US oil and
manufacturing giant that has made its owners the 19th richest men in the
world has outspent even ExxonMobil in funding the denial of the science
of climate change in recent years, according to a Greenpeace report
released today.
Entitled "Koch Industries: Secretly funding the climate denial
machine" (1), the report details how Kansas-based Koch Industries, a
multinational company with little public profile, is playing a quiet but
dominant role in the US policy debate on climate change. It shows how
Koch has become the financial kingpin in efforts to undermine confidence
in climate science and to oppose clean energy in the US and
internationally. Between 2005 and 2008, Koch foundations contributed
$24.8 million to climate denial organizations - nearly 3 times as much
as ExxonMobil in the same period.
machine" (1), the report details how Kansas-based Koch Industries, a
multinational company with little public profile, is playing a quiet but
dominant role in the US policy debate on climate change. It shows how
Koch has become the financial kingpin in efforts to undermine confidence
in climate science and to oppose clean energy in the US and
internationally. Between 2005 and 2008, Koch foundations contributed
$24.8 million to climate denial organizations - nearly 3 times as much
as ExxonMobil in the same period.
"It is time Koch Industries came clean and dropped its dirty,
behind-the-scenes campaign against action on climate change," said Kert
Davies, Research Director at Greenpeace US
The report also details Koch Industries' growing effort in recent years
to influence US climate and energy policy through spending on lobbying
and campaign contributions from Koch's Political Action Committee to
candidates for federal office. Since the 2006 election cycle, Koch
Industries PAC contributed more to federal candidates than any other
company in the oil & gas industry. Koch Industries ranks third in
lobby expenditures from the oil sector since 2006, just behind
ExxonMobil and Chevron.
Two brothers, Charles and David Koch, own and control Koch Industries as
well as its political spending.
"By spending millions of dollars on lobbying and political
contributions, Charles and David Koch are polluting not only our
environment, but also the US political process. Efforts to pass US clean
energy and climate policy are being hampered by polluter lobbyists and
climate science denial campaigns, and Koch Industries is at the core of
this obstruction." said Davies.
The report details several Koch-funded climate denial efforts:
* The Koch foundations provided substantial funding to at least 20
organizations central to the global "echo chamber" which have repeatedly
rebroadcast, referenced, and appeared as media spokespeople in the
story, dubbed "Climategate," of supposed wrongdoing by climate
scientists gleaned from e-mails hacked from the University of East
Anglia, in November 2009.
* Charles Koch's foundation along with ExxonMobil and the American
Petroleum Institute, funded an astrophysicist to write a 2007 article
about polar bears, masquerading as a peer-reviewed scientific paper
attempting to refute the science around the threat to polar bears from
climate change.
* The Kochs funded a Danish think tank that produced a dubious study
about the Danish wind industry. The Koch-funded 'echo chamber' in the
US used this study to challenge President Obama's support of wind
energy. Earlier this month, the Danish Environment Minister rejected the
study (2).
* The Kochs funded groups that supported and promoted a widely debunked
study in Spain that claimed that the renewable energy industry had lost
the country jobs. Among the groups was "Americans for Prosperity" - a
front group founded and chaired by David Koch. It is currently
campaigning against clean energy and climate policy in the US.
Although few Americans have heard of Koch Industries, it is a major oil
corporation with operations in nearly 60 countries. Koch Industries is
the second largest privately held company in the US, a conglomerate of
more than 20 companies with 70,000 employees and $100 billion in annual
sales. Most of Koch's operations are invisible to the public, with the
exception of a handful of retail brands such as Brawny(r) paper towels
and Dixie(r) cups as well as synthetic textiles like Lycra(r) and Cordura(r).
Part of Koch Industries' influence is channeled through three
foundations, also controlled by the co-owners of the company, David and
Charles Koch. From 2005 to 2008, ExxonMobil spent around US$9 million
while Koch Industries-controlled foundations spent nearly US$25 million
on undermining confidence in climate science by funding the climate
denial movement. Groups which received funding include the Americans for
Prosperity, the Heritage Foundation, Mercatus Center, the Cato
Institute, Washington Legal Foundation and the Foundation for Research
on Economics and the Environment (FREE).
"This funding is propping up an echo chamber of doubt, deliberately
creating the appearance of controversy and uncertainty about the
international consensus on climate change science in order to slow down
policymakers," said Davies.
Greenpeace is a global, independent campaigning organization that uses peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future.
+31 20 718 2000LATEST NEWS
Senate Tosses 'Dangerous Provision' Preventing State-Level AI Regulation From GOP Megabill
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry," said one advocate.
Jul 01, 2025
With a 99-1 vote early Tuesday, the Republican-controlled Senate decided to remove a controversial provision that would have prevented state-level regulation on artificial intelligence for 10 years from U.S. President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill that is currently being debated in Congress.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) was the lone lawmaker who voted to keep the moratorium in the bill.
While far from the only controversial part of the reconciliation package, the provision drew opposition from an ideologically diverse group that included Democratic and Republican state attorneys general; over 140 groups working to support children's online safety, consumer protections, and responsible innovation; and faith leaders.
Senators struck Sen. Ted Cruz's (R-Texas) AI measure from the megabill by adopting an amendment introduced by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.). They voted on Blackburn's amendment during a session known as a vote-a-rama. Blackburn introduced the amendment after considering an agreement that would have watered down the provision.
According to The Verge, the measure that was rejected on Tuesday required states to avoid regulation AI and "automated decision systems" if they wanted to get funding for their broadband programs.
The provision would have been a major win for Big Tech, which has made the case that state laws around AI are obstructing their ability to do business.
Advocates and Democratic lawmakers cheered the decision to strip the provision.
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry. It shows that Americans are aware of the proliferation of AI harms in real time," said J.B. Branch, Big Tech accountability advocate at the watchdog group Public Citizen.
Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) said Tuesday that "early this morning, the Senate overwhelmingly voted to reject a dangerous provision to block states from regulating artificial intelligence, including protecting kids online. This 99-1 vote sent a clear message that Congress will not sell out our kids and local communities in order to pad the pockets of Big Tech billionaires."
In addition to concerns focused on Big Tech, experts recently told The Guardian that in the absence of state-level AI regulation, untrammeled growth of AI would take a toll on the world's "dangerously overheating climate."
Sacha Haworth, the executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, credited the "massive" defeat of Cruz's provision to the "incredible mobilizing by advocates to beat back Big Tech lobbying and last-minute bullying."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Shred JD Vance as He Shrugs Off Millions of Americans Losing Medicaid as 'Minutiae'
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Jul 01, 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance took heat from critics this week when he downplayed legislation that would result in millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage as mere "minutiae."
Writing on X, Vance defended the budget megabill that's currently being pushed through the United States Senate by arguing that it will massively increase funding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which he deemed to be a necessary component of carrying out the Trump administration's mass deportation operation.
"The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits," wrote Vance. "The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass."
He then added that "everything else—the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions."
It was this line that drew the ire of many critics, as the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the Senate version of the budget bill would slash spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program by more than $1 trillion over a ten-year-period, which would result in more than 10 million people losing their coverage. Additionally, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has proposed an amendment that would roll back the expansion of Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which would likely kick millions more off of the program.
Many congressional Democrats were quick to pounce on Vance for what they said were callous comments about a vital government program.
"So if the only thing that matters is immigration... why didn't you support the bipartisan Lankford-Murphy bill that tackled immigration far better than your Ugly Bill?" asked Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.). "And it didn't have 'minutiae' that will kick 12m+ Americans off healthcare or raise the debt by $4tn."
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Veteran healthcare reporter Jonathan Cohn put some numbers behind the policies that are being minimized by the vice president.
"11.8M projected to lose health insurance," he wrote. "Clinics and hospitals taking a hit, especially in rural areas. Low-income seniors facing higher costs. 'Minutiae.'"
Activist Leah Greenberg, the co-chair of progressive organizing group Indivisible, zeroed in on Vance's emphasis on ramping up ICE's funding as particularly problematic.
"They are just coming right out and saying they want an exponential increase in $$$ so they can build their own personal Gestapo," she warned.
Washington Post global affairs columnist Ishaan Tharoor also found himself disturbed by the sheer size of the funding increase for ICE that Vance is demanding and he observed that "nothing matters more apparently than giving ICE a bigger budget than the militaries of virtually every European country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Heinrich Should Be Ashamed': Lone Senate Dem Helps GOP Deliver Big Pharma Win
The provision, part of the Senate budget bill, was described as "a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Jul 01, 2025
The deep-pocketed and powerful pharmaceutical industry notched a significant victory on Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a bill described by critics as a handout to drug corporations can be included in the Republican reconciliation package, which could become law as soon as this week.
The legislation, titled the Optimizing Research Progress Hope and New (ORPHAN) Cures Act, would exempt drugs that treat more than one rare disease from Medicare's drug-price negotiation program, allowing pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for life-saving medications in a purported effort to encourage innovation. (Medications developed to treat rare diseases are known as "orphan drugs.")
The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen observed that if the legislation were already in effect, Medicare "would have been barred from negotiating lower prices for important treatments like cancer drugs Imbruvica, Calquence, and Pomalyst."
Among the bill's leading supporters is Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whose spokesperson announced the parliamentarian's decision to allow the measure in the reconciliation package after previously advising that it be excluded. Heinrich is listed as the legislation's only co-sponsor in the Senate, alongside lead sponsor Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).
"Sen. Heinrich should be ashamed of prioritizing drug corporation profits over lower medicine prices for seniors and people with disabilities," Steve Knievel, access to medicines advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday. "Patients and consumers breathed a sigh of relief when the Senate parliamentarian stripped the proposal from Republicans' Big Ugly Betrayal, so it comes as a gut punch to hear that Sen. Heinrich welcomed the reversal and continued to champion a proposal that will transfer billions from taxpayers to Big Pharma."
"People across the country are demanding lower drug prices and for Medicare drug price negotiations to be expanded, not restricted," Knievel added. "Sen. Heinrich should apologize to his constituents and start listening to them instead of drug corporation lobbyists."
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group whose members include pharmaceutical companies, has publicly endorsed and promoted the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass it "as soon as possible."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients."
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the ORPHAN Cures Act would cost U.S. taxpayers around $5 billion over the next decade.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, said that "patients are infuriated to see the Senate cave to Big Pharma by reviving the ORPHAN Cures Act at the eleventh hour."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars," said Basey. "We call on lawmakers to remove this unnecessary provision immediately and stand with an overwhelming majority of Americans who want the Medicare Negotiation program to go further. Medicare negotiation will deliver huge savings for seniors and taxpayers; this bill would undermine that progress."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular