

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Jane Kochersperger – Greenpeace U.S., + 1 202 680 3798, jane.kochersperger@greenpeace.org
Greg McNevin - Greenpeace International Communications, +81 (0)80 5416 6506, greg.mcnevin@greenpeace.org
Kyoko Murakami - Greenpeace Japan Communications, +81 (0)3 5338 9816, kyoko.murakami@greenpeace.org
Sara Holden – Tokyo Two Campaign Coordinator, + 31 (0) 615 007 406, sara.holden@greenpeace.org
The Japanese government
breached a series of internationally guaranteed human rights by
detaining two Greenpeace activists who had uncovered major corruption
in the Japanese whaling program, according to a working group of the
United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC).
Junichi Sato and Toru Suzuki, known as the "Tokyo Two", are due to
stand trial on February 15th, but it has been revealed that the UNHRC's
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD) informed the Japanese
government in December that the rights of the two men have been
breached by the Japanese justice system.
"Junichi and Toru acted in the public interest to expose a scandal that
involved corruption in the taxpayer-funded whaling program. Now it is
clear that this is not just the opinion of Greenpeace, but also of the
competent United Nations body," said Greenpeace International Executive
Director Kumi Naidoo. "We expect the Japanese courts to take note of
this opinion and judge the case accordingly."
The Working Group noted that Sato and Suzuki had "...acted considering
that their actions were in the greater public interest as they sought
to expose criminal embezzlement within the taxpayer-funded whaling
industry." It recognizes that they willingly cooperated with the police
and the Public Prosecutor, that this cooperation was not acknowledged,
and that the Government did not itself submit any essential
information, such as details of their activities as environmental
activists, the investigation they carried out, the evidence they
gathered or the help they gave to authorities to formally investigate
their allegations.
The Working Group concluded: "The right of these two environmental
activists not to be arbitrarily deprived of their liberty; their rights
to freedom of opinion and expression and to exercise legitimate
activities, as well as their right to engage in peaceful activities
without intimidation or harassment has not been respected by the
Justice system." As such, the Working Group found that the government
has contravened articles 18,19 and 20 of the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights and articles 18 and 19 of the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights. It also took the view that Sato and Suzuki
had been denied the right to challenge their detention before an
independent and impartial tribunal in fair proceedings, and requested
that the remainder of the trial be conducted fairly.
"The decision to engage in this political prosecution was made by the
previous government in Japan. The new administration can remedy the
shame of this damning opinion by ensuring the trial will now be fair,
adhering to international legal standards. In the interest of
transparency they should welcome observers from other governments to
the proceedings," said Dr Naidoo, who is traveling to Japan later this
week to observe the trial. "Prime Minister Hatoyama must also order a
re-examination of the original allegations made by the Tokyo Two," Dr
Naidoo added.
Since their initial arrest in June 2008, more than a quarter of a
million people have signed a petition to demand justice for Sato and
Suzuki, and legal experts including Supreme Court advocates worldwide
have expressed concern about the prosecution. International human
rights and advocacy groups such as Amnesty International and
Transparency International have questioned the legitimacy of the
prosecution. A week of protests at Japanese embassies worldwide began
today in the run up to next Monday's hearing.
Greenpeace is an independent, global campaigning organization that acts
to change attitudes and behavior, to protect and conserve the
environment, and to promote peace.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/kumi-naidoo
In January 2008, Greenpeace began an investigation into whistleblower
allegations that organized whale meat embezzlement was being conducted
by crew inside Japan's so-called 'scientific' whaling program, which is
funded by Japanese taxpayers. The informer was previously involved in
the whaling program, and following his advice Junichi Sato and Toru
Suzuki began an investigation, eventually discovering firm proof that
cardboard boxes containing whale meat were being secretly shipped to
the homes of whaling fleet crew - and then sold for personal profit.
Junichi delivered a box of this whale meat to the Tokyo Prosecutors'
Office in May 2008, and filed a report of embezzlement. However, the
embezzlement investigation was dropped on 20 June - the same day that
both men were arrested and then held for 26 days before being charged
with theft and trespass. They are currently facing up to ten years in
prison for their actions.
More:
https://www.greenpeace.org/tokyo-two/whaling-on-trial
https://www.greenpeace.org/tokyo-two
https://www.greenpeace.org/tokyo-two/wgad-opinion
February 08, 2010
May 15, 2008
Greenpeace is a global, independent campaigning organization that uses peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future.
+31 20 718 2000"He’s the Jim Cramer of Iran war predictions," said one critic.
Conservative commentator Dave Rubin, who for months has been a top booster of President Donald Trump's illegal war with Iran, was inundated with mockery on Sunday after a viral video exposed months' worth of his failed predictions about the conflict.
The video, which was posted on social media Saturday, begins with Rubin telling viewers to not listen to any of the prognostications being made by critics of the war, which Trump launched in late February without any authorization from Congress.
"I'm pretty good with predictions," Rubin says. "And my prediction here is that everything the media is now going to say about Iran—it's going to close the Strait of Hormuz, and energy prices are going to go crazy—none of this is going to come to pass."
Iran war: greatest hits from the last 12 weeks pic.twitter.com/9pgXyvmsgF
— Dave Rubin Clips II (Parody) - Retired Jan.20/2025 (@DaveClips) May 24, 2026
The video then cuts to Rubin wrongly predicting that gas prices during the conflict "will continue to come down," before switching to claims that Iran lacks the military capability to keep the Strait of Hormuz closed in the face of US military power.
"If the United States wants to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, which it does," says Rubin, "and Donald Trump says we'll escort ships through if we have to, it's going to stay open."
From there, the video shows Rubin hyping of the prospect of Iranian dissident Reza Pahlavi swooping in to take over the country after the war, and then getting fooled by a fake artificial intelligence-generated video of Iranians giving thanks to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for bombing their country.
The video compilation of Rubin's failed predictions drew immediate ridicule from critics.
"He’s the Jim Cramer of Iran war predictions," joked Krystal Ball.
Commentator Adam Mockler wrote of Rubin that "it’s brutal watching him make failed predictions week after week."
Journalist Glenn Greenwald argued that the video should be the last nail in the coffin of whatever credibility Rubin had left.
"Imagine having sat through and listened to all of this Israeli propaganda, which turned out to be (predictably and completely) false," commented Greenwald, "and then thinking there was some value in continuing to listen to this person."
The Bulwark's Tim Miller said that while he knew Rubin was "a smooth-brained hack," he still "couldn’t even fathom how bad these war takes would be."
Political analyst Omar Baddar, meanwhile, said the video should erase any doubt that Rubin is "the dumbest man on the internet."
The Trump administration last week sued Minnesota after it passed a law banning prediction markets from operating in the state.
A Sunday report in The New York Times revealed how the Trump administration is using a key government agency to shut down any efforts to regulate online betting markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket.
According to the Times, the administration has stacked the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) with industry insiders who have systematically "mowed down" staffers at the agency who have expressed interest in providing oversight on prediction markets.
Among other things, the report documented how multiple officials at CTFC have been put on leave simply for asking questions about the betting markets' ties to members of President Donald Trump's family or for having past experience enforcing regulations related to cryptocurrencies.
What's more, the Times found that even being an industry insider isn't enough to guarantee good standing in the agency. Brian Quintenz, who was tapped by Trump to lead CTFC last year, saw his nomination withdrawn after he drew the ire of Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss for refusing to support their cryptocurrency exchange's complaint against the agency.
Revelations about industry insiders rolling over regulators at CTFC come as the Trump administration is fighting any attempts by states to regulate prediction markets.
As explained in a Thursday report from CNBC, the Trump administration is "fighting a multi-front battle to stop the state actions and assert its regulatory authority," with CTFC arguing that it is "the only entity that can regulate" betting platforms.
16 different states are engaged in legal proceedings against the platforms, and Minnesota last week passed a law to ban them outright, which immediately drew a lawsuit from the administration.
The new Minnesota law, which is scheduled to take effect in August, bans prediction markets "from hosting, creating or advertising in the state," according to ABC News.
In an interview with ABC, Minnesota state Rep. Emma Greenman (D-63B) said she authored the legislation because she has grown increasingly concerned about young people in the state seeing their finances drained from placing online bets.
"We're seeing studies come out that say [the companies] are targeting 18- to 21-year-olds," said Greenman, "and we are seeing gambling starting younger and younger."
CFTC Chair Michael Selig last month warned states against trying to regulate prediction markets, which he said would "circumvent the clear directive of Congress."
"Our message to Wisconsin is the same as to New York, Arizona, and others," said Selig. "If you interfere with the operation of federal law in regulating financial markets, we will sue you."
"Nothing was accomplished by Operation Epic Fury except putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in charge of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz," said one critic of the war.
President Donald Trump revealed on Saturday that he is mulling a deal that would end his illegal war with Iran, and some hawks within the Republican Party are expressing alarm.
According to a Sunday report in The New York Times, many details of the agreement to end the war remain murky, with the fate of Iran's enriched uranium up in the air. US and Iranian officials have also given contradictory messages about the proposed deal's contents, suggesting there is much work still to be done before any agreement is finalized.
Regardless, three hawkish GOP senators on Saturday raised major concerns about the contents of the deal, warning against accepting any agreement that will leave Iran in a stronger position than before Trump illegally launched a war against it without any authorization from Congress in late February.
"If it is perceived in the region that a deal with Iran allows the regime to survive and become more powerful over time, we will have poured gasoline on the conflicts in Lebanon and Iraq," wrote Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who lobbied Trump to attack Iran repeatedly before the start of the war. "A deal that is perceived to allow Iran to survive and possess the ability to control the [Strait of Hormuz] in the future will put Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Shia militias in Iraq on steroids.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), another longtime Iran hawk, said he was "deeply concerned" about what he's been hearing about the deal and expressed particular worry about Iran getting relief from US sanctions while still maintaining the ability to shut down the Strait of Hormuz.
"If the result of all that is to be an Iranian regime—still run by Islamists who chant 'death to America'—now receiving billions of dollars," Cruz wrote, "being able to enrich uranium and develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake."
Sen. Roger Wicker (D-Miss.) was even blunter in his condemnation of the reported agreement.
"The rumored 60-day ceasefire—with the belief that Iran will ever engage in good faith—would be a disaster," Wicker wrote. "Everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught!"
Ben Rhodes, a former deputy national security adviser for President Barack Obama, challenged Wicker's claims that Trump's illegal war had achieved anything of value.
"Nothing was accomplished by Operation Epic Fury," Rhodes wrote, "except putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in charge of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz."
Rhodes' criticism was echoed by Stephen Wertheim, senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, who wrote that "everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury is already for naught."
Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group, accused the Iran hawks of being delusional for thinking further bombing would force Iran to capitulate.
"DC's Iran hawks got two wars, nearly every conceivable sanction designation, a blockade, threw a wrench in global economy," Vaez wrote, "and will still claim that just a little more pressure and a touch more bombing will magically yield the concessions they still won't be satisfied with."