August, 26 2009, 08:50am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Shum Preston, 510-273-2276 or Liz Jacobs, 510-273-2232
Many Hospitals Are Not Ready for H1N1: Nurse Survey Shows Deficiencies in Hospital Swine Flu Readiness
Data from 190 Healthcare Facilities in Nine States from California to Maine
NATIONWIDE
A patient health and safety survey of 190 American hospitals
from coast to coast compiled by registered nurses in eight
different states finds that a disturbing number of our nation's
healthcare facilities are not prepared for the coming H1N1/swine
flu pandemic, according to results released today by the
California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing
Committee.
The data reflects a survey conducted over the past four weeks
by RNs in hospitals in Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois,
Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Texas. And it
comes just a day after release of a report from the President's
Council of Advisors on Science and Technology predicting nearly
2 million Americans could be hospitalized due to swine flu
infections this winter, and as many as 90,000 could die, nearly
triple the deaths that occur in a normal flu season.
What the RNs reported are wide gaps in safety gear, infection
control training, and post-exposure procedures. Among key
findings:
- At more than one-fourth of the hospitals, nurses
cite inadequate isolation of swine flu patients, increasing the
risk of infection to others. - Nurses at 15 percent of hospitals do not have access
to the proper respirator masks, exposing nurses and patients to
infection; at up to 40 percent of the hospitals,
nurses are expected to re-use masks, in violation of
Centers for Disease Control
Guidelines. - At 18 percent of the hospitals, RNs report that
nurses have become infected; one Sacramento, Calif. RN has
already died.
CNA/NNOC is calling on all hospitals to adhere to the highest
standard of protection for patients and nurses to combat the
expected onslaught of new cases this fall and winter, and urging
legislators to strengthen public protections.
"These continuing problems increase the risk that many
hospitals will become vectors for infection, with inadequate
patient protections leading to a spread of the pandemic among
other patients, their friends, family, and caregivers, and the
surrounding community," warned Deborah Burger, RN, CNA/NNOC
co-president. "What we're hearing from around the country is
dangerous to patient health and safety, but with smart and
clinically appropriate leadership we can fix policies in time
for the upcoming pandemic."
On Wednesday, nurses at more than 50 of these
hospitals, mostly large hospital systems, will hold actions to
demand hospital administrators immediately implement safety
improvements for nurses and patients. Contact CNA/NNOC to
find out about what nurses are doing in your area.
CNA/NNOC leaders will also be testifying in a joint
California Senate hearing in Sacramento Thursday on preparedness
for swine flu in the state's health and education systems.
The hearing is at 9 a.m. in Room 112 at the State
Capitol.
"This report should serve as a wake-up to hospital
management, policy makers, and healthcare workers across the
country. We need to urgently increase our readiness,"
Burger said. "We do not yet have a complete picture of the
morbidity of the H1N1 pandemic. But that is no justification for
hospitals making inadequate preparations and endangering the
health and safety of patients and their community. When
September comes, we expect that infection rates of H1N1 will
spike due to the beginning of the school year, prompting
overcrowded emergency rooms, which will put our public health
readiness to the test."
"The swine flu is not the type of flu we are used to.
This pandemic will stress every aspect of our healthcare
system. Hospitals must be proactive in protecting the
public," said Houston RN Terry Hardin.
"The state of Maine has identified over 300 cases of H1N1
infection, resulting in at least 19 hospitalizations and one
death," said Cokie Giles, EMMC, president of Maine State Nurses
Association/NNOC. "A recent survey of our membership
indicates that there may be some areas of serious concern
regarding preparedness policies. We are calling on
MSNA/NNOC represented facilities to ensure that patients and
nurses are protected to the fullest extent from exposure to
H1N1."
"It is important for hospitals to meet full safety standards
for swine flu so that our patients and our nurses are
protected," said Temple University Hospital RN Patricia Eakin,
president of the Pennsylvania Association of Staff Nurses and
Allied Professionals/NNOC.
"I don't know how the local hospitals will staff up for the
pandemic. Nurses at my institution don't accrue sick time, we
use our accrued vacation time to call out sick. We also
work short [staffed] instead of having a replacement when
someone does call out. In these economic times, you tell
me who will be staffing the hospitals?" said Tampa Bay area RN
Peggy Bowen.
Illinois hospitals, says Chicago RN Brenda Langford, "are not
prepared to deal with this pandemic. We have provided our
copies of our surveys to management and they have not moved to
change our practice to be in compliance with the recommendation
set for by the CDC. If the Cook County Health and Hospital
System won't make these needed changes and the Cook County
Department of Public Health won't support our efforts to protect
the nurses and the public, it is left up to the NNOC to make
sure these needed protections are implemented."
Findings of the survey include:
- Half the hospitals have seen infected patients. At 18
percent, RNs have been infected, nurses say. - Nurses at 15 percent of hospitals report that they do not
have access or only some have access to the appropriate N95
respirator masks, and at 19 percent of the hospitals all or some
masks were not "fitted," to ensure their effectiveness against
the virus - More than one in five, 22 percent of the facilities, do not
have enough masks, say nurses. - At almost 40 percent of those which do have sufficient
masks, all or some of the masks are expected to be reused, say
nurses. That puts nurses and patients at risk of infection and
violates CDC guidelines which say all healthcare personnel who
enter rooms of patients in isolation for H1N1 should wear a
fit-tested disposable N95 mask, and that the masks should not be
reused. - Nurses at 26 percent of hospitals report that infected
patients are not being properly isolated, in appropriately
ventilated rooms, raising the possibility of the infection
spreading to others in the facility. At nearly a third of the
facilities, proper infection controls are not being
followed. - Nurses at fewer than half of facilities (49 percent) report
that they have been adequately trained on H1N1 issues, including
identification of infected patients, and procedures for caring
for these patients. - Nurses at only 35 percent of facilities report that they are
guaranteed adequate sick leave if they become ill while caring
for a patient, penalizing them for appropriately staying home
while infectious.
These numbers are borne out by the controversies that have
been reported at hospitals across the country. Examples
include:
- At the University of California Davis Medical Center (near
Sacramento), a patient who subsequently died from H1N1 was
transferred to an intensive care unit as the patient's condition
deteriorated. But rather than be kept in strict isolation with
proper ventilation, the door to the patient's room was kept open
the entire time, placing other high-risk patients, visitors, and
caregivers at risk. - Nurses at Temple University Hospital, a major acute-care
hospital in Philadelphia, are concerned that the level of
preparedness is not sufficient. The hospital has yet to make
clear to nurses its plans and procedures for dealing with H1N1
which is expected to worsen with the start of the school year.
The nurses are already seeing an influx of more patients due to
the closure of one of Temple's nearby facilities, Northeastern
Hospital, and are concerned that without better preparation and
sufficient staff, the anticipated influx of patients due to the
pandemic would be especially dangerous. - At Sutter Solano Medical Center in Vallejo, Calif., there
were not enough masks to deal with three infected patients in
the ICU. Within short order, approximately 10 nurses were
affected. The state office of occupational health and
safety is investigating. - Nurses report that a Kaiser Hospital South Sacramento has
informed patients and visitors that N95 respirator masks are not
necessary and that simple "surgical" masks will suffice, which
directly contravenes standards issued by every government
agency. - Nurses at Los Alamitos Medical Center near Los Angeles
report that Tenet has eliminated sick benefits that would ensure
nurses could afford to take time away from work if they develop
symptoms.
In conjunction with the report, CNA/NNOC is releasing a list
of demands - "The Nurses' Swine Flu Safety
Agenda" - to adequately prepare for this
pandemic.
- Minimize infection of hospital patients and workers by
strict adherence to the highest standard of infection control
procedures, including identification and isolation with
appropriate ventilation of infected patients - All hospital workers and visitors must be provided with
appropriate protection gear at the highest government standards,
including N95 respirator masks or better for all who enter the
isolation room of a confirmed or suspected H1N1 patient. - Guarantee all patients and workers full transparency after
any exposures to H1N1, in as timely a manner as possible - Healthcare workers and facility visitors must receive full
information and guidelines on risk exposure and facility
infection control recommendations - Any RN who is unable to work due to contracting a
communicable or infectious disease identified or treated in his
or her hospital/clinic shall be guaranteed sick leave, not face
disciplinary action, and shall be presumptively eligible for
workers' compensation benefits - Implement a moratorium on any closures of emergency rooms,
layoffs of direct healthcare personnel, and reductions of
hospital beds. - Federal guidelines for protection must be developed that are
consistent across agencies - Disposable respirator masks must not be re-used. In the
event of a demonstrated national mask shortage, facilities
should adhere to government recommendations on mask
conservation.
National Nurses United, with close to 185,000 members in every state, is the largest union and professional association of registered nurses in US history.
(240) 235-2000LATEST NEWS
Supreme Court Signals It Will Uphold 'State-Sanctioned Discrimination' in Transgender Care Case
"We the people means all the people," said the ACLU. "There is no 'transgender' exception to the U.S. Constitution."
Dec 04, 2024
Attorneys who argued against Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming healthcare at the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed hope that the court's nine justices will take "the opportunity to affirm the essential freedom and equality of all people before the law," while reports indicated that the right-wing majority is inclined to uphold the ban.
"Every day this law inflicts further pain, injustice, and discrimination on families in Tennessee and prevents them from receiving the medical care they need," said Lucas Cameron-Vaughn, staff attorney at the ACLU of Tennessee, which represented three families and a physician. "We ask the Supreme Court to commit to upholding the promises of the U.S. Constitution for all people by putting an end to Tennessee's state-sanctioned discrimination against trans youth and their families."
The law, S.B. 1, which was passed in March 2023, bars medical providers from prescribing puberty-delaying medications, other hormonal treatment, and surgical procedures to transgender minors and youths with gender dysphoria.
The Supreme Court case, United States v. Skrmetti, applies only to the ban on puberty blockers and hormonal therapy for minors; a lower court found the plaintiffs did not have legal standing to challenge the surgery ban.
The ACLU, the ACLU of Tennessee, Lambda Legal, and a law firm were joined by the Biden administration in arguing that Tennessee allows doctors to prescribe puberty blockers and other hormonal treatments for youths with congenital defects, early puberty, diseases, or physical injuries.
As such, said the plaintiffs, Tennessee's ban for transgender and nonbinary youths violates the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment, which guarantees equal treatment under the law.
"My heart—and the heart of every transgender advocate fighting this fight—is heavy with the weight of what these laws mean for people's everyday lives."
The court's three liberal justices—Justices Sonya Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson—all indicated they believed Tennessee has tried to classify people according to sex or gender with the law.
"One of the articulated purposes of this law is essentially to encourage gender conformity and to discourage anything other than gender conformity," said Kagan. "Sounds to me like, 'We want boys to be boys and we want girls to be girls,' and that's an important purpose behind the law."
Matthew Rice, the lawyer representing Tennessee in the case, claimed the state simply wants to prevent "regret" among minors, and the court's six conservative justices signaled they were inclined to allow Tennessee to ban the treatments—which are endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics and other top medical associations.
Chief Justice John Roberts said the nine justices should not overrule the decision made by lawmakers representing Tennessee residents, considering there is debate over the issue, and pointed to changes some European countries have made to their gender-affirming care protocols for minors.
Representing the Biden administration, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar acknowledged that there has been debate about gender-affirming care in the U.S. and abroad, but pointed out that countries including the U.K. and Sweden have not outright banned treatment.
"I think that's because of the recognition that this care can provide critical, sometimes lifesaving benefits for individuals with severe gender dysphoria," she said.
Following the arguments, plaintiff Brian Williams, who has a 16-year-old daughter in need of gender-affirming care, addressed supporters who had assembled outside the Supreme Court.
"Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming medical care is an active threat to the future my daughter deserves," said Williams. "It infringes not only on her freedom to be herself but on our family's love for her. We are not expecting everyone to understand everything about our family or the needs of transgender young people like our daughter. What we are asking for is for her freedom to be herself without fear. We are asking for her to be able to access the care she needs and enter adulthood knowing nothing is holding her back because of who she is."
Sotomayor said there is "very clear" evidence "that there are some children who actually need this treatment."
A 2022 study led by researchers at the University of Washington found that transgender and nonbinary youths aged 13-20 were 60% less likely to experience moderate or severe depression and 73% less likely to be suicidal after receiving gender-affirming care.
Prelogar asked the justices to "think about the real-world consequences of laws like S.B. 1," highlighting the case of a plaintiff identified as Ryan Roe.
Roe had such severe gender dysphoria that "he was throwing up before school every day," said Prelogar. "He thought about going mute because his voice caused him so much distress. And Ryan has told the courts that getting these medications after a careful consultation process with his doctors and his parents, has saved his life."
"But Tennessee has come in and categorically cut off access to Ryan's care," she added. "This law harms Ryan's health and the health of all other transgender adolescents for whom these medications are a necessity."
Tennessee is home to about 3,100 transgender teenagers, and about 110,000 transgender youths between the ages of 13-17 live in the 24 states where gender-affirming care is restricted.
More than 20 states have laws that could be impacted by the court's ruling in United States v. Skrmetti.
"My heart—and the heart of every transgender advocate fighting this fight—is heavy with the weight of what these laws mean for people's everyday lives," said Chase Strangio, co-director of the ACLU's LGBTQ & HIV Project. "But I also know that every out trans person has embraced the unknown in the name of living free from shame or the limits of other people's expectations."
"My heart aches for the parents who spent years watching their children in distress and eventually found relief in the medical care that Tennessee now overrides their judgment to ban," said Strangio. "Whatever happens today, tomorrow, and in the months and years to come, I trust that we will come together to fight for the realized promise of our Constitution's guarantee of equal protection for all."
A ruling in the case is expected in June.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Small Town Sues Utility for Climate Deception
"We have to speak truth to power as we continue to fight the existential threat that is climate change," said the mayor of Carrboro, North Carolina.
Dec 04, 2024
The town of Carrboro, North Carolina filed a lawsuit Wednesday accusing the utility company Duke Energy of carrying out a "knowing deception campaign concerning the causes and dangers posed by the climate crisis."
The municipality—which is near Chapel Hill and is after compensation for damages it has suffered or will suffer as a result of the alleged deception campaign—is the first town in the United States to challenge an electric utility for public deception about the dangers of fossil fuels and seek damages for the harms those emissions have created, according to the town's mayor, Barbara Foushee.
The case was filed in North Carolina Superior Court and argues that Duke Energy has engaged in a "greenwashing" campaign to convince the public it sought to address the climate emergency.
"In reliance upon these misrepresentations, the public has continued to conduct business with Duke under the mistaken belief that the company is committed to renewable energy," according to the filing.
"We have to speak truth to power as we continue to fight the existential threat that is climate change. The climate crisis continues to burden our community and cost residents their hard-earned tax dollars," said Foushee, according to a press release.
Mayor Pro Tem Danny Nowell added that "it's time for us to hold Duke Energy accountable for decades of deception, padding executives' pockets while towns like ours worked to mitigate the harmful effects of climate change. This suit will allow the Town of Carrboro to invest new resources into building a stronger, more climate-resilient community, using the damages justly due to our residents to reimagine the ways we prepare for our climate reality."
According to the lawsuit, Carrboro will be forced to spend millions of dollars either repairing or shoring up public infrastructure as a result of more frequent and devastating storms, which scientists agree are caused by climate change.
The complaint comes not long after the release of a report, Duke Energy Knew: Documenting the Utility’s Early Knowledge and Ongoing Deception About Climate Change, from the Energy and Policy Institute, a watchdog group. According to the report, Duke Energy well understood the risks posed by burning fossil fuels as far back as the 1960s, but chose to take part in promoting disinformation about climate science. In more recent years, the utility continued to pursue fossil fuels while blocking renewable energy development, according to the report's authors. Much of this research is referenced in the lawsuit.
As one example of its "deception," the lawsuit points to Duke Energy's participation in the the Global Climate Coalition, an entity created with the intent of opposing action to curb the climate crisis.
Duke Energy was the third largest emitter of greenhouse gasses in 2021, according to a breakdown from the Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, which ranked U.S. companies in terms of their CO2-equivalent greenhouse gas emissions.
More than 20 states, tribes, cities, and counties have brought similar climate deception lawsuits. Maine, for example, recently became the ninth state to sue a major oil and gas company for deceiving the public about its products' role in the climate crisis.
"We’ll soon have a climate denier-in-chief in the White House, but Carrboro is a shining light in this darkness, taking on one of the country's largest polluters and climate deceivers," Jean Su, energy justice director at the Center for Biological Diversity, said in a press release. The Center for Biological Diversity is advising on the case.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Groups Sound Alarm Over Trump Plot to Install Nominees Without Senate Approval
"If you're trying to ram through nominees without Senate and public scrutiny, it's a pretty good guess that you have something to hide."
Dec 04, 2024
Dozens of civil rights and pro-democracy organizations teamed up Wednesday to express opposition to President-elect Donald Trump's push to use recess appointments to evade the Senate confirmation process for his political nominees, many of which have
glaring conflicts of interest.
The 70 groups—including People For the American Way, Public Citizen, the Constitutional Accountability Center, and the NAACP—sent a letter to U.S. senators arguing that Senate confirmation procedures provide "crucial data" that helps lawmakers and the public "evaluate nominees' fitness for the important positions to which they are nominated."
"The framers of the Constitution included the requirement of Senate 'Advice and Consent' for high-ranking officers for a reason: The requirement can protect our freedom, just as the Bill of Rights does, by providing an indispensable check on presidential power," reads the new letter. "None of that would happen with recess appointments. The American people would be kept in the dark."
Since his victory in last month's election, Trump has publicly expressed his desire to bypass the often time-consuming Senate confirmation process via recess appointments, which are allowed under the Constitution and have been used in the past by presidents of both parties. The need for Senate confirmation is already proving to be a significant obstacle for the incoming administration: Trump's first attorney general nominee, Matt Gaetz, withdrew amid seemingly insurmountable Senate opposition, and Pentagon nominee Pete Hegseth appears to be on the ropes.
"Giving in to the president-elect's demand for recess appointments under the current circumstances would dramatically depart from how important positions have always been filled at the start of an administration," the groups wrote in their letter. "The confirmation process gathers important information that helps ensure that nominees who will be dangerous or ineffective for the American people are not confirmed and given great power, and that those who are confirmed meet at least a minimum standard of acceptability."
"The American people deserve full vetting of every person selected to serve in our nation's highest offices, and Trump's nominees are no exception."
Scholars argue recess appointments were intended as a way for presidents to appoint officials to key posts under unusual circumstances, not as an exploit for presidents whose nominees run up against significant opposition.
The Senate could prevent recess appointments by refusing to officially go on recess and making use of pro forma sessions, but incoming Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has said that "we have to have all the options on the table" to push through Trump's nominees.
"We are not going to allow the Democrats to thwart the will of the American people in giving President Trump the people that he wants in those positions to implement his agenda," Thune said last month.
Trump has also previously threatened to invoke a never-before-used provision of the Constitution that he claims would allow him to force both chambers of Congress to adjourn, paving the way for recess appointments.
Conservative scholar Edward Whelan, a distinguished senior fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, denounced that proposed route as a "cockamamie scheme" that would mean "eviscerating the Senate's advice-and-consent role."
Svante Myrick, president of People For the American Way, said in a statement Wednesday that "if you're trying to ram through nominees without Senate and public scrutiny, it's a pretty good guess that you have something to hide."
"The American people deserve full vetting of every person selected to serve in our nation's highest offices," said Myrick, "and Trump's nominees are no exception."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular