Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

If you’ve been waiting for the right time to support our work—that time is now.

Our mission is simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

But without the support of our readers, this model does not work and we simply won’t survive. It’s that simple.
We must meet our Mid-Year Campaign goal but we need you now.

Please, support independent journalism today.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

Rebecka Ortiz offers a sample of pasta to her 3-year-old daughter at the grocery store where she was using her SNAP benefits to stock up on food for her family on March 1, 2013 in Woonsocket, Rhode Island. (Photo: Michael S. Williamson/Washington Post via Getty Images)

Rebecka Ortiz offers a sample of pasta to her 3-year-old daughter at the grocery store where she was using her SNAP benefits to stock up on food for her family on March 1, 2013 in Woonsocket, Rhode Island. (Photo: Michael S. Williamson/Washington Post via Getty Images)

Biden's Permanent SNAP Boost 'Will Transform Lives,' Say Anti-Poverty Advocates

The USDA's record 27% increase in food stamp benefits "is a large advance for poverty reduction, nutrition, and opportunity for children," said one economist.

Kenny Stancil

Progressives on Monday commended the Biden administration for approving the largest permanent expansion of food benefits in the history of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which anti-poverty advocates say will help improve health and educational outcomes for millions of low-income households in need of financial support.

"This increase will be a huge relief for the 42 million Americans who rely on SNAP, including working families who are simply not paid enough to afford basic living expenses."
—Joel Berg, Hunger Free America

Although the cost of a healthy diet has grown over time, the United States Department of Agriculture had not increased the value of the Thrifty Food Plan—its model for estimating how families could meet nutritional guidelines as inexpensively as possible, which is used to calculate SNAP benefits—since it was first established in 1975 based on 1962 prices, with the exception of adjustments for inflation.

USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack announced on Monday that thanks to a long-awaited re-evaluation of the Thrifty Food Plan, the maximum SNAP benefit will climb to $835 a month for a family of four, an increase of 21%, beginning on October 1, 2021. The average SNAP benefit will rise by 27% above pre-pandemic levels, adjusted for inflation, according to the New York Times.

"A modernized Thrifty Food Plan is more than a commitment to good nutrition—it's an investment in our nation's health, economy, and security," said Vilsack. "Ensuring low-income families have access to a healthy diet helps prevent disease, supports children in the classroom, reduces healthcare costs, and more. And the additional money families will spend on groceries helps grow the food economy, creating thousands of new jobs along the way."

As the Times reported Sunday:

For at least a decade, critics of the benefits have said they were too low to provide an adequate diet. More than three-quarters of households exhaust their benefits in the first half of the monthly cycle, and researchers have linked subsequent food shortages to problems as diverse as increased hospital admissions, more school suspensions, and lower SAT scores.

Under the new rules, average monthly benefits, $121 per person before the pandemic, will rise by $36. Although the increase may seem modest to middle-class families, proponents say it will reduce hunger, improve nutrition, and lead to better health.

Unlike coronavirus-driven expansions of the social safety net, some of which are set to expire next month, the upcoming augmentation of SNAP benefits has been designed to outlast the ongoing public health emergency.

While the boost to SNAP comes amid a pandemic-related surge in hunger, the Times noted that the importance of food assistance has been growing for years in the wake of bipartisan cuts to social welfare programs during the Clinton administration. Enrollment in SNAP "more than doubled... from the early 2000s to the aftermath of the Great Recession," according to the newspaper.

The Biden administration's revision of the Thrifty Food Plan, and ensuing permanent expansion of SNAP benefits, elicited praise from a number of anti-hunger advocates.

Anti-poverty expert Rebecca Vallas called the change a "historic step towards addressing a shameful nationwide hunger crisis that long predated Covid."

Joel Berg, CEO of Hunger Free America said in a statement Monday that "the new Thrifty Food Plan is a huge victory in the fight against hunger and for the tens of millions of Americans facing food insecurity."

"This is something that Hunger Free America has been advocating for years," he continued, "as a permanent boost to SNAP benefits will allow families participating in the program to be able to afford healthier food without fear of running out of benefits each month."

Berg added that "this increase will be a huge relief for the 42 million Americans who rely on SNAP, including working families who are simply not paid enough to afford basic living expenses. Being able to afford a more nutritious diet is also crucial for the overall health of low-income families, allowing them to have greater protection against Covid-19 as the rates of the virus continue to skyrocket in areas across the country."

The increase in food aid did not require congressional approval, and "as hints of the benefit increase spread last week, Republicans pushed back," the Times reported. "Before the plan was even released, two Republican legislators called for a watchdog to review it."

"The changes have enormous potential to reduce, and potentially eliminate, child hunger and poverty in this country."
—Jamie Bussel, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Ironically, however, "the changes are the result of [the Farm Bill] passed in 2018 by a Republican Congress, which ordered a review of the program's assumptions and gave the Agriculture Department four years to do it," the Times noted. "In January, President [Joe] Biden urged the department to speed up the process so that benefits 'reflect the true cost of a basic healthy diet.'"

"In allowing the plan's value to rise, officials argued they were following the 2018 law, which required new standards but did not specify whether costs should stay the same," the newspaper added. "Former Rep. Mike Conaway, a Republican and chief author of the 2018 law, said it was written 'assuming the precedent of cost-neutrality would be followed' and warned the administration against 'unilateral overreach.'"

Progressive critics of the USDA's previous Thrifty Food Plan have long argued that the assumption of fixed food costs resulted in an unrealistic model that ignored several factors, including preparation time, geographic variation in prices, and dietary changes during adolescence. The resulting inadequate food budget for impoverished families forced many to settle for cheaper, less nutritious options or go hungry when benefits began to run low, as they did for almost 90% of recipients before the end of the month.

A study (pdf) published last month by the Urban Institute found that in 2020, the maximum SNAP benefit provided by the old formula "did not cover the cost of a modestly priced meal in 96% of all U.S. counties."

Anti-poverty advocates, meanwhile, celebrated the Biden administration's new, more generous plan, which incorporates the latest recommendations regarding exercise and caloric intake, reflects updated dietary standards, and acknowledges the need for greater convenience.

"I am beyond thrilled President Biden is taking the long overdue step to adjust the Thrift Food Plan to be in line with the increased cost of healthy food," Jason Furman, professor of economics at Harvard University, said Sunday. "This is a large advance for poverty reduction, nutrition, and opportunity for children."

Jamie Bussel, a senior program officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, told the Washington Post on Sunday that "this is totally a game-changing moment."

"The changes have enormous potential to reduce, and potentially eliminate, child hunger and poverty in this country," said Bussel. "This will reflect much more accurately what food actually costs in communities."


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

"I'm sure this will be all over the corporate media, right?"
That’s what one longtime Common Dreams reader said yesterday after the newsroom reported on new research showing how corporate price gouging surged to a nearly 70-year high in 2021. While major broadcasters, newspapers, and other outlets continue to carry water for their corporate advertisers when they report on issues like inflation, economic inequality, and the climate emergency, our independence empowers us to provide you stories and perspectives that powerful interests don’t want you to have. But this independence is only possible because of support from readers like you. You make the difference. If our support dries up, so will we. Our crucial Mid-Year Campaign is now underway and we are in emergency mode to make sure we raise the necessary funds so that every day we can bring you the stories that corporate, for-profit outlets ignore and neglect. Please, if you can, support Common Dreams today.

 

'We WILL Fight Back': Outrage, Resolve as Protests Erupt Against SCOTUS Abortion Ruling

Demonstrators took to the streets Friday to defiantly denounce the Supreme Court's right-wing supermajority after it rescinded a constitutional right for the first time in U.S. history.

Brett Wilkins ·


80+ US Prosecutors Vow Not to Be Part of Criminalizing Abortion Care

"Criminalizing and prosecuting individuals who seek or provide abortion care makes a mockery of justice," says a joint statement signed by 84 elected attorneys. "Prosecutors should not be part of that."

Kenny Stancil ·


Progressives Rebuke Dem Leadership as Clyburn Dismisses Death of Roe as 'Anticlimactic'

"The gap between the Democratic leadership, and younger progressives on the question of 'How Bad Is It?' is just enormous."

Julia Conley ·


In 10 Key US Senate Races, Here's How Top Candidates Responded to Roe Ruling

While Republicans unanimously welcomed the Supreme Court's rollback of half a century of reproductive rights, one Democrat said "it's just wrong that my granddaughter will have fewer freedoms than my grandmother did."

Brett Wilkins ·


Sanders Says End Filibuster to Combat 'Outrageous' Supreme Court Assault on Abortion Rights

"If Republicans can end the filibuster to install right-wing judges to overturn Roe v. Wade, Democrats can and must end the filibuster, codify Roe v. Wade, and make abortion legal and safe," said the Vermont senator.

Jake Johnson ·

Common Dreams Logo