

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Since 2021, top Wall Street banks have committed more than $124 billion in investments to the nine companies set to profit most from the toppling of Venezuela's government.
As oil industry giants are being set up to profit from President Donald Trump's invasion of Venezuela, a new analysis shows the ample backing those companies have received from Wall Street's top financial institutions.
Last week, Bloomberg reported that stock traders and tycoons were "pouncing" after Trump's kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro earlier this month, after having pressured the Trump administration to "create a more favorable business environment in Venezuela."
A dataset compiled by the international environmental advocacy group Stand.earth shows the extent to which these interests are intertwined.
Stand.earth found that since 2021, banks—including JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, TD, RBC, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America—have committed more than $124 billion in investments to the nine companies set to profit most from the toppling of Venezuela's government.
More than a third of that financing, $42 billion, came in 2025 alone, when Trump launched his aggressive campaign against Venezuela.

Among the companies expected to profit most immediately are refiners like Valero, PBF Energy, Citgo, and Phillips 66, which have large operations on the Gulf Coast that can process the heavy crude Venezuela is known to produce. These four companies have received $41 billion from major banks over the past five years.
Chevron, which also operates many heavy-crude facilities, benefits from being the only US company that operated in Venezuela under the Maduro regime, where it exported more than 140,000 barrels of oil per day last quarter.
At a White House gathering with top oil executives on Friday, the company's vice chair, Mark Nelson, told Trump the company could double its exports "effective immediately."
According to Jason Gabelman, an analyst at TD Cowen, the company could increase its annual cash flow by $400 million to $700 million as a result of Trump's takeover of Venezuelan oil resources.
Chevron was also by far the number-one recipient of investments in 2025, with more than $11 billion in total coming from the banks listed in the report—including $1.78 billion from Barclays, another $1.78 billion from Bank of America, and $1.32 billion from Citigroup.
According to Bloomberg, just weeks before Maduro's removal, analysts at Citigroup predicted 60% gains on the nation's more than $60 billion in bonds if he were replaced.
Even ExxonMobil, whose CEO Darren Woods dumped cold water on Trump's calls to set up operations in Venezuela on Friday, calling the nation "uninvestable," potentially has something major to gain from Maduro's overthrow.
Exxon and ConocoPhillips each have outstanding arbitration cases against Venezuela over the government's 2007 nationalization of oil assets, which could award them $20 billion and $12 billion, respectively.
The report found that in 2025, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips received a combined total of more than $12.8 billion in investment from major financial institutions, which vastly exceeded that from previous years.
Data on these staggering investments comes as oil companies face increased scrutiny surrounding possible foreknowledge of Trump's attack on Venezuela.
Last week, US Senate Democrats launched a formal investigation into “communications between major US oil and oilfield services companies and the Trump administration surrounding last week’s military action in Venezuela and efforts to exploit Venezuelan oil resources.”
Richard Brooks, Stand.earth's climate finance director, said the role of the financial institutions underwriting those oil companies should not be overlooked either.
"Without financial support from big banks and investors, the likes of Chevron, Exxon, ConocoPhillips, and Valero would not have the power that they do to start wars, overthrow governments, or slow the pace of climate action," he said. "Banks and investors need to choose if they are on the side of peace, or of warmongering oil companies.”
Three members of the Just Economy Institute share their insights on how to weave multiple worlds together to accelerate change.
Most activists sense the dense web of connections linking social, economic and climate justice issues, yet stick largely to their own anchor points. It’s time to come unstuck. To make progress at a pace that matches the urgency of our problems, we must widen the circles of activism and invite everyone in.
“We need to take big leaps of faith,” says Akaya Windwood, lead advisor for Third Act and founder of the New Universal Wisdom and Leadership Institute. “There are enough of us now doing this work. We have everything we need in order to make transformation happen.”
To find out what it means to pull all the pieces together, we interviewed three members of the Just Economy Institute who are doing it: Windwood; Tzeporah Berman, international program director at Stand.earth; and Stephone Coward, economic justice director at the Hip Hop Caucus. Here are their insights on how to weave multiple worlds together to accelerate change.
Many fellows who came to our program with a social justice focus have dissociated from money. What they find, though, is that tracing its flow reveals hidden leverage points.
“There’s an opportunity to lean more into the power that people have through their money—even if they don’t have a great portfolio—to send a message that we can’t prioritize profit over people,” says Coward.
To that end, Coward recently launched Bank Black and Green, a multiyear campaign to rally impact investors to shift capital to Black-owned banks that pledge not to finance the fossil fuel industry or mass incarceration.
“These minority depository institutions are frontline actors in a just transition from the current extractive economy to a regenerative one,” Coward says. Meanwhile, “fossil fuel companies come into underdeveloped communities with the promise of good jobs and actually end up poisoning these communities, lowering the value of homes and local businesses, and driving away other forms of economic investment.”
“We need to bring the organizing away from the centers of power and into the centers of impact, where climate change is already hitting hard,” says Coward. “New York, D.C., L.A.—places like that are important, but the people who live in the Gulf states also want and need to be a part of this work. We have to build power and mobilize people in the South.”
That requires a long-term commitment, he adds—not just “parachuting into communities to do some type of vanity project and then leaving. And in order for us to do this financial activism and climate activism work together, we’ve got to understand where people are currently.”
“If we’re actually going to change things, we need to start finding honest common ground.”
This is true in every dimension of difference. “It’s been eye opening to me to understand that we are having two very different conversations generationally,” Windwood says, “and I'm coming to the understanding that cross-generational work is as essential as working across race, gender, and class—and perhaps more salient now than anything else.”
Doing that work, she adds, requires moving away from negative communication habits.
“One of the most toxic patterns in our social movements is the critiquing that we do, the contest to see who’s the smartest person in the room—and the way I can tell you that I’m the smartest person in the room is by tearing down your ideas,” Windwood says. “If we’re actually going to change things, we need to start finding honest common ground. Imagine going to a social justice gathering where we are welcoming and kind, and can disagree with some grace.”
“We have got to learn how to listen—listen to understand, not to respond,” says Berman, whose organization builds power side-by-side with the frontline communities most impacted by environmental crises.
“There is an inherent tension in the work we do, because when you work on environmental and climate issues, you always feel like you’re racing against the clock,” she says. “Yet true justice-based relationships that are not extractive take trust, and trust takes time.”
Building trust—especially with frontline communities—starts with the approach to developing the campaign, she adds: The most effective actions involve co-creating the strategy, not just giving people the opportunity to have a voice in it. Berman offers Stand.earth’s Amazon campaign, which persuaded banks to shift billions of dollars away from financing oil extraction.
“We built a resistance strategy jointly with Indigenous associations and leadership. And when we decided to try to convince banks to stop funding oil drilling in the heart of the Amazon, we weren’t just facilitating Indigenous leaders to do a speech to a bank,” Berman said. “Instead, our researchers briefed them on all the financial information and answered their questions so that when the Indigenous leaders showed up in a meeting with vice presidents of some of the largest banks in the world, they were negotiating with real information, and they were equal partners.”
“Those bank executives were hearing not just the story of impacts on the land and in the forest, but an assessment of their recent financial transactions in the oil trade and a direct request to stop this contract and no longer pursue this particular company. They didn’t expect that.”
Activism by its nature is focused on problems, and that can make the work feel grim to people who don’t do it for a living—and even to some who do.
“We need people to stay for the long-term. Our hope must be louder than the other side’s grievances,” Coward says. “We can use the power of storytelling to put out something aspirational, to talk about what a society that doesn’t prioritize profit over people looks like.”
Windwood echoes the need for “stories that tell us of possible futures,” along with an experience of community. “I think that’s why Third Act is so effective, and how we went from an idea two years ago to having over 70,000 members today,” she says. “When we say, ‘Let’s go sit in front of the banks in our rocking chairs,’ people want to do that. Why? Because it’s fun.”
Berman’s parting advice: “Find ways to experience joy together. It will do more to strengthen your work than anything else because joy is the justice we give ourselves in troubled times.”
Even in times of heartache, we find hope and resolve in our collective work to hold polluters accountable for their destruction, and to reclaim, repair, and rebuild healthy and safe communities.
On the heels of COP28, where world governments finally recognized the need to “transition away from fossil fuels” but failed to acknowledge the inevitable phaseout, the global fossil fuel divestment movement surpassed a major milestone, already leading the way to a fossil free world: 1,600+ institutions, representing $40.6 trillion in assets, are cutting ties with the toxic energy of the past.
This is a stark reminder: When oil companies are corrupting world governments (see: COP28) we fail to move at the pace and scale the climate crisis requires—but people power gets the goods.
2023 saw record-breaking climate chaos around the world, from fires and floods, to deadly heat and smoke—and fossil fuel corporations and their financiers are responsible.
Divestment is one (powerful) tool in our toolbox to take on fossil fuel greed and transform our energy and financial systems to be community-led, accessible, and democratized.
Swiss pension fund CPEG, the U.K.’s Wiltshire Pension Fund, and the largest private pension in the Netherlands are the latest to join the unstoppable movement. In 2023 alone, major divestment commitments were made by the Church of England, New York University, the National Academy of Medicine, and Triodos Bank.
From Fossil Free Research to Fossil Free Careers, the intergenerational, interracial divestment movement has helped create the political and public space to reclaim our economy from fossil fueled interest. Not only is a world beyond fossil fuels possible, it’s happening right now—it’s time for fossil fuel executives and their financiers to stop holding us back.
According to the Global Fossil Fuel Divestment Database, the world’s most comprehensive index of institutional fossil fuel divestment commitments managed by Stand.earth, divestment spans every sector of society—and continues to grow.
Surpassing 1,600 fossil fuel divestment commitments would not have been possible without millions of climate justice leaders and activists around the world, and countless economic, racial, and climate justice organizations. As the movement enters its 13th year, and sets sights on bigger victories, we also want to mark the steadfast support of Ellen Dorsey who is stepping down as head of the Wallace Global Fund (WGF). WGF has supported this movement from its inception, building upon the success of the Anti-Apartheid Divestment Movement.
From educational institutions and public pension funds, to faith-based and healthcare groups, to governments, nonprofits, and cultural institutions, major institutional investors have even reported consistent positive or neutral returns following divestment—despite broader economic volatility and insecurity.
More than a decade of data affirms that fossil fuel divestment is a winning financial strategy, including early adopters of divestment strategies reporting neutral or positive financial results. This follows years of attempted shareholder engagement, now a proven futile strategy, with fossil fuel corporations hell-bent on our destruction.
This includes Danish pension AkademikerPension, which engaged in a rigorous and transparent shareholder engagement process with fossil fuel companies, dropping the final oil major from its portfolio—Italian oil company Eni—because “top management in the oil and gas sector simply refuse to do so in manner consistent with the goals of the Paris agreement.”
Notably in its decision, AkademikerPension reported positive financial returns after shedding the last major oil and gas investments.
If 1,600+ institutional commitments doesn’t convince you, let’s look to the International Energy Agency (IEA): In its annual World Energy Outlook 2023 report released in October, the IEA revealed that our energy systems are already on track to transition off fossil fuels with demand decreasing significantly by 2030.
As IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol said:
The transition to clean energy is happening worldwide and it’s unstoppable. It’s not a question of “if,” it’s just a matter of “how soon”—and the sooner the better for all of us.
On top of this, a June 2023 foundational report from the University of Waterloo revealed that just six U.S. public pension funds would be $21 billion richer had they divested from fossil fuels a decade ago. This includes major pensions in the Climate Safe Pensions Network. Specifically, the two largest public pensions in the United States—CalPERS and CalSTRS collectively representing over $780 billion in assets—missed out on over $9.6 billion in returns.
Divestment is one (powerful) tool in our toolbox to take on fossil fuel greed and transform our energy and financial systems to be community-led, accessible, and democratized.
This strategy must be employed alongside solidarity with Indigenous and frontline fights to directly stop toxic and unnecessary and sovereignty-violating fossil fuel projects; together with the growing movement to stop the money pipeline from banks, pensions, and financial institutions to fossil fuel corporations; and with dozens of municipalities and states, most recently the state of California, launching lawsuits against major oil corporations for climate deception and damages.
Even in times of heartache, we find hope and resolve in our collective work to hold polluters accountable for their destruction, and to reclaim, repair, and rebuild healthy and safe communities.
Instead of financing climate chaos-causing fossil fuels, violence, and extraction, financial institutions like big banks and pension funds must protect people and the planet alike, cutting ties with fossil fuels and reinvesting in proven community-led climate-safe solutions. Together, the many will defeat the dirty money.