

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

In a bold bid to share with the suffering American people a portion of the extraordinary wealth gained by the nation's billionaires during the pandemic, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) today introduced legislation that would place a one-time 60% tax on the growth in billionaire wealth between March 18 and the end of the year. As of August 5, the tax would raise $422 billion although the figure will likely rise by Dec. 31.
Sanders would use the revenue to cover the out-of-pocket medical expenses of all the uninsured and the under-insured Medicare beneficiaries over the next 12 months during the COVID-19 crisis. The money raised by Sanders's "Make Billionaires Pay Act" could also in theory be used for other vital public purposes (see list at bottom). Initial cosponsors of the bill are Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Ed Markey (D-MA).
Based on an analysis by Americans for Tax Fairness and the Institute for Policy Studies using Forbes billionaires data, as of August 5, 467 of the country's nearly 650 billionaires would be subject to the tax.* Their collective wealth has ballooned by $732 billion, or 30%, since the rough start of the coronavirus lockdown on March 18, or by $36.6 billion a week or $5.2 billion a day over the last 20 weeks. A 60% tax on their increased wealth under the Sanders legislation would raise $422 billion, but still leave them with $310 billion in wealth gains since mid-March.
Data on the amount each state's billionaires would owe in taxes is available here.
This extraordinary growth in wealth occurred as 32 million Americans lost their jobs, nearly 5 million contracted the COVID-19 virus, and almost 160,000 died from it. Some 40 million families face eviction, but so far during the pandemic Jeff Bezos--already the world's richest man--has gained over $71 billion in wealth, or 63%.
Long lines snake outside food banks as 26 million adults report going hungry, but so far during the pandemic Mark Zuckerberg's fortune has jumped by $38 billion, or 69%. More than five million Americans have lost health insurance in the midst of a healthcare crisis, but so far during the pandemic Elon Musk's net worth has nearly tripled thanks to a $46 billion boost.
"The multiple crises of 2020 have made clear that there are two Americas: the one most of us live in, currently battered by disease, recession and civil strife; and the privileged world of the ultra-rich, exemplified by the billionaires," said Frank Clemente, executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness, which has been publicizing the divergent fates of billionaires and the rest of us. "The Make Billionaires Pay Act would draw those two America's closer together by making billionaires share a sizable portion of their obscene growth in wealth during these troubled times. It's only by acting together that we can emerge from our troubles stronger than ever."
"An emergency wealth tax on billionaires is what the body politic requires," said Chuck Collins, coauthor of Billionaire Bonanza 2020 and director of the Institute for Policy Studies - Program on Inequality. "These billionaires will remain billions richer than a year ago--and a portion of their extreme wealth gains will be deployed to address the pandemic crisis."
No one worth less than a billion dollars would pay a cent under Sanders's bill and billionaires who have lost money would be exempt. And even after paying the one-time tax, they would still be 40% richer than they were before the virus hit.
In addition to having Medicare pay the out-of-pocket healthcare expenses of the uninsured and underinsured over the next year, which one estimate says would cost $400 billion, the $422 billion Sanders's bill would raise as of August 5 could also be put to other good uses, such as paying for the following items in the latest House-passed coronavirus relief bill, the Heroes Act:
* Nearly all of the $500 billion in aid that would go to help state governments keep providing public services or all of the $375 billion that would go sustain local public services.
* Expanded and extended unemployment benefits ($437 billion).
* Improved pandemic payouts of up to $6,000 per family ($413 billion).
* Both an initiative to save families from eviction and foreclosure ($202 billion) and one to provide hazard pay to frontline workers ($190 billion).
* All of the following: continued health coverage for laid-off workers ($98 billion); COVID-19 treatment ($90 billion); increased aid to schools and colleges ($90 billion); testing and contact tracing ($75 billion); and tax credits for employers and closed businesses ($73 billion).
* There are nearly 650 U.S. billionaires as of Aug. 5, according to Forbes data analyzed by ATF and IPS, but 176 of them currently would not have to pay the Sanders pandemic wealth tax because their wealth declined from March 18 to August 5, or they joined the billionaires list during that period but their wealth growth during the period did not exceed $1 billion, the threshold for newcomers to be assessed the tax because that is the minimum wealth to be placed on the Forbes list. March 18 is the date Forbes released its annual report on billionaires' wealth.
Institute for Policy Studies turns Ideas into Action for Peace, Justice and the Environment. We strengthen social movements with independent research, visionary thinking, and links to the grassroots, scholars and elected officials. I.F. Stone once called IPS "the think tank for the rest of us." Since 1963, we have empowered people to build healthy and democratic societies in communities, the US, and the world. Click here to learn more, or read the latest below.
"Nothing was accomplished by Operation Epic Fury except putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in charge of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz," said one critic of the war.
President Donald Trump revealed on Saturday that he is mulling a deal that would end his illegal war with Iran, and some hawks within the Republican Party are expressing alarm.
According to a Sunday report in The New York Times, many details of the agreement to end the war remain murky, with the fate of Iran's enriched uranium up in the air. US and Iranian officials have also given contradictory messages about the proposed deal's contents, suggesting there is much work still to be done before any agreement is finalized.
Regardless, three hawkish GOP senators on Saturday raised major concerns about the contents of the deal, warning against accepting any agreement that will leave Iran in a stronger position than before Trump illegally launched a war against it without any authorization from Congress in late February.
"If it is perceived in the region that a deal with Iran allows the regime to survive and become more powerful over time, we will have poured gasoline on the conflicts in Lebanon and Iraq," wrote Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who lobbied Trump to attack Iran repeatedly before the start of the war. "A deal that is perceived to allow Iran to survive and possess the ability to control the [Strait of Hormuz] in the future will put Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Shia militias in Iraq on steroids.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), another longtime Iran hawk, said he was "deeply concerned" about what he's been hearing about the deal and expressed particular worry about Iran getting relief from US sanctions while still maintaining the ability to shut down the Strait of Hormuz.
"If the result of all that is to be an Iranian regime—still run by Islamists who chant 'death to America'—now receiving billions of dollars," Cruz wrote, "being able to enrich uranium and develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake."
Sen. Roger Wicker (D-Miss.) was even blunter in his condemnation of the reported agreement.
"The rumored 60-day ceasefire—with the belief that Iran will ever engage in good faith—would be a disaster," Wicker wrote. "Everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught!"
Ben Rhodes, a former deputy national security adviser for President Barack Obama, challenged Wicker's claims that Trump's illegal war had achieved anything of value.
"Nothing was accomplished by Operation Epic Fury," Rhodes wrote, "except putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in charge of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz."
Rhodes' criticism was echoed by Stephen Wertheim, senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, who wrote that "everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury is already for naught."
Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group, accused the Iran hawks of being delusional for thinking further bombing would force Iran to capitulate.
"DC's Iran hawks got two wars, nearly every conceivable sanction designation, a blockade, threw a wrench in global economy," Vaez wrote, "and will still claim that just a little more pressure and a touch more bombing will magically yield the concessions they still won't be satisfied with."
Data released by the University of Michigan and Gallup this week showed US consumer sentiment cratering even as stock markets hit record highs.
Multiple polls and surveys released in recent days have shown US consumer sentiment cratering—and all the while, the US stock market keeps hitting record highs.
The Kobeissi Letter, a financial newsletter, posted a graphic Saturday that matched consumer sentiment as measured by the University of Michigan's Surveys of Consumers with the performance of the S&P 500 stock index over a 30-year span.
The graphic shows that, up until around 2020, consumer sentiment matched stock market performance closely, although there was a large divergence between the two leading up to the 2008 financial crisis, where stocks briefly outperformed consumer sentiment before crashing downward as the housing bubble burst.
But throughout the last six years, the graphic shows, the S&P 500 has produced an almost continuous upward surge even as consumer sentiment spirals downward.
Absolutely incredible:
Over the last 6 years, the S&P 500 has risen +130% while US Consumer Sentiment has collapsed by -55%, to its lowest since data began in 1952.
We are witnessing the formation of the biggest wealth divide in modern history. https://t.co/XGMR6DfuNc pic.twitter.com/2w7cRvn7ok
— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) May 23, 2026
"Absolutely incredible," commented Kobeissi Letter. "Over the last six years, the S&P 500 has risen +130% while US Consumer Sentiment has collapsed by -55%, to its lowest since data began in 1952. We are witnessing the formation of the biggest wealth divide in modern history."
Kobeissi Letter produced the graphic one day after the University of Michigan's latest survey found consumer sentiment hitting the lowest level on record.
Joanne Hsu, director of the survey, observed that "the cost of living continues to be a first-order concern, with 57% of consumers spontaneously mentioning that high prices were eroding their personal finances, up from 50% last month."
On the same day, Gallup published new data showing that Americans' economic confidence has fallen to its lowest level since October 2022, with just 16% of Americans rating the economy as excellent or good, and nearly half describing it as poor.
Axios reported on Saturday that even Republicans have been growing sour on the US economy, citing a recent poll from The Associated Press showing GOP approval of President Donald Trump on the economy to be at around 60%, down from 80% just three months ago.
"The growing GOP gloom could hardly come at a worse time for Trump and the party," Axios noted, "less than six months out from a midterm election that's likely to turn on the economy."
The gap between overall consumer sentiment and stock market performance also lines up with recent consumer spending trends. Data published by The Financial Times earlier this year showed that the top 10% of earners in the US now account for nearly half of all consumer spending, while the bottom 80% of earners now account for less than 40% of all consumer spending.
A February report from TD Economics economist Ksenia Bushmeneva noted that “the economic divide between America’s households at the top of the income spectrum and everyone else continued to widen last year,” as “upper-income households benefited from the still-robust wage growth, strong gains in equity markets, and better access to consumer credit.”
"Private equity is destroying our favorite baseball team, stripping them for parts," Democratic US Senate candidate Platner said in an ad that aired on the New England Sports Network.
Maine Democratic US Senate candidate Graham Platner on Saturday said that a campaign ad that aired during a Boston Red Sox game was "taken down" after it took aim at the team's ownership.
The ad in question features Platner discussing the role that private equity firms play in the US economy, including sports teams.
"Private equity is destroying our favorite baseball team, stripping them for parts," Platner says at the start of the ad. "Private equity is buying up our homes, our sports, and our lives. I will reverse the private equity curse."
Private equity is taking our homes. It's taking our hospitals. It's taking beloved local businesses and stripping them for parts.
And now private equity is running the Red Sox into the ground.
Our new ad ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/w7LapElpdA
— Graham Platner for Senate (@grahamformaine) May 22, 2026
Platner concludes the ad by saying that he approves this message "because I miss Mookie Betts," the star player whom the Red Sox traded to the Los Angeles Dodgers in 2020 in a deal that was widely decried by local fans as a salary dump.
According to Platner, his campaign began airing the ad Friday on the New England Sports Network (NESN), the cable TV station owned partially by Fenway Sports Group, the conglomerate that owns the Red Sox.
However, he said that "midway through the game the ad was taken down" by NESN, after which the Red Sox proceeded to blow a 4-0 lead, losing to the Minnesota Twins by a final score of 8-6.
Platner, an oyster farmer and upstart candidate who has never before held political office, became the Democratic Party's presumptive nominee for the 2026 US Senate race in Maine last month after his top rival, Democratic Maine Gov. Janet Mills, dropped out of the race.
In recent weeks, Platner has pivoted to challenging incumbent Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who has held the seat since 1996 and is now running for her sixth term in office.