For Immediate Release

Contact: 

Kyla Bennett (508) 230-9933; Kirsten Stade kstade@peer.org

Suit Against EPA'S Elimination Of Clean Water Protections

EPA Rule Paves Way for Destruction of Wetlands and Small Streams.

CHARLESTON, S.C. - Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) joined 13 conservation groups today in filing a lawsuit in federal court against the Trump Administration’s effort to eliminate clean water protections for wetlands and streams that feed drinking-water sources for 200 million Americans. The legal challenge, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, opens a major court battle over the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ re-definition of what waters are protected under the Clean Water Act that leaves many waterways, as well as the communities and wildlife that rely on them, unprotected. 
 
The Southern Environmental Law Center filed today’s challenge on behalf of PEER and American Rivers, Charleston Waterkeeper, Chattahoochee Riverkeeper, Clean Water Action, Defenders of Wildlife, Environment America, Friends of the Rappahannock, James River Association, National Wildlife Federation, North Carolina Coastal Federation, North Carolina Wildlife Federation, Roanoke River Basin Association and South Carolina Coastal Conservation League.
 
The lawsuit contends that the agencies’ wholesale stripping of protections was an unlawful departure from decades of bipartisan practice.  PEER earlier filed a Scientific Integrity Complaint with EPA that demonstrated that the drafting of the rule by EPA deliberately ignored, or shunted aside, the agency’s scientific integrity requirements.  PEER’s Complaint relied on confidential disclosures provided by several still-active EPA scientists, and was endorsed by a large number of retired EPA and U.S. Army Corps officials. 
 
“Trump’s proposed waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) rule not only ignores basic science, but is contrary to the Clean Water Act’s goal of protecting the integrity of America’s waterways,” stated PEER Science Policy Director Kyla Bennett, a scientist and attorney formerly with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “This was the key point in PEER’s Scientific Integrity Complaint, and is corroborated by EPA’s own Science Advisory Board, which warned that the proposed rule flew in the face of established studies and research.” 
 
The agencies’ bid to dramatically reduce water protections was met with overwhelming opposition, with the bulk of more than 600,000 comments submitted from across the country opposed to the stripping away the Clean Water Act’s reach.

###

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Please select a donation method:



Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) is a national alliance of local state and federal resource professionals. PEER's environmental work is solely directed by the needs of its members. As a consequence, we have the distinct honor of serving resource professionals who daily cast profiles in courage in cubicles across the country.

Share This Article