SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
August, 22 2018, 12:00am EDT
Contact:
Evan Greer, 978-852-6457, press@fightforthefuture.org
California Net Neutrality Bill Faces Crucial Vote Today at Same Committee That Gutted it Last Time
This afternoon, at 1:30pm PST, California net neutrality bill SB 822--widely regarded as the best state level net neutrality bill in the country--faces a crucial vote in front of the same committee where it was unceremoniously gutted last month. In early June, at the behest of ISP lobbyists, the Communications and Conveyance Committee eviscerated the bill by ripping out key protections in a vote on amendments that was held even before testimony was heard.
WASHINGTON
This afternoon, at 1:30pm PST, California net neutrality bill SB 822--widely regarded as the best state level net neutrality bill in the country--faces a crucial vote in front of the same committee where it was unceremoniously gutted last month. In early June, at the behest of ISP lobbyists, the Communications and Conveyance Committee eviscerated the bill by ripping out key protections in a vote on amendments that was held even before testimony was heard.
Now the bill heads back to the committee to approve amendments that restore those protections - this time with the blessing of the committee chairman Miguel Santiago, who has become an ardent supporter of the bill after facing massive public outcry and the threat of crowdfunded billboards in his district. However, several members of the committee still haven't committed to supporting the bill. All eyes should be on Sacramento this afternoon as the committee votes.
Fight for the Future, a leading net neutrality group with hundreds of thousands of members in California, issued the followings statement, which can be attributed to Deputy Director, Evan Greer (pronouns: she/her):
"Let me say this in no uncertain terms: any California legislator who stands in the way of net neutrality will regret it for the rest of their political career. The whole Internet is watching. Honestly it's ridiculous and a bit embarrassing for the Democratic Party that net neutrality activists have had to fight so hard to get this bill passed in a state with a supermajority of lawmakers from a party that professes to love the free and open Internet.
It shows the stranglehold that monopolistic ISPs like AT&T have over state legislators, bought and paid for with campaign contributions and fancy golf outings with lobbyists. This juxtaposed with the very real impact of these companies' greed on Californians--including the story that broke yesterday showing Verizon throttled the connection of firefighters battling the state's wildfires.
SB 822 is the best darn state level net neutrality bill in the nation. Passing it should be a no-brainer for the California legislature. This is a test of our democracy."
Fight for the Future is a group of artists, engineers, activists, and technologists who have been behind the largest online protests in human history, channeling Internet outrage into political power to win public interest victories previously thought to be impossible. We fight for a future where technology liberates -- not oppresses -- us.
(508) 368-3026LATEST NEWS
Sanders, Senate Dems to CBS Owner: 'Do Not Capitulate' to Trump Assault on Press Freedom
"In the United States of America, presidents do not get to punish or censor the media for criticizing them. Freedom of the press is what sets us apart from tin-pot dictatorships and authoritarian regimes."
May 07, 2025
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders and a group of Democratic lawmakers on Tuesday implored the owner of CBS News' parent company not to cave in the face of President Donald Trump's legal assault on the outlet and other media organizations that he perceives as political enemies.
Sanders (I-Vt.) and his Senate colleagues argue in a letter to Shari Redstone, the controlling shareholder of Paramount, that the $20 billion lawsuit Trump filed against CBS News late last year represents "a blatant attempt to intimidate the media and those who speak out against him."
The lawsuit, which First Amendment experts have described as "frivolous" and potentially dangerous to press freedoms, claims CBS deceptively edited an interview it conducted with former Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the 2024 election.
The senators wrote in their Tuesday letter that "this lawsuit is an attack on the United States Constitution and the First Amendment."
"In the United States of America, presidents do not get to punish or censor the media for criticizing them. Freedom of the press is what sets us apart from tin-pot dictatorships and authoritarian regimes," the senators added.
"It will only embolden him to shake down, extort, and silence CBS and other media outlets that have the courage to report about issues that Trump may not like."
But the lawmakers raised alarm over Redstone's push to settle the Trump lawsuit as she seeks to close a merger deal with the entertainment company Skydance. If federal regulators approve the deal, Redstone's family stands to receive $2.4 billion in cash from Skydance in exchange for the controlling stake in Paramount.
The Wall Street Journalreported last month that Redstone "has advocated for a settlement with Trump, hoping it would clear the way for the merger's approval."
According to the Journal, Paramount leaders have discussed settling the Trump lawsuit for up to $20 million. Redstone has also reportedly "kept tabs" on recent "60 Minutes" segments to monitor Trump-related coverage.
Sanders and his Senate Democratic colleagues argued that settling the lawsuit "would be a grave mistake," warning that "rewarding Trump with tens of millions of dollars for filing this bogus lawsuit will not cause him to back down on his war against the media and a free press."
"It will only embolden him to shake down, extort, and silence CBS and other media outlets that have the courage to report about issues that Trump may not like," the letter states. "We urge you and the board of directors at Paramount to make it clear to President Trump today that Paramount will not surrender to his attack on the First Amendment."
"Stand up for freedom of the press and our democracy," it continues. "Do not capitulate to this dangerous move to authoritarianism."
CBS is one of several media outlets Trump has targeted with legal action in recent months as part of a far-reaching assault on journalism in the United States.
"After nearly a decade of repeating insults and falsehoods, and filing lawsuits, Trump has normalized disdain for media to an alarming degree," the Committee to Protect Journalists said in a report released last month.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Fresh Pakistan-India Military Exchange 'Exactly Why Nuclear Weapons Must Be Eliminated'
Nobel-winning nuclear abolition group called on "the international community to redouble efforts toward disarmament through the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons."
May 07, 2025
Fear of potential war between India and Pakistan, both nuclear-armed nations, rose after India launched deadly strikes on Pakistan and Pakistani Kashmir early Wednesday local time—prompting the nuclear nonproliferation group the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons to call for de-escalation between the two countries.
In retaliation on Wednesday, Pakistan shot down several Indian aircraft. The fighting is the latest in escalating tensions that have risen since last month's Kashmir massacre. India has blamed Pakistan for the April 22 attack in which armed militants killed tourists in Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir, while the Pakistani government has called for a "neutral" probe.
Both countries control parts of Kashmir but claim it in full.
"A nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan would cause millions of immediate deaths in the region and have global consequences," said executive director of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) Melissa Parke in a Wednesday statement.
Parke pointed to a study published in 2022 in Nature Food, which found that even a more limited nuclear war between the two countries could have devastating consequences for global food supplies and could lead to the deaths of a sizable portion of the world's population. The authors of the study also estimated that more than 2 billion people could die from nuclear war between India and Pakistan due to famine.
"No country would be spared. No government can protect its people from the consequences," said Parke.
"This is exactly why nuclear weapons must be eliminated. ICAN calls on both governments to show restraint and de-escalate, and calls on the international community to redouble efforts toward disarmament through the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons," Parke continued. "The only way to guarantee these weapons are never used is to ban and eliminate them."
The U.N. Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons is a global agreement that bans the possession, use, and testing of nuclear weapons. The treaty has 94 signatories and 73 state parties, though neither Pakistan nor India have signed or are a party to it.
ICAN won the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize in part due to its work on the treaty.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Aggressive Step' Toward Privatization as Trump Picks FedEx Board Member to Lead USPS
"It is a blatant conflict of interest and an attempt by President Trump to install a handpicked loyalist who he believes will put his interests over what may be best for the Postal Service and the American people."
May 07, 2025
President Donald Trump and the U.S. Postal Service's leadership have reportedly agreed to appoint a FedEx board member to succeed Louis DeJoy as postmaster general, heightening concerns that the administration is pushing the independent mail agency toward privatization.
The Washington Postreported late Tuesday that Trump and the USPS Board of Governors are expected to name former Waste Management CEO David Steiner to lead the Postal Service. Steiner is currently the lead independent director at FedEx, a Postal Service competitor.
Brian Renfroe, president of the National Association of Letter Carriers—a union representing nearly 300,000 active and retired letter carriers—called the decision to place Steiner at the head of the USPS "an aggressive step toward handing America's mail system over to corporate interests."
"Private shippers have been waiting to get USPS out of parcel delivery for years," said Renfroe. "Steiner's selection is an open invitation to do just that. This isn't just bad policy—it's a direct assault on the workers who keep the mail moving and the public connected. The damage will hit rural communities hardest, where the Postal Service isn't just a convenience—it's a lifeline. And make no mistake: If this appointment stands, it threatens 7.9 million jobs tied to the postal industry and service to over 300 million Americans."
"The board has the responsibility to do what is best for USPS," he added. "This decision is not only a failure in that responsibility but shows open contempt for the work of America's letter carriers and the public good."
"The Trump administration has been relentless in its attempts to privatize America's most trusted institution, both outwardly and behind the scenes."
The USPS Board of Governors—which is currently comprised of two Democrats, two Republicans, and an independent—is ultimately responsible for appointing the head of the mail service, who cannot be directly fired by the president.
The Post reported Tuesday that postal governors, who are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, submitted three postmaster general finalists to the White House in recent days, including Steiner.
"Trump has the power to immediately reshape the [postal board] with five appointments: The board has four vacancies, plus a seat that is occupied temporarily," the Post noted. "Trump announced plans to nominate Anthony Lomangino, a GOP financier, to one of those roles."
Earlier this year, Trump considered but soon dropped a plan to fire every member of the postal board and bring the USPS under the direct control of his administration. The president has also spoken openly about privatizing the mail service, saying in the wake of his 2024 election win that "it's an idea that a lot of people have liked for a long time."
Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, said in a statement Tuesday that "the Trump administration has been relentless in its attempts to privatize America's most trusted institution, both outwardly and behind the scenes."
"If these reports are true, it is a blatant conflict of interest and an attempt by President Trump to install a handpicked loyalist who he believes will put his interests over what may be best for the Postal Service and the American people," Connolly said of Steiner's selection. "The American people deserve a postmaster general who will stand up for an independent, fair, and accessible Postal Service and who will work with Congress to ensure Americans in all communities nationwide can continue to rely on this public service to deliver mail, medications, ballots, and more without prejudice."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular