For Immediate Release
Phillips 66 Dismisses Lawsuit Fighting for California Oil Train Expansion
Dismissal Comes After Environmental Groups Intervene.
SAN LUIS OBISPO, Calif. - Phillips 66 agreed yesterday to dismiss its lawsuit challenging the county of San Luis Obispo’s denial of its proposed oil train terminal in the coastal town of Nipomo, Calif.
“Phillips 66 has finally given up fighting the county’s rejection of its reckless plan to run trains carrying explosive crude oil through California,” said Clare Lakewood, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law Institute. “We’re relieved that the county’s decision to protect communities and wildlife from toxic air pollution, train derailments and oil spills will stand.”
The terminal would have allowed more than 7 million gallons of crude oil, including tar sands oil, per week to be shipped by train from across North America to Phillips 66’s Nipomo Mesa refinery.
Tar sands crude, when prepared for transport, is thinned with an unstable blend of chemicals that can explode in derailment incidents, which have become increasingly frequent in recent years.
Trains servicing the terminal would have traveled through hundreds of California cities, including Los Angeles, Sacramento, Davis, Berkeley, Oakland and San Jose. The plan also threatened ecologically sensitive areas like the San Francisco Bay and California's central coast.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Our Summer Campaign Is Underway
Support Common Dreams Today
Independent News and Views Putting People Over Profit
Phillips 66 proposed its Rail Spur Project in 2013. During the nearly three-year review process, more than 20,000 Californians voiced opposition to the project, and more than 45 cities, counties and school boards sent letters urging the San Luis Obispo County Planning Commission to deny it.
The planning commission denied the proposal in October 2016, and the county Board of Supervisors denied the company’s appeal last March. The county denied the project because, among other reasons, the site contains ecologically sensitive habitat areas and the increased diesel emissions would significantly worsen local air quality. Phillips 66 then sued the Board of Supervisors challenging the habitat determination.
The Center and five other environmental groups were granted permission to intervene in the lawsuit to defend the environmental review process and the county’s decision. The groups and the county filed a motion to dismiss in June, arguing that Phillips 66 failed to appeal the decision to the California Coastal Commission before pursuing litigation as required by state law. Facing the motion Phillips 66 agreed to dismiss the suit.
“Phillips 66 failed to silence the many Californians who took a stand against this risky fossil fuel project that would slow our state’s transition to a clean energy future,” said Lakewood. “I hope the county continues to defend public safety and vulnerable wildlife habitat from ill-conceived oil and gas expansions.”
This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.
Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Won't Exist.
Please select a donation method:
At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature - to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law, and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters, and climate that species need to survive.