For Immediate Release



FDA Advisors who Endorsed Contraceptive had Industry Ties

WASHINGTON - The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should disregard a joint advisory committee’s support of a controversial birth control pill because four members of the panel had ties to either the contraceptive maker or the maker of a generic version, the Project On Government Oversight (POGO) said Wednesday in a letter to the FDA.

In POGO’s letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, the watchdog group questioned why members with ties to Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals were allowed, in essence, to endorse the company’s second-best-selling franchise without announcing their ties during the meeting.

“It’s troubling that the FDA was well aware of the potential conflicts of interest, without discussing the ties at a public forum,” POGO Executive Director Danielle Brian said. “The American public must be able to trust that the FDA and its advisory committees are making decisions based on science not industry influence.”

The FDA joint advisory committee met Dec. 8 to consider whether the benefits of the oral contraceptives Yaz and Yasmin outweighed the risks of the drugs, which have been linked to fatal blood clots in some women who have taken the pills. The joint committee voted 15-11 in favor of the contraceptive. One member, Pharma watchdog Dr. Sidney Wolfe of Public Citizen, was not allowed to vote because of his previous advocacy against Yaz/Yasmin.

FDA officials were aware of the ties but neither agency officials nor the four members publicly disclosed these ties during the Dec. 8 meeting joint committee meeting. Dr. Paula Hillard of Stanford School of Medicine, Dr. Julia V. Johnson of the University of Massachusetts Medical School and Dr. Anne E. Burke of The John Hopkins Bayview Medical Center had all received past funding from Bayer. The fourth, Dr. Elizabeth Raymond of the Gynuity Health Projects in New York had received research funds from a company which has a licensing agreement with Bayer for generic versions of Yaz.

POGO is asking the FDA to:

  • Set aside the December vote and convene a new advisory committee to reevaluate the safety of Yaz and Yasmin;
  • Ensure that ethics guidelines currently under consideration include stronger requirements for public disclosure of conflicts; and
  • Post the financial disclosure forms filed by advisory board members online.

“How many more times will the FDA have to answer questions about potential conflicts of interest before it finally raises it standards?” Brian said.

Follow the link to read POGO’s letter to the FDA.

Founded in 1981, the Project On Government Oversight (POGO) is a nonpartisan independent watchdog that champions good government reforms. POGO's investigations into corruption, misconduct, and conflicts of interest achieve a more effective, accountable, open, and ethical federal government.


This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do.

The Project On Government Oversight (POGO) is an independent nonprofit that investigates and exposes corruption and other misconduct in order to achieve a more effective, accountable, open and honest federal government.

Share This Article

More in: