

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Thousands of Somali refugees
and asylum-seekers fleeing to Kenya face terrible conditions and
risks, their lives in jeopardy and their rights abused, Amnesty International
said in a report issued today.
"Continued fighting and horrendous
abuses in Somalia pose a very real threat to the lives of tens of thousands
of children, women and men," said Michelle Kagari, deputy director
of the Africa Program at Amnesty International. "No Somali should
be forcibly returned to southern and central Somalia."
Thousands of Somali refugees
and asylum-seekers fleeing to Kenya face terrible conditions and
risks, their lives in jeopardy and their rights abused, Amnesty International
said in a report issued today.
"Continued fighting and horrendous
abuses in Somalia pose a very real threat to the lives of tens of thousands
of children, women and men," said Michelle Kagari, deputy director
of the Africa Program at Amnesty International. "No Somali should
be forcibly returned to southern and central Somalia."
The report, "
From Life Without Peace
to Peace Without Life," describes how thousands fleeing violence
in Somalia are unable to find refuge, protection and lasting solutions
in Kenya, due to the closure of the border between the two countries almost
four years ago amid security concerns.
Last month around 8,000
Somali refugees who had fled across the border into Kenya from the Somali
town of Belet Hawo following intense fighting there, were ordered to return
to Somalia by the Kenyan authorities. Moreover, Kenyan police then forced
about 3,000 of them further into Somalia, where they continue to be at
risk of grave human rights abuses.
"Many Somalis have no option but to cross
into Kenya," said Kagari. "Kenya's closure of the screening
center near the border however means no Somali is registered immediately
and that nobody is screened. Inevitably, this does nothing to address Kenya's
national security concerns."
Following a surge in violence in December 2006, Kenya closed its 682 kilometer
border (423 miles) with Somalia, maintaining that fighters with alleged
links to al-Qaeda might otherwise enter Kenya and endanger national security.
However, because the border is porous, Somalis have continued to seek refuge
in Kenya. The Kenyan authorities have turned a blind eye to the continuous
flow of Somali asylum-seekers across the border, calling into question
what impact, if any, the closure has had on the security situation.
In a meeting with Amnesty International last March, Kenya's Minister of
State for Immigration admitted "the closure of the border does not help.
We would be better to screen them [Somali asylum seekers] so that we can
know who they are."
In its 18-page report, Amnesty International describes how Kenyan security
forces have forcibly returned asylum-seekers and refugees to Somalia and
demanded bribes and arbitrarily arrested and detained them. Somalis are
regularly harassed by Kenyan police at the border areas, in the Dadaab
refugee camps in northeastern Kenya and in urban areas, including Nairobi.
A Somali woman, age 55, told Amnesty International:
"I came to Dadaab seven days ago through Dobley. I was caught after Dobley
and spent six days in jail in Garissa. I came by car with 25 other Somalis.
We were all jailed... I had four children with me: one girl aged 11, and
three boys aged eight, nine and three years-old. The Kenyan police said:
"you came illegally through the wrong way."
I had to pay 5,000 Kenyan shillings. My relatives had to send money."
The three Daadab camps are themselves grossly overcrowded. Originally built
to accommodate 90,000 refugees, they now house more than 280,000. As a
result, housing, water, sanitation, health and education services are strained.
The Kenyan government has been slow in allocating
more land to host the growing refugee population.
Refugees in the Daadab camps told Amnesty International that the camps
themselves are increasingly insecure and that members and sympathizers
of al-Shabab, an armed Islamist group in Somalia, were present in the camps
or travelled through them and at times recruited refugees to fight in Somalia.
The Kenyan security forces are also reported to have been involved in recruiting
Somali refugees for military training in late 2009.
"The situation in the Daadab camps has reached crisis point," said Kagari.
"Somali refugees find themselves stuck between a war zone and what many
describe as an open prison, since Kenya does not allow them to leave the
camps without special permission. Refugees who have made their way to Kenya's
cities live precariously and remain vulnerable to police abuse."
"Kenya disproportionately shoulders the responsibility for massive refugee
flows from Somalia and needs more support from the international community,
including European Union countries to provide durable solutions for these
people," said Kagari.
Amnesty International is calling on the
Kenyan government to ensure that Somalis are given refuge and adequate
protection on Kenyan soil.
It also asks the international community and Kenya's donor partners to
share responsibility for Somalia's refugee crisis and to increase resettlement
programs and support local integration projects to improve the lives of
refugees in Kenya.
Amnesty International is a Nobel Peace Prize-winning
grassroots activist organization with more than 2.8 million supporters,
activists and volunteers in more than 150 countries campaigning for human
rights worldwide. The organization investigates and exposes abuses, educates
and mobilizes the public, and works to protect people wherever justice,
freedom, truth and dignity are denied.
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400"I will give," said the Republican mega-donor with a smile.
Billionaire Miram Adelson on Tuesday night suggested the legal obstacles for President Donald Trump to serve an additional term in office after 2028 are not insurmountable as the far-right Republican megadonor vowed another $250 million to bolster a run that experts say would be unlawful and unconstitutional on its face.
Adelson, a hardline Zionist who, along with her now deceased husband, Sheldon Adelson, has given hundreds of millions to US lawmakers who back a strong relationship between the US and Israeli governments, was sharing the podium with Trump during a Hanukkah candlelighting event at the White House when she made the remarks.
With a reference to Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, Adelson said they had discussed "the legal thing of four more years"—something Trump has repeatedly gestured toward and many of his backers have called for—and told Trump, “So, we can do it, think about it.”
A chant in the crowd then broke out for "For four more years!" as Adelson whispered something in Trump's ear.
“She said, ‘Think about it, I’ll give you another $250 million,’” Trump then said into the microphone. "I will give," Adelson said with a smile.
Watch the exchange:
Adelson: I met Alan Dershowitz.. he said.. four more years. We can do it. Think about it.
Crowd: *chants four more years*
Trump: She said think about it, I’ll give you another 250 million pic.twitter.com/eOc7Zazyns
— Acyn (@Acyn) December 17, 2025
For Trump's 2024 presidential campaign alone, Adelson gave at least $100 million to support the Republican candidate with Super PAC she established, according to federal filings.
In his remarks on Tuesday, Trump credited Adelson with providing him $250 million overall—"directly and indirectly"—during his 2024 bid.
"When someone can you $250 million, I think that we should give her the opportunity to say hello," Trump said, when introducing her. "And Miriam, make it quick, because $250 million is not what it used to be."
"This is the Iraq War 2.0 with a South American flavor to it," warned one Democratic senator.
US President Donald Trump late Tuesday declared a blockade on "all sanctioned oil tankers" approaching and leaving Venezuela, a major escalation in what's widely seen as an accelerating march to war with the South American country.
The "total and complete blockade," Trump wrote on his social media platform, will only be lifted when Venezuela returns to the US "all of the Oil, Land, and other Assets that they previously stole from us."
"Venezuela is completely surrounded by the largest Armada ever assembled in the History of South America," Trump wrote, referring to the massive US military buildup in the Caribbean. "It will only get bigger, and the shock to them will be like nothing they have ever seen before."
The government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, which has mobilized its military in response to the US president's warmongering, denounced Trump's comments as a "grotesque threat" aimed at "stealing the riches that belong to our homeland."
The US-based anti-war group CodePink said in a statement that "Trump’s assertion that Venezuela must 'return' oil, land, and other assets to the United States exposes the true objective" of his military campaign.
"Venezuela did not steal anything from the United States. What Trump describes as 'theft' is Venezuela’s lawful assertion of sovereignty over its own natural resources and its refusal to allow US corporations to control its economy," said CodePink. "A blockade, a terrorist designation, and a military buildup are steps toward war. Congress must act immediately to stop this escalation, and the international community must reject this lawless threat."
The announced naval blockade—an act of aggression under international law—came a week after the Trump administration seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela and made clear that it intends to intercept more.
US Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas), one of the leaders of a war powers resolution aimed at preventing the Trump administration from launching a war on Venezuela without congressional approval, said Tuesday that "a naval blockade is unquestionably an act of war."
"A war that the Congress never authorized and the American people do not want," Castro added, noting that a vote on his resolution is set for Thursday. "Every member of the House of Representatives will have the opportunity to decide if they support sending Americans into yet another regime change war."
"This is absolutely an effort to get us involved in a war in Venezuela."
Human rights organizations have accused the Republican-controlled Congress of abdicating its responsibilities as the Trump administration takes belligerent and illegal actions in international waters and against Venezuela directly, claiming without evidence to be combating drug trafficking.
Last month, Senate Republicans—some of whom are publicly clamoring for the US military to overthrow Maduro's government—voted down a Venezuela war powers resolution. Two GOP senators, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, joined Democrats in supporting the resolution.
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the Center for International Policy, wrote Tuesday that "the White House minimized Republican 'yes' votes by promising that Trump would seek Congress’ authorization before initiating hostilities against Venezuela itself."
"Trump today broke that promise to his own party’s lawmakers by ordering a partial blockade on Venezuelan ships," wrote Williams. "A blockade, including a partial one, definitively constitutes an act of war. Trump is starting a war against Venezuela without congressional authorization."
Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) warned in a television appearance late Monday that members of the Trump administration are "going to do everything they can to get us into this war."
"This is the Iraq War 2.0 with a South American flavor to it," he added. "This is absolutely an effort to get us involved in a war in Venezuela."
"Obviously, they have issues with what is in that video, and that’s why they don’t want everybody to see it," Sen. Mark Kelly said of administration officials after the meeting.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday that the Pentagon will not release unedited video footage of a September airstrike that killed two men who survived an initial strike on a boat allegedly carrying drugs in the Caribbean Sea, a move that followed a briefing with congressional lawmakers described by one Democrat as an "exercise in futility" and by another as "a joke."
Hegseth said that members of the House and Senate Armed Services committees would be given a chance to view video of the September 2 "double-tap" strike, which experts said was illegal like all the other boat bombings. The secretary did not say whether all congressional lawmakers would be provided access to the footage.
“Of course we’re not going to release a top secret, full, unedited video of that to the general public,” Hegseth told reporters following a closed-door briefing during which he and Secretary of State Marco Rubio fielded questions from lawmakers.
As with a similar briefing earlier this month, Tuesday's meeting left some Democrat attendees with more questions than answers.
“The administration came to this briefing empty-handed,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) told reporters. “If they can’t be transparent on this, how can you trust their transparency on all the other issues swirling about in the Caribbean?”
That includes preparations for a possible attack on oil-rich Venezuela, which include the deployment of US warships and thousands of troops to the region and the authorization of covert action aimed at toppling the government of longtime Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
Tuesday's briefing came as House lawmakers prepare to vote this week on a pair of war powers resolutions aimed at preventing President Donald Trump from waging war on Venezuela. A similar bipartisan resolution recently failed in the Senate.
Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY), the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and co-author of one of the new war powers resolution, said in a statement: “Today’s briefing from Secretaries Rubio and Hegseth was an exercise in futility. It did nothing to address the serious legal, strategic, and moral concerns surrounding the administration’s unprecedented use of US military force in the Caribbean and Pacific."
"As of today, the administration has already carried out 25 such strikes over three months, extrajudicially killing 95 people," Meeks noted. "That this briefing to members of Congress only occurred more than three months since the strikes began—despite numerous requests for classified and public briefings—further proves these operations are unable to withstand scrutiny and lack a defensible legal rationale."
Briefing attendee Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.)—who is in the administration's crosshairs for reminding US troops that military rules and international law require them to disobey illegal orders—said of Trump officials, "Obviously, they have issues with what is in that video, and that’s why they don’t want everybody to see it."
Defending Hegseth's decision to not make the boat strike video public, Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) argued that “there’s a lot of members that’s gonna walk out there and that’s gonna leak classified information and there’s gonna be certain ones that you hold accountable."
Mullin singled out Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), who, along with the Somalian American community at large, has been the target of mounting Islamophobic and racist abuse by Trump and his supporters.
“Not everybody can go through the same background checks that need to be cleared on this,” he said. “Do you think Omar needs all this information? I will say no.”
Rejecting GOP arguments against releasing the video, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said after attending Tuesday's briefing: “I found the legal explanations and the strategic explanations incoherent, but I think the American people should see this video. And all members of Congress should have that opportunity. I certainly want it for myself.”