SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Rachel Myers, ACLU, (212) 549-2689 or 2666; media@aclu.org
William Ramirez, ACLU of Puerto Rico, (787) 753-8493; wramirez@aclu.org
Meetali Jain, IHRLC, (202) 247-4147; mjain@wcl.american.edu
The American Civil Liberties Union, the
ACLU of Puerto Rico and the International Human Rights Law Clinic at
American University Washington College of Law (IHRLC) today filed a
request asking the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) to
intervene in the case of the Puerto Rican community of Villas del Sol,
where over 200 families have been subjected to continuous human rights
violations by the Puerto Rican government and local law enforcement.
Members of the community, made up of both Dominican immigrants and
American citizens including over 300 children, have been subjected to
police brutality, denied access to basic water and electrical services
and now face forced eviction from the land where they have lived for
more than a decade.
"Without immediate intervention, the
residents of Villas del Sol face the serious threat of continued police
brutality, life-threatening illness due to lack of water and even the
loss of the homes they built and have lived in for over 10 years," said
Chandra Bhatnagar, staff attorney with the ACLU Human Rights Program.
"This sort of egregious abuse undermines basic values of fairness and
due process and is a violation of U.S. human rights commitments."
Villas del Sol, a community located
in the Puerto Rican municipality of Toa Baja, was founded in 1998 by
several families who were unable to evacuate the area following
Hurricane George. With the knowledge of municipal authorities, the
remaining families spent thousands of their own dollars cleaning up the
devastation and building houses on the land. The community was provided
with municipal water and electricity services and existed without issue
for nearly a decade.
According to the request to the
IACHR, in 2007 Puerto Rican authorities began subjecting the residents
of Villas del Sol to harassment, claiming the area was a flood zone and
they could not live there anymore. That year, without warning,
representatives of the Puerto Rican housing authority arrived at Villas
del Sol with bulldozers and proceeded to destroy 30 homes. In 2009,
dozens of police officers descended on Villas del Sol with
semi-automatic weapons, dogs, horses and a helicopter and proceeded to
erect a barrier at the edge of the community, blocking all entry and
exit from the area. Residents who attempted to peacefully resist the
barricade, as well as some who did not attempt to resist at all, were
met with pepper spray, tasers and other police brutality - including the
beatings of a pregnant woman and her six-year-old child. Puerto Rican
authorities then put Villas del Sol under 24-hour police surveillance
and shut off water and electrical services to the community, a health
hazard which has contributed to an infant contracting H1N1 and increased
incidences of Dengue fever and other disease and infection.
"The residents of Villas del Sol now
face eviction because of the current government's backlash against
squatter communities - which have developed around the island as a
direct result of the government's own failure to make available
affordable rental properties for the poor," said William Ramirez,
Executive Director of the ACLU of Puerto Rico. "The government's
inhumane tactics and human and civil rights violations have caused pain
and suffering to the people of Villas del Sol. Unfortunately,
authorities and courts have thus far refused to provide any remedy."
According to today's request to the
IACHR, the actions by Puerto Rican authorities toward the residents of
Villas del Sol, many of whom are of Afro-Dominican descent, are
motivated by racial and anti-immigrant bias, among other factors. The
request also asserts the actions are violations of the United States'
obligation under the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of
Man, adopted by the Conference of American States in 1948. The request
asks the IACHR to take measures to protect the residents of Villas del
Sol from further harm, and specifically to call on the U.S. and Puerto
Rican governments to take immediate measures to reinstate water and
electric services, protect the community from police violence and halt
forced evictions until all residents of Villas del Sol are safely
relocated to adequate housing, pending final execution of any agreements
reached by all parties involved.
"We call on the United States
government to take responsibility for the deplorable human rights
violations occurring in Puerto Rico," said Andrea Pestone, a student
attorney with the IHRLC. "The federal government should work with the
Puerto Rican government to ensure that residents once again have access
to water and electricity and are treated with dignity and as the decent
human beings they are."
The request to the IACHR is online
at: www.aclu.org/human-rights/request-precautionary-measures-iahrc-regarding-villas-del-sol
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666"Our fight to ensure that voters—not politicians—have the final say is far from over," said one organizer.
Campaigners who last month celebrated the success of their effort to place an abortion rights referendum on November ballots in Missouri faced uncertainty about the ballot initiative Friday night, after a judge ruled that organizers had made an error on their petitions that rendered the measure invalid.
Judge Christopher Limbaugh of Cole County Circuit Court sided with pro-forced pregnancy lawmakers and activists who had argued that Missourians for Constitutional Freedom had not sufficiently explained the ramifications of the Right to Reproductive Freedom initiative, or Amendment 3, which would overturn the state's near-total abortion ban.
The state constitution has a requirement that initiative petitions include "an enacting clause and the full text of the measure," and clarify the laws or sections of the constitution that would be repealed if the amendment were passed.
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom included the full text of the measure on their petitions, which were signed by more than 380,000 residents—more than twice the number of signatures needed to place the question on ballots.
Opponents claimed, though, that organizers did not explain to signatories the meaning of "a person's fundamental right to reproductive freedom."
Limbaugh accused the group of a "blatant violation" of the constitution.
Rachel Sweet, campaign manager for the group, said it "remains unwavering in [its] mission to ensure Missourians have the right to vote on reproductive freedom on November 5."
"The court's decision to block Amendment 3 from appearing on the ballot is a profound injustice to the initiative petition process and undermines the rights of the... 380,000 Missourians who signed our petition," said Sweet. "Our fight to ensure that voters—not politicians—have the final say is far from over."
Limbaugh said he would wait until Tuesday, when the state is set to print ballots, to formally issue an injunction instructing the secretary of state to remove the question.
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom said it plans to appeal to a higher court, but if the court declines to act, the question would be struck from ballots.
As the case plays out in the coming days, said Missouri state Rep. Eric Woods (D-18), "it's a good time for a reminder that Missouri's current extreme abortion ban has ZERO exceptions for rape or incest. And Missouri Republicans are hell bent on keeping it that way."
The ruling came weeks after the Arkansas Supreme Court disqualified an abortion rights amendment from appearing on November ballots, saying organizers had failed to correctly submit paperwork verifying that paid canvassers had been properly trained.
"We demand our government completely stop arming Israel and push for a cease-fire now," said the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
Thousands of people gathered at London's Picadilly Circus Saturday for the city's latest march against Israel's bombardment of Gaza and the United Kingdom's continued support for the Israel Defense Forces, following what organizers called "a major victory in defense of the democratic right to protest."
The Metropolitan Police on Friday dropped its restrictions on the march, which was the first pro-Palestinian protest since last October to proceed to the Israeli embassy in London.
The police had attempted to stop campaigners from gathering before 2:30 pm, conflicting with plans to begin the rally preceding the march at noon.
"They never provided any convincing explanation or evidence for this delay, and it has caused enormous, unnecessary difficulty to the organization of a large-scale demonstration," Ben Jamal, who leads the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, one of the groups organizing the march, toldMiddle East Eye on Friday.
"It has unfortunately been part of a pattern of obstruction, delay, and lack of communication on the part of the Met which we will press them to review and reflect on for future demonstrations," he added. "For tomorrow, we call on our supporters to turn out in their hundreds of thousands to show we will not be deterred from seeking an end to Israel's genocide and justice for Palestine!"
Jamal said the police "saw sense and abandoned their unjustified and impractical attempt to delay the start of the march by two hours on Saturday," allowing the march to begin at 1:30 pm.
During previous marches in which hundreds of thousands of people have demonstrated in solidarity with Palestinians since last October, police have blocked off the area surrounding the Israeli embassy in Kensington, threatening anyone who protested in the vicinity with arrest.
Marching to the embassy, demonstrators made a "renewed call to end the ongoing genocide in Gaza" and demanded an "immediate and full cessation of arms supplies to Israel."
Earlier this week, the U.K. government announced it was suspending approximately 30 of its 350 arms export licenses for Israel, saying that "there does exist a clear risk that they might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law."
Human rights advocates, medical professionals working in Gaza, and legal experts have for months demanded that Israel's top international funders, including the U.S. and U.K., stop providing military aid as Israel has blocked humanitarian aid from reaching Gaza and waged attacks on civilian infrastructure, killing more than 40,000 people.
The country has also been accused of carrying out genocide in a case led by South Africa at the International Court of Justice; the court has ordered Israel to end its blockade on humanitarian aid and to prevent genocide in Gaza.
"We demand our government completely stop arming Israel and push for a cease-fire now," said the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
As Londoners marched on Saturday, the Gaza Health Ministry announced that at least 61 Palestinians had been killed by Israeli forces in the last two days. Four people were killed in a strike on Halimah al-Saadiyah school in Jabaliya, where displaced Palestinians have been sheltering, and three were killed in a bombing at Amr Ibn al-As school in Gaza City.
Media outlets in Palestine reported that a baby named Yaqeen al-Astal had become the 37th child in Gaza to die of malnutrition since Israel began its near-total aid blockade.
International outrage also grew on Saturday regarding the killing of a Turkish American activist, Aysenur Ezgi Eygi, in the West Bank on Friday. Local media and eyewitnesses said Eygi had been deliberately shot in the head by Israeli forces at a protest over the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements.
The U.S. called on Israel to investigate the killing on Friday, but Eygi's family said in a statement that such a probe would not be "adequate."
"We call on President [Joe] Biden, Vice President [Kamala] Harris, and Secretary of State [Antony] Blinken to order an independent investigation into the unlawful killing of a U.S. citizen and to ensure full accountability for the guilty parties," said the family.
Stéphane Dujarric, spokesperson for the United Nations, called for "a full investigation of the circumstances" and said that "people should be held accountable. And again, civilians must be protected at all times."
“If Speaker Johnson drives House Republicans down this highly partisan path," said Democratic leaders, "the odds of a shutdown go way up."
Leading U.S. Senate Democrats on Friday accused House Republicans of "wasting precious time catering to the hard MAGA right" as House Speaker Mike Johnson unveiled a stopgap funding bill tied to a proposal that would require proof of citizenship in order to vote in federal elections.
The proposal—the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act—has been pushed by Republican presidential nominee and former President Donald Trump and was passed by the House in July, with five Democrats joining the GOP in supporting the bill.
Non-citizens are already barred from voting in federal elections. With about 21.3 million eligible voters reporting in a recent survey that they would not be able to quickly access their birth certificate, passport, naturalization certificate, or certificate of citizenship in order to prove their status, critics say the proposal is a clear attempt to stop people of color and young Americans from taking part in elections.
Johnson proposed including the legislation in a stopgap bill, or a continuing resolution, that would keep the government running roughly at current spending levels through March 28—a move that would postpone major spending negotiations until after the next president takes office.
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said that "avoiding a government shutdown requires bipartisanship, not a bill drawn up by one party," and alluded to former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy's (R-Calif.) attempt last September to ram a spending bill through with immigration and border policy changes in order to avert a government shutdown.
"Speaker Johnson is making the same mistake as former Speaker McCarthy did a year ago," said Schumer and Murray in a statement. "The House Republican funding proposal is an ominous case of déjà vu."
“If Speaker Johnson drives House Republicans down this highly partisan path," they added, "the odds of a shutdown go way up, and Americans will know that the responsibility of a shutdown will be on the House Republicans' hands."
Johnson is expected to bring the bill to the House floor on Wednesday after lawmakers return from summer recess. Congress has a September 30 deadline to make changes to the spending bill in order to avoid a partial government shutdown on October 1.
The House speaker called the proposal "a critically important step" toward funding the government and ensuring "that only American citizens can decide American elections"—prompting one critic to accuse Johnson of pushing a "manufactured" issue.
"Anyone who reads the SAVE Act understands it is a bad bill," said attorney Heath Hixson, "a poorly worded unfunded mandate that'll lead to voter suppression and racist outcomes."