

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Taylor Materio 202-662-1530 x227; taylor@nlihc.org
National Low Income
Housing Coalition board member Leonard Williams
testified before the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Housing
and
Community Opportunity today in support of two public housing bills, the
Public Housing One-for-One Replacement and Tenant Protection Act of 2010
and the
Public Housing Preservation and Rehabilitation Act of 2010. The bills
are
expected to be introduced shortly by Subcommittee Chairwoman Maxine
Waters
(D-CA) and Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA), respectively.
National Low Income
Housing Coalition board member Leonard Williams
testified before the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Housing
and
Community Opportunity today in support of two public housing bills, the
Public Housing One-for-One Replacement and Tenant Protection Act of 2010
and the
Public Housing Preservation and Rehabilitation Act of 2010. The bills
are
expected to be introduced shortly by Subcommittee Chairwoman Maxine
Waters
(D-CA) and Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA), respectively.
The
One-for-One Replacement and Tenant Protection Act would address the
significant
loss of public housing and public housing tenant displacement resulting
from the
demolition and disposition, or sale, of public housing, and from the
mandatory
and voluntary conversion of public housing to tenant-based vouchers. The bill would require the one-for-one
replacement of all
public housing units lost through demolition, disposition, and mandatory
or
voluntary conversion to vouchers, and provide additional rights for
public
housing residents.
The
Public Housing Preservation and Rehabilitation Act of 2010 would provide tools to allow public housing agencies to
leverage
private financial assistance, repeal the existing prohibition against
development of new public housing units, and authorize grants for the
conversion
of public housing projects to assisted living facilities.
"The
bills before the Subcommittee today would help preserve the nation's
public
housing stock, protect public housing tenants, and help ensure that
people can
receive the supportive services they need while living in public housing
rather
than be prematurely institutionalized in nursing homes," Mr. Williams
stated.
"The nation's shortage of homes affordable to extremely low income
households is
evidence of the need to preserve existing affordable housing while we
strive to
achieve the resources necessary to add to the nation's affordable
housing
stock."
Mr.
Williams also presented NLIHC's public housing principles:
1. There
is an intrinsic value of public housing being publicly owned. Public
housing has
a critical place among a community's array of housing choices. Public
housing
serves extremely low and very low income households, groups that most
state and
local housing resources do not reach.
2. Full
resident participation is critical to successful public housing.
Involved
tenants share responsibility for maintaining their community, have a
vested
interest in the future of their homes and have a first-hand
understanding of how
their housing is managed.
3. At
a minimum, current income targeting requirements must be met. At least
40% of
new annual admissions must have incomes below 30% of area median income.
This is
significant because this below 30% AMI population has the nation's most
significant housing cost burdens.
4. Tenant
contributions for rents must be affordable. Tenant contributions for
rents must
be tied to individual household incomes and must be affordable to each
household.
5.
The need to raise private capital should not drive other decisions that
are
contrary to the interests of residents and others in need of affordable
housing.
Where there is private funding of public housing redevelopment, the
ongoing
federal subsidies must be adequate to ensure that these interests,
including the
need to serve extremely low income households, the necessity that tenant
contributions for rents be affordable to each household and the right of
residents and others to participate in the decisions impacting public
housing,
can be met.
6. Admission
criteria should be directly related to an applicant's ability to fulfill
the
obligations of an assisted lease and individual circumstances must be
considered
for each applicant who is not categorically excluded.
7. Every
revitalization, demolition, and replacement plan must take into account
the
extent to which public housing in that housing market area has operated
to
create and perpetuate racial and economic segregation of low income
families. Public
housing tenants
must have a right to return to their revitalized homes.
"In
addition to supporting policy proposals to preserve public housing,
NLIHC also
supports increased federal appropriations for the public housing
operating and
capital funds. The public housing operating fund had been underfunded
for seven
straight years until FY10," Mr. Williams stated. "We cannot expect PHAs
to
maintain the nation's investment in public housing without sufficient
resources
to do so."
Mr. Williams, a
resident of
public housing, is in his second term as a resident commissioner on the
Buffalo
Municipal Housing Authority Board of Commissioners. He is a member of
the
Resident Advisory Board of Buffalo and, for the last seven years, has
been a
member of his development's Resident Council.
Other
witnesses at the hearing included: Honorable Sandra Henriquez, Assistant
Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban
Development; Keith D. Kinard, Executive Director, Newark Housing
Authority on
behalf of the Council of Large Public Housing Authorities; Deirdre
Oakley,
Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Georgia State University;
Anthony
O'Leary, Executive Director, Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority on
behalf of
the Public Housing Authorities Directors Association; Joseph Puma,
Public
Housing Resident on behalf of National People's Action; Frederick
Purnell,
Executive Director, Wilmington Housing Authority on behalf of the
National
Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials; and David Rammler,
Staff
Attorney and Director of Government Relations, National Housing Law
Project.
Mr.Williams'
full testimony is available at: https://www.nlihc.org/doc/Testimony-of-LW-NLIHC-4-28-10.pdf
More
information on the hearing is available at: https://www.house.gov/apps/list/hearing/financialsvcs_dem/hrhousing_042310.shtml
The National Low Income Housing Coalition is dedicated solely to ending America's affordable housing crisis. Established in 1974 by Cushing N. Dolbeare, NLIHC educates, organizes and advocates to ensure decent, affordable housing within healthy neighborhoods for everyone. NLIHC provides up-to-date information, formulates policy and educates the public on housing needs and the strategies for solutions.
"I will give," said the Republican mega-donor with a smile.
Billionaire Miram Adelson on Tuesday night suggested the legal obstacles for President Donald Trump to serve an additional term in office after 2028 are not insurmountable as the far-right Republican megadonor vowed another $250 million to bolster a run that experts say would be unlawful and unconstitutional on its face.
Adelson, a hardline Zionist who, along with her now deceased husband, Sheldon Adelson, has given hundreds of millions to US lawmakers who back a strong relationship between the US and Israeli governments, was sharing the podium with Trump during a Hanukkah candlelighting event at the White House when she made the remarks.
With a reference to Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, Adelson said they had discussed "the legal thing of four more years"—something Trump has repeatedly gestured toward and many of his backers have called for—and told Trump, “So, we can do it, think about it.”
A chant in the crowd then broke out for "For four more years!" as Adelson whispered something in Trump's ear.
“She said, ‘Think about it, I’ll give you another $250 million,’” Trump then said into the microphone. "I will give," Adelson said with a smile.
Watch the exchange:
Adelson: I met Alan Dershowitz.. he said.. four more years. We can do it. Think about it.
Crowd: *chants four more years*
Trump: She said think about it, I’ll give you another 250 million pic.twitter.com/eOc7Zazyns
— Acyn (@Acyn) December 17, 2025
For Trump's 2024 presidential campaign alone, Adelson gave at least $100 million to support the Republican candidate with Super PAC she established, according to federal filings.
In his remarks on Tuesday, Trump credited Adelson with providing him $250 million overall—"directly and indirectly"—during his 2024 bid.
"When someone can you $250 million, I think that we should give her the opportunity to say hello," Trump said, when introducing her. "And Miriam, make it quick, because $250 million is not what it used to be."
"This is the Iraq War 2.0 with a South American flavor to it," warned one Democratic senator.
US President Donald Trump late Tuesday declared a blockade on "all sanctioned oil tankers" approaching and leaving Venezuela, a major escalation in what's widely seen as an accelerating march to war with the South American country.
The "total and complete blockade," Trump wrote on his social media platform, will only be lifted when Venezuela returns to the US "all of the Oil, Land, and other Assets that they previously stole from us."
"Venezuela is completely surrounded by the largest Armada ever assembled in the History of South America," Trump wrote, referring to the massive US military buildup in the Caribbean. "It will only get bigger, and the shock to them will be like nothing they have ever seen before."
The government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, which has mobilized its military in response to the US president's warmongering, denounced Trump's comments as a "grotesque threat" aimed at "stealing the riches that belong to our homeland."
The US-based anti-war group CodePink said in a statement that "Trump’s assertion that Venezuela must 'return' oil, land, and other assets to the United States exposes the true objective" of his military campaign.
"Venezuela did not steal anything from the United States. What Trump describes as 'theft' is Venezuela’s lawful assertion of sovereignty over its own natural resources and its refusal to allow US corporations to control its economy," said CodePink. "A blockade, a terrorist designation, and a military buildup are steps toward war. Congress must act immediately to stop this escalation, and the international community must reject this lawless threat."
The announced naval blockade—an act of aggression under international law—came a week after the Trump administration seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela and made clear that it intends to intercept more.
US Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas), one of the leaders of a war powers resolution aimed at preventing the Trump administration from launching a war on Venezuela without congressional approval, said Tuesday that "a naval blockade is unquestionably an act of war."
"A war that the Congress never authorized and the American people do not want," Castro added, noting that a vote on his resolution is set for Thursday. "Every member of the House of Representatives will have the opportunity to decide if they support sending Americans into yet another regime change war."
"This is absolutely an effort to get us involved in a war in Venezuela."
Human rights organizations have accused the Republican-controlled Congress of abdicating its responsibilities as the Trump administration takes belligerent and illegal actions in international waters and against Venezuela directly, claiming without evidence to be combating drug trafficking.
Last month, Senate Republicans—some of whom are publicly clamoring for the US military to overthrow Maduro's government—voted down a Venezuela war powers resolution. Two GOP senators, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, joined Democrats in supporting the resolution.
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the Center for International Policy, wrote Tuesday that "the White House minimized Republican 'yes' votes by promising that Trump would seek Congress’ authorization before initiating hostilities against Venezuela itself."
"Trump today broke that promise to his own party’s lawmakers by ordering a partial blockade on Venezuelan ships," wrote Williams. "A blockade, including a partial one, definitively constitutes an act of war. Trump is starting a war against Venezuela without congressional authorization."
Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) warned in a television appearance late Monday that members of the Trump administration are "going to do everything they can to get us into this war."
"This is the Iraq War 2.0 with a South American flavor to it," he added. "This is absolutely an effort to get us involved in a war in Venezuela."
"Obviously, they have issues with what is in that video, and that’s why they don’t want everybody to see it," Sen. Mark Kelly said of administration officials after the meeting.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday that the Pentagon will not release unedited video footage of a September airstrike that killed two men who survived an initial strike on a boat allegedly carrying drugs in the Caribbean Sea, a move that followed a briefing with congressional lawmakers described by one Democrat as an "exercise in futility" and by another as "a joke."
Hegseth said that members of the House and Senate Armed Services committees would be given a chance to view video of the September 2 "double-tap" strike, which experts said was illegal like all the other boat bombings. The secretary did not say whether all congressional lawmakers would be provided access to the footage.
“Of course we’re not going to release a top secret, full, unedited video of that to the general public,” Hegseth told reporters following a closed-door briefing during which he and Secretary of State Marco Rubio fielded questions from lawmakers.
As with a similar briefing earlier this month, Tuesday's meeting left some Democrat attendees with more questions than answers.
“The administration came to this briefing empty-handed,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) told reporters. “If they can’t be transparent on this, how can you trust their transparency on all the other issues swirling about in the Caribbean?”
That includes preparations for a possible attack on oil-rich Venezuela, which include the deployment of US warships and thousands of troops to the region and the authorization of covert action aimed at toppling the government of longtime Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
Tuesday's briefing came as House lawmakers prepare to vote this week on a pair of war powers resolutions aimed at preventing President Donald Trump from waging war on Venezuela. A similar bipartisan resolution recently failed in the Senate.
Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY), the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and co-author of one of the new war powers resolution, said in a statement: “Today’s briefing from Secretaries Rubio and Hegseth was an exercise in futility. It did nothing to address the serious legal, strategic, and moral concerns surrounding the administration’s unprecedented use of US military force in the Caribbean and Pacific."
"As of today, the administration has already carried out 25 such strikes over three months, extrajudicially killing 95 people," Meeks noted. "That this briefing to members of Congress only occurred more than three months since the strikes began—despite numerous requests for classified and public briefings—further proves these operations are unable to withstand scrutiny and lack a defensible legal rationale."
Briefing attendee Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.)—who is in the administration's crosshairs for reminding US troops that military rules and international law require them to disobey illegal orders—said of Trump officials, "Obviously, they have issues with what is in that video, and that’s why they don’t want everybody to see it."
Defending Hegseth's decision to not make the boat strike video public, Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) argued that “there’s a lot of members that’s gonna walk out there and that’s gonna leak classified information and there’s gonna be certain ones that you hold accountable."
Mullin singled out Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), who, along with the Somalian American community at large, has been the target of mounting Islamophobic and racist abuse by Trump and his supporters.
“Not everybody can go through the same background checks that need to be cleared on this,” he said. “Do you think Omar needs all this information? I will say no.”
Rejecting GOP arguments against releasing the video, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said after attending Tuesday's briefing: “I found the legal explanations and the strategic explanations incoherent, but I think the American people should see this video. And all members of Congress should have that opportunity. I certainly want it for myself.”