October, 08 2009, 11:56am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Stephenie Hendricks 415 258-9151 stephdh@earthlink.net, Margie Kelly, Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families, (541) 344-2282, margie@saferstates.org
Toxic Chemicals Found in Doctors and Nurses
New Biomonitoring Study Detects Four Chemicals on EPA’s Recently Announced Top Priority List
WASHINGTON
Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR) in partnership with
American Nurses Association (ANA) and Health Care Without Harm (HCWH)
released the "Hazardous Chemicals In Health Care"
report today, detailing the first investigation ever of chemicals found
in the bodies of health care professionals. The inquiry found that all
of the 20 participants had toxic chemicals associated with health care
in their bodies. Each participant had at least 24 individual chemicals
present, four of which are on the recently released Environmental
Protection Agency list of priority chemicals for regulation. These
chemicals are all associated with chronic illness and physical
disorders.
"The health care profession is asking whether we can reduce
prevalence of disease by changing the way we manage chemicals. Nurses
and doctors volunteered for this study because they believe it is their
responsibility to better understand how chemicals impact human health,"
explained Kristen Welker-Hood, ScD, MSN, RN, director
of Environment and Health Programs, Physicians For Social
Responsibility, co- principal investigator and a co-author of the
report.
Other findings include:
- Eighteen of the same chemicals were detected in every single participant
- All twenty participants had at least five of the six major types of chemicals tested
- Thirteen participants tested positive for all six of these major chemical types
- All participants had bisphenol A, phthalates, PBDEs and PFCs,
priority chemicals for regulation by the EPA and associated with
chronic illness such as cancer and endocrine malfunction
Twelve doctors and eight nurses, two in each of 10 states - Alaska,
California, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New
York, Oregon, and Washington - were tested for the presence of six
major chemical types used in the health care setting that are
associated with health problems and are pervasive in our environment.
"Simply put, we are being 'polluted' by exposure to chemicals used
in health care. This study demonstrates the urgent need to find safer
alternatives to toxic chemicals whenever possible; to demand adequate
information on the health effects of chemicals; and to require
manufacturers to fully disclose the potential risks of their products
and their components, for the safety of both health care professionals
and the communities we serve," added ANA President Rebecca M. Patton, MSN, RN, CNOR.
The Hazardous Chemicals in Health Care report offers preliminary
indicators of what the broader health care community may be
experiencing. The project tested for 62 distinct chemicals in six
categories: bisphenol A, mercury, perflourinated compounds, phthalates,
polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and triclosan. The chemicals tested in
the investigation are used in products common to the health care
setting, from baby bottles, hand sanitizer, and medical gauges, to
industrial paints, IV bags and tubes and stain-resistant clothing.
Project participant Dr. Sean Palfrey, professor of
pediatrics and public health at Boston University School of Medicine,
and medical director of Boston's Lead Poisoning Prevention Program
says, "I was tested for chemicals that have been associated with
certain diseases whose incidences are on the rise. If we as physicians
are to understand our patients' health problems - from cancer to
neurological harm to reproductive dysfunctions - we need to take a look
at chemical exposure in our bodies."
Another participant Dr. George Lundgren, a family
practice physician from Minneapolis Minnesota said upon learning his
results "When you do find out some of the specific unnatural chemicals
in your body it is hard to deny, minimize, rationalize or justify their
presence. It is disturbing to know the only body I have is permanently
contaminated."
The Centers for Disease Control National Biomonitoring Project has
found synthetic chemicals linked to health problems are present in
every American. Overall, PSR's test results were consistent with the
findings by the CDC, with the exception of a specific type of toxic
chemical, dimethyl phthalate, which was found at levels above the CDC's
95th percentile. Future biomonitoring may illuminate a work source of
exposure to dimethyl phthalate, which is used in insecticides, hair
spray and other personal care items, rocket fuel and more.
"Our nation is experiencing an epidemic of chronic health problems,
some of which clearly have links to chemicals in our environment,"
stated Anna Gilmore Hall, executive director of
Health Care Without Harm. "Reducing chemical exposures is an important
primary prevention measure to help improve the health of our nation and
the expense of providing health care." Gilmore Hall wrote the study
preface.
PSR, ANA and HCWH have joined the Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families
campaign, a diverse and growing coalition of organizations, businesses
and individuals united by concern about the toxic chemicals in our
homes, places of work and in products used every day. The coalition is
working to reform the federal law governing toxic chemicals, the Toxic
Substance Control Act (TSCA) calling for eliminating the most dangerous
chemicals from commerce, holding chemical companies responsible for
information about health and environmental impacts of chemicals, and
using the best science to protect all people and vulnerable groups,
including children. (see www.saferchemicals.org)
"Stronger laws are necessary to keep us safe from toxic chemicals.
In 33 years, the EPA has tested for safety only 200 and banned only
five of the more than 80,000 chemicals in commerce. We need to do
better to protect public health," says Charlotte Brody, RN, Health Care Without Harm Board Member, registered nurse, and National Field Director for Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families. The report can be found here.
In addition to data on testing, the report includes recommendations on
how health care professionals can protect their patients and themselves
by avoiding the use of toxic chemicals.
Physicians for Social Responsibility mobilizes physicians and health professionals to advocate for climate solutions and a nuclear weapons-free world. PSR's health advocates contribute a health voice to energy, environmental health and nuclear weapons policy at the local, federal and international level.
LATEST NEWS
Alan Greenspan, Longtime Fed Chair and Ayn Rand Disciple, Meets Ultimate ‘Invisible Hand’
"For decades, he preached that the self-interest of the predator was the invisible hand of the common good," Yanis Varoufakis said after the man who led the US central bank under four presidents died aged 100.
Jun 22, 2026
Alan Greenspan, whose policies during nearly 20 years as US Federal Reserve chair fueled soaring economic inequality and helped create the conditions for multiple economic crashes, died Monday at age 100 after a long battle with Parkinson's disease.
While many corporate media outlets published hagiographic obituaries lionizing the "Maestro" who presided over nearly two decades of low inflation, rising stock prices, and American economic confidence, critics focused on Greenspan's role in promoting dangerous deregulation and "easy money" policies that inflated financial bubbles, with sometimes disastrous results.
Robert Reich—who served as US labor secretary under President Bill Clinton during all of Greenspan's tenure—called him "in many ways the most powerful person in America" during that era.
"If any single person was responsible for the financial crisis of 2008, it was Greenspan."
"He maintained an iron grip over the Fed, and almost single-handedly decided on interest rates," Reich wrote. "He essentially fired George H. W. Bush by raising interest rates so high (ostensibly to ward off the inflation then threatening the economy) that the economy took a dive, and voters blamed Bush. This was enough to convince my boss, Bill Clinton, to do exactly what Greenspan wanted—which was to reduce the federal budget deficit and thereby destroy much of the agenda Clinton ran on (and I helped create)."
"I don’t want to speak ill of anyone who has passed. Greenspan was an extremely charming, intelligent, and thoughtful man," Reich added. "But the truth must be told: If any single person was responsible for the financial crisis of 2008, it was Greenspan. That crisis—the worst collapse since 1929, which led to the worst recession in decades, in which millions of Americans lost their jobs, savings, and even their homes—resulted from the deregulation of Wall Street that Greenspan advocated."
Former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis wrote on X: "His epitaph? A singular, glorious confession, 'I found a flaw in my model of the world.' A flaw, he said, as though it were a leaky pipe, not a total collapse of the intellectual architecture that anointed him Oracle. For decades, he preached that the self-interest of the predator was the invisible hand of the common good.
"Then, in 2008, the beast devoured the table, and to his credit, he blinked, admitting that his entire worldview—the one that central bankers canonized and the world swallowed—was a fairy tale for rentiers," Varoufakis added. "He did not, of course, admit to culpability. That would require a moral compass, a device notably absent from his Ayn Randian toolbelt. No, he merely noted the flaw, as a meteorologist might note a gust of wind, and returned to his well-earned silence."
Born 10 miles from Wall Street in Manhattan's Washington Heights during one of the most infamous economic bubbles of all time, Greenspan was a protégé of libertarian writer and philosopher Ayn Rand and was influenced by the Atlas Shrugged author's moral defense of capitalism, her fierce advocacy of deregulation, and her insidious insistence that self-interest was socially beneficial.
Their relationship cooled as Greenspan embraced more mainstream economic policies despised by Rand and gradually became a leading steward of the very sort of state-shepherded system she deeply distrusted.
After heading President Gerald Ford's Council of Economic Advisers, Greenspan was appointed chair of the Fed by President Ronald Reagan in 1987. He would remain in the post well into George W. Bush's second term.
Greenspan generally favored low interest rates, especially after crises like the 1987 stock market crash, the 1998 Long-Term Capital Management crisis, and the 2001 recession. His fame grew after he suggested that the economy might be experiencing a tech-driven “productivity miracle," language that many investors took as validation that traditional valuation limits were obsolete.
Critics would later call it a "productivity mirage."
Staunch devotion to low interest rates by Greenspan's Fed boosted stock prices and real estate values under "easy money" policies. Many investors came to believe that the Fed would intervene aggressively whenever markets fell sharply—the so-called "Greenspan Put."
However, since ownership of financial assets (and the firms that sell and promote them) is concentrated among the wealthy, it was the rich who benefited most from Greenspan's polices. When bubbles burst, as they did after the dot-com boom that ended in early 2000 and during the 2008 global financial crisis, the rich bounced back thanks to their diversified portfolios and bailouts, while middle- and lower-income households were wiped out through asset devaluation, foreclosures, and job losses.
"It is no exaggeration to say the global financial crisis of 2008 had an enormous and lasting impact on American life and the way ordinary people view elites," New York Times global economic correspondent Peter S. Goodman said on social media. "It is also no exaggeration to say that Alan Greenspan has as much responsibility for the crisis as an individual can."
"For those not old enough to remember, it is difficult to state his aura during his time of greatest influence," Goodman continued. "When he told Americans that they should buy houses and use variable-rate mortgages to do it, they listened. Much is made of his econ jargon-laden vernacular that went over the heads of nearly all listeners."
"That was central to the mystique," he added. "When he went to the Hill and spoke to Congress, most people had no idea what he was talking about but assumed that smarter kids did. And so his quasi-religious faith in the efficiency of markets as the ultimate insurance against risk went unchallenged and became dogma, and the risks kept building."
Keep ReadingShow Less
‘Time to Sue This Liar’: Trillionaire Elon Musk Threatens Ro Khanna for Warning of 4.5 Million Child Deaths From DOGE Cuts
"The Dems should have a leader who Elon Musk is threatening to sue and wants imprisoned," said one political observer. "That's the right guy."
Jun 22, 2026
The recently crowned world's first trillionaire Elon Musk threatened Rep. Ro Khanna with legal action on Monday after the California Democrat pointed out the life-ending potential of foreign aid cuts made by the Department of Government Efficiency.
During an appearance on the "I've Had It" podcast on Saturday, Khanna (D-Calif.) said that there must be consequences for Musk, who in February 2025 used DOGE to curtail programs and cut funding for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
"There needs to be accountability for Elon Musk," Khanna emphasized. "You know, they’re celebrating that he created 4,400 millionaires, but they don’t talk about the 4.5 million children around the world who he possibly sentenced to death by dismantling USAID.”
A peer-reviewed study published by The Lancet in July 2025 estimated that proposed cuts to USAID could lead to as many as 14 million preventable deaths by 2030 worldwide, including the deaths of 4.5 million children under the ages of five years old.
Musk, who earlier this month became the world's first trillionaire, wrote in response to Khanna's interview that it was "time to sue this liar."
It's not clear how Khanna's statement could be defamatory given that it was based on research published by a prestigious medical journal.
Musk, in a separate reaction to Khanna's remarks about USAID, later added that the US lawmaker "should be in prison."
On Monday afternoon, Khanna posted a video in which he challenged Musk to debate him on the impact the DOGE cuts have had on people throughout the Global South who had previously benefited from USAID.
"The world's richest person has spent all day... going after me," Khanna said. "Why? Because I cited an academic study that his DOGE cuts may lead to the deaths of millions of children overseas. You know, Elon, I thought you were a free speech guy. Why not debate me on these issues instead of threatening lawfare?"
"You're not going to be able to intimidate me," Khanna added.
.@elonmusk let's debate. You game?
I am for free speech, not lawfare. pic.twitter.com/gThLggxiOW
— Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) June 22, 2026
Mehdi Hasan, editor-in-chief of Zeteo News, said that Khanna’s willingness to directly take on Musk exhibited qualities that Democrats could use more of in leadership positions.
"He is picking/making the right enemies on the right, and really pissing them off," Hasan wrote of Khanna. "The Dems should have a leader who Elon Musk is threatening to sue and wants imprisoned. That's the right guy."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'There Will Come a Day When He Faces Prosecution': Trump Condemned After US Murders Two More at Sea
"The summary execution of two more in an alleged drug boat brings the number of murders ordered by Trump to more than 210," noted one human rights defender.
Jun 22, 2026
Two people were killed, and six others survived, a strike on Sunday that the US military claimed—without providing evidence—targeted a boat full of "narco-terrorists," but that human rights defenders called another summary execution worthy of prosecution.
"On June 21, at the direction of the commander of US Southern Command, Gen. Francis L. Donovan, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations," USSOUTHCOM said in a statement. "Intelligence confirmed the vessel was transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the Caribbean and was engaged in narco-trafficking operations."
"Two male narco-terrorists were killed during this action, and there were six male survivors," the statement added. "Following the engagement, USSOUTHCOM immediately notified US Coast Guard to activate the Search and Rescue system for the survivors."
More lawless killing in the Trump administration’s boat bombing campaign.Real killing in a phony armed conflict with “narco-terrorists.”This strike reportedly left 6 survivors.US record for rescuing survivors alive is…not great.
[image or embed]
— Brian Finucane (@bcfinucane.bsky.social) June 21, 2026 at 11:28 PM
According to The Intercept's Nick Turse, who has tracked all of the reported US boat bombings in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean, there have now been 66 such strikes, which have killed 215 people and left 12 survivors, based on USSOUTHCOM data.
The fate of previous boat strike survivors is not completely clear. After one April bombing, the US Coast Guard told UPI that search-and-rescue operations were called off after no signs of survivors were found. Last October, President Donald Trump said two strike survivors were repatriated to their home countries of Ecuador and Colombia, where they faced prosecution.
Survivors of some of the strikes have accused US forces of torturing them.
Relatives of people killed in previous US boat bombings, as well as officials in Venezuela and Colombia, have said that numerous victims were fishers who were not involved in the illicit drug trade.
In January, relatives of two Trinidadian fishers killed in the strikes filed a federal wrongful death lawsuit in Massachusetts.
"The summary execution of two more in an alleged drug boat brings the number of murders ordered by Trump to more than 210," former Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth said on social media. "There will come a day when he faces prosecution for these crimes."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


