U.S. House Natural Resources Committee Chair Raúl Grijalva on Friday warned that days into Russia\u0026#039;s war on Ukraine, the U.S. fossil fuel industry has launched a misinformation campaign aimed at promoting even more oil and gas drilling as the key to ending the conflict and aiding Ukrainians.\r\n\r\nIn an opinion piece at The Guardian, the Arizona Democrat pointed to a list of demands the American Petroleum Institute—the largest lobbying firm for the U.S. oil and gas sector—released just before Russian forces invaded Ukraine last week, including \u0022Release permits for energy development on public lands\u0022 and \u0022Accelerate energy infrastructure permitting.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022With the facts laid bare, we see the fossil fuel industry\u0026#039;s crocodile tears for what they are—the same old demands for cheaper leases and looser regulations they\u0026#039;ve been peddling for decades.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022I feel duty-bound to set the record straight,\u0022 wrote the congressman. \u0022We can\u0026#039;t let the fossil fuel industry scare us into a domestic drilling free-for-all that is neither economically warranted nor environmentally sound.\u0022\r\n\r\nSuch demands wrongly portray a fossil fuel industry \u0022hobbled\u0022 by President Joe Biden and suggest the U.S. must flood the global market with oil and gas to deter Russian President Vladimir Putin, Grijalva wrote.\r\n\r\n\u0022Much to my deep disappointment and protest, this administration actually approved more U.S. drilling permits per month in 2021 than President Trump did during each of the first three years of his presidency,\u0022 the congressman said.\r\n\r\nThe fossil fuel industry has already laid claim to at least 26 million acres of public land, he wrote, and has more than 9,000 approved drilling permits that companies have yet to use, as well as federal offshore oil and gas leases covering more than eight million acres.\r\n\r\n\u0022With the facts laid bare, we see the fossil fuel industry\u0026#039;s crocodile tears for what they are—the same old demands for cheaper leases and looser regulations they\u0026#039;ve been peddling for decades,\u0022 wrote Grijalva. \u0022These pleas have nothing to do with countering Putin\u0026#039;s invasion or stabilizing gas prices, and everything to do with making oil and gas development as easy and profitable as possible.\u0022\r\n\r\nAs Fossil Free Media director Jamie Henn wrote at Common Dreams earlier this week, API, the fossil fuel giants it represents, and right-wing lawmakers who count the industry among their major donors believe \u0022they can fool the public into thinking that more U.S. fossil fuel production will help Ukraine and harm Putin.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022API likes to pretend that more infrastructure will allow the U.S. to somehow flood the global market with enough oil and gas that Putin won’t sell any of his, but that\u0026#039;s not how markets work,\u0022 Henn wrote. \u0022As long as the world is still reliant on fossil fuels, money will be flowing into the Putin regime.\u0022\r\n\r\nThe fossil fuel lobby has been joined by Republicans and anti-climate Democrats in Congress in its push to capitalize on the crisis in Ukraine, which has so far displaced more than a million people and killed more than 2,000 people, according to the Ukrainian emergency service.\r\n\r\nSen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), who has opposed his own party\u0026#039;s proposals to shift toward renewable energy as part of the Build Back Better Act, this week called on the U.S. to \u0022ramp up domestic energy production,\u0022 while Republicans claimed in a letter to Biden on Wednesday that the halting of the Keystone pipeline project left the U.S. and its allies \u0022vulnerable to the malicious maneuverings of Vladimir Putin,\u0022 urging him to approve more pipeline and offshore drilling permits and loosen environmental regulations.\u0026nbsp;\r\n\r\nNaomi Klein, author of \u0022The Shock Doctrine,\u0022 suggested on Twitter that the right\u0026#039;s push for more drilling amid Ukraine\u0026#039;s deadly crisis is an example of \u0022disaster capitalism.\u0022\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nRight-wing lawmakers are also exploiting Americans\u0026#039; struggles with rising prices on essential goods, Grijalva said, claiming increased oil and gas extraction will lower the cost of fuel.\r\n\r\n\u0022But if that\u0026#039;s true, why hasn\u0026#039;t record oil extraction from both federal and non-federal lands over the last decade done anything to consistently lower, or at least stabilize, prices at the pump?\u0022 asked Grijalva.\r\n\r\nRather than ramp up oil and gas drilling, the congressman said, the U.S. must choose \u0022a path forward that simultaneously cuts the lifeline to fossil fuel despots like Putin, stabilizes energy prices here at home, and creates a safer, more sustainable planet.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022We must wean ourselves off our oil and gas dependence and make transformational investments in cleaner renewable energy technologies, like those in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the Build Back Better Act, and the Competes Act, and we must do it now,\u0022 he wrote.