

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Anna Susman, Anna.Susman@berlinrosen.com, 646-200-5285 Jack Temple, jack.temple@berlinrosen.com, 646-200-5280
Workers in nearly 30 cities have announced they are convening the first-ever "people's Wage Boards" to examine how poverty wages are holding back neighborhoods and communities across the city. Fed up with low wages that result in evictions, unpaid bills, and having to depend on food stamps for dinner, underpaid workers and their community members will testify at panels patterned after the Wage Board in New York that resulted in the state raising pay for nearly 200,000 fast-food workers to $15 an hour.
Beginning on October 6 and continuing throughout the week, these workers will deliver personal testimony on why they need $15 an hour and the right to a union--and are willing to do whatever it takes to win.
Local leaders from state senators to academics to members of the clergy have volunteered to sit on the Wage Boards. In Raleigh, the Wage Board will be made up of state Rep. Yvonne Holley, the Rev. Curtis Gatewood, and a local business owner, Vimala Rajendran. In New Orleans, state Rep. Joseph Bouie Jr., former city councilman and WBOK radio host Oliver Thomas, Pastor Dwight Webster and Human Rights Attorney S. Mandisa Moore-O'Neal will sit on the panel. In Little Rock, three state Senators--Will Bond, Joe Woodson and Vivian Flowers--will sit on the panel to hear testimony from fast-food, child care, home care and retail workers.
In conjunction with the Wage Board in Pittsburgh, a local city council member has proposed the city establish a Wage Board committee that looks at the effect of increasing wages of low-income workers.
"I used to think that if I kept working hard at Wendy's and put in the hours, I'd eventually scrounge enough that the sight of my monthly electricity bill didn't cause me to panic," said Tara Blair, who makes $7.50 an hour at Wendy's and will be testifying in front of the Wage Board in Memphis. "But I know now it takes workers joining together--as they did in New York--who will actually make the difference. That's why I'll be standing up in front of the Wage Board to describe some of my most personal moments--like being kicked out of apartments because I can't pay rent. It's not easy for me to share these stories, but Memphis has to realize there are too many people living just like me, and we're not going to take it anymore."
Gov. Cuomo's announcement earlier this year to adopt the $15 recommendation set by the Wage Board followed weeks of public hearings at which workers testified of being paid so little that they are frequently forced to rely on public assistance to feed their families; of squeezing into crowded apartments, often with strangers; and of being unable to buy clothing or school supplies for their kids, or to take them to the movies.
"When New York fast-food workers won $15, underpaid workers all around the country won too," said Hilda Edmundson, who has been a home care worker for five years and will be testifying in front of the Wage Board in Raleigh. "Right then, we pledged to build off New York's victory to win $15 in every state for all workers. The launch of the people's Wage Boards proves we are unstoppable--we're going to turn $15 from a dream into a reality."
According to a recent report from the National Employment Law Project, wages have stagnated for America's workers across the board, but those in lower-paying jobs are being hit the hardest and low-wage occupations saw the biggest drop in real wages during the recovery. Among the 10-largest occupations in the bottom fifth, declines were most pronounced for occupations in the restaurant sector: food preparation workers and cooks saw wage declines of 7.7 percent and 8.9 percent. Janitors and cleaners, personal care aides, home health aides, and maids and housekeeping cleaners also experienced steep declines.
The people's Wage Board hearings come as consensus builds that $15 an hour is what American workers everywhere need to survive. In August, the Democratic Party adopted a $15 platform, and every major presidential candidate for the party's nomination has expressed support for the workers in the Fight for $15. Meanwhile, Democratic leaders from Nancy Pelosi to Kristen Gillibrand have called for a $15 federal minimum wage. And on a state level, politicians are turning out to recommend a raise to $15 to help lift up local economies and families.
"The workers' testimonies in New York revealed the insensitivity of politicians and society as a whole to make sure that people who work hard are able to take care of their families," said state Rep. Joseph Bouie Jr., who will sit on the Wage Board panel in New Orleans. "It's imperative that in New Orleans, we listen to the voices of our workers, too."
"Child care workers are raising the future and need $15 to afford the basics for their own families," said Toland Barnett, who has been a child care worker in Raleigh for 13 years. "We celebrated when fast-food workers won $15 in New York, and we're not going to stop until all workers win $15 and a union."
From coast to coast, workers are winning unprecedented raises. Earlier this summer, Los Angeles raised its minimum wage to $15 an hour, following similar moves in SeaTac, San Francisco and Seattle. Fifteen dollar proposals are pending in Washington, D.C., Portland, Maine, Olympia and Tacoma, Wash. and Sacramento and Davis, Calif. Home care workers in Massachusetts and Oregon won $15 and it is the minimum pay at leading companies like Facebook and Aetna. Noting how the Fight for $15 has changed the politics of the country, the New York Times declared that "$15 could become the new, de facto $7.25," and the Washington Post said $15 has "gone from almost absurdly ambitious to mainstream in the span of a few years."
Workers from the following cities will testify at Wage Boards:
AR Little Rock
AZ Phoenix
CO Denver
GA Atlanta
LA New Orleans
MI Detroit
MN Minneapolis
MO Kansas City
MO St Louis
NC Charlotte
NC Greensboro
NC Greenville
NC Raleigh Durham
NV Las Vegas
PA Philadelphia
PA Pittsburgh
SC Charleston
TN Memphis
TN Nashville
TN Knoxville
TX Houston
VA Richmond
WI Madison
WI Milwaukee
Fast food workers are coming together all over the country to fight for $15 an hour and the right to form a union without retaliation. We work for corporations that are making tremendous profits, but do not pay employees enough to support our families and to cover basic needs like food, health care, rent and transportation.
"Does anyone truly believe that caving in to Trump now will stop his unprecedented attacks on our democracy and working people?" asked Sen. Bernie Sanders.
US Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday implored his Democratic colleagues in Congress not to cave to President Donald Trump and Republicans in the ongoing government shutdown fight, warning that doing so would hasten the country's descent into authoritarianism.
In an op-ed for The Guardian, Sanders (I-Vt.) called Trump a "schoolyard bully" and argued that "anyone who thinks surrendering to him now will lead to better outcomes and cooperation in the future does not understand how a power-hungry demagogue operates."
"This is a man who threatens to arrest and jail his political opponents, deploys the US military into Democratic cities, and allows masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to pick people up off the streets and throw them into vans without due process," Sanders wrote. "He has sued virtually every major media outlet because he does not tolerate criticism, has extorted funds from law firms and is withholding federal funding from states that voted against him."
If Democrats capitulate, Sanders warned, Trump "will utilize his victory to accelerate his movement toward authoritarianism."
"At a time when he already has no regard for our democratic system of checks and balances," the senator wrote, "he will be emboldened to continue decimating programs that protect elderly people, children, the sick and the poor while giving more tax breaks and other benefits to his fellow oligarchs."
Sanders' op-ed came as the shutdown continued with no end in sight, with Democrats standing by their demand for an extension of Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits as a necessary condition for any government funding deal. Republicans have so far refused to negotiate on the ACA subsidies even as health insurance premiums skyrocket nationwide.
The Trump administration, meanwhile, is illegally withholding Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) funding from tens of millions of Americans—including millions of children—despite court rulings ordering him to release the money.
In a "60 Minutes" interview that aired Sunday, Trump again urged Republicans to nuke the 60-vote filibuster in the Senate to remove the need for Democratic support to reopen the government and advance other elements of their agenda unilaterally. Under the status quo, Republicans need the support of at least seven Democratic senators to advance a government funding package.
"The Republicans have to get tougher," Trump said. "If we end the filibuster, we can do exactly what we want. We're not going to lose power."
Congressional Democrats have faced some pressure from allies, most notably the head of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), to cut a deal with Republicans to end the shutdown and alleviate the suffering it has inflicted on federal workers and many others.
But Democrats appear unmoved by the AFGE president's demand, and other labor leaders have since voiced support for the minority party's effort to secure an extension of ACA subsidies.
"We're urging our Democratic friends to hold the line," said Jaime Contreras, executive vice president of the 185,000-member Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ.
In his op-ed on Sunday, Sanders asked, "Does anyone truly believe that caving in to Trump now will stop his unprecedented attacks on our democracy and working people?"
"If the Democrats cave now, it would be a betrayal of the millions of Americans who have fought and died for democracy and our Constitution," the senator wrote. "It would be a sellout of a working class that is struggling to survive in very difficult economic times. Democrats in Congress are the last remaining opposition to Trump's quest for absolute power. To surrender now would be an historic tragedy for our country, something that history will not look kindly upon."
"Can't follow the law when a judge says fund the program, but have to follow the rules exactly when they say don't help poor people afford food," one lawyer said.
As the Trump administration continued its illegal freeze on food assistance, the US Department of Agriculture sent a warning to grocery stores not to provide discounts to the more than 42 million Americans affected.
Several grocery chains and food delivery apps have announced in recent days that they would provide substantial discounts to those whose Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits have been delayed. More than 1 in 8 Americans rely on the program, and 39% of them are children.
But on Sunday, Catherine Rampell, a reporter at the Washington Post published an email from the USDA that was sent to grocery stores around the country, telling them they were prohibited from offering special discounts to those at greater risk of food insecurity due to the cuts.
"You must offer eligible foods at the same prices and on the same terms and conditions to SNAP-EBT customers as other customers, except that sales tax cannot be charged on SNAP purchases," the email said. "You cannot treat SNAP-EBT customers differently from any other customer. Offering discounts or services only to SNAP-eligible customers is a SNAP violation unless you have a SNAP equal treatment waiver."
The email referred to SNAP's "Equal Treatment Rule," which prohibits stores from discriminating against SNAP recipients by charging them higher prices or treating them more favorably than other customers by offering them specialized sales or incentives.
Rampell said she was "aware of at least two stores that had offered struggling customers a discount, then withdrew it after receiving this email."
She added that it was "understandable why grocery stores might be scared off" because "a store caught violating the prohibition could be denied the ability to accept SNAP benefits in the future. In low-income areas where the SNAP shutdown will have the biggest impact, getting thrown off SNAP could mean a store is no longer financially viable."
While the rule prohibits special treatment in either direction, legal analyst Jeffrey Evan Gold argues that it was a "perverted interpretation of a rule that stops grocers from price gouging SNAP recipients... charging them more when they use food stamps."
The government also notably allows retailers to request waivers for programs that incentivize SNAP recipients to purchase healthy food.
Others pointed out that SNAP is currently not paying out to Americans because President Donald Trump is defying multiple federal court rulings issued Friday, requiring him to tap a $6 billion contingency fund to ensure benefit payments go out. Both courts, in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, have said his administration's refusal to pay out benefits is against the law.
One labor movement lawyer summed up the administration's position on social media: "Can't follow the law when a judge says fund the program, but have to follow the rules exactly when they say don't help poor people afford food."
"You need to understand that he actually believes it is illegal to criticize him," wrote Sen. Chris Murphy.
After failing to use the government's might to bully Jimmy Kimmel off the air earlier this fall, President Donald Trump is once again threatening to bring the force of law down on comedians for the egregious crime of making fun of him.
This time, his target was NBC late-night host Seth Meyers, whom the president said, in a Truth Social post Saturday, "may be the least talented person to 'perform' live in the history of television."
On Thursday, the comedian hosted a segment mocking Trump's bizarre distaste for the electromagnetic catapults aboard Navy ships, which the president said he may sign an executive order to replace with older (and less efficient) steam-powered ones.
Trump did not take kindly to Meyers' barbs: "On and on he went, a truly deranged lunatic. Why does NBC waste its time and money on a guy like this??? - NO TALENT, NO RATINGS, 100% ANTI TRUMP, WHICH IS PROBABLY ILLEGAL!!!"
It is, of course, not "illegal" for a late-night comedian, or any other news reporter or commentator, for that matter, to be "anti-Trump." But it's not the first time the president has made such a suggestion. Amid the backlash against Kimmel's firing in September, Trump asserted that networks that give him "bad publicity or press" should have their licenses taken away.
"I read someplace that the networks were 97% against me... I mean, they’re getting a license, I would think maybe their license should be taken away,” Trump said. "All they do is hit Trump. They’re licensed. They’re not allowed to do that.”
His FCC director, Brendan Carr, used a similar logic to justify his pressure campaign to get Kimmel booted by ABC, which he said could be punished for airing what he determined was "distorted” content.
Before Kimmel, Carr suggested in April that Comcast may be violating its broadcast licenses after MSNBC declined to air a White House press briefing in which the administration defended its wrongful deportation of Salvadoran immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
"You need to understand that he actually believes it is illegal to criticize him," wrote Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on social media following Trump's tirade against Meyers. "Why? Because Trump believes he—not the people—decides the law. This is why we are in the middle of, not on the verge of, a totalitarian takeover."