

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Victims of the fires raging across Los Angeles today demanded justice and accountability from the actors most responsible for the climate change that exacerbated suffering and losses: the Big Oil companies that created the climate conditions driving the fires.
While there have always been fires, and sparks that start fires, the survivors—who were joined by a climate attribution scientist and legal experts—insisted that climate change is what transformed the sparks that started these fires into the raging conflagrations that destroyed their homes and so much else.
Below is a selection of quotes from the event. A recording of the event is available here.
“My mom, a proud Palisadian, passed away in January 2020,” said Danielle Levanas, a survivor of the 2025 Palisades fire. “She had lovingly renovated our home with my dad, her partner of 40 years. Losing that house in some ways feels like losing my mom all over again. Growing up in the Palisades of the 1980s and 90s, we were no strangers to natural disasters. But the level of destruction the Palisades and Eaton Fires have left us is unprecedented. The disasters we’re seeing today are not natural. They are crimes. My elementary and middle school, our rec center, our library, the local community theater, the banks, post office, grocery stores, our favorite restaurants, they all have been taken out. Climate change and the impact of fossil fuel companies have truly upended our lives.”
“The science is clear that hot, dry, fire-prone conditions are becoming more common in California, in large part because of human-caused climate change,” said Dr. Kristina Dahl, vice president for science at Climate Central. “Science can tell us what this contribution has been, but it falls to the public and the law to decide whether or how those emissions translate into financial responsibility.”
Sam James, whose family has lived in Altadena for five generations, described how her community has been impacted. “Our roots in the Altadena/Pasadena area go back to at least 1890, with a legacy of building opportunities for Black generational wealth, primarily through home ownership. Much of this progress has been devastated by the Eaton fire, which destroyed the homes of several of my family members. I am working through the Altadena Recovery Team to help fire survivors heal and rebuild. But it should not continuously fall on us to address the physical and emotional toll of this crisis caused by the actions of a powerful few. It’s time for Big Oil to be held accountable and take real, measurable steps toward a more sustainable future.”
Clara Vondrich, senior counsel at Public Citizen, underscored the need to target the root cause of climate disasters: “As investigators puzzle over the immediate cause of the fires – a dropped cigarette, arson, bad power lines – the real culprit is on the loose and stacking kindling for the next fire. Today, as Californians are dying, Big Oil is thriving with unmatched profits, rapid growth, and a promise of anything-goes deregulation by the new administration.
Allen Meyers, whose family lost everything in the 2018 Camp Fire, also shared his story, explaining that the LA fires this week are not an isolated phenomenon. “The fires burning in Los Angeles right now mirror what we’ve been through in Paradise. And these catastrophes are going to keep happening, more and more often. We can’t wait for more lives to be lost. We need to hold Big Oil accountable and demand bold action on climate.”
Margaret Koster, who survived the 2017 Redwood Valley Fire, compared Big Oil’s conduct to that of Big Tobacco, saying, “As with smoking and lung cancer, corporate industry had knowledge of the link between burning fossil fuels and climate disruption, but suppressed it. It took concentrated social, political and legal pressure to force the tobacco companies to take corrective action and the same is true with fossil fuel companies.”
Participants on the call went on to describe exactly what they meant by calling for Big Oil accountability. Maya Golden-Krasner, senior attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law Institute, said, “Much of our Altadena community is gone. Our friends’ houses, gone. Our synagogue, in ashes. Our favorite pizza places, our post office, maybe our vet, and much, much more, all gone. Many shops and restaurants in our town are owned by locals who lost both their businesses and their homes. I’m grieving. And I’m outraged at the failure to hold fossil-fuel polluters accountable for the devastation they’ve caused by disrupting our climate. It’s time to pass a California ‘climate superfund’ bill to make the largest fossil fuel polluters pay a portion of their huge profits to address the climate consequences they’ve helped create and help California adapt to climate-fueled disasters. Vermont and New York have already passed similar bills. California needs one, too, so we can begin to put billions of dollars in climate costs back onto the corporate polluters where they belong.”
Aaron Regunberg, director of Public Citizen’s Climate Accountability Project, added that legal action was also necessary. “The climate effects driving these fires are the direct and foreseeable—and, in fact, foreseen—consequences of the actions of fossil fuel companies that knowingly generated a huge portion of all the greenhouse gas emissions that caused this crisis, and fraudulently deceived the public about the dangerousness of their products in order to block and delay solutions that could have avoided these catastrophes. We have a phrase in the law for when someone consciously disregards a substantial risk of causing harm to another person: criminal recklessness. And that’s what we mean when we say that while these losses are unspeakably tragic, they aren’t just tragedies. They’re crimes. And the victims and survivors of these climate crimes deserve justice. It’s time for all of our public officials—our state legislators, our local councilors, our county prosecutors, and everyone in between—to act accordingly.”
Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people - not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country.
(202) 588-1000The State Department said the women were related to the assassinated Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani, but Iranian media said they had no connection to him.
With a majority of Americans including President Donald Trump's own base demanding a swift end to the war in Iran—and Iran's military capabilities proving difficult to overpower—observers suggested on Saturday that the White House was looking elsewhere to score "victories," as Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that federal agents had arrested relatives of the late Major General Qasem Soleimani, the Iranian military commander who the US assassinated in 2020 during President Donald Trump's first term.
Rubio accused Soleimani's niece, Hamideh Soleimani Afshar, of promoting "regime propaganda" and voicing support for the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and said she had been living a "lavish lifestyle" in the US. Afshar's husband has been barred from entering the US and the lawful permanent resident status she and her daughter had has been terminated, said the State Department.
"Are we losing so badly we need to arrest the distant relatives of long-since-dead Iranian commanders?" asked Ryan Grim of Drop Site News.
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council noted that the administration had used the same legal authority to arrest Soleimani's reported family members as it did to detain former Columbia University student organizer Mahmoud Khalil and Tufts University scholar Rümeysa Öztürk for speaking out against US support for Israel—a tactic which is being challenged in court as unconstitutional.
Far-right conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer, who has wielded influence in the White House during the second Trump administration, claimed credit for the arrest of the two women, saying that in communications with the State Department, she had "exposed the fact that Qasem Soleimani’s Niece Hamideh Soleimani Afshar has been living in the United States (Los Angeles, California) where she posts pro-Iranian regime and pro-IRGC content on her social media while she lives a life of luxury."
"She has been arrested and will be deported back to Iran!" she added. "Over the last few months, I have quietly been documenting all of Hamideh Soleimani Afshar’s social media activity. I uploaded it all to a secure file and shared it with [the Department of Homeland Security] and Department of State, and now she has been arrested and she will be deported from our country."
In Iran on Saturday, media outlets were reporting that the two women arrested by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement were not related to Soleimani—who had no nieces, according to journalist Kourosh Ziabari.
Soleimani's daughter told the news outlet Jamaran that "none" of her extended family has ever lived in the US.
Regardless of the women's relation to Soleimani or lack thereof, journalist Ryan Grim said the arbitrary arrest "actively puts innocent Americans around the world at risk."
Rubio's explanation for the detention and his move to revoke the women's green cards is the latest evidence that "the US is now deporting people for thought crimes," said historian Zachary Foster.
Journalist Sana Saeed said the case shows that constitutional protections for due process and free speech, which are supposed to apply to green card holders, "no longer mean anything."
"People cannot lose their green card status simply because of familial relationships, so the justification shifts here to their alleged support for the Iranian government," said Saeed. "But supporting a foreign government is not a criminal offense. And if you begin to treat it as one—as the US government effectively is in this case—then expect a lot more of this."
"It will not stop here, and it will not remain limited to Iranians," she said. "The logic does not contain itself, it expands."
The president demanded once again that Iran open the Strait of Hormuz and said that "all Hell will reign down" on the country if officials don't "make a deal."
As the US military's frantic search continued Saturday for an airman who was aboard an F-15E fighter jet when it was downed by Iranian forces a day earlier, and analysts and Iranian media alike suggested the Trump administration has lost control of its war against Iran, President Donald Trump issued his latest threat against the country—once again appearing to threaten tens of millions of Iranians with war crimes.
Renewing his demand that Iran "MAKE A DEAL or OPEN UP THE HORMUZ STRAIT," the president said he was giving the Iranian government "48 hours before all Hell will reign down on them," appearing to confuse the word "reign" with "rain."
"Time is running out," said Trump in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social.
In his post, Trump did not directly address the ongoing search for the airman, who was one of two who ejected from the fighter jet when Iran reportedly used new air defense systems to shoot down the plane. One crew member was found and rescued on Friday.
Iranian officials were also looking for the missing airman on Saturday, raising concerns that the service member could be taken as a hostage and used as leverage.
The president has said little about the ongoing search, but spoke briefly to The Independent in a phone call Saturday about the possibility that Iran could find the service member first.
"We hope that’s not going to happen,” he said.
Trump's comments on social media, meanwhile, appeared to signal "a countdown to massive war crimes," said New York University law professor Ryan Goodman.
The president has also previously warned Iran with an ultimatum, only to delay the threatened action. He said on March 22 that the US would "hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST!" if officials did not reopen the strait—prompting critics to condemn him as a "maniacal tyrant."
The March 22 threat was likely a reference to Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, the vicinity of which was struck by a projectile on Saturday, prompting condemnation from the International Atomic Energy Agency. Human rights experts have repeated warnings in recent weeks that striking power plants would constitute war crimes.
At least five people were killed and 170 were injured in airstrikes on a petrochemical hub in Iran's Khuzestan province on Saturday morning, in addition to the Bushehr attack.
After his initial threat, Trump later said direct strikes on energy infrastructure would not be launched until April 6, and demanded that Iran open the key waterway before then.
Despite Trump's increasingly belligerent threats of "hell" and destruction of civilian infrastructure, a number of media critics noted on Saturday that mainstream Western news outlets including The New York Times, The Economist, and Bloomberg described Iran's use of air defense systems to shoot down US war planes involved in the invasion as an "escalation from Iran's leadership."
"Does Iran have a right to defend itself? Does Palestine? Does Lebanon?" asked commentator Hasan Piker, noting that the US and Israel have claimed they launched the invasion of Iran to "defend" themselves against an imminent attack, contrary to US intelligence analysis. "Or is it just Israel and America who get to claim self-defense as they engage in wars of conquest?"
The International Atomic Energy Agency warned of "the paramount importance of adhering to the seven pillars for ensuring nuclear safety and security during a conflict."
The director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency on Saturday demanded "maximum military restraint" from the US and Israel as it confirmed reports that strikes had targeted a location close to Iran's Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, killing at least one person.
In a statement released via social media, the IAEA relayed a message from Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi, who expressed "deep concern about the reported incident."
Grossi warned that nuclear power plants or nearby areas "must never be attacked, noting that auxiliary site buildings may contain vital safety equipment" and stressed "the paramount importance of adhering to the seven pillars for ensuring nuclear safety and security during a conflict."
The IAEA said the attack near the Bushehr plant, Iran's only operational nuclear power facility, was the fourth such attack since Israel and the US began its invasion of Iran on February 28. The plant lies in a city inhabited by about 250,000 people.
A security staff member was killed by a projectile fragment and a building on the Bushehr site was impacted by shockwaves and fragments. Grossi said that no increase in radiation levels was reported.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also condemned the Bushehr strike and issued a reminder of the "Western outrage about hostilities near Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine" when Russia attacked the site.
"Israel-US have bombed our Bushehr plant four times now. Radioactive fallout will end life in [Gulf Cooperation Council] capitals, not Tehran. Attacks on our petrochemicals also convey real objectives," said Araghchi.
Al Jazeera reported that at least two petrochemical facilities had been hit by the US and Israel in southern Iran’s Khuzestan province, an energy hub in the country. At least five people were injured in those attacks,
Iranian news agency Mehr reported that the state-run Bandar Imam petrochemical complex, which produces liquefied petroleum gas and chemicals as well as other products, sustained damage.
President Donald Trump said late last month that he would delay any attacks on Iran's energy infrastructure until April 6 and said the delay was "subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions.”
He has threatened to destroy Iran's power plants and other civilian infrastructure if Iranian leaders don't end the blockade on the oil export waterway the Strait of Hormuz, which they began in retaliation for the US-Israeli strikes that started more than a month ago and which has fueled skyrocketing global energy prices.
The threat amounted to Trump warning that he could soon commit a war crime, said international law experts.