January, 17 2025, 12:11pm EDT

Fire Survivors Call for Accountability for Big Oil’s Role in Causing Infernos in Los Angeles
LOS ANGELES
Victims of the fires raging across Los Angeles today demanded justice and accountability from the actors most responsible for the climate change that exacerbated suffering and losses: the Big Oil companies that created the climate conditions driving the fires.
While there have always been fires, and sparks that start fires, the survivors—who were joined by a climate attribution scientist and legal experts—insisted that climate change is what transformed the sparks that started these fires into the raging conflagrations that destroyed their homes and so much else.
Below is a selection of quotes from the event. A recording of the event is available here.
“My mom, a proud Palisadian, passed away in January 2020,” said Danielle Levanas, a survivor of the 2025 Palisades fire. “She had lovingly renovated our home with my dad, her partner of 40 years. Losing that house in some ways feels like losing my mom all over again. Growing up in the Palisades of the 1980s and 90s, we were no strangers to natural disasters. But the level of destruction the Palisades and Eaton Fires have left us is unprecedented. The disasters we’re seeing today are not natural. They are crimes. My elementary and middle school, our rec center, our library, the local community theater, the banks, post office, grocery stores, our favorite restaurants, they all have been taken out. Climate change and the impact of fossil fuel companies have truly upended our lives.”
“The science is clear that hot, dry, fire-prone conditions are becoming more common in California, in large part because of human-caused climate change,” said Dr. Kristina Dahl, vice president for science at Climate Central. “Science can tell us what this contribution has been, but it falls to the public and the law to decide whether or how those emissions translate into financial responsibility.”
Sam James, whose family has lived in Altadena for five generations, described how her community has been impacted. “Our roots in the Altadena/Pasadena area go back to at least 1890, with a legacy of building opportunities for Black generational wealth, primarily through home ownership. Much of this progress has been devastated by the Eaton fire, which destroyed the homes of several of my family members. I am working through the Altadena Recovery Team to help fire survivors heal and rebuild. But it should not continuously fall on us to address the physical and emotional toll of this crisis caused by the actions of a powerful few. It’s time for Big Oil to be held accountable and take real, measurable steps toward a more sustainable future.”
Clara Vondrich, senior counsel at Public Citizen, underscored the need to target the root cause of climate disasters: “As investigators puzzle over the immediate cause of the fires – a dropped cigarette, arson, bad power lines – the real culprit is on the loose and stacking kindling for the next fire. Today, as Californians are dying, Big Oil is thriving with unmatched profits, rapid growth, and a promise of anything-goes deregulation by the new administration.
Allen Meyers, whose family lost everything in the 2018 Camp Fire, also shared his story, explaining that the LA fires this week are not an isolated phenomenon. “The fires burning in Los Angeles right now mirror what we’ve been through in Paradise. And these catastrophes are going to keep happening, more and more often. We can’t wait for more lives to be lost. We need to hold Big Oil accountable and demand bold action on climate.”
Margaret Koster, who survived the 2017 Redwood Valley Fire, compared Big Oil’s conduct to that of Big Tobacco, saying, “As with smoking and lung cancer, corporate industry had knowledge of the link between burning fossil fuels and climate disruption, but suppressed it. It took concentrated social, political and legal pressure to force the tobacco companies to take corrective action and the same is true with fossil fuel companies.”
Participants on the call went on to describe exactly what they meant by calling for Big Oil accountability. Maya Golden-Krasner, senior attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law Institute, said, “Much of our Altadena community is gone. Our friends’ houses, gone. Our synagogue, in ashes. Our favorite pizza places, our post office, maybe our vet, and much, much more, all gone. Many shops and restaurants in our town are owned by locals who lost both their businesses and their homes. I’m grieving. And I’m outraged at the failure to hold fossil-fuel polluters accountable for the devastation they’ve caused by disrupting our climate. It’s time to pass a California ‘climate superfund’ bill to make the largest fossil fuel polluters pay a portion of their huge profits to address the climate consequences they’ve helped create and help California adapt to climate-fueled disasters. Vermont and New York have already passed similar bills. California needs one, too, so we can begin to put billions of dollars in climate costs back onto the corporate polluters where they belong.”
Aaron Regunberg, director of Public Citizen’s Climate Accountability Project, added that legal action was also necessary. “The climate effects driving these fires are the direct and foreseeable—and, in fact, foreseen—consequences of the actions of fossil fuel companies that knowingly generated a huge portion of all the greenhouse gas emissions that caused this crisis, and fraudulently deceived the public about the dangerousness of their products in order to block and delay solutions that could have avoided these catastrophes. We have a phrase in the law for when someone consciously disregards a substantial risk of causing harm to another person: criminal recklessness. And that’s what we mean when we say that while these losses are unspeakably tragic, they aren’t just tragedies. They’re crimes. And the victims and survivors of these climate crimes deserve justice. It’s time for all of our public officials—our state legislators, our local councilors, our county prosecutors, and everyone in between—to act accordingly.”
Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people - not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country.
(202) 588-1000LATEST NEWS
National Team Member Becomes at Least 265th Palestinian Footballer Killed by Israel in Gaza
Muhannad al-Lili's killing by Israeli airstrike came as the world mourned the death of Portugal and Liverpool star Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva in a car crash in Spain.
Jul 04, 2025
Muhannad Fadl al-Lili, captain of the Al-Maghazi Services Club and a member of Palestine's national football team, died Thursday from injuries suffered during an Israeli airstrike on his family home in the central Gaza Strip earlier this week, making him the latest of hundreds of Palestinian athletes killed since the start of Israel's genocidal onslaught.
Al-Maghazi Services Club announced al-Lili's death in a Facebook tribute offering condolences to "his family, relatives, friends, and colleagues" and asking "Allah to shower him with his mercy."
The Palestine Football Association (PFA) said that "on Monday, a drone fired a missile at Muhannad's room on the third floor of his house, which led to severe bleeding in the skull."
"During the war of extermination against our people, Muhannad tried to travel outside Gaza to catch up with his wife, who left the strip for Norway on a work mission before the outbreak of the war," the association added. "But he failed to do so, and was deprived of seeing his eldest son, who was born outside the Gaza Strip."
According to the PFA, al-Lili is at least the 265th Palestinian footballer and 585th athlete to be killed by Israeli forces since they launched their assault and siege on Gaza following the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel. Sports journalist Leyla Hamed says 439 Palestinian footballers have been killed by Israel.
Overall, Israel's war—which is the subject of an International Court of Justice (ICJ) genocide case—has left more than 206,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing, and around 2 million more forcibly displaced, starved, or sickened, according to Gaza officials.
The Palestine Chronicle contrasted the worldwide press coverage of the car crash deaths of Portuguese footballer Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva with the media's relative silence following al-Lili's killing.
"Jota's death was a tragedy that touched millions," the outlet wrote. "Yet the death of Muhannad al-Lili... was met with near-total silence from global sports media."
Last week, a group of legal experts including two United Nations special rapporteurs appealed to the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, the world football governing body, demanding that its Governance Audit and Compliance Committee take action against the Israel Football Association for violating FIFA rules by playing matches on occupied Palestinian territory.
In July 2024, the ICJ found that Israel's then-57-year occupation of Palestine—including Gaza—is an illegal form of apartheid that should be ended as soon as possible.
During their invasion and occupation of Gaza, Israeli forces have also used sporting facilities including Yarmouk Stadium for the detention of Palestinian men, women, and children—many of whom have reported torture and other abuse at the hands of their captors.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Highly Inspiring' Court Ruling Affirms Nations' Legal Duty to Combat Climate Emergency
"While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections," said one observer.
Jul 04, 2025
In a landmark advisory opinion published Thursday, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights—of which the United States, the world's second-biggest carbon polluter, is not a member—affirmed the right to a stable climate and underscored nations' duty to act to protect it and address the worsening planetary emergency.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change," a summary of the 234-page ruling states. "Any rollback of climate or environmental policies that affect human rights must be exceptional, duly justified based on objective criteria, and comply with standards of necessity and proportionality."
"The court also held that... states must take all necessary measures to reduce the risks arising, on the one hand, from the degradation of the global climate system and, on the other, from exposure and vulnerability to the effects of such degradation," the summary adds.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change."
The case was brought before the Costa-Rica based IACtHR by Chile and Colombia, both of which "face the daily challenge of dealing with the consequences of the climate emergency, including the proliferation of droughts, floods, landslides, and fires, among others."
"These phenomena highlight the need to respond urgently and based on the principles of equity, justice, cooperation, and sustainability, with a human rights-based approach," the court asserted.
IACtHR President Judge Nancy Hernández López said following the ruling that "states must not only refrain from causing significant environmental damage but have the positive obligation to take measures to guarantee the protection, restoration, and regeneration of ecosystems."
"Causing massive and irreversible environmental harm...alters the conditions for a healthy life on Earth to such an extent that it creates consequences of existential proportions," she added. "Therefore, it demands universal and effective legal responses."
The advisory opinion builds on two landmark decisions last year. In April 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the Swiss government violated senior citizens' human rights by refusing to abide by scientists' warnings to rapidly phase out fossil fuel production.
The following month, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea found in an advisory opinion that greenhouse gas emissions are marine pollution under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and that signatories to the accord "have the specific obligation to adopt laws and regulations to prevent, reduce, and control" them.
The IACtHR advisory opinion is expected to boost climate and human rights lawsuits throughout the Americas, and to impact talks ahead of November's United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP30, in Belém, Brazil.
Climate defenders around the world hailed Thursday's advisory opinion, with United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk calling it "a landmark step forward for the region—and beyond."
"As the impact of climate change becomes ever more visible across the world, the court is clear: People have a right to a stable climate and a healthy environment," Türk added. "States have a bedrock obligation under international law not to take steps that cause irreversible climate and environmental damage, and they have a duty to act urgently to take the necessary measures to protect the lives and rights of everyone—both those alive now and the interests of future generations."
Amnesty International head of strategic litigation Mandi Mudarikwa said, "Today, the Inter-American Court affirmed and clarified the obligations of states to respect, ensure, prevent, and cooperate in order to realize human rights in the context of the climate crisis."
"Crucially, the court recognized the autonomous right to a healthy climate for both individuals and communities, linked to the right to a healthy environment," Mudarikwa added. "The court also underscored the obligation of states to protect cross-border climate-displaced persons, including through the issuance of humanitarian visas and protection from deportation."
Delta Merner, lead scientist at the Science Hub for Climate Litigation at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a statement that "this opinion sets an important precedent affirming that governments have a legal duty to regulate corporate conduct that drives climate harm."
"Though the United States is not a party to the treaty governing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, this opinion should be a clarion call for transnational fossil fuel companies that have deceived the public for decades about the risks of their products," Merner added. "The era of accountability is here."
Markus Gehring, a fellow and director of studies in law at Hughes Hall at the University of Cambridge in England, called the advisory opinion "highly inspiring" and "seminal."
Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans at Earthjustice, said that "the Inter-American Court's ruling makes clear that climate change is an overriding threat to human rights in the world."
"Governments must act to cut carbon emissions drastically," Caputo stressed. "While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections for all from the realities of climate harm."
Climate litigation is increasing globally in the wake of the 2015 Paris climate agreement. In the Americas, Indigenous peoples, children, and green groups are among those who have been seeking climate justice via litigation.
However, in the United States, instead of acknowledging the climate emergency, President Donald Trump has declared an "energy emergency" while pursuing a "drill, baby, drill" policy of fossil fuel extraction and expansion.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Admin Quietly Approves Massive Crude Oil Expansion Project
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest," said one environmental attorney.
Jul 04, 2025
The Trump administration has quietly fast-tracked a massive oil expansion project that environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers warned could have a destructive impact on local communities and the climate.
As reported recently by the Oil and Gas Journal, the plan "involves expanding the Wildcat Loadout Facility, a key transfer point for moving Uinta basin crude oil to rail lines that transport it to refineries along the Gulf Coast."
The goal of the plan is to transfer an additional 70,000 barrels of oil per day from the Wildcat Loadout Facility, which is located in Utah, down to the Gulf Coast refineries via a route that runs along the Colorado River. Controversially, the Trump administration is also plowing ahead with the project by invoking emergency powers to address energy shortages despite the fact that the United States for the last couple of years has been producing record levels of domestic oil.
Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) issued a joint statement condemning the Trump administration's push to approve the project while rushing through environmental impact reviews.
"The Bureau of Land Management's decision to fast-track the Wildcat Loadout expansion—a project that would transport an additional 70,000 barrels of crude oil on train tracks along the Colorado River—using emergency procedures is profoundly flawed," the Colorado Democrats said. "These procedures give the agency just 14 days to complete an environmental review—with no opportunity for public input or administrative appeal—despite the project's clear risks to Colorado. There is no credible energy emergency to justify bypassing public involvement and environmental safeguards. The United States is currently producing more oil and gas than any country in the world."
On Thursday, the Bureau of Land Management announced the completion of its accelerated environmental review of the project, drawing condemnation from climate advocates.
Wendy Park, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, described the administration's rush to approve the project as "pure hubris," especially given its "refusal to hear community concerns about oil spill risks." She added that "this fast-tracked review breezed past vital protections for clean air, public safety and endangered species."
Landon Newell, staff attorney for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, accused the Trump administration of manufacturing an energy emergency to justify plans that could have a dire impact on local habitats.
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest by authorizing the transport of more than 1 billion gallons annually of additional oil on railcars traveling alongside the Colorado River," he said. "Any derailment and oil spill would have a devastating impact on the Colorado River and the communities and ecosystems that rely upon it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular