

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Victims of the fires raging across Los Angeles today demanded justice and accountability from the actors most responsible for the climate change that exacerbated suffering and losses: the Big Oil companies that created the climate conditions driving the fires.
While there have always been fires, and sparks that start fires, the survivors—who were joined by a climate attribution scientist and legal experts—insisted that climate change is what transformed the sparks that started these fires into the raging conflagrations that destroyed their homes and so much else.
Below is a selection of quotes from the event. A recording of the event is available here.
“My mom, a proud Palisadian, passed away in January 2020,” said Danielle Levanas, a survivor of the 2025 Palisades fire. “She had lovingly renovated our home with my dad, her partner of 40 years. Losing that house in some ways feels like losing my mom all over again. Growing up in the Palisades of the 1980s and 90s, we were no strangers to natural disasters. But the level of destruction the Palisades and Eaton Fires have left us is unprecedented. The disasters we’re seeing today are not natural. They are crimes. My elementary and middle school, our rec center, our library, the local community theater, the banks, post office, grocery stores, our favorite restaurants, they all have been taken out. Climate change and the impact of fossil fuel companies have truly upended our lives.”
“The science is clear that hot, dry, fire-prone conditions are becoming more common in California, in large part because of human-caused climate change,” said Dr. Kristina Dahl, vice president for science at Climate Central. “Science can tell us what this contribution has been, but it falls to the public and the law to decide whether or how those emissions translate into financial responsibility.”
Sam James, whose family has lived in Altadena for five generations, described how her community has been impacted. “Our roots in the Altadena/Pasadena area go back to at least 1890, with a legacy of building opportunities for Black generational wealth, primarily through home ownership. Much of this progress has been devastated by the Eaton fire, which destroyed the homes of several of my family members. I am working through the Altadena Recovery Team to help fire survivors heal and rebuild. But it should not continuously fall on us to address the physical and emotional toll of this crisis caused by the actions of a powerful few. It’s time for Big Oil to be held accountable and take real, measurable steps toward a more sustainable future.”
Clara Vondrich, senior counsel at Public Citizen, underscored the need to target the root cause of climate disasters: “As investigators puzzle over the immediate cause of the fires – a dropped cigarette, arson, bad power lines – the real culprit is on the loose and stacking kindling for the next fire. Today, as Californians are dying, Big Oil is thriving with unmatched profits, rapid growth, and a promise of anything-goes deregulation by the new administration.
Allen Meyers, whose family lost everything in the 2018 Camp Fire, also shared his story, explaining that the LA fires this week are not an isolated phenomenon. “The fires burning in Los Angeles right now mirror what we’ve been through in Paradise. And these catastrophes are going to keep happening, more and more often. We can’t wait for more lives to be lost. We need to hold Big Oil accountable and demand bold action on climate.”
Margaret Koster, who survived the 2017 Redwood Valley Fire, compared Big Oil’s conduct to that of Big Tobacco, saying, “As with smoking and lung cancer, corporate industry had knowledge of the link between burning fossil fuels and climate disruption, but suppressed it. It took concentrated social, political and legal pressure to force the tobacco companies to take corrective action and the same is true with fossil fuel companies.”
Participants on the call went on to describe exactly what they meant by calling for Big Oil accountability. Maya Golden-Krasner, senior attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law Institute, said, “Much of our Altadena community is gone. Our friends’ houses, gone. Our synagogue, in ashes. Our favorite pizza places, our post office, maybe our vet, and much, much more, all gone. Many shops and restaurants in our town are owned by locals who lost both their businesses and their homes. I’m grieving. And I’m outraged at the failure to hold fossil-fuel polluters accountable for the devastation they’ve caused by disrupting our climate. It’s time to pass a California ‘climate superfund’ bill to make the largest fossil fuel polluters pay a portion of their huge profits to address the climate consequences they’ve helped create and help California adapt to climate-fueled disasters. Vermont and New York have already passed similar bills. California needs one, too, so we can begin to put billions of dollars in climate costs back onto the corporate polluters where they belong.”
Aaron Regunberg, director of Public Citizen’s Climate Accountability Project, added that legal action was also necessary. “The climate effects driving these fires are the direct and foreseeable—and, in fact, foreseen—consequences of the actions of fossil fuel companies that knowingly generated a huge portion of all the greenhouse gas emissions that caused this crisis, and fraudulently deceived the public about the dangerousness of their products in order to block and delay solutions that could have avoided these catastrophes. We have a phrase in the law for when someone consciously disregards a substantial risk of causing harm to another person: criminal recklessness. And that’s what we mean when we say that while these losses are unspeakably tragic, they aren’t just tragedies. They’re crimes. And the victims and survivors of these climate crimes deserve justice. It’s time for all of our public officials—our state legislators, our local councilors, our county prosecutors, and everyone in between—to act accordingly.”
Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people - not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country.
(202) 588-1000"Does anyone truly believe that caving in to Trump now will stop his unprecedented attacks on our democracy and working people?" asked Sen. Bernie Sanders.
US Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday implored his Democratic colleagues in Congress not to cave to President Donald Trump and Republicans in the ongoing government shutdown fight, warning that doing so would hasten the country's descent into authoritarianism.
In an op-ed for The Guardian, Sanders (I-Vt.) called Trump a "schoolyard bully" and argued that "anyone who thinks surrendering to him now will lead to better outcomes and cooperation in the future does not understand how a power-hungry demagogue operates."
"This is a man who threatens to arrest and jail his political opponents, deploys the US military into Democratic cities, and allows masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to pick people up off the streets and throw them into vans without due process," Sanders wrote. "He has sued virtually every major media outlet because he does not tolerate criticism, has extorted funds from law firms and is withholding federal funding from states that voted against him."
If Democrats capitulate, Sanders warned, Trump "will utilize his victory to accelerate his movement toward authoritarianism."
"At a time when he already has no regard for our democratic system of checks and balances," the senator wrote, "he will be emboldened to continue decimating programs that protect elderly people, children, the sick and the poor while giving more tax breaks and other benefits to his fellow oligarchs."
Sanders' op-ed came as the shutdown continued with no end in sight, with Democrats standing by their demand for an extension of Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits as a necessary condition for any government funding deal. Republicans have so far refused to negotiate on the ACA subsidies even as health insurance premiums skyrocket nationwide.
The Trump administration, meanwhile, is illegally withholding Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) funding from tens of millions of Americans—including millions of children—despite court rulings ordering him to release the money.
In a "60 Minutes" interview that aired Sunday, Trump again urged Republicans to nuke the 60-vote filibuster in the Senate to remove the need for Democratic support to reopen the government and advance other elements of their agenda unilaterally. Under the status quo, Republicans need the support of at least seven Democratic senators to advance a government funding package.
"The Republicans have to get tougher," Trump said. "If we end the filibuster, we can do exactly what we want. We're not going to lose power."
Congressional Democrats have faced some pressure from allies, most notably the head of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), to cut a deal with Republicans to end the shutdown and alleviate the suffering it has inflicted on federal workers and many others.
But Democrats appear unmoved by the AFGE president's demand, and other labor leaders have since voiced support for the minority party's effort to secure an extension of ACA subsidies.
"We're urging our Democratic friends to hold the line," said Jaime Contreras, executive vice president of the 185,000-member Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ.
In his op-ed on Sunday, Sanders asked, "Does anyone truly believe that caving in to Trump now will stop his unprecedented attacks on our democracy and working people?"
"If the Democrats cave now, it would be a betrayal of the millions of Americans who have fought and died for democracy and our Constitution," the senator wrote. "It would be a sellout of a working class that is struggling to survive in very difficult economic times. Democrats in Congress are the last remaining opposition to Trump's quest for absolute power. To surrender now would be an historic tragedy for our country, something that history will not look kindly upon."
"Can't follow the law when a judge says fund the program, but have to follow the rules exactly when they say don't help poor people afford food," one lawyer said.
As the Trump administration continued its illegal freeze on food assistance, the US Department of Agriculture sent a warning to grocery stores not to provide discounts to the more than 42 million Americans affected.
Several grocery chains and food delivery apps have announced in recent days that they would provide substantial discounts to those whose Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits have been delayed. More than 1 in 8 Americans rely on the program, and 39% of them are children.
But on Sunday, Catherine Rampell, a reporter at the Washington Post published an email from the USDA that was sent to grocery stores around the country, telling them they were prohibited from offering special discounts to those at greater risk of food insecurity due to the cuts.
"You must offer eligible foods at the same prices and on the same terms and conditions to SNAP-EBT customers as other customers, except that sales tax cannot be charged on SNAP purchases," the email said. "You cannot treat SNAP-EBT customers differently from any other customer. Offering discounts or services only to SNAP-eligible customers is a SNAP violation unless you have a SNAP equal treatment waiver."
The email referred to SNAP's "Equal Treatment Rule," which prohibits stores from discriminating against SNAP recipients by charging them higher prices or treating them more favorably than other customers by offering them specialized sales or incentives.
Rampell said she was "aware of at least two stores that had offered struggling customers a discount, then withdrew it after receiving this email."
She added that it was "understandable why grocery stores might be scared off" because "a store caught violating the prohibition could be denied the ability to accept SNAP benefits in the future. In low-income areas where the SNAP shutdown will have the biggest impact, getting thrown off SNAP could mean a store is no longer financially viable."
While the rule prohibits special treatment in either direction, legal analyst Jeffrey Evan Gold argues that it was a "perverted interpretation of a rule that stops grocers from price gouging SNAP recipients... charging them more when they use food stamps."
The government also notably allows retailers to request waivers for programs that incentivize SNAP recipients to purchase healthy food.
Others pointed out that SNAP is currently not paying out to Americans because President Donald Trump is defying multiple federal court rulings issued Friday, requiring him to tap a $6 billion contingency fund to ensure benefit payments go out. Both courts, in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, have said his administration's refusal to pay out benefits is against the law.
One labor movement lawyer summed up the administration's position on social media: "Can't follow the law when a judge says fund the program, but have to follow the rules exactly when they say don't help poor people afford food."
"You need to understand that he actually believes it is illegal to criticize him," wrote Sen. Chris Murphy.
After failing to use the government's might to bully Jimmy Kimmel off the air earlier this fall, President Donald Trump is once again threatening to bring the force of law down on comedians for the egregious crime of making fun of him.
This time, his target was NBC late-night host Seth Meyers, whom the president said, in a Truth Social post Saturday, "may be the least talented person to 'perform' live in the history of television."
On Thursday, the comedian hosted a segment mocking Trump's bizarre distaste for the electromagnetic catapults aboard Navy ships, which the president said he may sign an executive order to replace with older (and less efficient) steam-powered ones.
Trump did not take kindly to Meyers' barbs: "On and on he went, a truly deranged lunatic. Why does NBC waste its time and money on a guy like this??? - NO TALENT, NO RATINGS, 100% ANTI TRUMP, WHICH IS PROBABLY ILLEGAL!!!"
It is, of course, not "illegal" for a late-night comedian, or any other news reporter or commentator, for that matter, to be "anti-Trump." But it's not the first time the president has made such a suggestion. Amid the backlash against Kimmel's firing in September, Trump asserted that networks that give him "bad publicity or press" should have their licenses taken away.
"I read someplace that the networks were 97% against me... I mean, they’re getting a license, I would think maybe their license should be taken away,” Trump said. "All they do is hit Trump. They’re licensed. They’re not allowed to do that.”
His FCC director, Brendan Carr, used a similar logic to justify his pressure campaign to get Kimmel booted by ABC, which he said could be punished for airing what he determined was "distorted” content.
Before Kimmel, Carr suggested in April that Comcast may be violating its broadcast licenses after MSNBC declined to air a White House press briefing in which the administration defended its wrongful deportation of Salvadoran immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
"You need to understand that he actually believes it is illegal to criticize him," wrote Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on social media following Trump's tirade against Meyers. "Why? Because Trump believes he—not the people—decides the law. This is why we are in the middle of, not on the verge of, a totalitarian takeover."