June, 07 2011, 11:42am EDT

ACLU Calls for Department of Justice to Investigate Wisconsin's Discriminatory School Voucher Program
The American Civil Liberties Union today called on the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate the systematic discrimination against and exclusion of students with disabilities in Wisconsin's school voucher program. In a complaint filed today with the DOJ's Office of Civil Rights, the ACLU charges that Milwaukee Public Schools' (MPS) voucher program fails to ensure that students with disabilities are given equal access to education.
MILWAUKEE, WI
The American Civil Liberties Union today called on the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate the systematic discrimination against and exclusion of students with disabilities in Wisconsin's school voucher program. In a complaint filed today with the DOJ's Office of Civil Rights, the ACLU charges that Milwaukee Public Schools' (MPS) voucher program fails to ensure that students with disabilities are given equal access to education.
"Wisconsin's voucher schools are failing to provide children with disabilities their right to equal access to an education," said Courtney Bowie, senior staff attorney with the ACLU Racial Justice Program. "Federal law prohibits recipients of federal funding from discriminating against individuals with disabilities. The state of Wisconsin should not expand its voucher program if it cannot ensure equal, meaningful access for these students."
Wisconsin sits at the forefront of an emerging national debate over whether efforts to expand school choice are adequately serving students with special needs. The privatization of public education is moving forward nationwide without regard to the private sector's ability or willingness to educate students with disabilities, despite requirements that they do so. Indiana recently passed the most expansive school voucher program in the country, and the Wisconsin state legislature is likely to pass legislation this summer that will substantially expand its program. Advocates for people with disabilities have expressed concerns that such programs sanction the exclusion and segregation of students with disabilities. A Washington D.C. based organization advocating on behalf of people with disabilities also recently filed a complaint with the DOJ, charging that the district's public charter schools discriminate against students with disabilities in their admission policies.
The Milwaukee Public School District is the largest public school district in the state but is receiving fewer and fewer state resources to educate its approximately 81,000 students - including approximately 16,000 students with disabilities - while the state diverts a significant portion of MPS funding to the voucher program that serves an almost exclusively non-disabled population. Families in Milwaukee have a number of government-funded educational options, the largest of which is the MPS system. Students may also attend charter schools and participate in the voucher program formally known as the "Milwaukee Parental Choice Program." To be eligible to enter the voucher program, the nation's oldest, families are required to live in the city of Milwaukee and have a household income equal to 175 percent of the poverty line or less.
"Right now only about 1.6 percent of voucher students have disabilities, while 19.5 percent of Milwaukee Public School students do," said Karyn Rotker, senior staff attorney with the ACLU of Wisconsin. "Increasing the size of the voucher program - as the state intends to do - will only lead to even more discrimination and more segregation of children with disabilities. We hope that DOJ will step in to stop that from occurring."
Although Milwaukee's voucher schools receive taxpayer dollars, the state asserts that they are private schools. Nearly 21,000 Milwaukee students attend these voucher schools with public funds. By treating these schools as private, Wisconsin has failed to hold these voucher schools accountable to the non-discrimination standards that public schools must uphold when serving students with disabilities. The complaint alleges that, as a result, the voucher schools discriminate against students with disabilities by refusing them admission or accommodation.
"Twenty years of offering vouchers to attend private schools in Milwaukee has demonstrated that children with disabilities are not welcome in Milwaukee's private schools," said Jeffrey Spitzer-Resnick, attorney with Disability Rights Wisconsin. "Equally discriminatory is when these voucher schools occasionally accept children with disabilities, take their voucher funds and then expel them without recourse. They leave the family no other option than to return to Milwaukee Public Schools. In fact, our complaint includes one family whose children with disabilities were not admitted to a voucher school and another whose disabled child was kicked out of a voucher school and sent back to the public school system."
The complaint can be found at: www.aclu.org/racial-justice/aclu-v-state-wisconsin-complaint-under-rehabilitation-act-and-americans-disabilities
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
Billionaire Palantir Co-Founder Pushes Return of Public Hangings as Part of 'Masculine Leadership' Initiative
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," said one critic in response.
Dec 07, 2025
Venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of data platform company Palantir, is calling for the return of public hangings as part of a broader push to restore what he describes as "masculine leadership" to the US.
In a statement posted on X Friday, Lonsdale said that he supported changing the so-called "three strikes" anti-crime law to ensure that anyone who is convicted of three violent crimes gets publicly executed, rather than simply sent to prison for life.
"If I’m in charge later, we won’t just have a three strikes law," he wrote. "We will quickly try and hang men after three violent crimes. And yes, we will do it in public to deter others."
Lonsdale then added that "our society needs balance," and said that "it's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable."
Lonsdale's views on public hangings being necessary to restore "masculine leadership" drew swift criticism.
Gil Durán, a journalist who documents the increasingly authoritarian politics of Silicon Valley in his newsletter "The Nerd Reich," argued in a Saturday post that Lonsdale's call for public hangings showed that US tech elites are "entering a more dangerous and desperate phase of radicalization."
"For months, Peter Thiel guru Curtis Yarvin has been squawking about the need for more severe measures to cement Trump's authoritarian rule," Durán explained. "Peter Thiel is ranting about the Antichrist in a global tour. And now Lonsdale—a Thiel protégé—is fantasizing about a future in which he will have the power to unleash state violence at mass scale."
Taulby Edmondson, an adjunct professor of history, religion, and culture at Virginia Tech, wrote in a post on Bluesky that the rhetoric Lonsdale uses to justify the return of public hangings has even darker intonations than calls for state-backed violence.
"A point of nuance here: 'masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable' is how lynch mobs are described, not state-sanctioned executions," he observed.
Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll argued that Lonsdale's remarks were symbolic of a kind of performative masculinity that has infected US culture.
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," he wrote.
Tech entrepreneur Anil Dash warned Lonsdale that his call for public hangings could have unintended consequences for members of the Silicon Valley elite.
"Well, Joe, Mark Zuckerberg has sole control over Facebook, which directly enabled the Rohingya genocide," he wrote. "So let’s have the conversation."
And Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin noted that Lonsdale has been a major backer of the University of Austin, an unaccredited liberal arts college that has been pitched as an alternative to left-wing university education with the goal of preparing "thoughtful and ethical innovators, builders, leaders, public servants and citizens through open inquiry and civil discourse."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hegseth Defends Boat Bombings as New Details Further Undermine Administration's Justifications
The boat targeted in the infamous September 2 "double-tap" strike was not even headed for the US, Adm. Frank Bradley revealed to lawmakers.
Dec 07, 2025
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday defended the Trump administration's policy of bombing suspected drug-trafficking vessels even as new details further undermined the administration's stated justifications for the policy.
According to the Guardian, Hegseth told a gathering at the Ronald Reagan presidential library that the boat bombings, which so far have killed at least 87 people, are necessary to protect Americans from illegal drugs being shipped to the US.
"If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you," Hegseth said. "Let there be no doubt about it."
However, leaked details about a classified briefing delivered to lawmakers last week by Adm. Frank Bradley about a September 2 boat strike cast new doubts on Hegseth's justifications.
CNN reported on Friday that Bradley told lawmakers that the boat taken out by the September 2 attack was not even headed toward the US, but was going "to link up with another, larger vessel that was bound for Suriname," a small nation in the northeast of South America.
While Bradley acknowledged that the boat was not heading toward the US, he told lawmakers that the strike on it was justified because the drugs it was carrying could have theoretically wound up in the US at some point.
Additionally, NBC News reported on Saturday that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth had ordered all 11 men who were on the boat targeted by the September 2 strike to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted."
This is relevant because the US military launched a second strike during the September 2 operation to kill two men who had survived the initial strike on their vessel, which many legal experts consider to be either a war crime or an act of murder under domestic law.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, watched video of the September 2 double-tap attack last week, and he described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” Himes explained. “Now, there’s a whole set of contextual items that the admiral explained. Yes, they were carrying drugs. They were not in position to continue their mission in any way... People will someday see this video and they will see that that video shows, if you don’t have the broader context, an attack on shipwrecked sailors.”
While there has been much discussion about the legality of the September 2 double-tap strike in recent days, some critics have warned that fixating on this particular aspect of the administration's policy risks taking the focus off the illegality of the boat-bombing campaign as a whole.
Daphne Eviatar, director for security and human rights for Amnesty International USA, said on Friday that the entire boat-bombing campaign has been "illegal under both domestic and international law."
"All of them constitute murder because none of the victims, whether or not they were smuggling illegal narcotics, posed an imminent threat to life," she said. "Congress must take action now to stop the US military from murdering more people in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Memo Shows Pam Bondi Wants List of 'Domestic Terrorism' Groups Who Express 'Anti-American Sentiment'
"Millions of Americans like you and I could be the target," warned journalist Ken Klippenstein of the new memo.
Dec 07, 2025
A leaked memo written by US Attorney General Pam Bondi directs the Department of Justice to compile a list of potential "domestic terrorism" organizations that espouse "extreme viewpoints on immigration, radical gender ideology, and anti-American sentiment."
The memo, which was obtained by journalist Ken Klippenstein, expands upon National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7), a directive signed by President Donald Trump in late September that demanded a "national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts."
The new Bondi memo instructs law enforcement agencies to refer "suspected" domestic terrorism cases to the Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs), which will then undertake an "exhaustive investigation contemplated by NSPM-7" that will incorporate "a focused strategy to root out all culpable participants—including organizers and funders—in all domestic terrorism activities."
The memo identifies the "domestic terrorism threat" as organizations that use "violence or the threat of violence" to advance political goals such as "opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders; adherence to radical gender ideology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, or anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; hostility towards traditional views on family, religion, and morality."
Commenting on the significance of the memo, Klippenstein criticized mainstream media organizations for largely ignoring the implications of NSPM-7, which was drafted and signed in the wake of the murder of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.
"For months, major media outlets have largely blown off the story of NSPM-7, thinking it was all just Trump bluster and too crazy to be serious," he wrote. "But a memo like this one shows you that the administration is absolutely taking this seriously—even if the media are not—and is actively working to operationalize NSPM-7."
Klippenstein also warned that NSPM-7 appeared to be the start of a new "war on terrorism," but "only this time, millions of Americans like you and I could be the target."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


