

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido--who attempted to spark a military coup last week with expressed U.S. backing--speaks during a press conference at the headquarters of political party Un Nuevo Tiempo on May 03, 2019 in Caracas, Venezuela. (Photo: Eva Marie Uzcategui/Getty Images)
For all its bluster about "standing with the Venezuelan people," the Trump administration is under fire for refusing to give protected status to asylum-seekers from that nation even as the State Department and White House have worked overtime to support a coup and impose sanctions - both of which have served to further destabilize a country in the midst of a political and economic crisis.
As the Guardian reports on Sunday:
The United Nations estimated 5.3 million Venezuelans will have fled by the end of 2019, but the Trump administration has resisted calls - including those from Republicans - to put in place immigration programs that would let a tiny portion of them seek protection in the US.
Instead, its efforts have been focused on pushing for opposition leader, Juan Guaido, to replace Nicolas Maduro, and repeating calls for the "freedom" of Venezuelans, who face chronic food and medicine shortages in the collapsing country.
A report released late last month by the Center for Economic and Policy Research, authored by economists Mark Weisbrot and Jeffrey Sachs, warned that U.S.-imposed economic sanctions against Venezuela have been "a death sentence for tens of thousands of people" and that the nation's humanitarian crisis--and the associated political turmoil--will worsen as long as the sanctions are kept in place.
So while U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and national security advisor John Bolton have repeatedly gone in front of U.S. television cameras to proclaim that the Trump administration is operating on behalf of the Venezuelan people and for their benefit, Weisbrot and Sachs argue the evidence shows that U.S. sanctions have "exacerbated Venezuela's economic crisis and made it nearly impossible to stabilize the economy, contributing further to excess deaths." The impacts of the sanctions regime, they said, "disproportionately harmed the poorest and most vulnerable Venezuelans."
The fact that the administration is openly pushing for a coup by right-wing forces in Venezuela while simultaneously refusing to provide asylum status to Venezuelans who are fleeing the violence or economic hardship, say critics, is just further evidence that Trump, vice president Mike Pence, Pompeo, and Bolton should not be simply taken at their word when it comes to their motivations.
"Here you have the administration standing with Venezuelans seeking freedom - and banning them from seeking that freedom in the United States," Nazanin Ash, the International Rescue Committee's (IRC's) vice-president of policy and advocacy, told the Guardian.
"What this administration has demonstrated again and again over the last several years," Ash added, "is that crises and vulnerability ... have not been the factors that have moved them."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
For all its bluster about "standing with the Venezuelan people," the Trump administration is under fire for refusing to give protected status to asylum-seekers from that nation even as the State Department and White House have worked overtime to support a coup and impose sanctions - both of which have served to further destabilize a country in the midst of a political and economic crisis.
As the Guardian reports on Sunday:
The United Nations estimated 5.3 million Venezuelans will have fled by the end of 2019, but the Trump administration has resisted calls - including those from Republicans - to put in place immigration programs that would let a tiny portion of them seek protection in the US.
Instead, its efforts have been focused on pushing for opposition leader, Juan Guaido, to replace Nicolas Maduro, and repeating calls for the "freedom" of Venezuelans, who face chronic food and medicine shortages in the collapsing country.
A report released late last month by the Center for Economic and Policy Research, authored by economists Mark Weisbrot and Jeffrey Sachs, warned that U.S.-imposed economic sanctions against Venezuela have been "a death sentence for tens of thousands of people" and that the nation's humanitarian crisis--and the associated political turmoil--will worsen as long as the sanctions are kept in place.
So while U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and national security advisor John Bolton have repeatedly gone in front of U.S. television cameras to proclaim that the Trump administration is operating on behalf of the Venezuelan people and for their benefit, Weisbrot and Sachs argue the evidence shows that U.S. sanctions have "exacerbated Venezuela's economic crisis and made it nearly impossible to stabilize the economy, contributing further to excess deaths." The impacts of the sanctions regime, they said, "disproportionately harmed the poorest and most vulnerable Venezuelans."
The fact that the administration is openly pushing for a coup by right-wing forces in Venezuela while simultaneously refusing to provide asylum status to Venezuelans who are fleeing the violence or economic hardship, say critics, is just further evidence that Trump, vice president Mike Pence, Pompeo, and Bolton should not be simply taken at their word when it comes to their motivations.
"Here you have the administration standing with Venezuelans seeking freedom - and banning them from seeking that freedom in the United States," Nazanin Ash, the International Rescue Committee's (IRC's) vice-president of policy and advocacy, told the Guardian.
"What this administration has demonstrated again and again over the last several years," Ash added, "is that crises and vulnerability ... have not been the factors that have moved them."
For all its bluster about "standing with the Venezuelan people," the Trump administration is under fire for refusing to give protected status to asylum-seekers from that nation even as the State Department and White House have worked overtime to support a coup and impose sanctions - both of which have served to further destabilize a country in the midst of a political and economic crisis.
As the Guardian reports on Sunday:
The United Nations estimated 5.3 million Venezuelans will have fled by the end of 2019, but the Trump administration has resisted calls - including those from Republicans - to put in place immigration programs that would let a tiny portion of them seek protection in the US.
Instead, its efforts have been focused on pushing for opposition leader, Juan Guaido, to replace Nicolas Maduro, and repeating calls for the "freedom" of Venezuelans, who face chronic food and medicine shortages in the collapsing country.
A report released late last month by the Center for Economic and Policy Research, authored by economists Mark Weisbrot and Jeffrey Sachs, warned that U.S.-imposed economic sanctions against Venezuela have been "a death sentence for tens of thousands of people" and that the nation's humanitarian crisis--and the associated political turmoil--will worsen as long as the sanctions are kept in place.
So while U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and national security advisor John Bolton have repeatedly gone in front of U.S. television cameras to proclaim that the Trump administration is operating on behalf of the Venezuelan people and for their benefit, Weisbrot and Sachs argue the evidence shows that U.S. sanctions have "exacerbated Venezuela's economic crisis and made it nearly impossible to stabilize the economy, contributing further to excess deaths." The impacts of the sanctions regime, they said, "disproportionately harmed the poorest and most vulnerable Venezuelans."
The fact that the administration is openly pushing for a coup by right-wing forces in Venezuela while simultaneously refusing to provide asylum status to Venezuelans who are fleeing the violence or economic hardship, say critics, is just further evidence that Trump, vice president Mike Pence, Pompeo, and Bolton should not be simply taken at their word when it comes to their motivations.
"Here you have the administration standing with Venezuelans seeking freedom - and banning them from seeking that freedom in the United States," Nazanin Ash, the International Rescue Committee's (IRC's) vice-president of policy and advocacy, told the Guardian.
"What this administration has demonstrated again and again over the last several years," Ash added, "is that crises and vulnerability ... have not been the factors that have moved them."