Wikileaks on Thursday has made public a never-before-seen internal review conducted by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency that looked at the agency\u0026#039;s drone and targeted assassination programs in places like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and elsewhere.The agency\u0026#039;s own analysis, conducted in 2009, found that its clandestine drone and assassination program was likely to produce counterproductive outcomes, including strengthening the very \u0022extremist groups\u0022 it was allegedly designed to destroy.Here\u0026#039;s a link to the document, titled Best Practices in Counterinsurgency: Making High-Value Targeting Operations an Effective Counterinsurgency Toolocument (pdf).In one of the key findings contained in the CIA report, agency analysts warn of the negative consequences of assassinating so-called High Level Targets (HLT).\u0022The potential negative effect of HLT operations,\u0022 the report states, \u0022include increasing the level of insurgent support […], strengthening an armed group\u0026#039;s bonds with the population, radicalizing an insurgent group\u0026#039;s remaining leaders, creating a vacuum into which more radical groups can enter, and escalating or de-escalating a conflict in ways that favor the insurgents.”Wikileaks points out that this internal prediction \u0022has been proven right\u0022 in the years since the internal review was conducted near the outset of President Obama\u0026#039;s first term. And despite those internal warnings—which have been loudly shared by human rights and foreign policy experts critical of the CIA\u0026#039;s drone and assassination programs—Wikileaks also notes that after the internal review was prepared, \u0022US drone strike killings rose to an all-time high.\u0022Reached by the Washington Post on Thursday for response, CIA spokesperson Kali J. Caldwell said the agency would not comment “on the authenticity or content of purported stolen intelligence documents.”According to a statement released by Wikileaks:The report discusses assassination operations (by various states) against the Taliban, al-Qa\u0026#039;ida, the FARC, Hizbullah, the PLO, HAMAS, Peru\u0026#039;s Shining Path, the Tamil\u0026#039;s LTTE, the IRA and Algeria\u0026#039;s FLN. Case studies are drawn from Chechnya, Libya, Pakistan and Thailand.The assessment was prepared by the CIA\u0026#039;s Office of Transnational Issues (OTI). Its role is to provide “the most senior US policymakers, military planners, and law enforcement with analysis, warning, and crisis support”. The report is dated 7 July 2009, six months into Leon Panetta\u0026#039;s term as CIA chief, and not long after CIA analyst John Kiriakou blew the whistle on the torture of CIA detainees. Kiriakou is still in prison for shedding light on the CIA torture programme.Following the politically embarrassing exposure of the CIA\u0026#039;s torture practices and the growing cost of keeping people in detention indefinitely, the Obama administration faced a crucial choice in its counter-insurgency strategy: should it kill, capture, or do something else entirely?Given exclusive access to the CIA document ahead of its public release, the Sydney Morning Herald\u0026#039;s Philip Dorling reported earlier on Thursday:According to a leaked document by the CIA\u0026#039;s Directorate of Intelligence, \u0022high value targeting\u0022 (HVT) involving air strikes and special forces operations against insurgent leaders can be effective, but can also havenegative effects including increasing violence and greater popular support for extremist groups.The leaked document is classified secret and \u0022NoForn\u0022 (meaning not to be distributed to non-US nationals) and reviews attacks by the United States and other countries engaged in counter-insurgency operations over the past 50\u0026nbsp;years.The CIA assessment is the first leaked secret intelligence document published by WikiLeaks since 2011. Led by Australian publisher Julian Assange, the anti-secrecy group says the CIA assessment is the first in what will be a new series of leaked documents relating to the US agency.The 2009 CIA study lends support to critics of US drone strikes in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen by warning that such operations \u0022may increase support for the insurgents, particularly if these strikes enhance insurgent leaders\u0026#039; lore, if non-combatants are killed in the attacks, if legitimate or semi-legitimate politicians aligned with the insurgents are targeted, or if the government is already seen as overly repressive or violent\u0022.Drone strikes have been a key element of the Obama administration\u0026#039;s attacks on Islamic extremist terrorist and insurgent groups in the Middle East and south Asia. Australia has directly supported these strikes through the electronic espionage operations of the US-Australian Joint Defence Facility at Pine Gap near Alice Springs in the Northern Territory.