September, 21 2021, 11:48am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Lindsay Meiman
Senior U.S. Communications Specialist
lindsay@350.org
us-comms@350.org
+1 347 460 9082
New York, USA
'US Pledge Sets the Tone, But We Need Stronger Climate Finance Commitments in Order to Truly Support the Most Vulnerable Communities'
At the United Nations General Assembly, President Joe Biden promised to double US public finance, including for adaptation efforts.
WASHINGTON
President Joe Biden announced today at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) he will double US climate finance for vulnerable nations from the previously promised $5.7bn a year by 2024, including for adaptation. The climate movement welcomes the pledge, but reinforces the need for stronger and more ambitious commitments, especially from the richest governments.
This is the first big multilateral moment on the road to COP26, and communities all over the globe are hoping for clear commitments on pledges to tackle the climate crisis, and a concrete delivery plan to show how financial gaps will be filled.
Following the pronouncements, 350.org's spokespeople commented the following:
Cansin Leylim, Associate Director of Global Campaigns at 350.org:
"Biden's pledge set the tone, but now we need to see all countries follow with action and a delivery plan. We can't afford further delay. We need strong, committed climate action from governments worldwide. Wealthy governments so far have failed to put their money where their mouth is. For COP26 to deliver, multilateralism is more important than ever. Leaders should work together to overcome the challenge of access to climate finance once and for all. G20 countries need to step up on the 1.5degC target and wealthy countries need to deliver on the US$100bn climate finance goal and go beyond. The lack of strong commitments means that world leaders are turning their back on the communities most affected by the impacts of climate change."
Thanu Yakupitiyage, US Communications Director, 350.org:
"We applaud President Biden's pledge to double climate aid for nations hit first and hardest by the climate crisis. The United States is responsible for the largest amount of historical emissions driving climate change and is the world's largest economy. This move by Biden signals recognition of the United States' duty to step up on climate finance and lead the world with bold climate action. We call on Biden to continue this climate finance leadership by appointing a climate champion to the Federal Reserve."
Nicolo Wojewoda, Europe Regional Director, 350.org:
"This is a critical year for climate action. Countries must urgently increase their ambition and set stronger emission reduction targets. Rich countries that have caused the climate crisis need to pay their climate debt to the countries who have contributed least and are hit hardest. Now is the time to do everything we can to keep global temperature increases below the 1.5C limit. The UK government has already failed to ensure vaccinations are made available to delegations from around the world to allow the COP26 climate talks to be a more equal space. The UK government is also backing more oil drilling in the North Sea, refuses to rule out a new coal mine in Cumbria, and continues pumping billions of stimulus cash into fossil fuels. Its self-proclaimed climate leadership risks being as empty as the stripped-down negotiations it's about to preside over."
Landry Ninteretse, 350 Africa Regional Director:
"Now more than ever the developed nations need to honour their climate finance commitments to drastically reduce their emissions, fund the just transition to a low carbon economy and help build resilient societies, especially in developing countries confronted with extreme climate impacts. Between now and COP26 we need to see a greater show of commitment to honour climate finance pledges and significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions, by the developed world."
Joseph Sikulu, Managing Director, 350 Pacific:
"Urgent collective action is required especially for the most affected countries and communities. The Pacific has felt these impacts strongly in the past few months with tropical cyclones such as Yasa and Ana. COP26 will be a pivotal event, and failure to deliver on its goals means bringing literal disaster not just for Pacific Islanders but for communities across the world."
Ilan Zugman, Managing Director, 350.org Latin America, based in Curitiba, Brazil:
"Bolsonaro's speech was a piece of fiction. As the destruction of the Amazon advances rapidly and Indigenous Peoples fight bravely against government-supported attacks on their lands, the Brazilian president, a climate crisis denier, distorts data and contradicts his own statements to pretend he is working for the environment. Brazil has a strong civil society that has been pushing for radical changes in environmental policies, but until that happens, the global community needs to make it clear that they see Bolsonaro's lies and that it will take more than poorly staged theater for the country to regain international trust."
Norly Mercado, Asia Regional Director, 350.org:
"Asia is home to more than half of the global population and finds itself on the frontlines of the dual crisis of climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic. Millions in the region are already experiencing the effects of climate change, while simultaneously confronting vaccine inequality. We need world leaders to commit to meaningful multilateral action on these issues now."
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
LATEST NEWS
Billionaire Palantir Co-Founder Pushes Return of Public Hangings as Part of 'Masculine Leadership' Initiative
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," said one critic in response.
Dec 07, 2025
Venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of data platform company Palantir, is calling for the return of public hangings as part of a broader push to restore what he describes as "masculine leadership" to the US.
In a statement posted on X Friday, Lonsdale said that he supported changing the so-called "three strikes" anti-crime law to ensure that anyone who is convicted of three violent crimes gets publicly executed, rather than simply sent to prison for life.
"If I’m in charge later, we won’t just have a three strikes law," he wrote. "We will quickly try and hang men after three violent crimes. And yes, we will do it in public to deter others."
Lonsdale then added that "our society needs balance," and said that "it's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable."
Lonsdale's views on public hangings being necessary to restore "masculine leadership" drew swift criticism.
Gil Durán, a journalist who documents the increasingly authoritarian politics of Silicon Valley in his newsletter "The Nerd Reich," argued in a Saturday post that Lonsdale's call for public hangings showed that US tech elites are "entering a more dangerous and desperate phase of radicalization."
"For months, Peter Thiel guru Curtis Yarvin has been squawking about the need for more severe measures to cement Trump's authoritarian rule," Durán explained. "Peter Thiel is ranting about the Antichrist in a global tour. And now Lonsdale—a Thiel protégé—is fantasizing about a future in which he will have the power to unleash state violence at mass scale."
Taulby Edmondson, an adjunct professor of history, religion, and culture at Virginia Tech, wrote in a post on Bluesky that the rhetoric Lonsdale uses to justify the return of public hangings has even darker intonations than calls for state-backed violence.
"A point of nuance here: 'masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable' is how lynch mobs are described, not state-sanctioned executions," he observed.
Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll argued that Lonsdale's remarks were symbolic of a kind of performative masculinity that has infected US culture.
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," he wrote.
Tech entrepreneur Anil Dash warned Lonsdale that his call for public hangings could have unintended consequences for members of the Silicon Valley elite.
"Well, Joe, Mark Zuckerberg has sole control over Facebook, which directly enabled the Rohingya genocide," he wrote. "So let’s have the conversation."
And Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin noted that Lonsdale has been a major backer of the University of Austin, an unaccredited liberal arts college that has been pitched as an alternative to left-wing university education with the goal of preparing "thoughtful and ethical innovators, builders, leaders, public servants and citizens through open inquiry and civil discourse."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hegseth Defends Boat Bombings as New Details Further Undermine Administration's Justifications
The boat targeted in the infamous September 2 "double-tap" strike was not even headed for the US, Adm. Frank Bradley revealed to lawmakers.
Dec 07, 2025
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday defended the Trump administration's policy of bombing suspected drug-trafficking vessels even as new details further undermined the administration's stated justifications for the policy.
According to the Guardian, Hegseth told a gathering at the Ronald Reagan presidential library that the boat bombings, which so far have killed at least 87 people, are necessary to protect Americans from illegal drugs being shipped to the US.
"If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you," Hegseth said. "Let there be no doubt about it."
However, leaked details about a classified briefing delivered to lawmakers last week by Adm. Frank Bradley about a September 2 boat strike cast new doubts on Hegseth's justifications.
CNN reported on Friday that Bradley told lawmakers that the boat taken out by the September 2 attack was not even headed toward the US, but was going "to link up with another, larger vessel that was bound for Suriname," a small nation in the northeast of South America.
While Bradley acknowledged that the boat was not heading toward the US, he told lawmakers that the strike on it was justified because the drugs it was carrying could have theoretically wound up in the US at some point.
Additionally, NBC News reported on Saturday that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth had ordered all 11 men who were on the boat targeted by the September 2 strike to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted."
This is relevant because the US military launched a second strike during the September 2 operation to kill two men who had survived the initial strike on their vessel, which many legal experts consider to be either a war crime or an act of murder under domestic law.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, watched video of the September 2 double-tap attack last week, and he described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” Himes explained. “Now, there’s a whole set of contextual items that the admiral explained. Yes, they were carrying drugs. They were not in position to continue their mission in any way... People will someday see this video and they will see that that video shows, if you don’t have the broader context, an attack on shipwrecked sailors.”
While there has been much discussion about the legality of the September 2 double-tap strike in recent days, some critics have warned that fixating on this particular aspect of the administration's policy risks taking the focus off the illegality of the boat-bombing campaign as a whole.
Daphne Eviatar, director for security and human rights for Amnesty International USA, said on Friday that the entire boat-bombing campaign has been "illegal under both domestic and international law."
"All of them constitute murder because none of the victims, whether or not they were smuggling illegal narcotics, posed an imminent threat to life," she said. "Congress must take action now to stop the US military from murdering more people in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Memo Shows Pam Bondi Wants List of 'Domestic Terrorism' Groups Who Express 'Anti-American Sentiment'
"Millions of Americans like you and I could be the target," warned journalist Ken Klippenstein of the new memo.
Dec 07, 2025
A leaked memo written by US Attorney General Pam Bondi directs the Department of Justice to compile a list of potential "domestic terrorism" organizations that espouse "extreme viewpoints on immigration, radical gender ideology, and anti-American sentiment."
The memo, which was obtained by journalist Ken Klippenstein, expands upon National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7), a directive signed by President Donald Trump in late September that demanded a "national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts."
The new Bondi memo instructs law enforcement agencies to refer "suspected" domestic terrorism cases to the Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs), which will then undertake an "exhaustive investigation contemplated by NSPM-7" that will incorporate "a focused strategy to root out all culpable participants—including organizers and funders—in all domestic terrorism activities."
The memo identifies the "domestic terrorism threat" as organizations that use "violence or the threat of violence" to advance political goals such as "opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders; adherence to radical gender ideology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, or anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; hostility towards traditional views on family, religion, and morality."
Commenting on the significance of the memo, Klippenstein criticized mainstream media organizations for largely ignoring the implications of NSPM-7, which was drafted and signed in the wake of the murder of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.
"For months, major media outlets have largely blown off the story of NSPM-7, thinking it was all just Trump bluster and too crazy to be serious," he wrote. "But a memo like this one shows you that the administration is absolutely taking this seriously—even if the media are not—and is actively working to operationalize NSPM-7."
Klippenstein also warned that NSPM-7 appeared to be the start of a new "war on terrorism," but "only this time, millions of Americans like you and I could be the target."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


