

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Timothy Karr, 201-533-8838
On Monday, British outlet Channel 4 News reported that it had gained access to a massive database of voter information that was used by the 2016 Trump Campaign to discourage Black people from going to the polls.
According to the report, the campaign had categorized more than 3.5 million Black American voters for "deterrence." They reportedly received Facebook political ads that discouraged them from turning out to vote on Election Day 2016, and indeed Black turnout was the lowest it had been for a general election in 20 years.
On Monday, British outlet Channel 4 News reported that it had gained access to a massive database of voter information that was used by the 2016 Trump Campaign to discourage Black people from going to the polls.
According to the report, the campaign had categorized more than 3.5 million Black American voters for "deterrence." They reportedly received Facebook political ads that discouraged them from turning out to vote on Election Day 2016, and indeed Black turnout was the lowest it had been for a general election in 20 years.
Facebook actively helped the Trump Campaign place these ads in 2016, but is now refusing to tell Channel 4 News reporters much more, including what ads were used, where they were placed, and how voters of color were targeted.
In 2016, Facebook still provided advertisers with tools that allowed them to target audiences by their "religious and ethnic affinities." These tools were known to realtors, for instance, some of whom used the technology to exclude people of color from seeing certain property ads. And while Facebook banned such discriminatory targeting in 2018, it still refuses to reveal whether it helped the Trump campaign target voters by race in 2016, or whether Facebook helped the Trump campaign show Black people ads that discouraged them from voting.
Free Press Action Vice President of Cultural Strategy Collette Watson made the following statement:
"We now have the receipts on the ways Donald Trump's 2016 campaign used Facebook to target Black voters and suppress their vote. Facebook needs to come clean about the role it played in discouraging Black voters in 2016, and may continue to be playing in 2020.
"Facebook is the newest frontier in a long history of suppression of the Black vote, dating back to the poll taxes of the Jim Crow South and still evident in the recent decision revoking the voting rights of formerly incarcerated people in Florida. We know there are forces in this country who want to take away Black folks' right to vote. The question is whether Facebook's leaders are content providing the tools that make digital racist disenfranchisement possible.
"The Trump campaign spent tens of millions of dollars on Facebook political ads in the 2016 campaign. Facebook was willing to pocket this money but has chosen not to be transparent about the ads.
"As we approach another contentious election it's time for Facebook to make good on its commitment to fight racism and disinformation. It must submit for an independent race-equity audit all 2016, 2018 and 2020 political ads placed by local, state and federal candidates, including their related targeting data."
Free Press Action Senior Policy Counsel Gaurav Laroia made the following statement:
"These kinds of data abuses imperil democracy and undermine the legitimacy of our elections. As the 2020 election season is underway we must be dead certain that discriminatory targeting and voter disenfranchisement isn't still happening. We must also ensure that Congress pass privacy legislation that prevents anyone that collects, uses and secures our personal information from using it in a discriminatory manner.
"These companies have used our data to enable and sometimes even participate in discrimination against people of color, women, members of the LGBTQ community, religious minorities, people with disabilities, immigrants and other marginalized communities.
"Free Press Action and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law have created a legislative draft that calls on Congress to protect civil rights and privacy online. We believe that privacy rights are civil rights. A new bargain must be struck between ordinary people and the powerful companies that act as gatekeepers to participation in 21st-century life.
"Congress must pass privacy legislation that ensures that powerful interests like Facebook and its advertisers don't use our data in ways that violate our rights and silence our voices. We must have control over how our personal information is used, and prohibit its use to build systems that oppress, discriminate, disenfranchise and exacerbate segregation.
"Freely and fairly participating in our elections is a hard-won and still embattled right. The continued fallout from the 2016 election shows how abusive and exploitative data practices can imperil those rights. Privacy and civil rights go hand in hand. We must protect both."
"China firmly supports Cuba in safeguarding national sovereignty and security and opposing external interference," a Beijing spokesperson said.
As the Trump administration weaponizes its economic privation of the Cuban people in hopes of ousting their socialist government, China on Tuesday reaffirmed its pledge to help alleviate the island's worsening oil shortage.
Emboldened by his recent abduction of socialist Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro on legally dubious "narco-terrorism" charges, President Donald Trump is ratcheting up pressure on a people already ravaged by 64 years of what many critics call Washington's "economic terrorism" and decades of actual terrorism committed by US-based right-wing Cuban exiles.
Cut off from the Venezuelan petroleum that provided around 75% of Cuba's imported oil just a few years ago, the island is suffering a worsening energy emergency. The Cuban government has responded by strictly rationing fuel and seeking alternate sources of oil such as Mexico and, to a lesser extent, Russia.
"I would like to stress again that China firmly supports Cuba in safeguarding national sovereignty and security and opposing external interference," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said during a press conference.
"China stands firmly against the inhumane actions that deprive the Cuban people of their right to subsistence and development," he added. "China will, as always, do our best to provide support and assistance to Cuba."
As is usually the case when Washington tightens the screws on Cuba, everyday Cubans are suffering the most.
“You can’t imagine how it touches every part of our lives,” Marta Jiménez, a hairdresser in Cuba’s eastern city of Holguín, told CodePink co-founder and frequent Common Dreams opinion contributor Medea Benjamin, who traveled to Cuba last week with a group to deliver 2,500 pounds of lentils.
“It’s a vicious, all-encompassing spiral downward," Jiménez continued. "With no gasoline, buses don’t run, so we can’t get to work. We have electricity only three to six hours a day. There’s no gas for cooking, so we’re burning wood and charcoal in our apartments. It’s like going back 100 years."
"The blockade is suffocating us—especially single mothers,” she added, “and no one is stopping these demons, Trump and [Secretary of State] Marco Rubio.”
The United Nations General Assembly has voted overwhelmingly every year but once since 1992 to condemn the US blockade on Cuba. Last October, the UNGA voted 165-7 against the embargo, with 12 abstentions.
"Your Department of Justice initially released this list of 32 survivors' names, with only one name redacted," Rep. Pramila Jayapal told Attorney General Pam Bondi.
US Attorney General Pam Bondi on Wednesday refused to apologize to victims of late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein during a contentious hearing before the House Judiciary Committee.
During the hearing, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) grilled Bondi on why her office failed repeatedly to comply with a law passed in 2025 requiring the US Department of Justice (DOJ) to release "all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in DOJ’s possession that relate to the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein."
In particular, Jayapal noted that some of the files released by the DOJ so far have kept victims' names intact, even while redacting the names of several powerful men who are implicated in Epstein's sex trafficking operation.
"Your Department of Justice initially released this list of 32 survivors' names, with only one name redacted," said Jayapal, who then slammed the DOJ for releasing files that not only included victims' names but also their email and residential addresses, and even nude photographs of them.
🚨HISTORIC. Rep. Jayapal asks Epstein survivors to raise their hand if they still haven't been invited to meet with Pam Bondi or the DOJ.
Every single one raises their hand.
Sometimes gestures are more powerful than words. Damn this Administration.
pic.twitter.com/jyYG7Mj6tN
— CALL TO ACTIVISM (@CalltoActivism) February 11, 2026
"Survivors are now telling us that their families are finding out for the first time that they were trafficked by Epstein," Jayapal continued. "In their words, 'This release does not provide closure, it feels like a deliberate attempt to intimidate survivors, punish those who came forward, and reinforce the same culture of secrecy that allowed Epstein's crimes to continue for decades.'"
Jayapal then invited the Epstein survivors who were in attendance at the hearing to stand if they so wished, and asked them to raise their hands if they had still yet to meet with the DOJ to discuss the case.
After several women stood and raised their hands, Jayapal asked Bondi if she would apologize to them failing to redact their names and personal information before releasing the Epstein files.
Bondi responded by trying to deflect blame for past failures onto former Attorney General Merrick Garland. Jayapal interrupted the attorney general and asked her if she would apologize to the survivors for disclosing their information.
Bondi again tried to redirect the conversation to Garland, after which Jayapal again objected.
Finally, Bondi responded, "I'm not going to get in the gutter for [Jayapal's] theatrics."
A report released Wednesday by a key Democratic senator details how President Donald Trump's "economic policies are making life unaffordable for millions of American small businesses, their workers, and their customers."
Since Trump returned to power last year, "America's 36 million small businesses and their workers have faced increased costs for everything from healthcare to electricity, groceries, childcare, housing, and other everyday necessities," notes Pain Street, the new report from Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), ranking member of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
The report highlights Republicans' so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which slashed various benefits for US families, and their refusal to extend Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies that helped over 20 million Americans afford health insurance.
The OBBBA's $1 trillion Medicaid cut "is devastating for small businesses," the document declares, noting that 630,000 owners and more than 7.5 million workers at such companies rely on the federal program for healthcare coverage. Additionally, over 10 million owners and employees relied on the ACA tax credits that expired at the end of last year.
The publication also points to the president's attacks on clean energy and support for the planet-wrecking fossil fuel industry that helped him secure a second term. It says that "household electric bills have increased by 11.5%, and commercial electric bills have increased by 9%," stressing that such costs have climbed "more than three times faster than the overall rate of inflation."

The report also spotlights the "whiplash and cost of Trump's reckless tariffs," emphasizing that while the president often claims foreign countries are paying for his import taxes, "analysis by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy found that 96% of Trump's tariffs are being paid by American importers and consumers."
Specifically, since last March, US small businesses have shelled out more than $63.1 billion because of Trump tariffs. California—the world's fifth-largest economy—leads the state-by-state breakdown, at $14.3 billion, followed by Texas ($7 billion), New York ($4.9 billion), New Jersey ($4.1 billion), Georgia ($3.9 billion), Florida ($3.6 billion), Illinois ($2.3 billion), Ohio ($2 billion), Michigan ($1.7 billion), and South Carolina ($1.6 billion).

The president also claims that his tariffs are spurring a "manufacturing renaissance," but "approximately 98% of manufacturers in the United States employ fewer than 500 workers, with 75% of manufacturers employing fewer than 20," the report states. "US manufacturing shrank for the 10th consecutive month in December, and US factories have shed 72,000 jobs since Trump's 'liberation day' in April."
Adding to the evidence of Trump's negative impact, the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced Wednesday that across all sectors, US employers added just 181,000 jobs last year, far below its initial estimate of 584,000, and the country's economy has more than a million fewer jobs than previously reported.

Markey's staff further found that "soaring rents have left a record 22.6 million renters—approximately 50% of all renters in the US—struggling to afford their rent," 70% of families said last year that raising children is too expensive, and Trump's deportation agenda is estimated to reduce the number of immigrant and US-born workers by more than 5 million.
"Small businesses don't have Mar-a-Lago memberships, golden gifts, or ballroom invitations granting them special exemptions from Trump’s reckless economic policies, including his tariff taxes," Markey said in a statement announcing the report.
"Since Inauguration Day, Trump has made life more expensive for Americans—driving up costs on everything from healthcare, electricity, and groceries to childcare and housing—all while giving tax cuts to CEO billionaires and currying favors with big business," he continued. "As Trump's affordability crisis wreaks havoc on Main Street, we must fight back to protect small businesses, working families, and communities in Massachusetts and across the country."
As part of that fight, Markey has tried to pass multiple pieces of legislation that would exempt small businesses from Trump's tariffs, but both chambers of Congress remain narrowly controlled by the president's Republican Party.