September, 02 2015, 03:30pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
350.org, Brett Fleishman, (970) 376-5041
Senator Kevin de León, Claire Conlon, (916) 651-4024
California Assembly Votes to Divest Public Pension Funds From Coal
S.B. 185, a bill calling for CalPERS and CalSTRS to divest from coal, heads to Governor Jerry Brown’s desk after 43-27 vote in State Assembly
SACRAMENTO, Calif.
With a vote of 43 for and 27 against, the California State Assembly voted to divest the state's public pension funds, CalPERS and CalSTRS, from thermal coal. Now that it's passed both houses of the state legislature, S.B. 185 will head to the desk of Governor Jerry Brown for his signature or veto. If signed into law, S.B. 185 would make the two massive and influential institutions the first statewide public pension funds in the nation to divest from any fossil fuels.
"Coal is losing value quickly and investing in coal is a losing proposition for our retirees; it's a nuisance to public health; and it's inconsistent with our values as a state on the forefront of efforts to address global climate change," said Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon. "California's utilities are phasing out coal, and it's time our pension funds did the same."
The fossil fuel divestment is challenging institutions, individuals, and governments to show climate leadership and align their investments with their values by divesting from fossil fuels ahead of December's climate talks in Paris.
"This is a big moment for California, and for everyone around the world standing up to the most powerful and destructive industry in history," said May Boeve, Executive Director of 350.org. "Today's vote is so meaningful because it sends a strong message: political leadership on climate change means being willing to stand up to powerful moneyed interests, and call out the destructive practices of the companies causing the climate crisis. Even in California, there's still more to do -- like divesting public pension funds from oil and gas, and banning extreme energy extraction techniques like fracking -- but this is a big step that adds major momentum to our campaign. Leaders in New York, Massachusetts, and around the country would be wise to take note and follow suit."
This vote comes shortly after a report from Trillium Asset Management revealed that, combined, CalPERS and CalSTRS incurred over $5 billion in losses from their holdings in fossil fuel companies in the last year alone, strengthening the case for turning away from all fossil fuels.
"I wrote the first-in-the-nation resolution calling for fossil fuel divestment, which passed my Ventura County Democratic Party back in 2013, and was ultimately passed by the California Democratic Party this spring," said RL Miller, cofounder of Climate Hawks Vote and Chair of the California Democratic Party's environmental caucus. "Though S.B. 185 is narrower, as it only calls for coal divestment, the work within the state's Democratic Party has enlightened a lot of activists to the need for full fossil fuel divestment, and S.B. 185 is the right bill at the right time. Once passed, I expect the bill to unleash a flood of actions in other states with similar bills."
S.B. 185, introduced by Senator de Leon, is one of eleven bills included in the California Climate Leadership Package. Other noteworthy bills include S.B. 350, and S.B. 32, which call for significant reductions in fossil fuel use and emissions, as well as an increase in the use of renewables to generate electricity and energy efficiency.
"Addressing the climate crisis is a moral imperative," said Jim Miller, member of the American Federation of Teachers, Local 1931 VP/Chair SD-Imperial Counties Labor Council Environmental Caucus. "Although much more still needs to be done, S.B. 185 and the Climate Leadership Package are an important step in the right direction if we are serious about saving our children's future."
This announcement comes shortly after the Executive Director of the California Academy of Sciences, Jonathan Foley, issued a strong statement on the museum's extensive efforts to disentangle themselves from the fossil fuel industry. His statement was a direct response to a new campaign launched by The Natural History Museum and 350.org calling on the country's top science and natural history museums to cut ties with the fossil fuel industry.
The campaign for S.B. 185 is part of a growing worldwide push to divest the financial holdings of universities, religious institutions, municipalities, pension funds, and other investors from fossil fuel companies. For more information on S.B. 185, visit: https://focus.senate.ca.gov/climate.
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
LATEST NEWS
In Fiery Speech, Ocasio-Cortez Rips GOP Budget Bill as 'Deal With the Devil'
"It explodes our national debt, it militarizes our entire economy, and it strips away healthcare and basic dignity of the American people. For what? To give Elon Musk a tax break and billionaires the greedy taking of our nation."
Jul 02, 2025
U.S. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez delivered a scathing condemnation of the GOP's budget reconciliation package—particularly its devastating cuts to Medicaid—in remarks on the House floor Wednesday as Republicans worked to send the legislation to President Donald Trump's desk.
"This bill is a deal with the devil," said Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). "It explodes our national debt, it militarizes our entire economy, and it strips away healthcare and basic dignity of the American people. For what? To give Elon Musk a tax break and billionaires the greedy taking of our nation. We cannot stand for it, and we will not support it."
"You should be ashamed," she added.
AOC: "On this point of tax on tips, as one of the only people in this body who has lived off of tips, I want to tell you a little bit about the scam ... the cap on that is $25,000 while you're jacking up taxes on people who make less than $50,000 across the US ... while kicking… pic.twitter.com/5VrEbJNnHl
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 2, 2025
Ocasio-Cortez expressed contempt for the Trump-backed Republican bill's proposed tax deduction for tips, which would be capped at $25,000 per year.
The New York Democrat argued the provision is effectively meaningless "while you're jacking up taxes on people who make less than $50,000 across the United States while taking away their [nutrition assistance], while taking away their Medicaid, while kicking them off of the [Affordable Care Act] and their healthcare extensions."
"So if you're at home and you're living off tips, you do the math," she added. "Is that worth it to you? Losing all your healthcare, not able to feed your babies, not being able to put a diaper on their bottom, in exchange for what?"
If approved, the Republican reconciliation bill would strip health coverage from at least 17 million Americans, according to expert estimates. That number includes the roughly 12 million who would lose coverage due to the bill's Medicaid cuts and millions more who would be left uninsured by the GOP's refusal to extend ACA subsidies that are set to expire at the end of the year.
"President Trump had issued some statements throughout this process saying and urging, insisting, that this bill does not cut Medicaid," Ocasio-Cortez said Wednesday. "President Trump, you're either being lied to or you are lying, because this bill represents... the largest and greatest loss of healthcare in American history."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Matter of Life and Death': New Tracker Exposes Trump Regime's Attack on Disaster Preparedness
"It's only a matter of time before Trump and Musk's reckless assault on disaster response and preparedness kills people in the United States," said a researcher with government watchdog The Revolving Door Project.
Jul 02, 2025
President Donald Trump has openly stated his desire to dismantle the Federal Emergency Management Agency—a move that has left some experts fearful about how the United States will handle natural disasters such as hurricanes in the coming months.
The Revolving Door Project, a government watchdog group, has now put together a tracking tool to keep tabs on how much the administration's attacks on both FEMA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have worsened the nation's disaster preparedness.
The tool has two components: An interactive map showing all of the state disaster aid requests that the Trump administration has outright denied or only partially approved and an interactive timeline documenting all of the times that the administration has undermined the functionality of America's disaster preparedness agencies through actions such as placing agency employees on administrative leave and disbanding key bodies such as FEMA's National Advisory Council and its National Dam Safety Review Board.
All of these disruptions and cuts, argued Revolving Door Project senior researcher Kenny Stancil, are likely to come back to bite America in a big way when another natural disaster strikes.
"It's only a matter of time before Trump and Musk's reckless assault on disaster response and preparedness kills people in the United States," he said in explaining the need for the initiative. "It nearly happened in mid-May in Kentucky, where a DOGE-damaged NWS forecast office had to scramble for staff before a tornado. Amid last week's heatwave, low-income households across the country were missing the federal support they need to keep the air conditioning on. And when a major hurricane arrives, Trump, Musk, OMB Director Russell Vought, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem will almost certainly have blood on their hands."
Revolving Door Project executive director Jeff Hauser issued a similarly dire warning about the administration's actions on U.S. disaster preparedness and he described the actions being taken by the administration as "a matter of life-and-death." He also accused the administration of "preventing forecasters and emergency managers at all levels from doing what is necessary to prepare for and respond to disasters."
Trump in the past has tried to use federal disaster relief money as a cudgel against his political opponents, such as when he threatened to withhold funding from California during catastrophic wildfires unless the state did a better job of "raking" its forests.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Wisconsin Supreme Court Strikes Down 'Archaic' 1849 Abortion Ban
While welcoming the "monumental win," the ACLU of Wisconsin's leader also stressed it's no time to back off the fight. "The political attacks on reproductive justice will not slow down, and we must remain vigilant."
Jul 02, 2025
Rights advocates celebrated Wednesday after the Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority struck down the state's abortion ban from 1849, but campaigners also emphasized that threats to specific healthcare providers and reproductive freedom in general persist.
After the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organizationdecision nixed nationwide abortion rights, the Badger State's anti-choice movement argued that the old ban, § 940.04(1), was back in effect. However, the Wisconsin top court concluded 4-3 that it is not, pointing to the state Legislature's actions between Dobbs and Roe v. Wade in 1973.
"We conclude that comprehensive legislation enacted over the last 50 years regulating in detail the 'who, what, where, when, and, how' of abortion so thoroughly covers the entire subject of abortion that it was meant as a substitute for the 19th century near-total ban on abortion," Justice Rebecca Frank Dallet wrote for the majority. "Accordingly, we hold that the legislature impliedly repealed § 940.04(1) as to abortion, and that § 940.04(1) therefore does not ban abortion in the state of Wisconsin."
"With this new ruling from our state's highest court, it's time for Wisconsin Republicans to stop forcing their way into our exam rooms."
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin initially stopped providing abortions due to uncertainty over the old ban but resumed care a few months after Dane County Judge Diane Schlipper ruled in July 2023 that "there is no such thing as an '1849 abortion ban' in Wisconsin." Joel Urmanski, Sheboygan County's Republican district attorney, asked Schlipper to reconsider her decision, but she reaffirmed it that December. Urmanski then turned to the state's top court, resulting in Wednesday's ruling.
"Today's ruling is another important step forward in protecting and expanding access to abortion in Wisconsin," Planned Parenthood Advocates of Wisconsin said on social media. "Since the overturning of Roe, Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin has maintained that Wis. Stat. 940.04 could not be enforced against abortion providers. This final ruling again confirms this."
"While we celebrate this ruling, there is more to be done. We will continue essential work to help protect and expand reproductive freedom in Wisconsin so that everyone who needs comprehensive reproductive healthcare in our state can get the nonjudgmental and compassionate care they deserve," the group added, thanking Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Attorney General Josh Kaul "for their leadership and efforts to protect reproductive freedom in Wisconsin."
BREAKING: We won! In a lawsuit we brought more than three years ago now, the Wisconsin Supreme Court just ruled to protect reproductive freedom in our state and preserve Wisconsinites' access to abortion care.My statement below ⬇️
[image or embed]
— Governor Tony Evers (@govevers.wisconsin.gov) July 2, 2025 at 10:02 AM
Melinda Brennan, executive director of the ACLU of Wisconsin, had a similar reaction to the new decision, saying in a Wednesday statement that "we have been waiting for this moment since the United States Supreme Court overturned our constitutional right and generational expectation to abortion."
"Since then," she said, "pregnant people in Wisconsin have dealt with the catastrophic consequences of having their bodily autonomy stripped from them—including forced pregnancy, denial of critical medical care for pregnancy-related complications like miscarriage, and having to leave home just to get the treatment they need and deserve. Even though that right was restored by lower courts, the fact that the Wisconsin Supreme Court has now rendered the criminal abortion ban unenforceable means Wisconsinites no longer have to fear the archaic 1849 ban could go back into effect."
"With the ban struck down, Wisconsin is a more free and more just place to live," she added. "But that doesn't mean it's time to back down. The political attacks on reproductive justice will not slow down, and we must remain vigilant to make sure everyone who can get pregnant has access to the full range of reproductive healthcare, no matter where in the state they live. Politicians will keep trying to legislate away and restrict our reproductive rights, as well as roll back LGBTQ rights, freedom of expression, and more. While we should celebrate this monumental win, we can't let up."
Great news! The Wisconsin Supreme Court finally struck down an 1849 law that stripped women's rights through a near-total abortion ban. This move protects women's access to medical care and their right to control what happens to their own bodies.
— Rep. Mark Pocan (@pocan.house.gov) July 2, 2025 at 11:58 AM
Lucy Ripp of A Better Wisconsin Together, a progressive research and communications hub affiliated with ProgressNow, responded to the ruling by urging elected Republicans in the state to stop attacking reproductive freedom.
"The Wisconsin Supreme Court's ruling in this case is a historic step forward in protecting and expanding abortion rights in Wisconsin," said Ripp. "We applaud the progressive majority on the court for taking this case and ruling to protect Wisconsinites' right to access abortion care."
"In the face of relentless attacks from Republicans, the vast majority of Wisconsinites have said time and time again that decisions on abortion should be made between a patient and their doctor, not politicians," she declared. "With this new ruling from our state's highest court, it's time for Wisconsin Republicans to stop forcing their way into our exam rooms and finally put an end to their repeated attacks on our access to reproductive healthcare."
The swing state's highest court has attracted national attention in recent years, including with an April election to replace retiring Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, who joined Wednesday's majority opinion. This spring, Susan Crawford defeated far-right Brad Schimel, securing liberals' majority until 2028. Crawford is set to be sworn in at the beginning of August.
Because the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision is rooted in state law, SCOTUS cannot reverse it. Reproductive freedom has been restored in Wisconsin … but only for as long as its citizens continue to elect liberal state Supreme Court justices.
— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjsdc.bsky.social) July 2, 2025 at 9:56 AM
While the Wisconsin Supreme Court just affirmed the right to abortion in the state, access to such care remains at risk, in part due to recent action at the federal level. This week, Republicans in Congress are working to pass President Donald Trump's so-called Big Beautiful Bill, which critics call the "Big Ugly Bill" because of provisions including one to "defund" Planned Parenthood by blocking Medicaid payments to abortion providers.
After the U.S. Senate sent the megabill back to the House of Representatives on Tuesday, Planned Parenthood Action Fund president and CEO Alexis McGill Johnson blasted it as "a backdoor abortion ban," warning that "this bill threatens to close nearly 200 Planned Parenthood health centers and will create devastating gaps in our healthcare infrastructure by putting the full range of reproductive care, like birth control, cancer screenings, and STI testing and treatments out of reach for many."
In Wisconsin specifically, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinelreported Monday, "it would mean more than half of Planned Parenthood's revenue would vanish. Health centers would close and staff would be laid off, senior leaders have said. And the nearly 1 in 5 Wisconsin residents who are enrolled in Medicaid would no longer be able to receive care at Planned Parenthood."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular