January, 21 2011, 12:02pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Emily Robinson, Center for Neighborhood Technology, erobinson@cnt.org, 773-269-4043
Will Hewes, American Rivers, whewes@americanrivers.org, 202-347-7550
New Guide Helps Municipalities Monetize the Value of Green Infrastructure
Quantifying the economic value of green infrastructure's benefits is
the key to helping municipalities adopt this innovative and
cost-effective stormwater management approach, according to a new report
by the Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT) and American Rivers. "The Value of Green Infrastructure: A Guide to Recognizing Its Economic, Social and Environmental Benefits" is a broad analysis that is the first to place an economic value on the numerous benefits
WASHINGTON
Quantifying the economic value of green infrastructure's benefits is
the key to helping municipalities adopt this innovative and
cost-effective stormwater management approach, according to a new report
by the Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT) and American Rivers. "The Value of Green Infrastructure: A Guide to Recognizing Its Economic, Social and Environmental Benefits" is a broad analysis that is the first to place an economic value on the numerous benefits provided by green infrastructure.
The guide fills an information gap that has hampered widespread
deployment of green infrastructure--the practice of managing stormwater
with natural systems. "The Value of Green Infrastructure" brings
together current research on green infrastructure performance and
presents methods for calculating related benefits in water management,
energy, air quality, climate, and community livability.
"When you can assign economic value to the wide array of green
infrastructure benefits, planners, builders, and city officials can
accurately evaluate the advantages of these approaches for managing
stormwater in their communities," said Danielle Gallet, infrastructure
strategist at CNT and one of the principal authors of the guide.
"Establishing a framework for calculating the benefits of green
infrastructure is a first, key step to making it a mainstream practice."
Green infrastructure is a network of decentralized stormwater
management practices--such as green roofs, trees, rain gardens and
permeable pavement--that can capture and infiltrate rain where it falls,
reducing stormwater runoff and improving the health of surrounding
waterways. The practices provide multiple environmental, economic and
social benefits, including, but not limited to:
- Less polluted stormwater runoff
- Improved air quality
- Energy savings
- Increased property values, and
- Reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
"This guide helps quantify the multiple energy, economic and
environmental dividends we're seeing in Portland with our own
sustainable stormwater efforts," said Mike Rosen, Watershed Division
Manager of Portland's Bureau of Environmental Services. "Every planner,
stormwater manager or developer who's deciding how to invest their water
infrastructure dollars for the next 20 years should read this
informative, thought-provoking handbook."
Municipalities have often struggled to quantify green
infrastructure's monetary benefits. However, any cost-benefit analysis
comparing grey infrastructure with green infrastructure is incomplete if
it fails to factor in the multiple benefits that only green
infrastructure uniquely delivers. These benefits are above and beyond
the basic stormwater control benefits, which are assumed to be equal to a
similar investment in grey infrastructure.
The values presented in this guide are not the final word. More
research is needed to put more accurate dollar figures on the full range
of green infrastructure's benefits. Based on existing research data,
many of the estimates in this guide likely undervalue the true worth of
green infrastructure benefits, but it is an important first step in the
right direction.
"Living green infrastructure has just taken a giant leap forward with
the publication of this practical, user-friendly guide that will help
policy makers, designers, manufacturers and installers evaluate the many
benefits of these important and too often undervalued technologies,"
said Steven W. Peck, the founder and president of Green Roofs for
Healthy Cities.
Aurora, Illinois is an example of a municipality that understands the
many benefits conferred by green infrastructure. In 2009, the city
installed permeable pavers, bioswales and infiltration trenches at its
new police headquarters, managing the runoff from the property and from
adjacent uphill land. The features minimize the discharge of water and
pollutants to nearby Indian Creek and eliminate the persistent basement
flooding in nearby homes. The guide's aim is to make Aurora's efforts
standard practice across the nation.
"When you do the math, the benefits of green infrastructure really
add up," said Betsy Otto, Vice President for Conservation and Strategic
Partnerships at American Rivers, a funder of the project. "This guide
will help communities decide where, when, and to what extent green
infrastructure practices should be incorporated into their planning,
development and redevelopment activities."
###
American Rivers is the leading conservation
organization fighting for healthy rivers so communities can thrive.
American Rivers protects and restores the nation's rivers and the clean
water that sustains people, wildlife and nature. Founded in 1973,
American Rivers has more than 65,000 members and supporters, with
offices in Washington, DC and nationwide. Visit www.AmericanRivers.org.
Founded in 1978, CNT is a Chicago-based
think-and-do tank that works nationally to advance urban sustainability
by researching, inventing and testing strategies that use resources more
efficiently and equitably. Its programs focus on climate, energy,
natural resources, transportation, and community development. CNT is one
of eight nonprofits selected from around the world to be recognized by a
2009 MacArthur Award for Creative and Effective Institutions, from the
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Visit www.cnt.org for more information.
American Rivers is the only national organization standing up for healthy rivers so our communities can thrive. Through national advocacy, innovative solutions and our growing network of strategic partners, we protect and promote our rivers as valuable assets that are vital to our health, safety and quality of life. Founded in 1973, American Rivers has more than 65,000 members and supporters nationwide, with offices in Washington, DC and the Mid-Atlantic, Northeast, Midwest, Southeast, California and Northwest regions.
LATEST NEWS
National Team Member Becomes at Least 265th Palestinian Footballer Killed by Israel in Gaza
Muhannad al-Lili's killing by Israeli airstrike came as the world mourned the death of Portugal and Liverpool star Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva in a car crash in Spain.
Jul 04, 2025
Muhannad Fadl al-Lili, captain of the Al-Maghazi Services Club and a member of Palestine's national football team, died Thursday from injuries suffered during an Israeli airstrike on his family home in the central Gaza Strip earlier this week, making him the latest of hundreds of Palestinian athletes killed since the start of Israel's genocidal onslaught.
Al-Maghazi Services Club announced al-Lili's death in a Facebook tribute offering condolences to "his family, relatives, friends, and colleagues" and asking "Allah to shower him with his mercy."
The Palestine Football Association (PFA) said that "on Monday, a drone fired a missile at Muhannad's room on the third floor of his house, which led to severe bleeding in the skull."
"During the war of extermination against our people, Muhannad tried to travel outside Gaza to catch up with his wife, who left the strip for Norway on a work mission before the outbreak of the war," the association added. "But he failed to do so, and was deprived of seeing his eldest son, who was born outside the Gaza Strip."
According to the PFA, al-Lili is at least the 265th Palestinian footballer and 585th athlete to be killed by Israeli forces since they launched their assault and siege on Gaza following the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel. Sports journalist Leyla Hamed says 439 Palestinian footballers have been killed by Israel.
Overall, Israel's war—which is the subject of an International Court of Justice (ICJ) genocide case—has left more than 206,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing, and around 2 million more forcibly displaced, starved, or sickened, according to Gaza officials.
The Palestine Chronicle contrasted the worldwide press coverage of the car crash deaths of Portuguese footballer Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva with the media's relative silence following al-Lili's killing.
"Jota's death was a tragedy that touched millions," the outlet wrote. "Yet the death of Muhannad al-Lili... was met with near-total silence from global sports media."
Last week, a group of legal experts including two United Nations special rapporteurs appealed to the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, the world football governing body, demanding that its Governance Audit and Compliance Committee take action against the Israel Football Association for violating FIFA rules by playing matches on occupied Palestinian territory.
In July 2024, the ICJ found that Israel's then-57-year occupation of Palestine—including Gaza—is an illegal form of apartheid that should be ended as soon as possible.
During their invasion and occupation of Gaza, Israeli forces have also used sporting facilities including Yarmouk Stadium for the detention of Palestinian men, women, and children—many of whom have reported torture and other abuse at the hands of their captors.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Highly Inspiring' Court Ruling Affirms Nations' Legal Duty to Combat Climate Emergency
"While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections," said one observer.
Jul 04, 2025
In a landmark advisory opinion published Thursday, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights—of which the United States, the world's second-biggest carbon polluter, is not a member—affirmed the right to a stable climate and underscored nations' duty to act to protect it and address the worsening planetary emergency.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change," a summary of the 234-page ruling states. "Any rollback of climate or environmental policies that affect human rights must be exceptional, duly justified based on objective criteria, and comply with standards of necessity and proportionality."
"The court also held that... states must take all necessary measures to reduce the risks arising, on the one hand, from the degradation of the global climate system and, on the other, from exposure and vulnerability to the effects of such degradation," the summary adds.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change."
The case was brought before the Costa-Rica based IACtHR by Chile and Colombia, both of which "face the daily challenge of dealing with the consequences of the climate emergency, including the proliferation of droughts, floods, landslides, and fires, among others."
"These phenomena highlight the need to respond urgently and based on the principles of equity, justice, cooperation, and sustainability, with a human rights-based approach," the court asserted.
IACtHR President Judge Nancy Hernández López said following the ruling that "states must not only refrain from causing significant environmental damage but have the positive obligation to take measures to guarantee the protection, restoration, and regeneration of ecosystems."
"Causing massive and irreversible environmental harm...alters the conditions for a healthy life on Earth to such an extent that it creates consequences of existential proportions," she added. "Therefore, it demands universal and effective legal responses."
The advisory opinion builds on two landmark decisions last year. In April 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the Swiss government violated senior citizens' human rights by refusing to abide by scientists' warnings to rapidly phase out fossil fuel production.
The following month, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea found in an advisory opinion that greenhouse gas emissions are marine pollution under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and that signatories to the accord "have the specific obligation to adopt laws and regulations to prevent, reduce, and control" them.
The IACtHR advisory opinion is expected to boost climate and human rights lawsuits throughout the Americas, and to impact talks ahead of November's United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP30, in Belém, Brazil.
Climate defenders around the world hailed Thursday's advisory opinion, with United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk calling it "a landmark step forward for the region—and beyond."
"As the impact of climate change becomes ever more visible across the world, the court is clear: People have a right to a stable climate and a healthy environment," Türk added. "States have a bedrock obligation under international law not to take steps that cause irreversible climate and environmental damage, and they have a duty to act urgently to take the necessary measures to protect the lives and rights of everyone—both those alive now and the interests of future generations."
Amnesty International head of strategic litigation Mandi Mudarikwa said, "Today, the Inter-American Court affirmed and clarified the obligations of states to respect, ensure, prevent, and cooperate in order to realize human rights in the context of the climate crisis."
"Crucially, the court recognized the autonomous right to a healthy climate for both individuals and communities, linked to the right to a healthy environment," Mudarikwa added. "The court also underscored the obligation of states to protect cross-border climate-displaced persons, including through the issuance of humanitarian visas and protection from deportation."
Delta Merner, lead scientist at the Science Hub for Climate Litigation at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a statement that "this opinion sets an important precedent affirming that governments have a legal duty to regulate corporate conduct that drives climate harm."
"Though the United States is not a party to the treaty governing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, this opinion should be a clarion call for transnational fossil fuel companies that have deceived the public for decades about the risks of their products," Merner added. "The era of accountability is here."
Markus Gehring, a fellow and director of studies in law at Hughes Hall at the University of Cambridge in England, called the advisory opinion "highly inspiring" and "seminal."
Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans at Earthjustice, said that "the Inter-American Court's ruling makes clear that climate change is an overriding threat to human rights in the world."
"Governments must act to cut carbon emissions drastically," Caputo stressed. "While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections for all from the realities of climate harm."
Climate litigation is increasing globally in the wake of the 2015 Paris climate agreement. In the Americas, Indigenous peoples, children, and green groups are among those who have been seeking climate justice via litigation.
However, in the United States, instead of acknowledging the climate emergency, President Donald Trump has declared an "energy emergency" while pursuing a "drill, baby, drill" policy of fossil fuel extraction and expansion.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Admin Quietly Approves Massive Crude Oil Expansion Project
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest," said one environmental attorney.
Jul 04, 2025
The Trump administration has quietly fast-tracked a massive oil expansion project that environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers warned could have a destructive impact on local communities and the climate.
As reported recently by the Oil and Gas Journal, the plan "involves expanding the Wildcat Loadout Facility, a key transfer point for moving Uinta basin crude oil to rail lines that transport it to refineries along the Gulf Coast."
The goal of the plan is to transfer an additional 70,000 barrels of oil per day from the Wildcat Loadout Facility, which is located in Utah, down to the Gulf Coast refineries via a route that runs along the Colorado River. Controversially, the Trump administration is also plowing ahead with the project by invoking emergency powers to address energy shortages despite the fact that the United States for the last couple of years has been producing record levels of domestic oil.
Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) issued a joint statement condemning the Trump administration's push to approve the project while rushing through environmental impact reviews.
"The Bureau of Land Management's decision to fast-track the Wildcat Loadout expansion—a project that would transport an additional 70,000 barrels of crude oil on train tracks along the Colorado River—using emergency procedures is profoundly flawed," the Colorado Democrats said. "These procedures give the agency just 14 days to complete an environmental review—with no opportunity for public input or administrative appeal—despite the project's clear risks to Colorado. There is no credible energy emergency to justify bypassing public involvement and environmental safeguards. The United States is currently producing more oil and gas than any country in the world."
On Thursday, the Bureau of Land Management announced the completion of its accelerated environmental review of the project, drawing condemnation from climate advocates.
Wendy Park, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, described the administration's rush to approve the project as "pure hubris," especially given its "refusal to hear community concerns about oil spill risks." She added that "this fast-tracked review breezed past vital protections for clean air, public safety and endangered species."
Landon Newell, staff attorney for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, accused the Trump administration of manufacturing an energy emergency to justify plans that could have a dire impact on local habitats.
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest by authorizing the transport of more than 1 billion gallons annually of additional oil on railcars traveling alongside the Colorado River," he said. "Any derailment and oil spill would have a devastating impact on the Colorado River and the communities and ecosystems that rely upon it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular