

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Uzbek authorities should immediately drop any unsubstantiated
criminal charges against Oyazimhon Hidirova, chairman of the Arnasai
Branch of the International Human Rights Society of Uzbekistan, and
free her from pre-trial detention, Human Rights Watch said today.
Hidirova was arrested on July 28, 2009 at the Arnasai District
Department of Internal Affairs on preliminary charges of hooliganism
(two counts), fraud, and tax evasion. Human Rights Watch is concerned
that Hidirova's arrest and prosecution may be in retaliation for her
efforts to expose corruption by agricultural officials in Arnasai, a
district in the Jizzakh region of Uzbekistan. Since 2004 she has been a
member of the International Human Rights Organization, one of the few
human rights groups that have been permitted to register in
Uzbekistan.
"Hidirova's work to expose official corruption and abuse of farmers
may well have led to her arrest," said Holly Cartner, Europe and
Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch. "Over and over again, the
Uzbek government shows it cannot tolerate anyone who speaks out against
its corrupt and abusive practices."
Hidirova was detained for failing to report to the Department of
Internal Affairs for questioning. She had been summoned after an
allegation by the chairman of the local farm collective, Almaz Sodikov,
on June 25, that Hidirova had attacked him during an altercation,
causing him a light injury. As a result of the alleged assault,
Hidirova was charged with one count of hooliganism.
The second count of hooliganism (for allegedly insulting a
representative of the regional government and threatening to blow up a
regional government building) and the tax evasion and fraud charges
were added after she was detained, said Ziyodullo Razakov, Hidirova's
public defender (a non-lawyer who acts alongside a defendant's lawyer
in criminal proceedings) and chairman of the Jizzakh branch of the
International Human Rights Organization. Razakov believes the
additional allegations were added to imprison her because the sole
hooliganism charge would have been insufficient to justify pre-trial
detention.
Razakov says that there is insufficient evidence to substantiate the
additional charges brought against Hidirova. The prosecution alleges
that Hidirova failed to pay 2,971,100 soms [about US$1,990] in taxes
from 2006 to 2008. The fraud charges arise from allegations made by one
of her workers, who claims that she sold him farm collective land for
4,500,000 soms [about US$3,015]. Hidirova denies the allegations.
The second count of hooliganism and tax evasion allegations made by
Hidirova's two accusers are due to be tested starting on August 18,
2009 at the Arnasai District Department of Internal Affairs, during the
"initial confrontation" (ochana stavka), a part of the initial
investigation in which two witnesses or suspects with different stories
confront each other. Hidirova's lawyer, Lapas Kamolov, was informed
about the ochana stavka on August 13. Another "initial confrontation"
for the fraud charge was held on July 30.
Following her arrest, Hidirova was held at the Arnasai Detention
Facility until July 31. On that day, Judge Lutfullo Mamarajabov of the
Arnasai District Criminal Court approved her arrest and ordered that
Hidirova be remanded in custody during the investigation, ignoring the
defense's request that she be allowed to stay at home during the
investigation to care for her two children. Upon hearing that she was
to remain in custody and already weak from a two-day hunger strike to
protest her arrest, Hidirova fainted. She spent the night in a
hospital, and was transferred to Dustlik Detention Facility the next
day.
Kamolov appealed the decision, but on August 3 the Jizzakh Regional
Criminal Court upheld her arrest and detention. The prosecution
contended that there was a risk that she would go into hiding or would
interfere in the investigation. On August 5, Hidirova was moved to the
Khavast Detention Facility.
On August 13, Hidirova's lawyer got a call from M. Nazirov, who said
that he was the new investigator and that Ilkhom Abdurasulov had been
dismissed from the case. Hidirova reportedly had refused to answer
Abdurasulov's questions because he is related to Sodikov, the man who
made the original assault allegation against her.
Hidirova's house was searched on the morning of July 29, the day
after she was arrested. According to Razakov, a police officer, the
deputy director of the Department of Internal Affairs, and Abdurasulov,
the investigator formerly assigned to her case, searched her house.
Hidirova's husband asked who they were and what they wanted, and they
introduced themselves and showed a search warrant, Razakov said. The
men said they were searching for weapons, narcotics, or banned
religious literature and CDs, but nothing was found or confiscated,
Razakov said.
Background
On June 5, Hidirova wrote a letter addressed to President Islam
Karimov, Prosecutor General Rashidjan Kodirov, the country's ombudsman,
Sayora Rashidova and other officials, raising the issue of repeated,
unlawful land confiscation and re-sale by Faizullo Salokhiddinov, the
district hokkim, or head of the regional government. In her letter, she
alleged that Salokhiddinov had seized 17 hectares of her land and sold
it. She also alleged that Salokhiddinov and District Prosecutor Dilshod
Boinazarov had summoned her and threatened her with imprisonment if she
did not "keep quiet." The letter said that if the land were not
returned to her, she would carry her protest to the capital.
Ziyodullo Razakov, chairman of Jizzakh branch of the International
Human Rights Society of Uzbekistan, said that Salokhiddinov had
illegally seized about 600 hectares of land in one farm-collective
alone.
Hidirova received several responses to her letter, including from
the Office of the Prosecutor General, the Ombudsman, and the National
Center for Human Rights. In the letter issued by the Office of the
Prosecutor General, the Jizzakh regional prosecutor was asked to
investigate Hidirova's allegations and inform the office of the
measures being taken by July 28. According to Razakov, no action has
been taken to date.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
"I will give," said the Republican mega-donor with a smile.
Billionaire Miram Adelson on Tuesday night suggested the legal obstacles for President Donald Trump to serve an additional term in office after 2028 are not insurmountable as the far-right Republican megadonor vowed another $250 million to bolster a run that experts say would be unlawful and unconstitutional on its face.
Adelson, a hardline Zionist who, along with her now deceased husband, Sheldon Adelson, has given hundreds of millions to US lawmakers who back a strong relationship between the US and Israeli governments, was sharing the podium with Trump during a Hanukkah candlelighting event at the White House when she made the remarks.
With a reference to Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, Adelson said they had discussed "the legal thing of four more years"—something Trump has repeatedly gestured toward and many of his backers have called for—and told Trump, “So, we can do it, think about it.”
A chant in the crowd then broke out for "For four more years!" as Adelson whispered something in Trump's ear.
“She said, ‘Think about it, I’ll give you another $250 million,’” Trump then said into the microphone. "I will give," Adelson said with a smile.
Watch the exchange:
Adelson: I met Alan Dershowitz.. he said.. four more years. We can do it. Think about it.
Crowd: *chants four more years*
Trump: She said think about it, I’ll give you another 250 million pic.twitter.com/eOc7Zazyns
— Acyn (@Acyn) December 17, 2025
For Trump's 2024 presidential campaign alone, Adelson gave at least $100 million to support the Republican candidate with Super PAC she established, according to federal filings.
In his remarks on Tuesday, Trump credited Adelson with providing him $250 million overall—"directly and indirectly"—during his 2024 bid.
"When someone can you $250 million, I think that we should give her the opportunity to say hello," Trump said, when introducing her. "And Miriam, make it quick, because $250 million is not what it used to be."
"This is the Iraq War 2.0 with a South American flavor to it," warned one Democratic senator.
US President Donald Trump late Tuesday declared a blockade on "all sanctioned oil tankers" approaching and leaving Venezuela, a major escalation in what's widely seen as an accelerating march to war with the South American country.
The "total and complete blockade," Trump wrote on his social media platform, will only be lifted when Venezuela returns to the US "all of the Oil, Land, and other Assets that they previously stole from us."
"Venezuela is completely surrounded by the largest Armada ever assembled in the History of South America," Trump wrote, referring to the massive US military buildup in the Caribbean. "It will only get bigger, and the shock to them will be like nothing they have ever seen before."
The government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, which has mobilized its military in response to the US president's warmongering, denounced Trump's comments as a "grotesque threat" aimed at "stealing the riches that belong to our homeland."
The US-based anti-war group CodePink said in a statement that "Trump’s assertion that Venezuela must 'return' oil, land, and other assets to the United States exposes the true objective" of his military campaign.
"Venezuela did not steal anything from the United States. What Trump describes as 'theft' is Venezuela’s lawful assertion of sovereignty over its own natural resources and its refusal to allow US corporations to control its economy," said CodePink. "A blockade, a terrorist designation, and a military buildup are steps toward war. Congress must act immediately to stop this escalation, and the international community must reject this lawless threat."
The announced naval blockade—an act of aggression under international law—came a week after the Trump administration seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela and made clear that it intends to intercept more.
US Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas), one of the leaders of a war powers resolution aimed at preventing the Trump administration from launching a war on Venezuela without congressional approval, said Tuesday that "a naval blockade is unquestionably an act of war."
"A war that the Congress never authorized and the American people do not want," Castro added, noting that a vote on his resolution is set for Thursday. "Every member of the House of Representatives will have the opportunity to decide if they support sending Americans into yet another regime change war."
"This is absolutely an effort to get us involved in a war in Venezuela."
Human rights organizations have accused the Republican-controlled Congress of abdicating its responsibilities as the Trump administration takes belligerent and illegal actions in international waters and against Venezuela directly, claiming without evidence to be combating drug trafficking.
Last month, Senate Republicans—some of whom are publicly clamoring for the US military to overthrow Maduro's government—voted down a Venezuela war powers resolution. Two GOP senators, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, joined Democrats in supporting the resolution.
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the Center for International Policy, wrote Tuesday that "the White House minimized Republican 'yes' votes by promising that Trump would seek Congress’ authorization before initiating hostilities against Venezuela itself."
"Trump today broke that promise to his own party’s lawmakers by ordering a partial blockade on Venezuelan ships," wrote Williams. "A blockade, including a partial one, definitively constitutes an act of war. Trump is starting a war against Venezuela without congressional authorization."
Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) warned in a television appearance late Monday that members of the Trump administration are "going to do everything they can to get us into this war."
"This is the Iraq War 2.0 with a South American flavor to it," he added. "This is absolutely an effort to get us involved in a war in Venezuela."
"Obviously, they have issues with what is in that video, and that’s why they don’t want everybody to see it," Sen. Mark Kelly said of administration officials after the meeting.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday that the Pentagon will not release unedited video footage of a September airstrike that killed two men who survived an initial strike on a boat allegedly carrying drugs in the Caribbean Sea, a move that followed a briefing with congressional lawmakers described by one Democrat as an "exercise in futility" and by another as "a joke."
Hegseth said that members of the House and Senate Armed Services committees would be given a chance to view video of the September 2 "double-tap" strike, which experts said was illegal like all the other boat bombings. The secretary did not say whether all congressional lawmakers would be provided access to the footage.
“Of course we’re not going to release a top secret, full, unedited video of that to the general public,” Hegseth told reporters following a closed-door briefing during which he and Secretary of State Marco Rubio fielded questions from lawmakers.
As with a similar briefing earlier this month, Tuesday's meeting left some Democrat attendees with more questions than answers.
“The administration came to this briefing empty-handed,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) told reporters. “If they can’t be transparent on this, how can you trust their transparency on all the other issues swirling about in the Caribbean?”
That includes preparations for a possible attack on oil-rich Venezuela, which include the deployment of US warships and thousands of troops to the region and the authorization of covert action aimed at toppling the government of longtime Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
Tuesday's briefing came as House lawmakers prepare to vote this week on a pair of war powers resolutions aimed at preventing President Donald Trump from waging war on Venezuela. A similar bipartisan resolution recently failed in the Senate.
Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY), the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and co-author of one of the new war powers resolution, said in a statement: “Today’s briefing from Secretaries Rubio and Hegseth was an exercise in futility. It did nothing to address the serious legal, strategic, and moral concerns surrounding the administration’s unprecedented use of US military force in the Caribbean and Pacific."
"As of today, the administration has already carried out 25 such strikes over three months, extrajudicially killing 95 people," Meeks noted. "That this briefing to members of Congress only occurred more than three months since the strikes began—despite numerous requests for classified and public briefings—further proves these operations are unable to withstand scrutiny and lack a defensible legal rationale."
Briefing attendee Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.)—who is in the administration's crosshairs for reminding US troops that military rules and international law require them to disobey illegal orders—said of Trump officials, "Obviously, they have issues with what is in that video, and that’s why they don’t want everybody to see it."
Defending Hegseth's decision to not make the boat strike video public, Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) argued that “there’s a lot of members that’s gonna walk out there and that’s gonna leak classified information and there’s gonna be certain ones that you hold accountable."
Mullin singled out Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), who, along with the Somalian American community at large, has been the target of mounting Islamophobic and racist abuse by Trump and his supporters.
“Not everybody can go through the same background checks that need to be cleared on this,” he said. “Do you think Omar needs all this information? I will say no.”
Rejecting GOP arguments against releasing the video, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said after attending Tuesday's briefing: “I found the legal explanations and the strategic explanations incoherent, but I think the American people should see this video. And all members of Congress should have that opportunity. I certainly want it for myself.”