SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Pete Hegseth (C), flanked by Rep Mike Waltz (R-Fla.) (L) and former Sen. Norm Colema, is pictured at his confirmation hearing on January 14, 2025 in Washington, D.C.
(Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)
'Far Too Much at Stake': Watchdog Warns Dems Against Fast-Tracking Trump Nominees
"Trump has lost any benefit of the doubt with his nominations of people with serious conflicts of interest and ethical problems," said the executive director of Accountable.US.
Jan 14, 2025
With the Republican-controlled Senate set to hold confirmation hearings for more than a dozen of President-elect Donald Trump's nominees this week, a watchdog group on Tuesday urged Democrats to oppose any effort to ram the picks through without sufficiently aggressive questioning and vetting.
"There's far too much at stake for our national security and economy for senators to rubber stamp any of President-elect Trump's nominees without doing their due diligence," Tony Carrk, executive director of Accountable.US, said in a statement. "Trump has lost any benefit of the doubt with his nominations of people with serious conflicts of interest and ethical problems. These nominees should be subject to more than a skin-deep examination of their records and senators who would fast-track nominations in the interest of going home early for the weekend would not be acting in the public interest."
Accountable demanded that all Trump picks be "fully and properly vetted—including all the required disclosures and clearances for each nominee." The group pointed to reports that Trump's transition team has been "bypassing traditional FBI background checks for at least some of his Cabinet picks while using private companies to conduct vetting of potential candidates for administration jobs."
The New York Times reported Tuesday that an FBI background check on Pete Hegseth, Trump's choice to lead the Pentagon, "omitted key details on major allegations against him, in part because it did not include interviews with critical witnesses."
"One missed opportunity came when the bureau did not interview one of Mr. Hegseth's ex-wives before its findings were presented to senators last week," the Times noted.
The newspaper's reporting came shortly before Hegseth, a defender of war criminals who has been accused of sexual assault, appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday for his confirmation hearing, during which he pledged to "bring the warrior culture back to the Pentagon" and be "laser-focused on lethality."
Laura Grego, senior scientist and research director for the Global Security Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said ahead of Hegseth's hearing that he is unqualified and "downright dangerous."
Hegseth is one of 13 Trump nominees who will appear before nearly a dozen Senate panels this week as Democrats face progressive backlash for not doing enough to resist the president-elect's picks.
Punchbowl reported Tuesday that "Senate Republicans want Trump's national security nominees to be confirmed on day one—or close to it—but Democrats are determined to expose what they see as an unfit nominee in Hegseth."
"It's virtually guaranteed that Democrats won't agree to fast-track Hegseth's nomination on the floor, even if it's clear he'd have the requisite votes to be confirmed," the outlet added. "All it takes is one Democrat to refuse to consent to fast-tracking any of these nominees, meaning Senate Majority Leader John Thune would have to burn a few days of floor time to confirm each one."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
With the Republican-controlled Senate set to hold confirmation hearings for more than a dozen of President-elect Donald Trump's nominees this week, a watchdog group on Tuesday urged Democrats to oppose any effort to ram the picks through without sufficiently aggressive questioning and vetting.
"There's far too much at stake for our national security and economy for senators to rubber stamp any of President-elect Trump's nominees without doing their due diligence," Tony Carrk, executive director of Accountable.US, said in a statement. "Trump has lost any benefit of the doubt with his nominations of people with serious conflicts of interest and ethical problems. These nominees should be subject to more than a skin-deep examination of their records and senators who would fast-track nominations in the interest of going home early for the weekend would not be acting in the public interest."
Accountable demanded that all Trump picks be "fully and properly vetted—including all the required disclosures and clearances for each nominee." The group pointed to reports that Trump's transition team has been "bypassing traditional FBI background checks for at least some of his Cabinet picks while using private companies to conduct vetting of potential candidates for administration jobs."
The New York Times reported Tuesday that an FBI background check on Pete Hegseth, Trump's choice to lead the Pentagon, "omitted key details on major allegations against him, in part because it did not include interviews with critical witnesses."
"One missed opportunity came when the bureau did not interview one of Mr. Hegseth's ex-wives before its findings were presented to senators last week," the Times noted.
The newspaper's reporting came shortly before Hegseth, a defender of war criminals who has been accused of sexual assault, appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday for his confirmation hearing, during which he pledged to "bring the warrior culture back to the Pentagon" and be "laser-focused on lethality."
Laura Grego, senior scientist and research director for the Global Security Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said ahead of Hegseth's hearing that he is unqualified and "downright dangerous."
Hegseth is one of 13 Trump nominees who will appear before nearly a dozen Senate panels this week as Democrats face progressive backlash for not doing enough to resist the president-elect's picks.
Punchbowl reported Tuesday that "Senate Republicans want Trump's national security nominees to be confirmed on day one—or close to it—but Democrats are determined to expose what they see as an unfit nominee in Hegseth."
"It's virtually guaranteed that Democrats won't agree to fast-track Hegseth's nomination on the floor, even if it's clear he'd have the requisite votes to be confirmed," the outlet added. "All it takes is one Democrat to refuse to consent to fast-tracking any of these nominees, meaning Senate Majority Leader John Thune would have to burn a few days of floor time to confirm each one."
With the Republican-controlled Senate set to hold confirmation hearings for more than a dozen of President-elect Donald Trump's nominees this week, a watchdog group on Tuesday urged Democrats to oppose any effort to ram the picks through without sufficiently aggressive questioning and vetting.
"There's far too much at stake for our national security and economy for senators to rubber stamp any of President-elect Trump's nominees without doing their due diligence," Tony Carrk, executive director of Accountable.US, said in a statement. "Trump has lost any benefit of the doubt with his nominations of people with serious conflicts of interest and ethical problems. These nominees should be subject to more than a skin-deep examination of their records and senators who would fast-track nominations in the interest of going home early for the weekend would not be acting in the public interest."
Accountable demanded that all Trump picks be "fully and properly vetted—including all the required disclosures and clearances for each nominee." The group pointed to reports that Trump's transition team has been "bypassing traditional FBI background checks for at least some of his Cabinet picks while using private companies to conduct vetting of potential candidates for administration jobs."
The New York Times reported Tuesday that an FBI background check on Pete Hegseth, Trump's choice to lead the Pentagon, "omitted key details on major allegations against him, in part because it did not include interviews with critical witnesses."
"One missed opportunity came when the bureau did not interview one of Mr. Hegseth's ex-wives before its findings were presented to senators last week," the Times noted.
The newspaper's reporting came shortly before Hegseth, a defender of war criminals who has been accused of sexual assault, appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday for his confirmation hearing, during which he pledged to "bring the warrior culture back to the Pentagon" and be "laser-focused on lethality."
Laura Grego, senior scientist and research director for the Global Security Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said ahead of Hegseth's hearing that he is unqualified and "downright dangerous."
Hegseth is one of 13 Trump nominees who will appear before nearly a dozen Senate panels this week as Democrats face progressive backlash for not doing enough to resist the president-elect's picks.
Punchbowl reported Tuesday that "Senate Republicans want Trump's national security nominees to be confirmed on day one—or close to it—but Democrats are determined to expose what they see as an unfit nominee in Hegseth."
"It's virtually guaranteed that Democrats won't agree to fast-track Hegseth's nomination on the floor, even if it's clear he'd have the requisite votes to be confirmed," the outlet added. "All it takes is one Democrat to refuse to consent to fast-tracking any of these nominees, meaning Senate Majority Leader John Thune would have to burn a few days of floor time to confirm each one."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.